Treatment of central nervous system disorders by intranasal administration of immunoglobulin g

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides, among other aspects, methods and compositions for treating a central nervous system (CNS) disorder by delivering a therapeutically effective amount of a composition of pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain via intranasal administration of the composition directly to the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity. In particular, methods and compositions for treating Alzheimer&#39;s disease are provided.

CROSS REFERENCES TO APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/165,993, filed Oct. 19, 2018, which is a Continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/335,027, filed Oct. 26, 2016 (now issued as U.S.Pat. No. 10,144,776), which is a Continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 14/189,981, filed Feb. 25, 2014 (now issued as U.S. Pat. No.9,556,260), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationSer. Nos. 61/769,673 filed Feb. 26, 2013, and 61/862,814 filed Aug. 6,2013, the disclosures of which are hereby incorpated herein by referencein their entireties for all purposes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The central nervous system (CNS) is the processing center for thenervous system. CNS disorders can affect the brain, the spinal cord, andnerve endings, resulting in neurological and/or psychiatric disorders.CNS disorders can be caused by genetic inheritance, trauma, infection,autoimmune disorders, structural defects, tumors, and stroke. CertainCNS disorders are characterized as neurodegenerative disease, many ofwhich are inherited genetic diseases. Examples of neurodegenerativediseases include Huntington's disease, ALS, hereditary spastichemiplegia, primary lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy,Kennedy's disease, Alzheimer's disease, a polyglutamine repeat disease,or Parkinson's disease. Treatment of CNS disorders, e.g., geneticdiseases of the brain such as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease,and Alzheimer's disease, remain an ongoing problem.

Alzheimer's disease is a common form of age-related dementia that causesgradual loss of cognitive function, including memory and criticalthinking abilities. Alzheimer's disease is diagnosed clinically bythrough a finding of progressive memory loss and decrease in cognitiveabilities. However, confirmation of Alzheimer's disease does not occuruntil after death.

Alzheimer's disease is becoming more prevalent in developed nations,where an increase in the population of elder persons has occurred due inpart to improved healthcare. While less than 1% of the population underthe age of 60 is affected by Alzheimer's, it is estimated that 25% to33% of persons develop some form of Alzheimer's by the age of 85. As 0of2012, 5.4 million Americans were diagnosed with Alzheimer's. As lifeexpectancy continues to increase worldwide, the prevalence ofAlzheimer's and other age-related dementia should continue to grow aswell.

Alzheimer's disease is typically classified as either “early onset,”referring to cases that begin to manifest at between 30 and 60 years ofage in affected individuals, and the more common “late onset”Alzheimer's, in which symptoms first become apparent after the age of60. Although only about 10% of all Alzheimer's cases are familial, earlyonset Alzheimer's disease has been linked to mutations in the amyloidprecursor protein (app), presenilin 1 (psen1), and presenilin 2 (psen2)genes, while late onset Alzheimer's disease has been linked to mutationsin the apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene (Ertekin-Taner N., Neurol Clin.,25:611-667 (2007)).

Histopathologically, this neurodegenerative disease is characterized bythe formation of amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, amyloidangiopathy, and granolovacuolar degeneration in the cerebral cortex(Mirra et al., Arch Pathol Lab Med., 117:132-144 (1993); Perl DP, NeurolClin., 18:847-864 (2000)). The characteristic amyloid plaques, used toconfirm Alzheimer's disease post-mortem, are formed largely bydeposition of a small amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide derived from the amyloidprecursor protein (APP).

To date, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved twotypes of medications for the management of Alzheimer's disease:cholinesterase inhibitors, including donepezil (e.g., ARICEPT®),rivastigmine (e.g., EXELON®), galantamine (e.g., RAZADYNE®), and tacrine(e.g., COGNEX®); and the NMDA-type glutamate receptor inhibitormemantine (marketed under a number of different brands). Although a curefor Alzheimer's disease has not been identified, these therapies serveto alleviate cognitive symptoms such as memory loss, confusion, and lossof critical thinking abilities in subjects diagnosed with age-relateddementia (e.g., Alzheimer's disease). In all, it is estimated thathealthcare spending on Alzheimer's disease and related age-relateddementias in 2012 will be $200 billion in the United States alone(Factsheet, Alzheimer's Association, Mar 2012).

In addition to these approved therapies, several studies have suggestedthat pooled intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is effective in slowingthe progression of symptoms in Alzheimer's patients (Dodel RC et al., JNeurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, Oct; 75(10):1472-4 (2004); Magga J. et al.,J Neuroinflammation, Dec 7; 7:90 (1997); Relkin NR et al., NeurobiolAging, 30(11):1728-36 (2008); Puli L. et al., J Neuroinflammation May29; 9:105 (2012)).

Immune globulin products from human plasma were first used in 1952 totreat immune deficiency. Initially, intramuscular or subcutaneousadministration of immunoglobulin isotype G (IgG) isolated from plasmawere the methods of choice. However, IgG products that could beadministered intravenously, referred to as intravenous immunoglobulin(IVIG), were later developed to allow for the administration of largeramounts of IgG necessary for effective treatment of various diseases.Usually, IVIG contains the pooled immunoglobulin G (IgG) immunoglobulinsfrom the plasma of multiple donors, e.g., more than a hundred or morethan a thousand blood donors. These purified IgG products are primarilyused in treating three main categories of medical conditions: (1) immunedeficiencies: X-linked agammaglobulinemia, hypogammaglobulinemia(primary immune deficiencies), and acquired compromised immunityconditions (secondary immune deficiencies), featuring low antibodylevels; (2) inflammatory and autoimmune diseases; and (3) acuteinfections.

Specifically, many people with primary immunodeficiency disorders lackantibodies needed to resist infection. In certain cases thesedeficiencies can be supplemented by the infusion of purified IgG,commonly through intravenous administration (i.e., IVIG therapy).Several primary immunodeficiency disorders are commonly treated in thefashion, including X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), Common VariableImmunodeficiency (CVID), Hyper-IgM Syndrome (HIM), Severe CombinedImmunodeficiency (SCID), and some IgG subclass deficiencies (Blaese andWinkelstein, J. Patient & Family Handbook for Primary ImmunodeficiencyDiseases. Towson, Md.: Immune Deficiency Foundation; 2007).

While IgG treatment can be very effective for managing primaryimmunodeficiency disorders, this therapy is only a temporary replacementfor antibodies that are not being produced in the body, rather than acure for the disease. Accordingly, patients depend upon repeated dosesof IgG therapy, typically about once a month for life. This therapyplaces a great demand on the continued production of IgG compositions.However, unlike other biologics that are produced via in vitroexpression of recombinant DNA vectors, IgG is fractionated from humanblood and plasma donations. Thus, the level of commercially availableIgG is limited by the available supply of blood and plasma donations.

Several factors drive the demand for IgG, including the acceptance ofIgG treatments, the identification of additional indications for whichIgG therapy is effective, and increasing patient diagnosis and IgGprescription. Notably, the global demand for IgG more than quadrupledbetween 1990 and 2009, and continues to increase at an annual ratebetween about 7% and 10% (Robert P., Pharmaceutical Policy and Law, 11(2009) 359-367). For example, the Australian National Blood Authorityreported that the demand for IgG in Australia grew by 11.1% for the2010-2011 fiscal year (National Blood Authority Australia Annual Report2010-2011).

It has been reported that in 2007, 26.5 million liters of plasma werefractionated, generating 75.2 metric tons of IgG, with an averageproduction yield of 2.8 grams per liter (Robert P., supra). This samereport estimated that global IgG yields are expected to increase toabout 3.43 grams per liter by 2012. However, due to the continued growthin global demand for IgG, projected at between about 7% and 14% annuallybetween now and 2015, further improvement of the overall IgG yield willbe needed to meet global demand. One of the factors that may driveincreased demand for pooled human immunoglobulins (e.g., IVIG) over thenext decade is whether or not IgG is approved for the treatment ofAlzheimer's disease. It is estimated that if these treatments areapproved by major regulatory agencies, an additional 5% increase indemand for IVIG will be seen (Robert P., supra).

Due in part to the increasing global demand and fluctuations in theavailable supply of immunoglobulin products, several countries,including Australia and England, have implemented demand managementprograms to protect supplies of these products for the highest demandpatients during times of product shortages. Thus, the development ofmethodologies that reduce the amount of pooled immunoglobulin G neededto treat various indications will be critical as the increase in demandfor pooled immunoglobulin begins to outpace the increase in globalmanufacturing output.

Pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) is manufactured according todifferent processes depending upon the specific manufacturer. However,the origin of most manufacturing processes is found in the fourthinstallment of a series of seminal papers published on the preparationand properties of serum and plasma proteins, Cohn et al. (J. Am. Chem.Soc., 1946, 68(3): 459-475). This paper first described a method for thealcohol fractionation of plasma proteins (method 6), which allows forthe isolation of a fraction enriched in IgG from human plasma.

The Cohn procedures were initially developed to obtain albumin atrelatively high (95%) purity by fractional precipitation with alcohol.However, it was realized by Oncley et al. (J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949,71(2): 541-550), Deutsch et al. (J. Biol. Chem., 1946, 164, 109-118),and Kistler and Nitschmann (Vox Sang., 1962, 7, 414-424), thatparticular protein precipitates (Fraction II and Fraction II+III) fromthe Cohn method could be used as a starting material for thepurification of highly enriched immunoglobulin compositions. In order toachieve the higher purity and safety required for the intravenousadministration of IgG compositions, several purification and polishingsteps (e.g. adsorption in general or all different chromatographictechniques, Cross-flow-filtration, etc.) have been added to IgGmanufacturing processes after the alcohol fractionation steps.

Current IgG manufactures typically rely on either a Cohn method 6Fraction II+III precipitate or a Kistler-Nitschmann precipitate A as thestarting material for downstream processing. Both fractions are formedby a two step process in which proteins such as fibrinogen and FactorXIII are removed by an initial precipitation step (Fraction Iprecipitation) performed at high pH (7.2) with low ethanol concentration(8-10% v/v), followed by a second precipitation step in which IgG isprecipitated from the Fraction I supernatant at pH 6.8 with 20-25% (v/v)ethanol (Fraction II+III) or at pH 5.85 with 19% ethanol (v/v) ethanol(precipitate A), while albumin and a significant portion of A1PI remainin the supernatant.

These methods, while laying the foundation for an entire industry ofplasma derived blood proteins, were unable to provide IgG preparationshaving sufficiently high purity for the chronic treatment of severalimmune-related diseases, including Kawasaki syndrome, immunethrombocytopenic purpura, and primary immune deficiencies, without anundue occurrence of serious side effects. As such, additionalmethodologies employing various techniques, such as ion exchangechromatography, were developed to provide higher purity IgGformulations. Hoppe et al. (Munch Med Wochenschr 1967 (34): 1749-1752),Falksveden (Swedish Patent No. 348942), and Falksveden and Lundblad(Methods of Plasma Protein Fractionation 1980) were among the first toemploy ion exchange chromatography for this purpose.

It is common practice to administer IgG by intravenous (IV) injection(Imbach et al., Lancet 1(8232): 1228-31 (1981)). Intravenous IgG (IVIG)may be administered alone or in combination with other compositions.IVIG is often administered over a 2 to 5 hour period, once a day for 2to 7 days, with follow-up doses every 10 to 21 days or every 3 to 4weeks. Such an administration regime is time consuming and inconvenientfor many patients. This inconvenience may be aggravated in the case ofAlzheimer's patients, who may have difficulty sitting quietly during theinfusion period, and may have to rely on their caregiver to bring themto an infusion center or supervise their infusion.

Systemic IVIG administration may cause adverse side effects. Forexample, IVIG may cause backache, headache, migraine, joint or musclepain, general feeling of discomfort, leg cramps, rash, pain at theinjection site, hives, dizziness, unusual fatigue or tiredness orweakness, chills, fever, sweating, increased heart rate, increased bloodpressure, cough, redness of the face, upset stomach, upper abdominalpain, and vomiting. Immediate adverse effects post-IVIG administrationwhich have been observed include headache, flushing, malaise, chesttightness, fever, chills, myalgia, fatigue, dyspnea, back pain, nausea,vomiting, diarrhea, blood pressure changes, tachycardia, andanaphylactic reactions. Orbach et al., Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.,29(3): 173-84 (2005).

Furthermore, the adverse side effects may vary based on the IVIGmanufacturer. Most manufactures preparations contain between 90% and 99%purified IgG in combination with stabilizers and liquid(s) forreconstitution. Orange et al. 2006 (J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117(4Suppl.): S525); Vo et al. 2006 (Clin. J.Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1(4): 844;Stiehm et al. 2006 (J. Pediatr. 148(1): 6). For example, somemanufacturers use maltose as a stabilizer while others use sucrose oramino acids.

The sodium and sugar content in IVIG, along with varying amounts of IgAand additional chemicals used in the IVIG production can affect thetolerability and efficacy of the brand of IVIG in patients.Specifically, older patients often suffer from co-morbid conditions thatincrease the risk of IVIG adverse side effects. For example, subjectswith renal disorders, vascular disorders, or diabetes also have aheightened risk of renal insufficiency and thrombotic events followingIVIG administration because IVIG compositions are commonly hyper-viscousand contain high concentrations of sugar and salt.

IVIG also carries the risk of catheter-related infection, i.e., aninfection where the catheter or needle enters a subject's vein or skin.Examples of catheter-related infection are tenderness, warmth,irritation, drainage, redness, swelling, and pain at the catheter site.Accordingly, alternate modes of administration would be beneficial fromthe standpoint of time, convenience, and adverse side effects.

In addition to adverse side effects of systemic administration of IVIG,penetration of IVIG across the blood-brain barrier has been shown to beunpredictable and intraventricular or intrathecal IgG may be necessary.For example, Haley et al. administered IVIG in the treatment ofmeningeal inflammation caused by West Nile virus encephalitis. Haley etal. found that penetration of IVIG was unpredictable and posited thatintrathecal or intraventricular administration may be required. Haley etal. 2003 (Clin. Inf. Diseases 37: e88-90).

It is difficult to target the CNS with IV administration therapeuticcompositions because of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The BBB providesan efficient barrier, preventing and/or limiting access to the CNS oftherapeutic compositions administered intravenously into the peripheralcirculation. Specifically, the BBB prevents diffusion of mosttherapeutic compositions, especially polar compositions, into the brainfrom the circulating blood.

At least three methods for increasing the passage of molecules throughthe BBB have been developed. First, lipophilic compounds such aslipid-soluble drugs and polar drugs encased in a lipid membrane havebeen developed. Lipophilic compounds with a molecular weight of lessthan 600 Da can diffuse through the BBB. Second, therapeutic compoundscan be bound to transporter molecules which can cross the BBB through asaturable transporter system. Examples of saturable transportermolecules are transferrin, insulin, IGF-1, and leptin. Third,therapeutic compounds can cross the BBB by binding the therapeuticcompounds to polycationic molecules such as positively-charged proteinsthat preferentially bind to the negatively-charged endothelial surfaceof the BBB. Patridge et al. 2003 (Mol. Interv. 3(2): 90-105); Patridgeet al. 2002 (Nature Reviews-Drug Discovery 1:131-139). However, each ofthe above-described approaches for increasing the delivery oftherapeutics through BBB to gain access to the CNS are limited. One suchlimitation is that the above-described approaches rely on systemicdelivery systems, e.g., administration directly or indirectly to theblood stream, which results in non-specific delivery of the therapeuticagent to other parts in the body, increasing the chance of adverse sideeffects.

Intranasal administration of therapeutics has become an increasinglyexplored method for delivering therapeutic agents to the brain becauseit circumvents the BBB and is a localized, non-invasive method fordelivery. Furthermore, intranasal administration offers the advantages,over more traditional methods of delivery (e.g., intravenous,subcutaneous, oral transmucosal, oral or rectal administration), ofbeing simple to administer, providing rapid onset of action, andavoiding first-pass metabolism. Unfortunately, intranasal administrationhas only been shown effective for the transport of small molecules, andto a certain extent smaller Fc fusion proteins, to the brain. Thedelivery of larger molecules, such as intact antibodies, has not yetbeen demonstrated. The difficulty in transporting larger proteins isbelieved to be due to the limited permeability of tight junctionspresent in the olfactory epithelia, which likely excludes globularmolecules having a hydrodynamic radius of more than 3.6 Å (Stevenson BR,et al., Mol Cell Biochem., 1988 Oct; 83(2):129-45).

U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,898 to Frey describes compositions and methods fortransporting neurologic agents, which promote nerve cell growth andsurvival or augment the activity of functioning cells, to the brain bymeans of the olfactory neural pathway. The neurological agents of the'898 patent are transported to the brain by means of the nervous system,rather than the circulatory system, so that potentially therapeuticagents that are unable to cross the blood-brain barrier may be deliveredto damaged neurons in the brain. The compositions described in the '898patent include a neurologic agent in combination with a pharmaceuticalcarrier and/or additive which promote the transfer of the agent withinthe olfactory system. The '898 patent does not teach intranasaladministration of pooled human immunoglobulins.

PCT publications WO 2006/091332 and WO 2009/058957, both by Bentz etal., describe methods for the delivery of therapeutic polypeptides tothe brain by fusing the polypeptide to an antibody or antibody fragmentand administering the resulting fusion protein intranasally. Althoughthe examples of the '332 and '957 PCT publications suggest thatFc-fusion “mimetibodies” may be administered intranasally, neitherpublication demonstrates delivery of larger, intact antibodies. In fact,the '957 PCT publication, published three years after the '332 PCTpublication, states that “[i]n published delivery studies to date,intranasal delivery efficiency to the CNS has been very low and thedelivery of large globular macromolecules, such as antibodies and theirfragments, has not been demonstrated.” The '957 PCT publication purportsto solve this problem through the use of a permeability enhancer (e.g.,membrane fluidizers, tight junction modulators, and medium chain lengthfatty acids and salts and esters thereof, as described below), whichenhances intranasal administration to the central nervous system.Neither PCT publication teaches intranasal administration of pooledhuman immunoglobulins.

PCT publication WO 2003/028668 by Barstow et al., describes thetreatment of immune-mediated diseases by alimentary administration(i.e., administration to the digestive tract) of pooled immunoglobulins.Although the '668 PCT publication discloses nasal administration of acomposition of pooled immunoglobulins, it is in the context ofdelivering the composition to the digestive tract. The '668 PCTpublication does not teach the delivery of pooled human immunoglobulinsto the brain via intranasal administration.

PCT publication WO 2001/60420 by Adjei et al., describes aerosolformulations of therapeutic polypeptides, including immunoglobulins, forpulmonary delivery. These aerosolizable compositions are formulated suchthat after oral or nasal inhalation, the therapeutic agent iseffectively delivered to the patient's lungs. The '420 PCT publicationdoes not teach the delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain viaintranasal administration.

Accordingly, there is a need in the art for methods of treating centralnervous system disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, using pooledhuman immunoglobulin G that provide specific targeting to the CNS (e.g.,administration primarily to the brain), reduce systemic distribution ofthe pooled immunoglobulins, and lower the therapeutically effected doseneeded for administration.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present disclosure provides solutions to these and other problems byproviding methods and compositions for the treatment of central nervoussystem disorders via intranasal administration of pooled humanimmunoglobulin G. Advantageously, intranasal administration providesdirected delivery of pooled IgG to the brain, bypassing the requirementthat it pass through the blood brain barrier (BBB). As shown herein,intranasal administration allows the delivery of intact IgG to thebrain. This results in greater efficiency for the treatment and reducesthe necessary IgG dose that must be administered to achieve the desiredeffect. As pooled human IgG is isolated from donated human plasma,pooled IgG is a limited resource. The reduction in the effective dose ofIgG provided by the present disclosure effectively increases thetherapeutic potential provided by the world's supply of pooled humanIgG. Furthermore, as demonstrated herein, intranasal administration ofIgG nearly eliminates the systemic exposure caused by intravenousadministration, improving the overall safety profile of the treatment.Finally, it was surprisingly found that IgG is efficiently transportedto the brain when intranasally administered in the absence ofpermeability enhancers, some of which have neurostimulatory effectsthemselves.

In one aspect, the disclosure provides a method for treating a centralnervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof, the methodincluding delivering a therapeutically effective amount of a compositioncomprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain of thesubject, where delivering the composition to the brain includesintranasally administering the composition directly to the olfactoryepithelium of the nasal cavity of the subject.

In another aspect, the disclosure provides a method for treating acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof, themethod including delivering a therapeutically effective amount of acomposition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brainof the subject, where delivering the composition to the brain includesintranasally administering the composition to a nasal epithelium of thesubject associated with trigeminal nerve endings.

In another aspect, the disclosure provides a method for treating acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof, themethod including delivering a therapeutically effective amount of acomposition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brainof the subject, where delivering the composition to the brain includesintranasally administering the composition to the upper third of thenasal cavity of the subject.

In another aspect, the disclosure provides a method for treating acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof, themethod including delivering a therapeutically effective amount of acomposition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brainof the subject, where delivering the composition to the brain includesintranasally administering the composition to one or both maxillarysinus of the subject.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of a neurodegenerative disorder ofthe central nervous system, a systemic atrophy primarily affecting thecentral nervous system, an extrapyramidal and movement disorder, ademyelinating disorder of the central nervous system, an episodic orparoxysmal disorder of the central nervous system, a paralytic syndromeof the central nervous system, a nerve, nerve root, or plexus disorderof the central nervous system, an organic mental disorder, a mental orbehavioral disorder caused by psychoactive substance use, aschizophrenia, schizotypal, or delusional disorder, a mood (affective)disorder, neurotic, stress-related, or somatoform disorder, a behavioralsyndrome, an adult personality or behavior disorder, a psychologicaldevelopment disorder, and a child onset behavioral or emotionaldisorder.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson'sdisease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),Huntington's disease, cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia,and Pediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS).

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson'sdisease, multiple sclerosis, Pediatric Autoimmune NeuropsychiatricDisorders Associated with Streptococcal infections (PANDAS), andPediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS).

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, multiplesclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the CNS disorder isAlzheimer's disease.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, intranasaladministration of the composition includes the use of a non-invasiveintranasal delivery device.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, intranasaladministration of the composition includes administration of a liquiddrop of the composition directly onto the nasal epithelium, the nasalepithelium of the subject associated with trigeminal nerve endings, orthe upper third of the nasal cavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, intranasaladministration of the composition includes directed administration of anaerosol of the composition to the nasal epithelium, the nasal epitheliumof the subject associated with trigeminal nerve endings, or the upperthird of the nasal cavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the aerosol of thecomposition is a liquid aerosol.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the aerosol of thecomposition is a powder aerosol.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, at least 40% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the nasalepithelium of the subject, the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavityof the subject, a nasal epithelium of the subject associated withtrigeminal nerve endings, the upper third of the nasal cavity of thesubject, or one or both maxillary sinus of the subject.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, at least 50% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the olfactoryepithelium of the nasal cavity of the subject, the nasal epithelium ofthe subject associated with trigeminal nerve endings, the upper third ofthe nasal cavity of the subject, or one or both maxillary sinus of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, at least 60% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the olfactoryepithelium of the nasal cavity of the subject, the nasal epithelium ofthe subject associated with trigeminal nerve endings, the upper third ofthe nasal cavity of the subject, or one or both maxillary sinus of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition does not contain a permeability enhancer.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition consists essentially of pooled human IgG and an amino acid.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the amino acid isselected from the group consisting of glycine, histidine, and proline.In a specific embodiment of the methods provided above, the amino acidis glycine.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition is an aqueous composition.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition includes from 10 mg/mL to 250 mg/mL pooled human IgG andfrom 50 mM to 500 mM glycine.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pH of thecomposition is from 4.0 to 6.0. In another embodiment of the methodsprovided above, the pH of the composition is from 4.0 to 7.5. In anotherembodiment of the methods provided above, the pH of the composition isfrom 6.0 to 7.5.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition is a dry powder composition.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the dry powdercomposition is prepared from an aqueous solution including from 10 mg/mLto 250 mg/mL pooled human IgG and from 50 mM to 500 mM glycine.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the dry powdercomposition is prepared from an aqueous solution having a pH of from 4.0to 6.0. In another embodiment of the methods provided above, the pH ofthe composition is from 4.0 to 7.5 In another embodiment of the methodsprovided above, the pH of the composition is from 6.0 to 7.5

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.08 mg to 100mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the methods provided above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.2 mg to 40 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the methods provided above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 5 mg to 20 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the methods provided above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 5 mg to 10 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the methods provided above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 1 mg to 5 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg).

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a fixed dose of from 50 mg to10 g pooled human IgG. In a specific embodiment of the methods providedabove, the method includes intranasally administering to the subject afixed dose of from 100 mg to 5.0 g pooled human IgG. In a specificembodiment of the methods provided above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a fixed dose of from 500 mg to2.5 g pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooled human IgG atleast twice monthly. In a specific embodiment of the methods describedabove, the method includes intranasally administering to the subject adose of pooled human IgG at least once weekly. In a specific embodimentof the methods described above, the method includes intranasallyadministering to the subject a dose of pooled human IgG at least twiceweekly. In a specific embodiment of the methods described above, themethod includes intranasally administering to the subject a dose ofpooled human IgG at least once daily. In a specific embodiment of themethods described above, the method includes intranasally administeringto the subject a dose of pooled human IgG at least twice daily.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition includes at least 0.1% anti-amyloid β IgG.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the method furtherincludes administering a second therapy for the CNS disorder to thesubject in need thereof.

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the second therapy forthe CNS disorder is a cholinesterase inhibitor. In a specific embodimentof the methods described above, the cholinesterase inhibitor is selectedfrom the group consisting of donepezil (e.g., ARICEPT®), rivastigmine(e.g., EXELON®), galantamine (e.g., RAZADYNE®), and tacrine (e.g.,COGNEX®).

In one embodiment of the methods described above, the second therapy forthe CNS disorder is an inhibitor of NMDA-type glutamate receptor. In aspecific embodiment of the methods described above, the inhibitor ofNMDA-type glutamate receptor is memantine.

In another aspect, the disclosure provides the use of a compositioncomprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) for the treatment of acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof byintranasal administration.

In some embodiments of the uses described above, intranasaladministration includes administration to the nasal epithelium of thesubject. In other embodiments of the uses described above, intranasaladministration comprises administration to the olfactory epithelium ofthe nasal cavity of the subject. In other embodiments of the usesdescribed above, intranasal administration includes administration to anasal epithelium of the subject associated with trigeminal nerveendings. In other embodiments of the uses described above, intranasaladministration includes administration to the upper third of the nasalepithelium of the nasal cavity of the subject. In yet other embodiments,of the uses described above, intranasal administration includesadministration to one or both maxillary sinus of the subject.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of a neurodegenerative disorder ofthe central nervous system, a systemic atrophy primarily affecting thecentral nervous system, an extrapyramidal and movement disorder, ademyelinating disorder of the central nervous system, an episodic orparoxysmal disorder of the central nervous system, a paralytic syndromeof the central nervous system, a nerve, nerve root, or plexus disorderof the central nervous system, an organic mental disorder, a mental orbehavioral disorder caused by psychoactive substance use, aschizophrenia, schizotypal, or delusional disorder, a mood (affective)disorder, neurotic, stress-related, or somatoform disorder, a behavioralsyndrome, an adult personality or behavior disorder, a psychologicaldevelopment disorder, and a child onset behavioral or emotionaldisorder.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson'sdisease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),Huntington's disease, cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia,and Pediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS).

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson'sdisease, multiple sclerosis, Pediatric Autoimmune NeuropsychiatricDisorders Associated with Streptococcal infections (PANDAS), andPediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS).

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the CNS disorder isselected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's disease, multiplesclerosis, and Parkinson's disease.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the CNS disorder isAlzheimer's disease.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, intranasal administrationof the composition includes the use of a non-invasive intranasaldelivery device.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, intranasal administrationof the composition includes administration of a liquid drop of thecomposition directly onto the nasal epithelium, the nasal epithelium ofthe subject associated with trigeminal nerve endings, or the upper thirdof the nasal cavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, intranasal administrationof the composition includes directed administration of an aerosol of thecomposition to the nasal epithelium, the nasal epithelium of the subjectassociated with trigeminal nerve endings, or the upper third of thenasal cavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the aerosol of thecomposition is a liquid aerosol.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the aerosol of thecomposition is a powder aerosol.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, at least 40% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the nasalepithelium of the subject, the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavityof the subject, a nasal epithelium of the subject associated withtrigeminal nerve endings, the upper third of the nasal cavity of thesubject, or one or both maxillary sinus of the subject.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, at least 50% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the nasalepithelium of the subject, the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavityof the subject, a nasal epithelium of the subject associated withtrigeminal nerve endings, the upper third of the nasal cavity of thesubject, or one or both maxillary sinus of the subject.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, at least 60% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the nasalepithelium of the subject, the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavityof the subject, a nasal epithelium of the subject associated withtrigeminal nerve endings, the upper third of the nasal cavity of thesubject, or one or both maxillary sinus of the subject.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition does not contain a permeability enhancer.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition consists essentially of pooled human IgG and an amino acid.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the amino acid isselected from the group consisting of glycine, histidine, and proline.In a specific embodiment of the methods provided above, the amino acidis glycine.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition is an aqueous composition.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition includes from 10 mg/mL to 250 mg/mL pooled human IgG andfrom 50 mM to 500 mM glycine.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pH of the compositionis from 4.0 to 6.0. In another embodiment of the uses described above,the pH of the composition is from 4.0 to 7.5. In another embodiment ofthe methods provided above, the pH of the composition is from 6.0 to7.5.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition is a dry powder composition.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the dry powdercomposition is prepared from an aqueous solution including from 10 mg/mLto 250 mg/mL pooled human IgG and from 50 mM to 500 mM glycine.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the dry powdercomposition is prepared from an aqueous solution having a pH of from 4.0to 6.0. In another embodiment of the uses described above, the pH of thecomposition is from 4.0 to 7.5 In another embodiment of the usesdescribed above, the pH of the composition is from 6.0 to 7.5

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the use includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.08 mg to 100mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the uses described above, the use includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.2 mg to 40 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the uses described above, the use includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 5 mg to 20 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the uses described above, the use includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 5 mg to 10 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg). In aspecific embodiment of the uses described above, the use includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 1 mg to 5 mgpooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg).

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the use includesintranasally administering to the subject a fixed dose of from 50 mg to10 g pooled human IgG. In a specific embodiment of the uses providedabove, the use includes intranasally administering to the subject afixed dose of from 100 mg to 5.0 g pooled human IgG. In a specificembodiment of the uses provided above, the use includes intranasallyadministering to the subject a fixed dose of from 500 mg to 2.5 g pooledhuman IgG.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the method includesintranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooled human IgG atleast twice monthly. In a specific embodiment of the uses describedabove, the method includes intranasally administering to the subject adose of pooled human IgG at least once weekly. In a specific embodimentof the uses described above, the method includes intranasallyadministering to the subject a dose of pooled human IgG at least twiceweekly. In a specific embodiment of the uses described above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooledhuman IgG at least once daily. In a specific embodiment of the usesdescribed above, the method includes intranasally administering to thesubject a dose of pooled human IgG at least twice daily.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the pooled human IgGcomposition includes at least 0.1% anti-amyloid β IgG.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the method furtherincludes administering a second therapy for the CNS disorder to thesubject in need thereof.

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the second therapy forthe CNS disorder is a cholinesterase inhibitor. In a specific embodimentof the uses described above, the cholinesterase inhibitor is selectedfrom the group consisting of donepezil (e.g., ARICEPT®), rivastigmine(e.g., EXELON®), galantamine (e.g., RAZADYNE®), or tacrine (e.g.,COGNEX®).

In one embodiment of the uses described above, the second therapy forthe CNS disorder is an inhibitor of NMDA-type glutamate receptor. In aspecific embodiment of the uses described above, the inhibitor ofNMDA-type glutamate receptor is memantine.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed incolor. Copies of this patent or patent application publication withcolor drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and paymentof the necessary fee.

FIGS. 1A-1F show brain slices from rats used to assess thebiodistribution of intranasally administered IgG in Example 2. Six 2 mmslices (3 rostral to the optic chiasm and 3 caudal) were acquired.

FIG. 1G illustrates a brain bisected along the midline. The bisectedbrain is further dissected in to midbrain, pons, medulla, and cerebellumfor biodistribution analysis.

FIGS. 2A-2B illustrate results of average brain tissue ¹²⁵I IgGconcentrations (nM) 30 and 90 minutes after intranasal administration ofIgG. FIG. 2A illustrates results of brain tissue ¹²⁵I IgG concentrations(nM) 30 (n=8) and 90 (n=6) minutes after administration of a liquidprotein IgG preparation, normilized to a 6.0 mg dose. FIG. 2Billustrates results of brain tissue ¹²⁵I IgG concentrations (nM) 30(n=12) and 90 (n=6) minutes after administration of a solid microsphereIgG preparation, normalized to a 6.0 mg dose.

FIGS. 3A-3E illustrate IHC data on cortical and hippocampal brainslices. Plaque content was determined for 12 mice from each cohort(WT-Saline, WT-High, TG-Saline, TG-Low, and TG-High; shown left to rightin the charts, respectively). FIG. 3A shows the percent area covered bybeta-amyloid plaques. Four slides from the cortex of each mouse wereanalyzed using ImageJ software. The data is distributed in the givenrange by plaque radius size (in micrometers). Significant differencesbetween transgenic treatment groups are marked in the graph with thep-value. FIG. 3B shows the average number of beta-amyloid plaques. Fourslides from the cortex of each mouse were analyzed using ImageJsoftware. The data is distributed in the given range by plaque radiussize (in micrometers). Significant differences between transgenictreatment groups are marked in the graph with the p-value. FIG. 3C showsthe average number of beta-amyloid plaques. Four slides from thehippocampus of each mouse were analyzed using ImageJ software. The datais distributed in the given range by plaque radius size (inmicrometers). FIG. 3D shows the percent area covered by beta-amyloidplaques. Four slides from the hippocampus of each mouse were analyzedusing ImageJ software. The data is distributed in the given range byplaque radius size (in micrometers). FIG. 3E shows immunofluorescentstaining of amyloid plaques in the hippocampus and cortex of aged TG2576transgenic mice (field of view=5.3 mm). For the immunofluorescentstaining, mice were intranasally administered saline, low dose IgG, orhigh dose IgG three times weekly over a period of 8 months. Each valueis reported as the mean value for the cohorts ± standard error.

FIG. 4 illustrates a Kaplan-Meier curve for survival rates of transgenicand wild-type mice administered IgG intranasally. These mice belong to adifferent cohort than the mice used for plaque analysis in FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 Illustrates the seven coronal brain slices which were hemisectedfrom intranasal ¹²⁵I IgG treated rats used to assess CNS delivery inExample 8.

FIGS. 6A-6B show comparative results of the intactness of IgG sprayedthrough a device designed for intranasal delivery with that ofnon-sprayed control. FIG. 6A shows a Coomassie stained, non-reducing gelof sprayed and non-sprayed (control) IgG. FIG. 6B shows a Western blotof a reducing gel probed with an anti-IgG antibody.

FIG. 7 shows results demonstrating the highly efficient olfactoryepithelium targeting of IN device administration in rats. The upperpanel shows the deposition of IN IgG after device administration of 15μL of 25% IVIG solution spiked with 0.01% fluorescein tracer in a rat.The lower panel shows the deposition pattern after deposition of 15 μLof 25% IVIG solution spiked with 0.01% fluorescein tracer administeredvia nose drops. OB=olfactory bulb, OE=olfactory epithelium,RE=respiratory epithelium, NS=naris.

FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate data showing a decrease of amyloid load in thelow IgG and high IgG intranasal treatment groups. FIG. 8A shows thetotal amyloid area (plaque and vasculature). FIG. 8B shows the number(#) of amyloid deposits (plaque and vasculature). FIG. 8C shows thetotal intensity of all amyloid deposits (i.e., the Sum Intensity).

FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate data showing a decrease in amyloid is a result ofa decrease in plaque load. FIG. 9A shows the total amyloid area (plaqueand vasculature). FIG. 9B shows the number (#) of amyloid deposits(plaque and vasculature). FIG. 9C shows the total intensity of allamyloid deposits (i.e., the Sum Intensity).

FIGS. 10A-10C illustrate data showing that the vascular component of theamyloid was found to increase slightly when a decrease in amyloid as aresult of a decrease in plaque load was observed (FIG. 9). FIG. 10Ashows the vascular amyloid area. FIG. 10B shows the number (#) ofvascular deposits. FIG. 10C shows the total intensity of vasculardeposits (i.e., the Sum Intensity).

FIGS. 11A-11B illustrate data showing the relative proportions ofvascular and plaque amyloid as it contributes to total amyloid. FIG. 11Ashows the relative plaque contribution to total amyloid. FIG. 11B showsthe relative vascular contribution to total amyloid.

FIGS. 12A-12F show Congo Red stained sagittal sections captured withconfocal fluorescent microscopy. FIG. 12A shows a z-stack max intensityprojection image created from five individual images at 10× with a512×512 resolution. FIGS. 12B-12F show single images created from thirtyof z-stacks projections as shown in FIG. 12A, encompassing the wholetissue section that were tiled (6×5, 5% overlap). Representative imagesfrom the groups: Tg-Saline with Thresholding, Full-Resolution, Portionof the cortex and hippocampus (FIG. 12A); Tg-Low without Thresholding(FIG. 12B); WT-Saline with thresholding (FIG. 12C); Tg-Saline withthresholding (FIG. 12D); Tg-Low with thresholding (FIG. 12E); andTg-High with thresholding (FIG. 12F).

FIGS. 13A-13B illustrate data for the average staining intensity for theAstrocyte marker GFAP (FIG. 13A) and the microglial marker CD11b (FIG.13B).

FIG. 14 is an example image of amyloid (blue), GFAP (green) and CD11b(red) staining from a Tg2576 mouse brain that had been treated with ahigh dose of IN IgG. CD11b staining was often observed surrounding theamyloid plaques.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION Introduction

The present disclosure provides methods and compositions for treating acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject by intranasaldelivery of a therapeutically effective amount of pooled humanimmunoglobulin G (IgG) directly to the epithelium of the nasal cavity ofthe subject. In a specific embodiment, pooled human IgG is administereddirectly to the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity. In someembodiments, pooled IgG is delivered to the upper third of the nasalcavity, e.g., above the lower turbinates. In some embodiments, pooledIgG is delivered to the brain via the trigeminal nerve after intranasaladministration to the nasal respiratory epithelium. In a specificembodiment, pooled IgG is delivered to the brain via the maxillary nerveafter intranasal administration to the nasal respiratory epithelium. Inother embodiments, pooled IgG is delivered to the brain afteradministration to the maxillary sinus.

In some embodiments, methods and compositions for the treatment ofAlzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease viaintranasal administration of pooled human IgG are provided herein. Inother embodiments, the methods and compositions provided herein areuseful for the treatment of CNS disorder known to one of skill in theart including, without limitation, a neurodegenerative disorder of thecentral nervous system, a systemic atrophy primarily affecting thecentral nervous system, an extrapyramidal and movement disorder, ademyelinating disorder of the central nervous system, an episodic orparoxysmal disorder of the central nervous system, a paralytic syndromeof the central nervous system, a nerve, nerve root, or plexus disorderof the central nervous system, an organic mental disorder, a mental orbehavioral disorder caused by psychoactive substance use, aschizophrenia, schizotypal, or delusional disorder, a mood (affective)disorder, neurotic, stress-related, or somatoform disorder, a behavioralsyndrome, an adult personality or behavior disorder, a psychologicaldevelopment disorder, or a child onset behavioral or emotional disorder.In some embodiments, the CNS disorder is selected from the groupconsisting of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiplesclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Huntington's disease,cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or Pediatricacute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS). In some embodiments, theCNS disorder is selected from the group consisting of Alzheimer'sdisease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Pediatric AutoimmuneNeuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections(PANDAS), or Pediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS).

Advantageously, it is shown herein that intranasal administration of IgGincreased weight and survival time of Alzheimer's disease mice models.For example, it is shown in Example 6 that intranasal administration ofIgG, at either high (0.8 g/kg once every two weeks) or low (0.4 g/k onceevery two weeks) doses, prolonged the lifespan of TG2576 mice. Thisresult shows that intranasal administration of IgG is capable ofincreasing lifespan in the Alzheimer's mouse model, indicating efficacyin Alzheimer's treatment.

Moreover, intranasal administration of IgG significantly reduced plaquesin the cerebral cortex of in the Alzheimer's mouse model. It is shown inExample 4 that treatment with pooled human IgG reduced the percent areacovered by plaques in the Alzheimer's mouse model by about 25%, whenadministered intranasally at either low (0.4 mg/kg/2 wk; p=0.014) orhigh (0.8 mg/kg/2 wk; p=0.037) dosage. This is further indication of theefficacy of intranasal administration of IgG in the treatment ofAlzheimer's disease.

As further demonstrated herein, intranasal administration results in amuch more discriminate delivery of pooled human IgG to the brain, ascompared to intravenous administration. For example, it is shown inExample 9 that intranasal administration of pooled human immunoglobulinG resulted in a 6-fold lower blood exposure as compared to intravenousadministration. The lower system exposure of IgG provided by intranasaladministration advantageously reduces the risk of side effectsassociated with the systemic exposure of IgG.

Advantageously, it was also found that pooled human immunoglobulin G wasefficiently delivered to the brain following intranasal administrationin the absence of a permeability enhancer (e.g., membrane fluidizers,tight junction modulators, and medium chain length fatty acids and saltsand esters thereof, as described below). Previous reports have suggestedthat in order to achieve efficient transport of biotherapeutics (e.g.,mimetibodies and Fc fusions) through the olfactory epithelium, apermeability enhancer is required (WO 2009/058957). However, as shown inthe examples provided herein, pooled human IgG is efficiently deliveredto the brain when intranasally administered as a liquid or dry powderformulated with only an amino acid (e.g., glycine).

Advantageously, it is also shown herein that the dose of pooled humanIgG can be significantly reduced when administered intranasally, ascompared to intravenous administration. For example, it is shown inExample 9 that administration of a low dose of pooled human IgG (0.002g/kg IgG) intranasally delivered directly to the olfactory epitheliumresults in substantially the same amount of IgG being delivered to theright and left hemispheres of the brain as for intravenousadministration of a ten-fold higher dose of pooled human IgG (0.02 g/kgIgG; compare corrected AUC values for right and left hemisphere IgGdelivery in Table 71 and Table 72). A ten-fold reduction in the amountof pooled human IgG required for administration is significant becauseof the limited supply of pooled human IgG and the high cost associatedtherewith.

The results described above, which taken together suggest that low dosesof intranasally administered pooled human IgG is effective for thetreatment of Alzheimer's disease, are surprising given the difficulty ofdelivering full-length immunoglobulins to the brain via intranasaladministration. First, although antibody fragments (e.g., Fabs) havepreviously been administered intranasally, the inventors are unaware ofany reports demonstrating delivery of full-length antibodies to thebrain via intranasal administration. In fact, it has been reported thatthe delivery of full-length antibodies poses a great difficulty in thefield of medicine (Harmsen MM et al., Appl Microbiol Biotechnol., 2007,77(1): 13-22; Athwal GS, Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology, July2009; WO 2006/091332; and WO 2009/058957). Consistent with thesereports, Applicants found that antibody fragments are delivered muchmore readily to the brain, as compared to full-length immunoglobulins,after intranasal administration. For example, it is shown in Example 2that, on average, the concentration of Fabs in brain tissuepost-intranasal administration is 19-times higher than the concentrationof full-length immunoglobulins post-intranasal administration. Given thesignificantly lower delivery of full-length immunoglobulins to thebrain, it is surprising that intranasal administration of pooledimmunoglobulins provides the effective results shown herein.

Advantageously, intranasal delivery of the pooled human IgG compositiondisclosed herein can be accomplished by a non-invasive means, ascompared to intravenous, subcutaneous, and intramuscular administration,all of which require puncture of the skin of the subject. For example,it is shown in Example 3 that pooled human IgG can be efficientlydelivered to the brain using nasal drops or a nasal spray.

Another benefit provided by the methods and compositions provided hereinfor intranasal administration of pooled human IgG is improved patientcompliance. Treatment with intravenous IgG (IVIG) requires a lengthyadministration period under medical supervision, generally taking placeat hospitals and medical facilities. For example, initial administrationof IVIG occurs over a 2 to 5 hour period, once a day for 2 to 7consecutive days. Follow-up doses, also typically administered at ahospital over a period of 2 to 5 hours, are required every 1 to 4 weeksdepending on the indication being treated and dosing regimen. Such anadministration regime is time consuming and inconvenient for manypatients. In comparison, intranasal administration can be administeredat home without medical supervision. Also, intranasal administration canbe performed quickly, over several minutes depending on the number ofdrops/sprays required, rather than several hours as required forintravenous administration. Thus, treatment can be prescribed morefrequently at lower doses to maintain an effective level of IgG in theCNS with minimal inconvenience because administration occurs at home ina shorter period of time.

Furthermore, IVIG therapy requires catheterization which can causediscomfort and infection at the site of the catheter. IVIG solutions areoften high in sodium and glucose to create isotonicity, causingincreased risk to the elderly population, which already have increasedrates of diabetes and high blood pressure. On the other hand, intranasaladministration is non-invasive, i.e. there is no catheterization anddoes not carry invasive-procedure related risks such as infection anddiscomfort at the site of the catheter. Intranasal administration ofpooled human IgG compositions is an improved procedure for elderlypersons because it does not require IV perfusion and thus does notcreate a systemic increase in concentrations of salt or glucose in theblood.

Thus, as compared to currently utilized modes of administering pooledhuman IgG (e.g., intravenous, subcutaneous, and intramuscular)intranasal administration increases the ease of administration,decreases overall administration time, decreases the number of hospitalvisits required, and eliminates the risks associated with catheter-basedadministration (e.g., IV administration). Thus, implementation ofintranasal administration of pooled human IgG will result in improvedpatient compliance.

Definitions

As used herein, the terms “disorder of the central nervous system,”“central nervous system disorder,” “CNS disorder,” and the like refer toa disorder affecting either the spinal cord (e.g., a myelopathy) orbrain (e.g., an encephalopathy) of a subject, which commonly presentswith neurological and/or psychiatric symptoms. CNS disorders includemany neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Huntington's disease, Amyotrophiclateral sclerosis (ALS), hereditary spastic hemiplegia, primary lateralsclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, Kennedy's disease, Alzheimer'sdisease, ataxias, Huntington's disease, Lewy body disease, apolyglutamine repeat disease, and Parkinson's disease) and psychiatricdisorders (e.g., mood disorders, schizophrenias, and autism).Non-limiting examples of ataxia include Friedreich's ataxia and thespinocerebellar ataxias. Specifically for this application, CNSdisorders do not include disorders resulting from acute viral andbacterial infections.

Non-limiting examples of CNS disorders include neurodegenerativedisorders of the central nervous system, systemic atrophies primarilyaffecting the central nervous system, extrapyramidal and movementdisorders, demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system,episodic or paroxysmal disorders of the central nervous system,paralytic syndromes of the central nervous system, nerve, nerve root, orplexus disorders of the central nervous system, organic mentaldisorders, mental or behavioral disorders caused by psychoactivesubstance use, schizophrenic, schizotypal, or delusional disorders, mood(affective) disorders, neurotic, stress-related, or somatoformdisorders, behavioral syndromes, adult personality or behaviordisorders, psychological development disorders, and child onsetbehavioral or emotional disorders. (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ofMental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV); The World Health Organization,The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10),Chapter V. Further exemplary CNS disorders are provided herein below.

Neurodegenerative CNS disorders are typically characterized byprogressive dysfunction and/or cell death in the central nervous system.The hallmark of many neurodegenerative CNS disorders is the accumulationof misfolded proteins, such as beta-amyloid, tau, alpha-synuclein, andTDP-43, both intracellularly and extracellularly. Many neurodegenerativediseases are also associated with gross mitochondrial dysfunction.Common examples of neurodegenerative CNS disorders include Alzheimer'sdisease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease, andAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Psychiatric disorders (also referred to as mental illnesses) commonlypresent with cognitive deficits and mood dysregulation. Psychiatricdisorders are generally defined by a combination of how a person feels,acts, thinks or perceives. Well established systems for theclassification of psychiatric disorders include the InternationalStatistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10thRevision (World Health Organization, tenth revision (2010), the contentof which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entiretyfor all purposes) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of MentalDisorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, DS-IV-TR (2000),the content of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference inits entirety for all purposes). Common examples of psychiatric disordersinclude mood disorders, schizophrenia, and autism.

As used herein, the terms “pooled human immunoglobulin G” and “pooledhuman IgG” refer to a composition containing polyvalent immunoglobulin G(IgG) purified from the blood/plasma of multiple donors, e.g., more thana hundred or more than a thousand blood donors. Typically, thecomposition will be at least 80% IgG (w/w, e.g., weight IgG per weighttotal protein), preferably at least 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%,92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% IgG (w/w). In certainembodiments, the pooled human IgG composition contains intact IgGimmunoglobulins. In other embodiments, the pooled human IgG compositioncontains IgG fragments, for example those prepared by treatment ofintact antibodies with trypsin. In certain embodiments, the pooled humanIgG compositions used in the treatments disclosed herein contain naturalor synthetic modifications, e.g., post-translational modificationsand/or chemical modifications.

As used herein, the terms “high titer anti-amyloid β pooledimmunoglobulin G” and “high titer anti-amyloid β pooled IgG” refer to acomposition containing polyvalent immunoglobulin G (IgG) purified fromthe blood/plasma of multiple donors, e.g., more than a hundred or morethan a thousand blood donors, having a relative titer of anti-amyloid βimmunoglobulin G that is greater than the expected titer of anti-amyloidβ immunoglobulins in a pooled IgG composition prepared from theblood/plasma of more than a thousand random individuals. Commerciallyavailable intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) preparations contain IgGsthat specifically recognize epitopes of various conformers of amyloid β,e.g., amyloid β monomers, amyloid β fibrils, and cross-linked amyloid βprotein species (CAPS). It has been reported that a commercialpreparation of GAMMAGARD LIQUID® (10% Immune Globulin Infusion (Human);Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, Ill.) contains 0.1% anti-amyloid βfibril IgG, 0.04% anti-CAPS IgG, and 0.02% anti-amyloid β monomer IgG,having EC₅₀ affinities of 40 nM, 40 nM, and 350 nM for their targetamyloid β conformer, respectively (O'Nuallain B. et al., Biochemistry,2008 Nov 25;47(47):12254-6, the content of which is hereby incorporatedby reference in its entirety for all purposes). In some embodiments, ahigh titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin G composition contains ahigh titer of IgG specific for one or more conformer of amyloid β. Inother embodiments, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains a high titer of IgG specific for amyloid βmonomers, amyloid β fibrils, and cross-linked amyloid β protein species(CAPS).

Accordingly, in one embodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooledimmunoglobulin G composition contains at least 0.1% anti-amyloid β IgG(e.g., 0.1% IgG with specific affinity for any amyloid β conformer). Inanother embodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.2% anti-amyloid β IgG. In yet otherembodiments, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.15%, 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.3%, 0.35%, 0.4%,0.45%, 0.5%, 0.55%, 0.6%, 0.65%, 0.7%, 0.75%, 0.8%, 0.85%, 0.9%, 0.95%,1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0% or moreanti-amyloid β IgG.

In one embodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.1% anti-amyloid β fibril IgG. In anotherembodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.2% anti-amyloid β fibril IgG. In yetother embodiments, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.15%, 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.3%, 0.35%, 0.4%,0.45%, 0.5%, 0.55%, 0.6%, 0.65%, 0.7%, 0.75%, 0.8%, 0.85%, 0.9%, 0.95%,1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0% or moreanti-amyloid β fibril IgG.

In one embodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.04% anti-CAPS IgG. In anotherembodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.08% anti-CAPS IgG. In yet otherembodiments, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%,0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.3%, 0.35%, 0.4%, 0.45%, 0.5%, 0.55%, 0.6%,0.65%, 0.7%, 0.75%, 0.8%, 0.85%, 0.9%, 0.95%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%,3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0% or more anti-CAPS IgG.

In one embodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.02% anti-amyloid β monomer IgG. Inanother embodiment, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.04% anti-amyloid β monomer IgG. In yetother embodiments, a high titer anti-amyloid β pooled immunoglobulin Gcomposition contains at least 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%,0.08%, 0.09%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.3%, 0.35%, 0.4%, 0.45%, 0.5%,0.55%, 0.6%, 0.65%, 0.7%, 0.75%, 0.8%, 0.85%, 0.9%, 0.95%, 1.0%, 1.5%,2.0%, 2.5%, 3.0%, 3.5%, 4.0%, 4.5%, 5.0% or more anti-amyloid β monomerIgG.

High titer anti-amyloid β pooled IgG can be prepared according tostandard methods for the manufacture of pooled IgG starting with astandard pool of blood/plasma of multiple donors, e.g., more than ahundred or more than a thousand blood donors, and subsequently enrichedfor anti-amyloid β immunoglobulin G. Methods for the enrichment oftarget-specific immunoglobulin G molecules are well known in the art(for example, see U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0101909,the content of which is hereby expressly incorporated by referenceherein in its entirety for all purposes). Alternatively, high titeranti-amyloid β pooled IgG can be prepared according to standard methodsfor the manufacture of pooled IgG starting with an enriched pool ofblood/plasma from at least fifty, one hundred, two hundred, fivehundred, or one thousand donors having a high relative titer ofanti-amyloid β immunoglobulin G. As compared to the manufacture ofstandard IgG for intravenous administration, hyperimmune IgGpreparations are commonly prepared from smaller donor pools. Theseenriched pools of blood/plasma can be formed, for example, byselectively pooling blood/plasma donations or donors with a highrelative titer of anti-amyloid β immunoglobulin G, e.g., by selection ofhigh titer blood/plasma donations or donors. Alternatively, an enrichedpool of blood/plasma can be formed by screening for blood/plasmadonations or donors with a low relative titer of anti-amyloid βimmunoglobulin G and excluding these donations or donors from thestarting blood/plasma pool, e.g., screening for low titer blood/plasmadonations or donors.

As used herein, the term “intactness” refers to a percentage oftherapeutic agent that has not been at least partially degraded at aparticular point in time following administration. In one embodiment,intactness is a measure of the total administered dose of thetherapeutic agent that has not been at least partially degraded at theparticular point in time (i.e., systemic intactness). In anotherembodiment, intactness is a measure of the therapeutic agent present ata particular site of the subject, e.g., brain or bloodstream, which hasnot been at least partially degraded (i.e., local intactness). In oneembodiment, the intactness of administered immunoglobulin (e.g., pooledhuman IgG) is measured by mass spectroscopy. For example, the intactnessof the administered immunoglobulins is determined by analyzing abiological sample from the subject, or proteins extracted from thebiological sample, by mass spectroscopy. In some embodiments, theintactness of the administered immunoglobulins is determined byseparating proteins present in a biological sample from the subject bymolecular weight, size, or shape (e.g., by electrophoresis or sizeexclusion chromatography) and determining the size distribution ofadministered immunoglobulins in the sample.

In one embodiment, the intactness of immunoglobulin (e.g., pooled humanIgG) in the brain of a subject following intranasal administration is atleast 40%. In preferred embodiments, the intactness of immunoglobulin(e.g., pooled human IgG) in the brain of a subject following intranasaladministration is at least 50%, preferably at least 60%. In certainembodiments, the intactness of immunoglobulin (e.g., pooled human IgG)in the brain of a subject following intranasal administration is atleast 35%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45%, 46%, 47%,48%, 49%, 50%, 51%, 52%, 53%, 54%, 55%, 56%, 57%, 58%, 59%, 60%, 61%, orhigher.

As used herein, the terms “intranasal administration” and “nasaladministration” refer to administration of a therapeutic composition tothe nasal cavity of a subject such that a therapeutic agent in thecomposition is delivered directly to one or more epithelium located inthe nose. In certain embodiments, intranasal administration is achievedusing a liquid preparation (e.g., an aqueous preparation), anaerosolized preparation, or a dry powder preparation, each of which canbe administered via an externally propelled or self-propelled (e.g., viainhalation) non-invasive nasal delivery device, or via a gel, cream,ointment, lotion, or paste directly applied to one or more nasalepithelium (e.g., olfactory epithelium or nasal respiratory epithelium).

As used herein, the term “nasal epithelium” refers to the tissues liningthe internal structure of the nasal cavity. The term nasal epitheliumincludes both the nasal respiratory epithelium, located in the lowertwo-thirds of the nasal cavity in humans, and the olfactory epithelium,located in the upper third of the nasal cavity of humans.

As used herein, the term “olfactory epithelium” refers to a specializedepithelial tissue inside the nasal cavity involved in smell. In humans,the olfactory epithelium is located in the upper third of the nasalcavity.

As used herein, the term “directed administration” refers to a processof preferentially delivering a therapeutic agent to a first location ina subject as compared a second location or systemic distribution of theagent. For example, in one embodiment, directed administration of atherapeutic agent results in at least a two-fold increase in the ratioof therapeutic agent delivered to a targeted site to therapeutic agentdelivered to a non-targeted site, as compared to the ratio followingsystemic or non-directed administration. In other embodiments, directedadministration of a therapeutic agent results in at least a 3-fold,4-fold, 5-fold, 6-fold, 7-fold, 8-fold, 9-fold, 10-fold, 15-fold,20-fold, 25-fold, 30-fold, 35-fold, 40-fold, 45-fold, 50-fold, 60-fold,70-fold, 80-fold, 90-fold, 100-fold, 200-fold, 300-fold, 400-fold,500-fold, 750-fold, 1000-fold, or greater increase in the ratio oftherapeutic agent delivered to a targeted site to therapeutic agentdelivered to a non-targeted site, as compared to the ratio followingsystemic or non-directed administration. In a particular embodiment,directed administration of an agent is contrasted to intravenousadministration of the agent. For example, in one embodiment, the ratioof therapeutic agent present at a targeted site to therapeutic agentpresent in the blood stream is increased at least two-fold when theagent is subject to directed administration (e.g., by delivery to thebrain via intranasal administration), as compared to when thetherapeutic agent is administered intravenously.

As used herein, the term “non-invasive nasal delivery device” refers aninstrument that is capable of delivering a therapeutic composition(e.g., pooled human IgG) to the nasal cavity without piercing theepithelium of the subject. Non-limiting examples of non-invasive nasaldelivery devices include propellant (e.g., a pressurized inhaler) andnon-propellant (e.g., a pump-type inhaler) types of aerosol or atomizerdevices, particle dispersion devices, nebulizers, and pressurizedolfactory delivery devices for delivery of liquid or powderformulations.

The term “treatment” or “therapy” generally means obtaining a desiredphysiologic effect. The effect may be prophylactic in terms ofcompletely or partially preventing a disease or condition or symptomthereof and/or may be therapeutic in terms of a partial or complete curefor an injury, disease or condition and/or amelioration of an adverseeffect attributable to the injury, disease or condition and includesarresting the development or causing regression of a disease orcondition. Treatment can also refer to any delay in onset, ameliorationof symptoms, improvement in patient survival, increase in survival timeor rate, improvement in cognitive function, etc. The effect of treatmentcan be compared to an individual or pool of individuals not receivingthe treatment.

As used herein, a “therapeutically effective amount or dose” or“sufficient/effective amount or dose,” refers to a dose that produceseffects for which it is administered. The exact dose will depend on thepurpose of the treatment, and will be ascertainable by one skilled inthe art using known techniques (see, e.g., Lieberman, PharmaceuticalDosage Forms (vols. 1-3, 1992); Lloyd, The Art, Science and Technologyof Pharmaceutical Compounding (1999); Pickar, Dosage Calculations(1999); and Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, 20thEdition, 2003, Gennaro, Ed., Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins).

As used here, the terms “dose” and “dosage” are used interchangeably andrefer to the amount of active ingredient given to an individual at eachadministration. The dose will vary depending on a number of factors,including frequency of administration; size and tolerance of theindividual; severity of the condition; risk of side effects; and theroute of administration. One of skill in the art will recognize that thedose can be modified depending on the above factors or based ontherapeutic progress. The term “dosage form” refers to the particularformat of the pharmaceutical, and depends on the route ofadministration. For example, a dosage form can be a liquid or drypowder, formulated for intranasal administration.

As used herein, a therapeutic composition “consisting essentially of abuffering agent and pooled human IgG” may also contain residual levelsof chemical agents used during the manufacturing process, e.g.,surfactants, buffers, salts, and stabilizing agents, as well as chemicalagents used to pH the final composition, for example, counter ionscontributed by an acid (e.g., hydrochloric acid or acetic acid) or base(e.g., sodium or potassium hydroxide), and/or trace amounts ofcontaminating proteins.

As used herein, the term “permeability enhancer” refers to a componentof a therapeutic composition formulated for intranasal administrationwhich promotes the passage of biotherapeutics (e.g., mimetibodies andFc-fusion polypeptides) through the nasal epithelium. Non-limitingexamples of permeability enhancers include membrane fluidizers, tightjunction modulators, and medium chain length fatty acids and salts andesters thereof. Non-limiting examples of medium chain length fatty acidsand salts and esters thereof included mono-, di-, and triglycerides(such as sodium caprylate, sodium caprate, glycerides (CAPMUL, GELUCIRE44/14 PEG32 glyceryl laurate EP); lipids; pegylated peptides; andliposomes. Surfactants and similarly acting compounds can also be usedas permeability enhancers. Non-limiting examples of surfactants andsimilarly acting compounds include polysorbate-80, phosphatidylcholine,N-methylpiperazine, sodium salicylate, melittin, and palmitoyl carnitinechloride (PCC). Generally, the pooled human immunoglobulin Gcompositions described herein are formulated for intranasaladministration in the absence of permeability enhancers.

As used herein, the term “dry powder composition” refers to alyophilized or spray dried form of a therapeutic pooled human IgGformulation. In one embodiment, a dry powder composition contains lessthan 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, or less residual watercontent.

A “control” is used herein, refers to a reference, usually a knownreference, for comparison to an experimental group. One of skill in theart will understand which controls are valuable in a given situation andbe able to analyze data based on comparisons to control values. Controlsare also valuable for determining the significance of data. For example,if values for a given parameter vary widely in controls, variation intest samples will not be considered as significant.

Before the present disclosure is described in greater detail, it is tobe understood that this invention is not limited to particularembodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to beunderstood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose ofdescribing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to belimiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited onlyby the appended claims.

Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that eachintervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unlessthe context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lowerlimit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in thatstated range, is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lowerlimits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in thesmaller ranges and are also encompassed within the invention, subject toany specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the statedrange includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either orboth of those included limits are also included in the invention.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill inthe art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods andmaterials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also beused in the practice or testing of the present invention, representativeillustrative methods and materials are now described.

It is noted that, as used herein and in the appended claims, thesingular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless thecontext clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claimsmay be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statementis intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusiveterminology as “solely,” “only,” and the like in connection with therecitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation.

As will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reading thisdisclosure, each of the individual embodiments described and illustratedherein has discrete components and features which may be readilyseparated from or combined with the features of any of the other severalembodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the presentinvention. Any recited method can be carried out in the order of eventsrecited or in any other order which is logically possible.

Administration

Intranasal (IN) administration is an advantageous mode of delivering adrug to the brain because it is non-invasive and there is a directconnection between the olfactory system and the brain. Intranasaladministration of IgG (INIG) to treat neurological diseases isparticularly advantageous because the direct connection between theolfactory system and the brain obviates delivery concerns associatedwith the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and minimizes systemic exposure tothe drug, thereby minimizing side effects of the drug. Furthermore, INdelivery allows compositions such as powders, granules, solutions,ointments, and creams, thereby obviating the need for intravenous andintramuscular administration. For example, when a drug is administeredintranasally, it is transported through the nasal mucosa and along theolfactory neural pathway. The drug can be administered alone or can becombined with a carrier molecule(s) to promote transport through thenasal mucosa and along the olfactory neural pathway. The drug can alsobe administered in combination with an absorption enhancer. Absorptionenhancers promote the absorption of the drug through the nasal mucosaand along the olfactory neural pathway. Furthermore, additionalmolecules can be added to facilitate drug transport across the olfactoryneural pathway.

IN administration can also be used to deliver therapeutic drugs to thebrain via the trigeminal pathway. Specifically, IN administration can beused to deliver IgG via the trigeminal pathway. The olfactory andtrigeminal nerves receive high concentrations of a drug with INadministration because the absorbent respiratory and olfactorypseudoepithelium are innervated by the trigeminal nerve. These nervescan then transport the drug into the brain and other connectedstructures. For example, the trigeminal nerve branches directly orindirectly reach the maxillary sinus, brainstem, hindbrain, cribriformplate, forebrain (e.g., cortex and diencephalon), orofacial structures(e.g., teeth, masseter muscle, and the temporomandibular joint),midbrain, cerebellum, cervical spinal cord, thoracic spinal cord, andlumbar spinal cord. Accordingly, INIG can be carried across thetrigeminal pathway to reach and treat neurological diseases.

In certain embodiments, methods are provided for the treatment of CNSdisorders by administration of pooled human immunoglobulins to tissueinnervated by the olfactory and/or trigeminal nerves. Surprisingly, itwas found that therapeutically effective amounts of pooled humanimmunoglobulin are delivered to the CNS when administered intranasally.For example, it is shown herein that intranasal administration of pooledhuman immunoglobulins is effective to reduce total amyloid plaque loadin a rodent model of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, by specificallytargeting the nasal epithelium, as opposed to the respiratory system(lung, pharynx, etc.), systemic exposure of the pooled humanimmunoglobulins is reduced.

Many types of intranasal delivery devices can be used to practice themethods provided herein. In some embodiments, the delivery device is anintranasal device for the administration of liquids. Non-limitingexamples of devices useful for the administration of liquid compositions(e.g., liquid pooled IgG compositions) include vapor devices (e.g.,vapor inhalers), drop devices (e.g., catheters, single-dose droppers,multi-dose droppers, and unit-dose pipettes), mechanical spray pumpdevices (e.g., squeeze bottles, multi-dose metered-dose spray pumps, andsingle/duo-dose spray pumps), bi-directional spray pumps (e.g.,breath-actuated nasal delivery devices), gas-driven spraysystems/atomizers (e.g., single- or multi-dose HFA or nitrogenpropellant-driven metered-dose inhalers, including traditional andcircumferential velocity inhalers), and electrically powerednebulizers/atomizers (e.g., pulsation membrane nebulizers, vibratingmechanical nebulizers, and hand-held mechanical nebulizers). In someembodiments, the delivery device is an intranasal device for theadministration of powders or gels. Non-limiting examples of devicesuseful for the administration of powder compositions (e.g., lyophilizedor otherwise dried pooled IgG compositions) include mechanical powdersprayers (e.g., hand-actuated capsule-based powder spray devices andhand-actuated powder spray devices, hand actuated gel delivery devices),breath-actuated inhalers (e.g., single- or multi-dose nasal inhalers andcapsule-based single- or multi-dose nasal inhalers), and insufflators(e.g., breath-actuated nasal delivery devices),In some embodiments, thepooled human immunoglobulins are preferentially administered to theolfactory area, located in the upper third of the nasal cavity, andparticularly to the olfactory epithelium. Fibers of the olfactory nerveare unmyelinated axons of olfactory receptor cells, which are located inthe superior one-third of the nasal cavity. The olfactory receptor cellsare bipolar neurons with swellings covered by hair-like cilia thatproject into the nasal cavity. At the other end, axons from these cellscollect into aggregates and enter the cranial cavity at the roof of thenose. Surrounded by a thin tube of pia, the olfactory nerves cross thesubarachnoid space containing CSF and enter the inferior aspects of theolfactory bulbs. Once the pooled human immunoglobulin is dispensed intothe nasal cavity, the immunoglobulin can undergo transport through thenasal mucosa and into the olfactory bulb and interconnected areas of thebrain, such as the hippocampal formation, amygdaloid nuclei, nucleusbasalis of Meynert, locus ceruleus, the brain stem, and the like (e.g.,Johnson et al., Molecular Pharmaceutics (2010) 7(3):884-893).

In certain embodiments, pooled human immunoglobulin is administered totissue innervated by the trigeminal nerve. The trigeminal nerveinnervates tissues of a mammal's (e.g., human) head including skin ofthe face and scalp, oral tissues, and tissues surrounding the eye. Thetrigeminal nerve has three major branches, the ophthalmic nerve, themaxillary nerve, and the mandibular nerve. In some embodiments, themethods provided herein include targeted administration of pooled humanimmunoglobulin to one or more of these trigeminal branches, i.e. thetrigeminal pathway. In some embodiments, the methods provided hereininclude targeted administration of pooled human immunoglobulin to themaxillary sinus, thereby reaching the brainstem, hindbrain, cribriformplate, forebrain (e.g., cortex and diencephalon), midbrain, cerebellum,cervical spinal cord, thoracic spinal cord, and lumbar spinal cordthrough the trigeminal pathway. In certain embodiments, methods providedherein include targeted administration of pooled human immunoglobulinfor treatment of a disorder of the CNS (e.g., Alzheimer's disease).

In some embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulin is administered tonasal tissues innervated by the trigeminal nerve, for example, to nasaltissues including the sinuses, the inferior two-thirds of the nasalcavity and the nasal septum. In certain embodiments, the pooled humanimmunoglobulin is targeted to the inferior two-thirds of the nasalcavity and/or the nasal septum.

In some embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulin is administered toone or both maxillary sinus of the individual. Methods and devices foradministration to the maxillary sinus are known in the art, for example,see United States Patent Application Publication Number 2011/0151393,the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in theirentirety for all purposes.

The maxillary sinus is in fluid communication with the patient's nasalcavity and comprises right and left maxillary sinuses. Each maxillarysinus communicates with the corresponding nasal passage via the orificeof the maxillary sinus. The maximum volume of the maxillary sinus inadults is approximately 4 to 15 ml, though individual sinuses maycomprise volumes outside of this range.

The pathway from the nasal passages to the corresponding orifice ofmaxillary sinus, and ultimately to the corresponding maxillary sinus,allows for a device to be inserted into the nasal passage to the orificeof the maxillary sinus, whereupon at least one effective amount or doseof pooled human immunoglobulins may be administered and delivered intothe maxillary sinus. The pathway to the maxillary sinus is tortuous andrequires: traversing the nostril, moving through the region between thelower and middle concha, navigating over and into the semilunar hiatus,traveling superiorly into the maxillary sinus opening, resisting theciliated action of the ostium/tube passing into the maxillary sinus andultimately moving into the sinus itself.

Since the trigeminal nerve passes through the maxillary sinus, thepooled human immunoglobulins in the maxillary sinus after deliverytherein will be moved along the trigeminal nerve to structuresinnervated by the trigeminal nerve. In this fashion, pooled human IgGadministered to one or both of the maxillary sinus is delivered to thebrain via the trigeminal nerve.

In one embodiment, the pooled human IgG compositions provided herein forthe treatment of a CNS disorder (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) areintranasally administered as a liquid preparation, e.g., an aqueousbased preparation. For example, in one embodiment, nasal drops areinstilled in the nasal cavity by tilting the head back sufficiently andapply the drops into the nares. In another embodiment, the drops aresnorted up the nose. In another embodiment, nasal drops are applied withan applicator or tube onto the upper third of the nasal mucosa. Inanother embodiment, nasal drops are applied with an applicator or tubeinto one or both of maxillary sinus of the subject. In anotherembodiment, the liquid preparation may be placed into an appropriatedevice so that it may be aerosolized for inhalation through the nasalcavity. For example, in one embodiment, the therapeutic agent is placedinto a plastic bottle atomizer. In a specific embodiment, the atomizeris advantageously configured to allow a substantial amount of the sprayto be directed to the upper one-third region or portion of the nasalcavity (e.g., the olfactory epithelium). In another embodiment, theliquid preparation is aerosolized and applied via an inhaler, such as ametered-dose inhaler (for example, see, U.S. Pat. No. 6,715,485). In aspecific embodiment, the inhaler is advantageously configured to allow asubstantial amount of the aerosol to be directed to the upper one-thirdregion or portion of the nasal cavity (e.g., the olfactory epithelium).In certain embodiments, a substantial amount of the pooled humanimmunoglobulin refers to at least 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%,60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 100% of the composition,which is administered to the upper one-third region of the nasal cavity(e.g., administered to the upper one-third of the nasal epithelium).

In one embodiment, the pooled human IgG compositions provided herein forthe treatment of a CNS disorder (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) areintranasally administered as a dry powder. Dry powder nasal deliverydevices are well known in the art, for example, see PCT publication No.WO 1996/222802. In one embodiment, following intranasal administration,pooled human IgG is absorbed across the olfactory epithelium, which isfound in the upper third of the nasal cavity. In another embodiment,following intranasal administration, pooled human IgG is absorbed acrossthe nasal respiratory epithelium, which is innervated with trigeminalnerves, in the lower two-thirds of the nasal cavity. The trigeminalnerves also innervate the conjunctive, oral mucosa, and certain areas ofthe dermis of the face and head, and absorption after intranasaladministration of the IgG from these regions may also occur. In otherembodiments, following intranasal administration, pooled human IgG isabsorbed across the maxillary sinus epithelium. In yet otherembodiments, pooled human IgG may be absorbed across more than one ofthese nasal epitheliums and subsequently delivered to the brain of thesubject.

Although administration is referred to herein as a single event that mayoccur according to some regular or irregular frequency of the course ofa treatment, a single administration even may include multipleadministrations. In this regard, a single dosage of pooled human IgG maybe partitioned into two or more physical compositions foradministration. For example, a 200 mg dose of pooled human IgG in aliquid composition formulated at 200 g/L IgG may be administered to a 50kg subject (4 mg/kg IgG) in four drops having a volume of 250 μL each.Likewise, a dry powder composition containing a single dosage of pooledhuman IgG may be administered, for example, in two or more distinctpuffs. In some embodiments, pooled human IgG is administered in one ormore puffs or sprays into each nare of the individual (e.g., one or morepuff into the right nare and one or more puffs into the left nare).

In certain embodiments, the methods described herein for treating a CNSdisorder include intranasal administration of pooled human IgG via anon-invasive intranasal delivery device. In one embodiment, thenon-invasive intranasal delivery device is a non-propellant type aerosolor atomizer device, a propellant type aerosol or atomizer device, anon-propellant pump-type device, a particle dispersion device, anebulizer device, or a pressurized olfactory delivery device.

In one embodiment the non-invasive intranasal delivery device delivers aliquid drop of a pooled human IgG composition to the nasal cavity of asubject. In a particular embodiment, the non-invasive intranasaldelivery device delivers a liquid drop of pooled human IgG directly to anasal epithelium of the subject. In a more specific embodiment, thenon-invasive intranasal delivery device delivers a liquid drop of pooledhuman IgG directly to the olfactory epithelium of the subject. In oneembodiment, the liquid drop is administered by tilting the head of thesubject back and administering the drop into a nare of the subject. Inanother embodiment, the liquid drop is administered by inserting the tipof a non-invasive intranasal delivery device into a nare of the subjectand squirting or spraying the drop into the nasal cavity of the subject.

In another embodiment, the non-invasive intranasal delivery devicedelivers a liquid or a powder aerosol of a pooled human IgG compositionto the nasal cavity of a subject. In a particular embodiment, thenon-invasive intranasal delivery device delivers a liquid or a powderaerosol of pooled human IgG directly to a nasal epithelium of thesubject. In a more specific embodiment, the non-invasive intranasaldelivery device delivers a liquid or a powder aerosol of pooled humanIgG directly to the olfactory epithelium of the subject.

In another embodiment, the non-invasive intranasal delivery devicedelivers a dry powder composition of pooled human IgG composition to thenasal cavity of a subject. In a particular embodiment, the non-invasiveintranasal delivery device delivers a dry powder composition of pooledhuman IgG directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. In a morespecific embodiment, the non-invasive intranasal delivery devicedelivers a dry powder composition of pooled human IgG directly to theolfactory epithelium of the subject.

In another embodiment, the non-invasive intranasal delivery devicedelivers a sustained release or controlled release composition of pooledhuman IgG composition to the nasal cavity of a subject. In a specificembodiment the sustained release composition comprises a dry powdercomposition of pooled human IgG. In some embodiments, the sustainedrelease composition is a gel, paste, hydrogel, cream, lotion, film, orsimilar form that coats at least a portion of the nasal epithelium(e.g., all or a portion of the olfactory epithelium, all or a portion ofa nasal epithelium associated with trigeminal nerve endings, all or aportion of the upper third of the nasal epithelium, all or a portion ofthe lower third of the nasal epithelium, or all or a portion of thenasal maxillary epithelium.

In one embodiment, the intranasal device is a single-use, disposabledevice. In another embodiment, the intranasal device is a multi- orrepeat-use device. In certain embodiments, the single-use or multi-usedevice is pre-metered. In a specific embodiment, the single-use ormulti-use device is pre-filled. In certain embodiments, the multi- orrepeat-use device is refillable. In certain embodiments, the device isrefilled by inserting a pooled human IgG composition into a chamber ofthe device. In other embodiments, a chamber of the multi- or repeat-usedevice designed to hold the pooled human IgG composition is replacedwith a new, pre-filled chamber.

In certain embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulin compositions areadministered by a pressurized nasal delivery (PND) device. In oneembodiment, the PND device can be used to deliver a liquid IgGcomposition to the nasal cavity. In one embodiment, the PND device canbe used to deliver a powder IgG composition to the nasal cavity. In oneembodiment, the PND device administers an IgG composition into onenostril. In one embodiment, the Impel device administers an IgGcomposition into both nostrils.

In some embodiments, the PND device is configured to deliver the liquidor powder IgG compositions to a particular epithelium, location, and/orstructure of the nasal cavity. For example, in one embodiment, the PNDdevice is configured to deliver the IgG composition to the upper nasalcavity. In one embodiment, the PND device is configured to deliver theIgG composition to the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity. In oneembodiment, the PND device is configured to deliver the IgG compositionto the lower two thirds of the nasal epithelium. In one embodiment, thePND device is configured to deliver the IgG composition to a nasalepithelium associated with trigeminal nerve endings. In one embodiment,the PND device is configured to deliver the IgG composition to the nasalmaxillary sinus epithelium.

Methods for configuring pressurized delivery devices to achieve aparticular delivery profile are known in the field. For example, in oneembodiment, a pressurized nasal delivery device is configured to producea stream, spray, puff, etc., have a particular characteristic. Forexample, in one embodiment, to achieve administration to the upper thirdof the nasal epithelium, the device is configured to produce a strong,focused stream, spray, puff, etc. In one embodiment, the strong focusedspray is created by imparting circumferential and/or axial velocity ontothe stream of the therapeutic composition (e.g., pooled human IgG) beingadministered into the nose. In another embodiment, to achieveadministration to a greater portion of the nasal epithelium (e.g., theentire or the lower two thirds of the nasal epithelium), the device isconfigured to produce a diffuse and/or weaker stream, spray, puff, etc.In some embodiments, the tip of the delivery device is configured tophysically direct the stream, spray, puff, etc., to the desiredintranasal location when inserted into the subject's nare. For example,a kink or bend may be introduced into the tip of the delivery device to“point” the stream, spray, puff, etc., at a targeted epithelium. In someembodiments, the delivery pattern of the device is adjustable, such thatthe device can be differentially configured to target the therapeuticagent (e.g., pooled human IgG) to a particular epithelium, structure, orlocation within the nose. In certain embodiments, the pooled humanimmunoglobulin compositions are administered by a breath-poweredtechnology device. In certain embodiments, the breath-powered technologyprovides positive pressure during administration. In certainembodiments, the positive pressure expands narrow nasal passages. Incertain embodiments, the expansion of the nasal passages allows reliabledelivery of liquid or powder pooled human immunoglobulin compositionsdescribed herein to the CNS. In some embodiments, exhalation into thedevice propels the therapeutic (e.g., pooled human IgG) into the nose,while at the same time closing the soft-palette, thereby reducingdeposition of the therapeutic into the throat and/or lungs. In oneembodiment, the breath-powered technology device administers an IgGcomposition described herein into one nostril. In one embodiment, thebreath-powered technology device administers an IgG compositiondescribed herein into two nostrils.

Non-limiting examples of commercial intranasal delivery devices includethe EQUADEL® nasal spray pump (Aptar Pharma), the Solovent dry powderdevice (BD Technologies), the Unidose nasal drug delivery device(Consort Medical PLC), the NasoNeb® Nasal Nebulizer (MedInvent, LLC),the VeriDoser® nasal delivery device (Mystic Pharmaceuticals), the VRx2™nasal delivery device (Mystic Pharmaceuticals), the DirectHaler™ Nasaldevice (Direct-Haler A/S), the TriViar™ single-use unit-dose dry powderinhaler (Trimel Pharmaceuticals), the SinuStar™ Aerosol Delivery System(Pari USA), the Aero Pump (Aero Pump GmbH), the Fit-Lizer™ nasaldelivery device (Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories), the LMA MADNasal™ device (LMA North America, Inc.), the Compleo intranasalbioadhesive gel delivery system (Trimel Pharmaceuticals), Impel'sPressurized Olfactory Delivery (POD) device (Impel Neuropharma), theViaNase™ electronic atomizer (Kurve Technology, Inc.), the OptiNosepowder delivery device (OptiNose US Inc.), and the Optinose liquiddelivery device (OptiNose US Inc.)

In one embodiment, an intranasal device described herein can deliver10%-20% of the metered IgG dose to the olfactory region. In oneembodiment, an intranasal device described herein can deliver 20%-30% ofthe metered IgG dose to the olfactory region. In one embodiment, anintranasal device described herein can deliver 5%-20% of the metered IgGdose to the olfactory region. In one embodiment, an intranasal devicedescribed herein can deliver 30%-40% of the metered IgG dose to theolfactory region. In one embodiment, an intranasal device describedherein can deliver 40%-50% of the metered IgG dose to the olfactoryregion. In one embodiment, an intranasal device described herein candeliver 60%-70% of the metered IgG dose to the olfactory region. In oneembodiment, an intranasal device described herein can deliver 60%-80% ofthe metered IgG dose to the olfactory region. In one embodiment, anintranasal device described herein can deliver 70%-80% of the meteredIgG dose to the olfactory region. In one embodiment, an intranasaldevice described herein can deliver 80%-90% of the metered IgG dose tothe olfactory region. In one embodiment, an intranasal device describedherein can deliver 60%-80% of the metered IgG dose to the olfactoryregion.

In certain embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulin compositions areadministered by an intranasal device described above in one or moredoses. In one embodiment the more than one dose is administer by theintranasal device in alternating nostrils. In one embodiment, the morethan one does is administered by the intranasal device at different timepoints throughout the day. In certain embodiments the more than one doseis two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve,thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, eighteen, nineteen, ortwenty or more doses. In certain embodiments the more than one dose isadministered by the intranasal device one, two, three, four, five, six,seven, eight, nine, or ten or more time points throughout the day.

In certain embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulin compositions areadministered by an intranasal device described above in an initial doseor set of doses followed by repeat maintenance doses. In certainembodiments the initial dose is one, two, three, four, five, six, seven,eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen,seventeen, eighteen, nineteen, or twenty or more doses.

In another embodiment, a gel, cream, ointment, lotion, or pastecontaining pooled human IgG is applied onto the nasal epithelium, forexample, by use of an application stick or swab. In a particularembodiment, a gel, cream, ointment, lotion, or paste containing pooledhuman IgG is applied directly onto a nasal epithelium of the subject. Ina more specific embodiment, a gel, cream, ointment, lotion, or pastecontaining pooled human IgG is applied directly onto the olfactoryepithelium of the subject.

In certain embodiments, a substantial fraction of the therapeutic agentpresent in the composition is delivered directly to one or more nasalepithelium. In certain embodiments, at least 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%,50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 100% of thetherapeutic agent present in the composition is delivered directly to anasal epithelium. In a specific embodiment, a substantial fraction ofthe therapeutic agent present in the composition is delivered directlyto the olfactory epithelium. In a more specific embodiment, at least25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%,95%, or 100% of the therapeutic agent present in the composition isdelivered directly to the olfactory epithelium. In another specificembodiment, a substantial fraction of the therapeutic agent present inthe composition is delivered directly to nasal epithelium innervatedwith trigeminal nerves. In a more specific embodiment, at least 25%,30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or100% of the therapeutic agent present in the composition is delivereddirectly to nasal epithelium innervated with trigeminal nerves.

In some embodiments, pooled human IgG can be administered to a subjectas a combination therapy with another treatment, e.g., another treatmentfor a disorder of the central nervous system (e.g., Alzheimer's disease,age-related dementia, Parkinson's disease, or multiple sclerosis). Forexample, the combination therapy can include administering to thesubject (e.g., a human patient) one or more additional agents thatprovide a therapeutic benefit to the subject who has, or is at risk ofdeveloping, a disorder of the central nervous system, e.g., Alzheimer'sdisease. In some embodiments, the pooled human IgG and the one or moreadditional agents are administered at the same time. In otherembodiments, the pooled human IgG is administered first in time and theone or more additional agents are administered second in time. In someembodiments, the one or more additional agents are administered first intime and the pooled human IgG is administered second in time.

The pooled human IgG can replace or augment a previously or currentlyadministered therapy. For example, upon treating with pooled human IgG,administration of the one or more additional agents can cease ordiminish, e.g., be administered at lower levels. In other embodiments,administration of the previous therapy is maintained. In someembodiments, a previous therapy will be maintained until the level ofpolyclonal IgG reaches a level sufficient to provide a therapeuticeffect. The two therapies can be administered in combination.

In one embodiment, a human receiving a first therapy for a disorder ofthe central nervous system, e.g., Alzheimer's disease, who is thentreated with pooled human IgG, continues to receive the first therapy atthe same or a reduced amount. In another embodiment, treatment with thefirst therapy overlaps for a time with treatment with pooled human IgG,but treatment with the first therapy is subsequently halted.

In a particular embodiment, pooled human IgG may be administered incombination with a treatment for an age-related dementia, e.g.,Alzheimer's disease. In certain embodiments, the treatment for anage-related dementia co-administered with pooled human IgG isadministration of a cholinesterase inhibitor (e.g., ARICEPT (donepezil),EXELON (rivastigmine), RAZADYNE (galantamine), or COGNEX (tacrine), oran inhibitor of the NMDA-type glutamate receptor (e.g., memantine).

In further embodiments the second therapy is levodopa (L-DOPA). Thesecond therapy can also be a dopamine agonist. Non-limiting examples ofdopamine agonists include bromocriptine, pergolide, pramipexole,ropinirole, piribedil, cabergoline, apomorphine and lisuride. The secondtherapy can be a MAO-B inhibitor. Non-limiting examples of MAO-Binhibitors are selegiline and rasgiline. Addition second therapies caninclude amantaine, anticholinergic compositions, clozapine, modafinil,and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

In further embodiments the second therapy is CAMPATH (alemtuzumab),ZENAPX (daclizumab), rituximab, dirucotide, BHT-3009, cladribine,dimethyl fumarate, estriol, laquinimod, pegylated interferon-β-1a,minocycline, statins, temsirolimus, teriflunomide, and low dosenaltexone.

In certain embodiments the second therapy is psychotherapy. Non-limitingexamples of psychotherapy are psychosocial intervention, behavioralintervention, reminiscence therapy, validation therapy, supportivepsychotherapy, sensory integration, simulated presence therapy,cognitive retraining, and stimulation-oriented therapies such as art,music, pet, exercise, and recreational activities.

Furthermore, two or more second therapies can be combined withtherapeutic intranasal IgG. For example, therapeutic intranasal IgG canbe combined with memantine and donepezil.

Dosing

The use of intravenous immunoglobulin G (IVIG) for the treatment ofdisorders of the central nervous system (CNS) is currently underinvestigation (Awad et al. 2011 (Current Neuropharmacology, 9:417428);Pohl et al. 2012 (Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 14:264-275);Krause et al. 2012 (European J. of Paediatric Neurology, 16:206-208);Elovaara et al. 2011 (Clinical Neuropharmacology, 34(2):84-89);Perlmutter, et al. 1999 (The Lancet, 354:1153-1158); Snider et al. 2003(J. of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 13(supp 1): S81-S88). Inthese trials, subjects are administered between 0.4 g/kg body weight and2.0 g/kg body weight IVIG per dosage. Specifically, the treatmentregimes of CNS disorders with IVIG range from 0.4 g/kg body weight IVIGadministered once daily for 5 consecutive days to 2.0 g/kg body weightIVIG administered once daily for 2 consecutive days. There are severalvariations of these IVIG treatment regimes. For example, IVIG treatmentregimes may be 1.0 g/kg body weight IVIG administered twice a day (total2.0 g/kg body weight IVIG per day). The initial 2 to 5 day IVIG dosagescan also be followed with maintenance doses ranging from 0.4 g/kg to 0.5g/kg body weight IVIG. Due to the limited supply of pooled human IgG,and high cost associated therewith, large-scale implementation of thesetreatments may prove problematic if they are approved by majorregulatory bodies.

Typical intravenous dosing of IgG in human Alzheimer's trials rangesfrom 200 mg/kg to 400 mg/kg every two weeks. Advantageously, theinventors have found that levels of pooled human IgG seen in the brainafter intravenous administration can also be achieved by intranasaladministration. For example, it is shown in Example 3 thatadministration of pooled human IgG (0.02 g/kg IgG) intranasally as drops(IN1) or a liquid spray delivered directly to the olfactory epithelium(IN3) results in substantially the same amount of IgG being delivered tothe right and left hemispheres of the brain as for intravenousadministration of pooled human IgG (0.02 g/kg IgG; compare corrected AUCvalues for right and left hemisphere IgG delivery in Table 69, Table 71,and Table 72). Significantly, intranasal administration of IgG liquiddrops at concentrations ten-fold lower (0.002 g/kg IgG) also resulted inthe delivery of intact IgG to the cerebral cortex (see, Table 70). Anyreduction in the amount of pooled human IgG required for administrationis significant because of the limited supply of pooled human IgG and thehigh cost associated therewith.

Accordingly, in certain embodiments, the methods for treating a CNSdisorder provided herein include intranasally administering from about0.05 mg of pooled human IgG per kg body weight (mg/kg IgG) to about 500mg/kg IgG in a single dosage.

In certain embodiments, the methods for treating a CNS disorder providedherein include intranasally administering a low dose of pooled humanIgG. In one embodiment, a low dose of pooled human IgG is from about0.05 mg/kg IgG to about 10 mg/kg IgG. In specific embodiments, a lowdose of pooled human IgG is about 0.05 mg/kg, 0.06 mg/kg, 0.07 mg/kg,0.08 mg/kg, 0.09 mg/kg, 0.10 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, 0.20 mg/kg, 0.25 mg/kg,0.30 mg/kg, 0.35 mg/kg, 0.40 mg/kg, 0.45 mg/kg, 0.50 mg/kg, 0.55 mg/kg,0.60 mg/kg, 0.65 mg/kg, 0.70 mg/kg, 0.75 mg/kg, 0.80 mg/kg, 0.85 mg/kg,0.90 mg/kg, 0.95 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg, 3.0mg/kg, 3.5 mg/kg, 4.0 mg/kg, 4.5 mg/kg, 5.0 mg/kg, 6.0 mg/kg, 7.0 mg/kg,8.0 mg/kg, 9.0 mg/kg, or 10.0 mg/kg IgG. In yet other embodiments, a lowdose of pooled human IgG is from 0.1 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg to 5mg/kg, 1 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, 1mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg to 8mg/kg, 3 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg, 1mg/kg to 6 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg to 6mg/kg, 5 mg/kg to 6 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg, or 3mg/kg to 4 mg/kg IgG.

In certain embodiments, the methods for treating a CNS disorder providedherein include intranasally administering a medium dose of pooled humanIgG. In one embodiment, a medium dose of pooled human IgG is from about10 mg/kg IgG to about 100 mg/kg IgG. In specific embodiments, a mediumdose of pooled human IgG is about 10 mg/kg, 11 mg/kg, 12 mg/kg, 13mg/kg, 14 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, 16 mg/kg, 17 mg/kg, 18 mg/kg, 19 mg/kg, 20mg/kg, 21 mg/kg, 22 mg/kg, 23 mg/kg, 24 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg, 26 mg/kg, 27mg/kg, 28 mg/kg, 29 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, 31 mg/kg, 32 mg/kg, 33 mg/kg, 34mg/kg, 35 mg/kg, 36 mg/kg, 37 mg/kg, 38 mg/kg, 39 mg/kg, 40 mg/kg, 41mg/kg, 42 mg/kg, 43 mg/kg, 44 mg/kg, 45 mg/kg, 46 mg/kg, 47 mg/kg, 48mg/kg, 49 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or 100mg/kg IgG. In yet other embodiments, a medium dose of pooled human IgGis from 10 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg to 100mg/kg, 75 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg to 75 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg to 75mg/kg, 50 mg/kg to 75 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg,or 10 mg/kg to 25 mg/kg IgG.

In some embodiments, the methods for treating a CNS disorder providedherein include intranasally administering a high dose of pooled humanIgG. In one embodiment, a high dose of pooled human IgG is from about100 mg/kg IgG to about 400 mg/kg IgG. In specific embodiments, a highdose of pooled human IgG is about 100 mg/kg, 110, 120 mg/kg, 130 mg/kg,140 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg, 175 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, 225 mg/kg, 250 mg/kg, 275mg/kg, 300 mg/kg, 325 mg/kg, 350 mg/kg, 375 mg/kg, 400 mg/kg, or higher.In yet other embodiments, a high dose of pooled human IgG is from 100mg/kg to 400 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg to 400 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg to 400 mg/kg, 250mg/kg to 400 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg to 400 mg/kg, 350 mg/kg to 400 mg/kg, 100mg/kg to 300 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg to 300 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg to 300 mg/kg, 250mg/kg to 300 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg, or100 mg/kg to 150 mg/kg IgG.

In some embodiments, pooled human IgG is administered at a set dosage,regardless of the weight of the subject. Without being bound by theory,unlike intravenous administration, the final concentration of IgG in thebrain should be independent of total body weight when administeredintranasally since the therapeutic will travel directly from the nose tothe brain. Accordingly, a standard dose of intranasal pooled human IgG,which is independent of body weight, may simplify the process of dosingindividual subjects.

Accordingly, in one embodiment, the methods described herein includeintranasal administration of a fixed dose of pooled human IgG of fromabout 50 mg to about 10 g. In some embodiments, the fixed dose of IgG isabout 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, 150 mg, 175 mg, 200 mg, 225 mg, 250mg, 275 mg, 300 mg, 350 mg, 400 mg, 450 mg, 500 mg, 550 mg, 600 mg, 650mg, 700 mg, 750 mg, 800 mg, 850 mg, 900 mg, 950 mg, 1.0 g, 1.25 g, 1.5g, 1.75 g, 2.0 g, 2.5 g, 3.0 g, 3.5 g, 4.0 g, 4.5 g, 5.0 g, 5.5 g, 6.0g, 6.5 g, 7.0 g, 7.5 g, 8.0 g, 8.5 g, 9.0 g, 9.5 g, 10.0 g, or more IgG.In other embodiments, the methods described herein include intranasaladministration of from 50 mg to 5 g, 100 mg to 5 g, 250 mg to 5 g, 500mg to 5 g, 750 mg to 5 g, 1 g to 5 g, 2.5 g to 5 g, 50 mg to 2.5 g, 100mg to 2.5 g, 250 mg to 2.5 g, 500 mg to 2.5 g, 750 mg to 2.5 g, 1 g to2.5 g, 50 mg to 1 g, 100 mg to 1 g, 250 mg to 1 g, 500 mg to 1 g, 750 mgto 1 g, 50 mg to 500 mg, 100 mg to 500 mg, 250 mg to 500 mg, 50 mg to250 mg, 100 mg to 250 mg, or 50 mg to 100 mg pooled human IgG.

Depending upon the CNS disorder being treated and the progression of thedisorder in the subject, the pooled human IgG compositions describedherein are intranasally administered to a subject anywhere from severaltimes daily to monthly. For example, a subject diagnosed with a CNSdisorder in an early stage of progression may require only a low dosageand/or low dosage frequency, while a subject diagnosed with a CNSdisorder in a late stage of progression may require a high dose and/orhigh dosage frequency. In yet another embodiment, a subject having ahigh likelihood of developing a CNS disorder may also be prescribed alow dose and/or low dosing frequency as a prophylactic treatment or todelay onset of symptoms associated with a CNS disorder. For example, asubject with a familial history of an age-related dementia (e.g.,Alzheimer's disease) may be intranasally administered pooled human IgGat a low dosage and/or low frequency to delay the onset of symptomsassociated with the age-related dementia. A skilled physician willreadily be able to determine an appropriate dosage and dosing frequencyfor a subject diagnosed with or having a high likelihood of developing aCNS disorder.

In one embodiment, where the progression of a particular CNS disorder ina subject requires frequent dosing, the methods provided herein fortreating a disorder of the central nervous system include administeringa composition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to thesubject at least once a week. In other embodiments, the method includesadministering a composition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G(IgG) to the subject at least two, three, four, five, or six times aweek. In yet another embodiment, the method includes administering acomposition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to thesubject at least once daily. In other embodiments, the method includesadministering a composition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G(IgG) to the subject at least two, three, four, five, or more timesdaily. In a specific embodiment, the CNS disorder is an age-relateddementia, Parkinson's disease, or multiple sclerosis. In a more specificembodiment, the CNS disorder is Alzheimer's disease.

In another embodiment, where the progression of a particular CNSdisorder in a subject requires less frequent dosing, the methodsprovided herein for treating a disorder of the central nervous systeminclude administering a composition comprising pooled humanimmunoglobulin G (IgG) to the subject at least once a month. In otherembodiments, the method includes administering a composition comprisingpooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the subject at least two, three,four, five, six, or more times a month. In yet another embodiment, themethod includes administering a composition comprising pooled humanimmunoglobulin G (IgG) to the subject at least once daily. In otherembodiments, the method includes administering a composition comprisingpooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the subject at least two, three,four, five, or more times daily. In a specific embodiment, the CNSdisorder is an age-related dementia, Parkinson's disease, or multiplesclerosis. In a more specific embodiment, the CNS disorder isAlzheimer's disease.

In certain embodiments, the composition can be administered 1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, or 31 times a month. The composition can beadministered between equally spaced days of the month, for example, onthe 1^(st) and the 15^(th) of each month. Alternatively, the compositioncan be administered in block dosing at the beginning, end, or middle ofthe month. For example, the composition can be administered only on the1^(st), 1^(st)-2^(nd), 1^(st)-3^(rd), 1^(st)-4^(th), 1^(st)-5^(th),1^(st)-6^(th), or 1^(st)-7^(th) days of the month. Similar dosingschemes can be administered toward the middle or end of the month.

In certain embodiments the dosing can change between dosing days. Forexample, on the first day of dosing a subject can receive 10 mg/kg IgGand on the second day of dosing the subject can receive 20 mg/kg IgG.Similarly, a subject who is administered two or more doses per day ofintranasal IgG can receive two different doses. For example, the firstdose of the day can be 10 mg/kg IgG and the second dose of the day canbe 5 mg/kg IgG.

In certain embodiments, the methods provided herein for the treatment ofa CNS disorder include intranasally administering from 0.05 mg/kg to 50mg/kg pooled human immunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. Inother embodiments, the methods provided herein for the treatment of aCNS disorder include intranasally administering pooled human IgG in adosage/frequency combination selected from variations 1 to 816 found inTable 1 and Table 2.

TABLE 1 Exemplary combinations of dosage and frequency for methods oftreating a CNS disorder by intranasal administration of pooled humanIgG. One Two Three Four One Two Three Every Time Times Times Times TimeTimes Times Other Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Weekly Weekly WeeklyDay 0.05 Var. 1 Var. 52 Var. 103 Var. 154 Var. 205 Var. 256 Var. 307Var. 358 mg/kg 0.1 Var. 2 Var. 53 Var. 104 Var. 155 Var. 206 Var. 257Var. 308 Var. 359 mg/kg 0.25 Var. 3 Var. 54 Var. 105 Var. 156 Var. 207Var. 258 Var. 309 Var. 360 mg/kg 0.5 Var. 4 Var. 55 Var. 106 Var. 157Var. 208 Var. 259 Var. 310 Var. 361 mg/kg 0.75 Var. 5 Var. 56 Var. 107Var. 158 Var. 209 Var. 260 Var. 311 Var. 362 mg/kg 1.0 Var. 6 Var. 57Var. 108 Var. 159 Var. 210 Var. 261 Var. 312 Var. 363 mg/kg 1.5 Var. 7Var. 58 Var. 109 Var. 160 Var. 211 Var. 262 Var. 313 Var. 364 mg/kg 2.0Var. 8 Var. 59 Var. 110 Var. 161 Var. 212 Var. 263 Var. 314 Var. 365mg/kg 2.5 Var. 9 Var. 60 Var. 111 Var. 162 Var. 213 Var. 264 Var. 315Var. 366 mg/kg 3.0 Var. 10 Var. 61 Var. 112 Var. 163 Var. 214 Var. 265Var. 316 Var. 367 mg/kg 3.5 Var. 11 Var. 62 Var. 113 Var. 164 Var. 215Var. 266 Var. 317 Var. 368 mg/kg 4.0 Var. 12 Var. 63 Var. 114 Var. 165Var. 216 Var. 267 Var. 318 Var. 369 mg/kg 4.5 Var. 13 Var. 64 Var. 115Var. 166 Var. 217 Var. 268 Var. 319 Var. 370 mg/kg 5.0 Var. 14 Var. 65Var. 116 Var. 167 Var. 218 Var. 269 Var. 320 Var. 371 mg/kg 6.0 Var. 15Var. 66 Var. 117 Var. 168 Var. 219 Var. 270 Var. 321 Var.372 mg/kg 7.0Var. 16 Var. 67 Var. 118 Var. 169 Var. 220 Var. 271 Var. 322 Var. 373mg/kg 8.0 Var. 17 Var. 68 Var. 119 Var. 170 Var. 221 Var. 272 Var. 323Var. 374 mg/kg 9.0 Var. 18 Var. 69 Var. 120 Var. 171 Var. 222 Var. 273Var. 324 Var.375 mg/kg 10 Var. 19 Var. 70 Var. 121 Var. 172 Var. 223Var. 274 Var. 325 Var. 376 mg/kg 11 Var. 20 Var. 71 Var. 122 Var. 173Var. 224 Var. 275 Var. 326 Var.377 mg/kg 12 Var. 21 Var. 72 Var. 123Var. 174 Var. 225 Var. 276 Var. 327 Var. 378 mg/kg 13 Var. 22 Var. 73Var. 124 Var. 175 Var. 226 Var. 277 Var. 328 Var. 379 mg/kg 14 Var. 23Var. 74 Var. 125 Var. 176 Var. 227 Var. 278 Var. 329 Var. 380 mg/kg 15Var. 24 Var. 75 Var. 126 Var. 177 Var. 228 Var. 279 Var. 330 Var. 381mg/kg 16 Var. 25 Var. 76 Var. 127 Var. 178 Var. 229 Var. 280 Var. 331Var. 382 mg/kg 17 Var. 26 Var. 77 Var. 128 Var. 179 Var. 230 Var. 281Var. 332 Var. 383 mg/kg 18 Var. 27 Var. 78 Var. 129 Var. 180 Var. 231Var. 282 Var. 333 Var. 384 mg/kg 19 Var. 28 Var. 79 Var. 130 Var. 181Var. 232 Var. 283 Var. 334 Var. 385 mg/kg 20 Var. 29 Var. 80 Var. 131Var. 182 Var. 233 Var. 284 Var. 335 Var. 386 mg/kg 22.5 Var. 30 Var. 81Var. 132 Var. 183 Var. 234 Var. 285 Var. 336 Var. 387 mg/kg 25 Var. 31Var. 82 Var. 133 Var. 184 Var. 235 Var. 286 Var. 337 Var. 388 mg/kg 27.5Var. 32 Var. 83 Var. 134 Var. 185 Var. 236 Var. 287 Var. 338 Var. 389mg/kg 30 Var. 33 Var. 84 Var. 135 Var. 186 Var. 237 Var. 288 Var. 339Var. 390 mg/kg 32.5 Var. 34 Var. 85 Var. 136 Var. 187 Var. 238 Var. 289Var. 340 Var. 391 mg/kg 35 Var. 35 Var. 86 Var. 137 Var. 188 Var. 239Var. 290 Var. 341 Var. 392 mg/kg 37.5 Var. 36 Var. 87 Var. 138 Var. 189Var. 240 Var. 291 Var. 342 Var. 393 mg/kg 40 Var. 37 Var. 88 Var. 139Var. 190 Var. 241 Var. 292 Var. 343 Var. 394 mg/kg 45 Var. 38 Var. 89Var. 140 Var. 191 Var. 242 Var. 293 Var. 344 Var. 395 mg/kg 50 Var. 39Var. 90 Var. 141 Var. 192 Var. 243 Var. 294 Var. 345 Var. 396 mg/kg0.5-40 Var. 40 Var. 91 Var. 142 Var. 193 Var. 244 Var. 295 Var. 346 Var.397 mg/kg 0.5-30 Var. 41 Var. 92 Var. 143 Var. 194 Var. 245 Var. 296Var. 347 Var. 398 mg/kg 0.5-20 Var. 42 Var. 93 Var. 144 Var. 195 Var.246 Var. 297 Var. 348 Var. 399 mg/kg 0.5-20 Var. 43 Var. 94 Var. 145Var. 196 Var. 247 Var. 298 Var. 349 Var. 400 mg/kg 0.5-10 Var. 44 Var.95 Var. 146 Var. 197 Var. 248 Var. 299 Var. 350 Var. 401 mg/kg 0.5-5Var. 45 Var. 96 Var. 147 Var. 198 Var. 249 Var. 300 Var. 351 Var. 402mg/kg 1-20 Var. 46 Var. 97 Var. 148 Var. 199 Var. 250 Var. 301 Var. 352Var. 403 mg/kg 1-15 Var. 47 Var. 98 Var. 149 Var. 200 Var. 251 Var. 302Var. 353 Var. 404 mg/kg 1-10 Var. 48 Var. 99 Var. 150 Var. 201 Var. 252Var. 303 Var. 354 Var. 405 mg/kg 1-5 Var. 49 Var. 100 Var. 151 Var. 202Var. 253 Var. 304 Var. 355 Var. 406 mg/kg 2-10 Var. 50 Var. 101 Var. 152Var. 203 Var. 254 Var. 305 Var. 356 Var. 407 mg/kg 2-5 Var. 51 Var. 102Var. 153 Var. 204 Var. 255 Var. 306 Var. 357 Var. 408 mg/kg * Var. =variation

TABLE 2 Exemplary combinations of dosage and frequency for methods oftreating a CNS disorder by intranasal administration of pooled humanIgG. Four Five Six One Two Three Four Five Times Times Times Time TimesTimes Times Times Weekly Weekly Weekly Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily0.05 Var. 409 Var. 460 Var. 511 Var. 562 Var. 613 Var. 664 Var. 715 Var.766 mg/kg 0.1 Var. 410 Var. 461 Var. 512 Var. 563 Var. 614 Var. 665 Var.716 Var. 767 mg/kg 0.25 Var. 411 Var. 462 Var. 513 Var. 564 Var. 615Var. 666 Var. 717 Var. 768 mg/kg 0.5 Var. 412 Var. 463 Var. 514 Var. 565Var. 616 Var. 667 Var. 718 Var. 769 mg/kg 0.75 Var. 413 Var. 464 Var.515 Var. 566 Var. 617 Var. 668 Var. 719 Var. 770 mg/kg 1.0 Var. 414 Var.465 Var. 516 Var. 567 Var. 618 Var. 669 Var. 720 Var. 771 mg/kg 1.5 Var.415 Var. 466 Var. 517 Var. 568 Var. 619 Var. 670 Var. 721 Var. 772 mg/kg2.0 Var. 416 Var. 467 Var. 518 Var. 569 Var. 620 Var. 671 Var. 722 Var.773 mg/kg 2.5 Var. 417 Var. 468 Var. 519 Var. 570 Var. 621 Var. 672 Var.723 Var. 774 mg/kg 3.0 Var. 418 Var. 469 Var. 520 Var. 571 Var. 622 Var.673 Var. 724 Var. 775 mg/kg 3.5 Var. 419 Var. 470 Var. 521 Var. 572 Var.623 Var. 674 Var. 725 Var. 776 mg/kg 4.0 Var. 420 Var. 471 Var. 522 Var.573 Var. 624 Var. 675 Var. 726 Var. 777 mg/kg 4.5 Var. 421 Var. 472 Var.523 Var. 574 Var. 625 Var. 676 Var. 727 Var. 778 mg/kg 5.0 Var. 422 Var.473 Var. 524 Var. 575 Var. 626 Var. 677 Var. 728 Var. 779 mg/kg 6.0 Var.423 Var. 474 Var. 525 Var. 576 Var. 627 Var. 678 Var. 729 Var. 780 mg/kg7.0 Var. 424 Var. 475 Var. 526 Var. 577 Var. 628 Var. 679 Var. 730 Var.781 mg/kg 8.0 Var. 425 Var. 476 Var. 527 Var. 578 Var. 629 Var. 680 Var.731 Var. 782 mg/kg 9.0 Var. 426 Var. 477 Var. 528 Var. 579 Var. 630 Var.681 Var. 732 Var. 783 mg/kg 10 Var. 427 Var. 478 Var. 529 Var. 580 Var.631 Var. 682 Var. 733 Var. 784 mg/kg 11 Var. 428 Var. 479 Var. 530 Var.581 Var. 632 Var. 683 Var. 734 Var. 785 mg/kg 12 Var. 429 Var. 480 Var.531 Var. 582 Var. 633 Var. 684 Var. 735 Var. 786 mg/kg 13 Var. 430 Var.481 Var. 532 Var. 583 Var. 634 Var. 685 Var. 736 Var. 787 mg/kg 14 Var.431 Var. 482 Var. 533 Var. 584 Var. 635 Var. 686 Var. 737 Var. 788 mg/kg15 Var. 432 Var. 483 Var. 534 Var. 585 Var. 636 Var. 687 Var. 738 Var.789 mg/kg 16 Var. 433 Var. 484 Var. 535 Var. 586 Var. 637 Var. 688 Var.739 Var. 790 mg/kg 17 Var. 434 Var. 485 Var. 536 Var. 587 Var. 638 Var.689 Var. 740 Var. 791 mg/kg 18 Var. 435 Var. 486 Var. 537 Var. 588 Var.639 Var. 690 Var. 741 Var. 792 mg/kg 19 Var. 436 Var. 487 Var. 538 Var.589 Var. 640 Var. 691 Var. 742 Var. 793 mg/kg 20 Var. 437 Var. 488 Var.539 Var. 590 Var. 641 Var. 692 Var. 743 Var. 794 mg/kg 22.5 Var. 438Var. 489 Var. 540 Var. 591 Var. 642 Var. 693 Var. 744 Var. 795 mg/kg 25Var. 439 Var. 490 Var. 541 Var. 592 Var. 643 Var. 694 Var. 745 Var. 796mg/kg 27.5 Var. 440 Var. 491 Var. 542 Var. 593 Var. 644 Var. 695 Var.746 Var. 797 mg/kg 30 Var. 441 Var. 492 Var. 543 Var. 594 Var. 645 Var.696 Var. 747 Var. 798 mg/kg 32.5 Var. 442 Var. 493 Var. 544 Var. 595Var. 646 Var. 697 Var. 748 Var. 799 mg/kg 35 Var. 443 Var. 494 Var. 545Var. 596 Var. 647 Var. 698 Var. 749 Var. 800 mg/kg 37.5 Var. 444 Var.495 Var. 546 Var. 597 Var. 648 Var. 699 Var. 750 Var. 801 mg/kg 40 Var.445 Var. 496 Var. 547 Var. 598 Var. 649 Var. 700 Var. 751 Var. 802 mg/kg45 Var. 446 Var. 497 Var. 548 Var. 599 Var. 650 Var. 701 Var. 752 Var.803 mg/kg 50 Var. 447 Var. 498 Var. 549 Var. 600 Var. 651 Var. 702 Var.753 Var. 804 mg/kg 0.5-40 Var. 448 Var. 499 Var. 550 Var. 601 Var. 652Var. 703 Var. 754 Var. 805 mg/kg 0.5-30 Var. 449 Var. 500 Var. 551 Var.602 Var. 653 Var. 704 Var. 755 Var. 806 mg/kg 0.5-20 Var. 450 Var. 501Var. 552 Var. 603 Var. 654 Var. 705 Var. 756 Var. 807 mg/kg 0.5-20 Var.451 Var. 502 Var. 553 Var. 604 Var. 655 Var. 706 Var. 757 Var. 808 mg/kg0.5-10 Var. 452 Var. 503 Var. 554 Var. 605 Var. 656 Var. 707 Var. 758Var. 809 mg/kg 0.5-5 Var. 453 Var. 504 Var. 555 Var. 606 Var. 657 Var.708 Var. 759 Var. 810 mg/kg 1-20 Var. 454 Var. 505 Var. 556 Var. 607Var. 658 Var. 709 Var. 760 Var. 811 mg/kg 1-15 Var. 455 Var. 506 Var.557 Var. 608 Var. 659 Var. 710 Var. 761 Var. 812 mg/kg 1-10 Var. 456Var. 507 Var. 558 Var. 609 Var. 660 Var. 711 Var. 762 Var. 813 mg/kg 1-5Var. 457 Var. 508 Var. 559 Var. 610 Var. 661 Var. 712 Var. 763 Var. 814mg/kg 2-10 Var. 458 Var. 509 Var. 560 Var. 611 Var. 662 Var. 713 Var.764 Var. 815 mg/kg 2-5 Var. 459 Var. 510 Var. 561 Var. 612 Var. 663 Var.714 Var. 765 Var. 816 mg/kg * Var. = variation

Formulation

Pharmaceutical compositions of pooled human immunoglobulin G describedherein can be prepared in accordance with methods well known androutinely practiced in the art. See, e.g., Remington: The Science andPractice of Pharmacy, Mack Publishing Co., 20^(th) ed., 2000; andSustained and Controlled Release Drug Delivery Systems, J. R. Robinson,ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1978. Pharmaceutical compositionsare preferably manufactured under GMP conditions. Typically, atherapeutically effective dose or efficacious dose of the pooled humanIgG preparation is employed in the pharmaceutical compositions describedherein. The pharmaceutical composition can be formulated into dosageforms by conventional methods known to those of skill in the art. Dosageregimens are adjusted to provide the optimum desired response (e.g., atherapeutic response). For example, a single bolus may be administered,several divided doses may be administered over time or the dose may beproportionally reduced or increased as indicated by the exigencies ofthe therapeutic situation. It can be advantageous to formulateparenteral compositions in dosage unit form for ease of administrationand uniformity of dosage. Dosage unit form as used herein refers tophysically discrete units suited as unitary dosages for the subjects tobe treated; each unit contains a predetermined quantity of activecompound calculated to produce the desired therapeutic effect inassociation with the required pharmaceutical carrier.

Actual dosage levels can be varied so as to obtain an amount of theactive ingredient which is effective to achieve the desired therapeuticresponse for a particular patient without being toxic to the patient. Aphysician can start doses of the pharmaceutical composition at levelslower than that required to achieve the desired therapeutic effect andgradually increase the dosage until the desired effect is achieved. Ingeneral, effective doses vary depending upon many different factors,including the specific disease or condition to be treated, its severity,physiological state of the patient, other medications administered, andwhether treatment is prophylactic or therapeutic.

In one embodiment, a therapeutic composition of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration does not contain a permeabilityenhancer. Permeability enhancers facilitate the transport of moleculesthrough the mucosa, including the mucous, and the nasal epithelium.Non-limiting examples of absorption enhancers include mucoadhesives,ciliary beat inhibitors, mucous fluidizers, membrane fluidizers, andtight junction modulators. Specific non-limiting examples include bilesalts, phospholipids, sodium glycyrrhetinate, sodium caprate, ammoniumtartrate, gamma. aminolevulinic acid, oxalic acid, malonic acid,succinic acid, maleic acid, and oxaloacetic acid.

In addition to pooled human IgG, the pharmaceutical compositionsprovided herein include one or more stabilizing agents. In a specificembodiment, the stabilizing agent is a buffering agent suitable forintranasal administration. Non-limiting examples of buffering agentssuitable for formulating the pooled human IgG compositions providedherein include an amino acid (e.g., glycine, histidine, or proline) asalt (e.g., citrate, phosphate, acetate, glutamate, tartrate, benzoate,lactate, gluconate, malate, succinate, formate, propionate, orcarbonate), or any combination thereof adjusted to an appropriate pH.Generally, the buffering agent will be sufficient to maintain a suitablepH in the formulation for an extended period of time. In a particularembodiment, the buffering agent is sufficient to maintain a pH of 4 to7.5. In a specific embodiment, the buffering agent is sufficient tomaintain a pH of approximately 4.0, or approximately 4.5, orapproximately 5.0, or approximately 5.5, or approximately 6.0, orapproximately 6.5, or approximately 7.0, or approximately 7.5.

In a particular embodiment, a pooled human IgG composition describedherein for the treatment of a CNS disorder via intranasal administrationcontains a stabilizing amount of an amino acid. In certain embodiments,a stabilizing amount of an amino acid is from about 25 mM to about 500mM

In a particular embodiment, the stabilizing agent employed in the pooledhuman IgG compositions provided herein is an amino acid. Non-limitingexamples of amino acids include isoleucine, alanine, leucine,asparagine, lysine, aspartic acid, methionine, cysteine, phenylalanine,glutamic acid, threonine, glutamine, tryptophan, glycine, valine,proline, selenocysteine, serine, tyrosine, arginine, histidine,ornithine, taurine, combinations thereof, and the like. In oneembodiment, the stabilizing amino acids include arginine, histidine,lysine, serine, proline, glycine, alanine, threonine, and a combinationthereof. In a preferred embodiment, the amino acid is glycine. Inanother preferred embodiment, the amino acid is proline. In yet anotherpreferred embodiment, the amino acid is histidine.

For purposes of stabilizing the compositions provided herein, thebuffering agent (e.g., glycine, histidine, or proline) will typically beadded to the formulation (or to a solution from which a dry powdercomposition is to be prepared) at a concentration from 5 mM to 0.75 M.In one embodiment, at least 100 mM of the buffering agent is added tothe formulation. In another embodiment, at least 200 mM of the bufferingagent is added to the formulation. In yet another embodiment, at least250 mM of the buffering agent is added to the formulation. In yet otherembodiments, the formulations provided herein contains at least 25 mM,50 mM, 75 mM, 100 mM, 150 mM, 200 mM, 250 mM, 300 mM, 350 mM, 400 mM,450 mM, 500 mM, 550 mM, 600 mM, 650 mM, 700 mM, 750 mM, or more of thebuffering agent. In a specific embodiment, the buffering agent isglycine.

In one embodiment, the concentration of buffering agent (e.g., glycine,histidine, or proline) in the formulation (or in the solution from whicha dry powder composition is to be prepared) is at or about from 5 mM to500 mM. In certain embodiments, the concentration of the buffering agentin the formulation will be at or about 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM, 20 mM, 25 mM,50 mM, 75 mM, 100 mM, 125 mM, 150 mM, 175 mM, 200 mM, 225 mM, 250 mM,275 mM, 300 mM, 325 mM, 350 mM, 375 mM, 400 mM, 425 mM, 450 mM, 475 mM,500 mM or higher. In a specific embodiment, the buffering agent isglycine.

In yet other embodiments, the concentration of the buffering agent(e.g., glycine, histidine, or proline) in formulation (or in thesolution from which a dry powder composition is to be prepared) is from50 mM to 500 mM, 100 mM to 500 mM, 200 mM to 500 mM, 250 mM to 500 mM,300 mM to 500 mM, 50 mM to 300 mM, 100 mM to 300 mM, 200 mM to 300 mM,or 225 mM to 275 mM. In yet other specific embodiments, theconcentration of the buffering agent (e.g., glycine, histidine, orproline) in formulations provided herein is 250±50 mM, 250±40 mM, 250±30mM, 250±25 mM, 250±20 mM, 250±15 mM, 250±10 mM, 250±5 mM, or 250 mM.

In some embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulins are formulatedwith between 100 mM and 400 mM histidine; no more than 10 mM of analkali metal cation; and a pH between 5.0 and 7.0.

In some embodiments of the pooled human immunoglobulin histidineformulation, the concentration of histidine is between 5 mM and 500 mM.In another embodiment, the concentration of histidine in the formulationwill be between 100 mM and 400 mM. In another embodiment, theconcentration of histidine in the formulation will be between 200 mM and300 mM. In another embodiment, the concentration of histidine in theformulation will be between 225 mM and 275 mM. In another embodiment,the concentration of histidine in the formulation will be between 240 mMand 260 mM. In a particular embodiment, the concentration of histidinewill be 250 mM. In certain other embodiments, the concentration ofhistidine in the formulation will be 5±0.5 mM, 10±1 mM, 15±1.5 mM, 20±2mM, 25±2.5 mM, 50±5 mM, 75±7.5 mM, 100±10 mM, 125±12.5 mM, 150±15 mM,175±17.5 mM, 200±20 mM, 225±22.5 mM, 250±25 mM, 275±27.5 mM, 300±30 mM,325±32.5 mM, 350±35 mM, 375±37.5 mM, 400±40 mM, 425±42.5 mM, 450±45 mM,475±47.5 mM, 500±50 mM or higher. In yet other embodiments, theconcentration of histidine in the formulation will be 5 mM, 10 mM, 15mM, 20 mM, 25 mM, 50 mM, 75 mM, 100 mM, 125 mM, 150 mM, 175 mM, 200 mM,225 mM, 250 mM, 275 mM, 300 mM, 325 mM, 350 mM, 375 mM, 400 mM, 425 mM,450 mM, 475 mM, 500 mM or higher.

In some embodiments of the pooled human immunoglobulin histidineformulation, the pH of the histidine formulation is from 4.0 to 7.5. Insome embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from 4.0 to6.0. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from4.0 to 4.5. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation isfrom 4.5 to 5.0. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidineformulation is from 4.0 to 5.5. In some embodiments, the pH of thehistidine formulation is from 4.0 to 6.5. In some embodiments, the pH ofthe histidine formulation is from 4.0 to 7.0. In some embodiments, thepH of the histidine formulation is from 4.5 to 6.0. In some embodiments,the pH of the histidine formulation is from 4.5 to 6.5. In someembodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from 4.5 to 7.0. Insome embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from 4.5 to7.5. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from5.5 to 7.0. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation isfrom 6.0 to 7.0. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidineformulation is from 6.5 to 7.0. In some embodiments, the pH of thehistidine formulation is from 5.0 to 6.5. In some embodiments, the pH ofthe histidine formulation is from 5.0 to 7.0. In some embodiments, thepH of the histidine formulation is from 5.5 to 6.5. In some embodiments,the pH of the histidine formulation is from 6.0 to 6.5. In someembodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from 5.0 to 6.0. Insome embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from 5.5 to6.0. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is from5.0 to 5.5. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation isfrom 7.0 to 7.5. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidineformulation is from 6.0 to 7.5. In some embodiments, the pH of thehistidine formulation is from 5.5 to 7.5. In some embodiments, the pH ofthe histidine formulation is from 5.0 to 7.5. In some embodiments, thepH of the histidine formulation is 5.0±0.2, 5.1±0.2, 5.2±0.2, 5.3±0.2,5.4±0.2, 5.5±0.2, 5.6±0.2, 5.7±0.2, 5.8±0.2, 5.9±0.2, 6.0±0.2, 6.1±0.2,6.2±0.2, 6.3±0.2, 6.4±0.2, 6.5±0.2, 6.6±0.2, 6.7±0.2, 6.8±0.2, 6.9±0.2,or 7.0±0.2. In some embodiments, the pH of the histidine formulation is5.0±0.1, 5.1±0.1, 5.2±0.1, 5.3±0.1, 5.4±0.1, 5.5±0.1, 5.6±0.1, 5.7±0.1,5.8±0.1, 5.9±0.1, 6.0±0.1, 6.1±0.1, 6.2±0.1, 6.3±0.1, 6.4±0.1, 6.5±0.1,6.6±0.1, 6.7±0.1, 6.8±0.1, 6.9±0.1, or 7.0±0.1.

In one embodiment, the pooled human IgG compositions described hereinfor the treatment of a CNS disorder via intranasal administration isformulated at a pH from about 4.0 to about 7.0. In particularembodiments, a pooled human IgG compositions is formulated at a pH ofabout 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2,5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.7,6.8, 6.9, or 7.0. In other embodiments, a pooled human IgG compositionis formulated at a pH from 4.0 to 6.5, 4.0 to 6.0, 4.0 to 5.5, 4.0 to5.0, 4.0 to 4.5, 4.5 to 6.5, 4.5 to 6.0, 4.5 to 5.5, 4.5 to 5.0. In yetother embodiments, a pooled human IgG composition is formulated at a pHof 4.8±0.5, 4.8±0.4, 4.8±0.3, 4.8±0.2, 4.8±0.1, or about 4.8.

In one embodiment, liquid compositions of pooled human IgG formulatedfor intranasal administration are provided for the treatment of CNSdisorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and multiplesclerosis). In a specific embodiment, the liquid composition is anaqueous composition. In a particular embodiment, an aqueous therapeuticcomposition formulated for intranasal administration provided hereinconsists essentially of a buffering agent and pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment, a liquid composition formulated for intranasaladministration contains from about 1.0 g pooled human IgG per liter (g/LIgG) to about 250 g/L IgG. In other embodiments, the liquid compositionformulated for intranasal administration contains about 1 g/L, 2 g/L, 3g/L, 4 g/L, 5 g/L, 6 g/L, 7 g/L, 8 g/L, 9 g/L, 10 g/L, 12.5 g/L, 15 g/L,17.5 g/L, 20 g/L, 25 g/L, 30 g/L, 35 g/L, 40 g/L, 45 g/L, 50 g/L, 55g/L, 60 g/L, 65 g/L, 70 g/L, 75 g/L, 80 g/L, 85 g/L, 90 g/L, 95 g/L, 100g/L, 110 g/L, 120 g/L, 130 g/L, 140 g/L, 150 g/L, 160 g/L, 170 g/L, 180g/L, 190 g/L, 200 g/L, 210 g/L, 220 g/L, 230 g/L, 240 g/L, 250 g/L, orhigher concentration of pooled human IgG. In certain embodiments, theliquid composition formulated for intranasal administration containsfrom 5.0 g/L to 250 g/L, 10 g/L to 250 g/L, 20 g/L to 250 g/L, 30 g/L to250 g/L, 40 g/L to 250 g/L, 50 g/L to 250 g/L, 60 g/L to 250 g/L, 70 g/Lto 250 g/L, 80 g/L to 250 g/L, 90 g/L to 250 g/L, 100 g/L to 250 g/L,125 g/L to 250 g/L, 150 g to 250 g/L, 175 g/L to 250 g/L, 200 g/L to 250g/L IgG.

In certain embodiments, the methods for treating a CNS disorder providedherein include intranasally administering a liquid compositioncontaining a low concentration of pooled human IgG. In one embodiment, alow concentration of pooled human IgG contains from 1.0 g/L to 100 g/L,5.0 g/L to 100 g/L, 10 g/L to 100 g/L, 20 g/L to 100 g/L, 30 g/L to 100g/L, 40 g/L to 100 g/L, 50 g/L to 100 g/L, 60 g/L to 100 g/L, 70 g/L to100 g/L, 75 g/L to 100 g/L, 80 g/L to 100 g/L, 1.0 g/L to 50 g/L, 5.0g/L to 50 g/L, 10 g/L to 50 g/L, 20 g/L to 50 g/L, 30 g/L to 50 g/L, or40 g/L to 50 g/L IgG.

In certain embodiments, the methods for treating a CNS disorder providedherein include intranasally administering a liquid compositioncontaining an intermediate concentration of pooled human IgG. In oneembodiment, an intermediate concentration of pooled human IgG containsfrom 75 g/L to 200 g/L, 100 g/L to 200 g/L, 110 g/L to 200 g/L, 120 g/Lto 200 g/L, 130 g/L to 200 g/L, 140 g/L to 200 g/L, 150 g/L to 200 g/L,160 g/L to 200 g/L, 170 g/L to 200 g/L, 175 g/L to 200 g/L, 180 g/L to200 g/L, 75 g/L to 150 g/L, 100 g/L to 150 g/L, 110 g/L to 150 g/L, 120g/L to 150 g/L, 130 g/L to 150 g/L, or 140 g/L to 150 g/L IgG.

In certain embodiments, the methods for treating a CNS disorder providedherein include intranasally administering a liquid compositioncontaining a high concentration of pooled human IgG. In one embodiment,a high concentration of pooled human IgG contains from 175 g/L to 250g/L, 200 g/L to 250 g/L, 210 g/L to 250 g/L, 220 g/L to 250 g/L, 230 g/Lto 250 g/L, or 240 g/L to 250 g/L IgG.

In a particular embodiment, a liquid compositions of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration consists essentially of from100 g/L to 250 g/L pooled human IgG and from 150 mM to 350 mM glycine.

In another particular embodiment, a liquid compositions of pooled humanIgG formulated for intranasal administration consists essentially offrom 150 g/L to 250 g/L pooled human IgG and from 200 mM to 300 mMglycine.

In yet another particular embodiment, a liquid compositions of pooledhuman IgG formulated for intranasal administration consists essentiallyof from 200 g/L to 250 g/L pooled human IgG and 250±25 mM glycine.

In certain embodiments, the liquid compositions of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration provided herein further includea humectant. Non-limiting examples of humectants include glycerin,polysaccharides, and polyethylene glycols.

In certain embodiments, the liquid compositions of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration provided herein further includean agent that increases the flow properties of the composition.Non-limiting examples of agents that increase to flow properties of anaqueous composition include sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, hyaluronicacid, gelatin, algin, carageenans, carbomers, galactomannans,polyethylene glycols, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sodiumcarboxymethyl dextran, and xantham.

In one embodiment, dry powder compositions of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration are provided for the treatmentof CNS disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, andmultiple sclerosis). In a specific embodiment, a dry powder therapeuticcomposition formulated for intranasal administration provided hereinconsists essentially of a buffering agent and pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment, a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration further comprises a bulkingagent. Non-limiting examples of bulking agents include oxyethylenemaleic anhydride copolymer, polyvinylether, polyvinylpyrrolidonepolyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylates, including sodium, potassium orammonium polyacrylate, polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polyvinylalcohol, polyvinyl acetate, carboxyvinyl polymer, polyvinylpyrrolidone,polyethylene glycol, celluloses (including cellulose, microcrystallinecellulose, and alpha-cellulose), cellulose derivatives (including methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose and ethylhydroxy ethyl cellulose), dextrins (including alpha-,beta-, or gamma-cyclodexthn, and dimethyl-beta-cyclodexthn), starches(including hydroxyethyl starch, hydroxypropyl starch, carboxymethylstarch), polysaccharides (including dextran, dextrin and alginic acid,hyaluronic acid, and pectic acid), carbohydrates (such as mannitol,glucose, lactose, fructose, sucrose, and amylose), proteins (includingcasein, gelatin, chitin, and chitosan), gums (such as gum arabic,xanthan gum, tragacanth gum, and glucomannan), phospholipids, andcombinations thereof.

In certain embodiments, a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration further comprises a mucosalpenetration enhancer. Non-limiting examples of mucosal penetrationenhancers are bile salts, fatty acids, surfactants and alcohols.Specific non-limiting examples of mucosal penetration enhancers aresodium cholate, sodium dodecyl sulphate, sodium deoxycholate,taurodeoxycholate, sodium glycocholate, dimethylsulfoxide or ethanol.

In certain embodiments, a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration further comprises a dispersant.A dispersant is an agent that assists aerosolization of the IgG or theabsorption of the IgG in intranasal mucosal tissue, or both.Non-limiting examples of dispersants are a mucosal penetration enhancersand surfactants.

In certain embodiments, a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGformulated for intranasal administration further comprises a bioadhesiveagent. Non-limiting examples of bioadhesive agents include chitosan orcyclodextrin. In certain embodiments, a dry powder composition of pooledhuman IgG formulated for intranasal administration further comprises afiller. Non-limiting examples of fillers include sugars, includinglactose, sucrose, mannitol, or sorbitol; cellulose preparations such as:for example, maize starch, wheat starch, rice starch, potato starch,gelatin, gum tragacanth, methylcellulose, microcrystalline cellulose,hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, sodium carboxymethylcellulose; or otherssuch as: polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP or povidone) or calcium phosphate.

The particle size a dry powder composition of pooled human IgG can bedetermined by standard methods in the art. For example, the particlescan be screened or filtered through a mesh sieve. In certainembodiments, the dry particles have an average diameter from about 0.1μm to about 250 μm. In some embodiments, the dry particles have anaverage diameter between from 1 μm to about 25 μm. In some embodiments,the dry particles have an average diameter between from 10 μm to about100 μm. In yet other embodiments, the dray particles have an averagediameter of about 0.1 μm±10%, 0.2 μm±10%, 0.3 μm±10%, 0.4 μm±10%, 0.5μm±10%, 0.6 μm ±10%, 0.7 μm ±10%, 0.8 μm ±10%, 0.9 μm ±10%, 1.0 μm ±10%,2 μm 10%, 3 μm±10%, 4 μm±10%, 5 μm±10%, 6 μm±10%, 7 μm±10%, 8 μm±10%, 9μm 10%, 10 μm±10%, 11 μm±10%, 12 μm±10%, 13 μm±10%, 14 μm±10%, 15μm±10%, 16 μm±10%, 17 μm±10%, 18 μm±10%, 19 μm±10%, 20 μm±10%, 25 μm±10%, 30 μm±10%, 35 μm±10%, 40 μm±10%, 45 μm±10%, 50 μm±10%, 60 μm±10%,65 μm±10%, 70 μm±10%, 75 μm±10%, 80 μm±10%, 85 μm±10%, 90 μm±10%, 95μm±10%, 100 μm±10%, 110 μm±10%, 120 μm±10%, 130 μm±10%, 140 μm±10%, 150μm±10%, 160 μm±10%, 170 μm±10%, 180 μm±10%, 190 μm±10%, 200 μm±10%, 225μm±10%, 250 μm±10%, 275 μm±10%, 300 μm±10%, 350 μm±10%, 400 μm±10%, 450μm±10%, 500 μm±10%, or greater.

In one embodiment, gel, cream, or ointment compositions of pooled humanIgG formulated for intranasal administration are provided for thetreatment of CNS disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson'sdisease, and multiple sclerosis). In a specific embodiment, a gel,cream, or ointment therapeutic composition formulated for intranasaladministration provided herein consists essentially of a buffering agentand pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment, a gel, cream, or ointment composition of pooled humanIgG formulated for intranasal administration further comprises a carrieragent. Non-limiting examples of carrier agents for gel and ointmentcompositions include natural or synthetic polymers such as hyaluronicacid, sodium alginate, gelatin, corn starch, gum tragacanth,methylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, xanthangum, dextrin, carboxymethylstarch, polyvinyl alcohol, sodiumpolyacrylate, methoxyethylene maleic anhydride copolymer,polyvinylether, polyvinylpyrrolidone, fats and oils such as beeswax,olive oil, cacao butter, sesame oil, soybean oil, camellia oil, peanutoil, beef fat, lard, and lanolin, white petrolatum, paraffins,hydrocabon gel ointments, fatty acids such as stearic acid, alcoholssuch as cetyl alcohol and stearyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, water,and combinations thereof.

In certain embodiments, the pooled human immunoglobulins areco-formulated with one or more vasoconstrictor agents. When present, thevasoconstrictor agent reduces non-target exposure (e.g., systemicexposure) of the pooled human immunoglobulin, by reducing absorption ofthe immunoglobulins into the blood, effectively increasing the targetingof the immunoglobulin to the CNS (e.g., to the brain). Methods for theco-formulation of other pharmaceuticals and vasoconstrictors can befound in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0305077, thecontent of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety for all purposes. Non-limiting examples of vasoconstrictorsthat may be co-formulated with pooled human immunoglobulins in thisfashion include tetrahydrozoline, methoxamine, phenylephrine, ephedrine,norepinephrine, oxymetazoline, tetrahydrozoline, xylometazoline,clonidine, guanabenz, guanfacine, α-methyldopa, arginine vasopressin,and pseudoephedrine.

Disorders of the Central Nervous System

IVIG treatment has been used in the treatment of CNS disorders.Specifically, IVIG has been studied or used in the treatment of MultipleSclerosis (MS), stiff-person syndrome, Alzheimer's disease (AD),postpolio syndrome, narcolepsy, stroke, and fibromyalgia and other painsyndromes. Stangle 2008 (Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders,1(2):115-124).

IVIG has also been used to treat neuromyelitis optica (NMO). NMO, alsoknown as Devic's disease or Devic's syndrome, is an autoimmune,inflammatory disorder of the optic nerves and spinal cord. For example,a 2 g/kg induction dose of IVIG followed by 0.4-0.5 g/kg monthlymaintenance doses of IVIG has been used to treat NMO. Awad et al. 2011(Current Neuropharmacology, 9:417428).

IVIG has also been used and studied for the treatment of acutedisseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). ADEM is an immune mediateddisease of the brain. Specifically, ADEM involves autoimmunedemyelination and is classified as a MS borderline disease. For example,a standard dose of 2 g/kg IVIG given over 2-5 days can be used to treatADEM. Pohl et al. 2012 (Current Treatment Options in Neurology,14:264-275).

IVIG has also studied and used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease(PD). For example, studies have shown that IVIG may reduce α-synucleinneurotoxicity, a possible contributing factor to the pathogenesis of PD,through an unknown mechanism. Smith et al. 2012 (InternationalImmunopharmacology, 14:550-557) and Patrias et al. (Clinical andExperimental Immunology, 161:527-535).

IVIG has also been used and studied for the treatment of MS. Forexample, IVIG has been used successfully in the treatment of Schilder'sdisease (SD), a rare variant of MS. Krause et al. 2012 (European J. ofPaediatric Neurology, 16:206-208). IVIG has also been suggested to bebeneficial in the treatment of acute relapses in MS patients. Elovaaraet al. 2011 (Clinical Neuropharmacology, 34(2):84-89).

IVIG has also been used and studied for the treatment ofobsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD) and tic disorders. For example,IVIG was shown to lessen the severity of symptoms of OCD and ticdisorders in children with infection-triggered OCD and tic disorders.Perlmutter, et al. 1999 (The Lancet, 354:1153-1158). Similarly, it hasbeen shown that IVIG is effective in reducing neuropsychiatric symptomseverity in a subgroup OCD and tic disorder patients withchildhood-onset OCD and tic disorders. Snider et al. 2003 (J. of Childand Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 13(supp 1): S81-S88).

In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof bydelivering a therapeutically effective amount of a compositioncomprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain of thesubject, wherein delivering the composition to the brain comprisesintranasally administering the composition directly to an epithelium ofthe nasal cavity of the subject. In a specific embodiment, thecomposition is administered directly to the olfactory epithelium of thenasal cavity. In certain embodiments, the CNS disorder is selected fromthe group consisting of a systemic atrophy primarily affecting thecentral nervous system, an extrapyramidal and movement disorder, aneurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system, ademyelinating disorder of the central nervous system, an episodic orparoxysmal disorder of the central nervous system, a paralytic syndromeof the central nervous system, a nerve, nerve root, or plexus disorderof the central nervous system, an organic mental disorder, a mental orbehavioral disorder caused by psychoactive substance use, aschizophrenia, schizotypal, or delusional disorder, a mood (affective)disorder, neurotic, stress-related, or somatoform disorder, a behavioralsyndrome, an adult personality or behavior disorder, a psychologicaldevelopment disorder, or a child onset behavioral or emotional disorder.In some embodiments, the CNS disorder is selected from the groupconsisting of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiplesclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Huntington's disease,cerebral palsy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or Pediatricacute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS). In some embodiments, theCNS disorder is selected from the group consisting of Alzheimer'sdisease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Pediatric AutoimmuneNeuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections(PANDAS), or Pediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a systemic atrophy primarilyaffecting the central nervous system. Non-limiting examples of systemicatrophies that primarily affect the central nervous system include:Huntington's disease; hereditary ataxias (e.g., congenitalnon-progressive ataxia, early-onset cerebellar ataxias—such asearly-onset cerebellar ataxia with essential tremor, Hunt's ataxia,early-onset cerebellar ataxia with retained tendon reflexes,Friedreich's ataxia, and X-linked recessive spinocerebellarataxia—late-onset cerebellar ataxia, ataxia telangiectasia (Louis-Barsyndrome), or hereditary spastic paraplegia); a spinal muscular atrophyor related disorder thereof (e.g., Werdnig-Hoffman disease (Type 1),progressive bulbar palsy of childhood (Fazio-Londe syndrome),Kugelberg-Welander disease (Type 3), or a motor neuron disease—such asfamilial motor neuron disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS),primary lateral sclerosis, progressive bulbar palsy, and progressivespinal muscular atrophy); paraneoplastic neuromyopathy and neuropathy;systemic atrophy primarily affecting the central nervous system inneoplastic disease; paraneoplastic limbic encephalopathy; and systemicatrophy primarily affecting the central nervous system in myxoedema.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is an extrapyramidal and movementdisorder. Non-limiting examples of extrapyramidal and movement disordersthat affect the central nervous system include: Parkinson's disease; asecondary parkinsonism (e.g., malignant neuroleptic syndrome orpostencephalitic parkinsonism); a degenerative disease of the basalganglia (e.g., Hallervorden-Spatz disease, progressive supranuclearophthalmoplegia (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski disease), or striatonigraldegeneration), a dystonia (e.g., drug-induced dystonia, idiopathicfamilial dystonia, idiopathic non-familial dystonia, spasmodictorticollis, idiopathic orofacial dystonia—such as orofacialdyskinesia—or blepharospasm); an essential tremor; a drug-inducedtremor, myoclonus, drug-induced chorea, drug-induced tics; restless legssyndrome; and stiff-man syndrome.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a neurodegenerative disorder ofthe central nervous system. Non-limiting examples of neurodegenerativedisorders that affect the central nervous system include: Alzheimer'sdisease; a circumscribed brain atrophy (e.g., Pick's disease); seniledegeneration of brain; a degeneration of nervous system due to alcohol;grey-matter degeneration (e.g., Alpers' disease); Lewy body dementia,subacute necrotizing encephalopathy (e.g., Leigh's disease); andsubacute combined degeneration of spinal cord. In certain embodiments,the CNS disorder is disorder characterized by dementia. In certainembodiments, the dementia is a cortical dementia (associated, forexample, with Alzheimer's) arising from a disorder affecting thecerebral cortex. In certain embodiments, the dementia is a subcorticaldementia (associated, for example, with Parkinson's disease andHuntington's disease) resulting from dysfunction in the parts of thebrain that are beneath the cortex. In certain embodiments, the dementiais a side effect of drug administration. In specific embodiments, thedementia is a side effect of the administration of a chemotherapeuticagent. In specific embodiments, the dementia is a result of undergoingcardiac bypass. In specific embodiments, the dementia is a result of avascular disorder (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, high bloodpressure). In specific embodiments, the dementia is a result ofdepression.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a demyelinating disorder of thecentral nervous system. Non-limiting examples of demyelinating disordersthat affect the central nervous system include: multiple sclerosis; anacute disseminated demyelination disorder (e.g., neuromyelitis optica(Devic's syndrome) or acute and subacute hemorrhagic leukoencephalitis(Hurst's disease)); diffuse sclerosis; central demyelination of corpuscallosum; central pontine myelinolysis; acute transverse myelitis indemyelinating disease of central nervous system; subacute necrotizingmyelitis; and concentric sclerosis (Baló disease).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is an episodic or paroxysmaldisorder of the central nervous system. Non-limiting examples ofepisodic and paroxysmal disorders that affect the central nervous systeminclude: epilepsy (e.g., localization-related (focal)(partial)idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with seizures of localizedonset, localization-related (focal)(partial) symptomatic epilepsy andepileptic syndromes with simple partial seizures; localization-related(focal)(partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes withcomplex partial seizures; a benign epileptic syndrome—such as myoclonicepilepsy in infancy and neonatal convulsions (familial)—childhoodabsence epilepsy (e.g., pyknolepsy), epilepsy with grand mal seizures onawakening, a juvenile epilepsy—such as absence epilepsy or myoclonicepilepsy (impulsive petit mal)—a nonspecific epileptic seizure—such asan atonic, clonic, myoclonic, tonic, or tonic-clonic epileptic seizure,epilepsy with myoclonic absences or myoclonic-astatic seizures,infantile spasms, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Salaam attacks, symptomaticearly myoclonic encephalopathy, West's syndrome, epilepsia partialiscontinua (Kozhevnikov epilepsy), grand mal seizures, or petit mal);headaches (e.g., a migraine—such as a migraine without aura (commonmigraine), a migraine with aura (classical migraine), statusmigrainosus, and complicated migraine—cluster headache syndrome, avascular headache, a tension-type headache, a chronic post-traumaticheadache, or a drug-induced headache); a cerebrovascular episodic orparoxysmal disorder (e.g., a transient cerebral ischaemic attacks orrelated syndrome—such as vertebrobasilar artery syndrome, carotid arterysyndrome (hemispheric), a multiple and bilateral precerebral arterysyndrome, amaurosis fugax, and transient global amnesia—a vascularsyndrome of the brain—such as middle cerebral artery syndrome, anteriorcerebral artery syndrome, posterior cerebral artery syndrome, a brainstem stroke syndrome (e.g., Benedikt syndrome, Claude syndrome, Fovillesyndrome, Millard-Gubler syndrome, Wallenberg syndrome, or Webersyndrome), cerebellar stroke syndrome, pure motor lacunar syndrome, puresensory lacunar syndrome, or a lacunar syndromes); and a sleep disorder(e.g., insomnia, hyperinsomnia, a disruption in circadian rhythm, sleepapnoea, narcolepsy, or cataplexy).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a paralytic syndrome of thecentral nervous system. Non-limiting examples of paralytic syndromesthat affect the central nervous system include: a cerebral palsy (e.g.,spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, spastic diplegic cerebral palsy,spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy, dyskinetic cerebral palsy, or ataxiccerebral palsy); a hemiplegia (e.g., flaccid hemiplegia or spastichemiplegia); a paraplegia or tetraplegia (e.g., flaccid paraplegia,spastic paraplegia, paralysis of both lower limbs, lower paraplegia,flaccid tetraplegia, spastic tetraplegia, or quadriplegia); diplegia ofupper limbs; monoplegia of a lower limb, monoplegia of an upper limb;cauda equina syndrome; and Todd's paralysis (postepileptic).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a nerve, nerve root, or plexusdisorder of the central nervous system. Non-limiting examples of nerve,nerve root, or plexus disorders that affect the central nervous systeminclude: a disorder of the trigeminal nerve (V; e.g., trigeminalneuralgia); a facial nerve disorders (VII; e.g., bell's palsy, facialpalsy, geniculate ganglionitis, melkersson's syndrome,melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome, a clonic hemifacial spasm, facialmyokymia); a disorder of the olfactory nerve (I); a disorder of theglossopharyngeal nerve (IX); a disorder of the vagus nerve (X); adisorder of the hypoglossal nerve (XII); a disorder of multiple cranialnerves; and a nerve root or plexus disorder affecting the CNS (e.g., abrachial plexus disorder—such as thoracic outlet syndrome—a lumbosacralplexus disorder, a cervical root, a thoracic root disorder, alumbosacral root disorder, a neuralgic amyotrophy—such asParsonage-Aldren-Turner syndrome—or phantom limb syndrome with orwithout pain).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is an otherwise classified disorderof the central nervous system. Non-limiting examples of these disordersinclude: hydrocephalus; a toxic encephalopathy, a cerebral cyst; anoxicbrain damage; benign intracranial hypertension; postviral fatiguesyndrome; an encephalopathy; compression of brain; cerebral oedema;reye's syndrome; postradiation encephalopathy; traumatic brain injury;syringomyelia; syringobulbia; a vascular myelopathy; spinal cordcompression; myelopathy; a cerebrospinal fluid leak; a disorder of themeninges (e.g., cerebral or spinal meningeal adhesion); and apost-procedural disorder of nervous system (e.g., cerebrospinal fluidleak from spinal puncture, an adverse reaction to a spinal or lumbarpuncture, or intracranial hypotension following ventricular shunting).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is an organic mental disorder.Non-limiting examples of organic mental disorders that affect thecentral nervous system include: dementia (e.g., dementia associated withAlzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, or human immunodeficiencyvirus (HIV) disease, or vascular dementia—such as multi-infarctdementia); organic amnesic syndrome not induced by alcohol and otherpsychoactive substances); delirium not induced by alcohol and otherpsychoactive substances; a mental disorder due to brain damage anddysfunction and to physical disease (e.g., organic hallucinosis, organiccatatonic disorder, organic delusional (schizophrenia-like) disorder,organic mood (affective) disorder, organic anxiety disorder, organicdissociative disorder; organic emotionally labile (asthenic) disorder; amild cognitive disorder, or organic brain syndrome); and a personalityand behavioral disorders due to brain disease, damage and dysfunction(e.g., organic personality disorder, postencephalitic syndrome, orpostconcussional syndrome).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a mental or behavioral disordercaused by psychoactive substance use. Non-limiting examples of mental orbehavioral disorders caused by psychoactive substance use that affectthe central nervous system include: acute intoxication (e.g., fromalcohol, opioid, cannabis, benzodiazepine, or cocaine use); a dependencesyndrome (e.g., from alcohol, opioid, cannabis, benzodiazepine, cocaine,or nicotine addiction); a withdrawal syndrome (e.g., an alcohol orbenzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome); delirium tremens; and a psychoticdisorder (e.g., alcoholic hallucinosis or stimulant psychosis); anamnesic syndrome (e.g., Korsakoff's syndrome); a residual and late-onsetpsychotic disorder (e.g., posthallucinogen perception disorder).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is an autism spectrum disorder. Incertain embodiments, the CNS disorder is autism, Asperger syndrome,pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS),childhood disintegrative disorder, or Rett syndrome.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a schizophrenia, schizotypal, ordelusional disorder. Non-limiting examples of schizophrenia,schizotypal, and delusional disorders that affect the central nervoussystem include: schizophrenia (e.g., paranoid schizophrenia, hebephrenicschizophrenia (disorganized schizophrenia), catatonic schizophrenia,undifferentiated schizophrenia, post-schizophrenic depression, residualschizophrenia, simple schizophrenia, cenesthopathic schizophrenia,schizophreniform disorder, or schizophreniform psychosis); schizotypaldisorder; a persistent delusional disorder (e.g., delusional disorder,delusional dysmorphophobia, involutional paranoid state, or paranoiaquerulans); an acute or transient psychotic disorder (e.g., acutepolymorphic psychotic disorder without symptoms of schizophrenia, acutepolymorphic psychotic disorder with symptoms of schizophrenia, or acuteschizophrenia-like psychotic disorder); an induced delusional disorder(e.g., folie á deux, induced paranoid disorder, or induced psychoticdisorder); a schizoaffective disorder (e.g., manic type, depressivetype, or mixed type schizoaffective disorder); and chronic hallucinatorypsychosis.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a mood (affective) disorder.Non-limiting examples of mood (affective) disorders that affect thecentral nervous system include: a manic episode (e.g., hypomania, maniawithout psychotic symptoms, or mania with psychotic symptoms); a bipolaraffective disorder (e.g., bipolar affective disorder—current episodehypomanic, bipolar affective disorder—current episode manic withoutpsychotic symptoms, bipolar affective disorder—current episode manicwith psychotic symptoms, bipolar affective disorder—current episode mildor moderate depression, bipolar affective disorder—current episodesevere depression without psychotic symptoms, bipolar affectivedisorder—current episode severe depression with psychotic symptoms,bipolar affective disorder—current episode mixed, bipolar affectivedisorder—currently in remission, bipolar II disorder, or recurrent manicepisodes); a depressive episode (e.g., mild depressive episode, moderatedepressive episode, severe depressive episode without psychoticsymptoms, severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms, atypicaldepression, or single episodes of “masked” depression); a recurrentdepressive disorder (e.g., recurrent depressive disorder—current episodemild, recurrent depressive disorder—current episode moderate, recurrentdepressive disorder—current episode severe without psychotic symptoms,recurrent depressive disorder—current episode severe with psychoticsymptoms, or recurrent depressive disorder—currently in remission); apersistent mood (affective) disorder (e.g., cyclothymia or dysthymia);mixed affective episode; and recurrent brief depressive episodes.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a neurotic, stress-related, orsomatoform disorder. Non-limiting examples of neurotic, stress-related,or somatoform disorders that affect the central nervous system include:a phobic anxiety disorder (e.g., agoraphobia, anthropophobia, socialneurosis, acrophobia, animal phobias, claustrophobia, or simple phobia);an otherwise categorized anxiety disorder (e.g., panic disorder(episodic paroxysmal anxiety) or generalized anxiety disorder);obsessive-compulsive disorder; an adjustment disorder (e.g., acutestress reaction; post-traumatic stress disorder, or adjustmentdisorder); a dissociative (conversion) disorder (e.g., dissociativeamnesia, dissociative fugue, dissociative stupor; trance disorder,possession disorder, dissociative motor disorder, dissociativeconvulsions, dissociative anaesthesia and sensory loss, mixeddissociative (conversion) disorder, Ganser's syndrome, or multiplepersonality disorder); a somatoform disorder (e.g., Briquet's disorder,multiple psychosomatic disorder, a hypochondriacal disorder—such as bodydysmorphic disorder, dysmorphophobia (nondelusional), hypochondriacalneurosis, hypochondriasis, and nosophobia—a somatoform autonomicdysfunction—such as cardiac neurosis, Da Costa's syndrome, gastricneurosis, and neurocirculatory asthenia—or psychalgia); neurasthenia;depersonalization-derealization syndrome; Dhat syndrome, occupationalneurosis (e.g., writer's cramp); psychasthenia; psychasthenic neurosis;and psychogenic syncope.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a behavioral syndrome associatedwith physiological disturbances or physical factors. Non-limitingexamples of behavioral syndromes associated with physiologicaldisturbances or physical factors that affect the central nervous systeminclude: an eating disorder (e.g., anorexia nervos, atypical anorexianervosa, bulimia nervosa, atypical bulimia nervosa, overeatingassociated with other psychological disturbances, vomiting associatedwith other psychological disturbances, or pica in adults); a nonorganicsleep disorder (e.g., nonorganic insomnia, nonorganic hypersomnia,nonorganic disorder of the sleep-wake schedule, sleepwalking(somnambulism), sleep terrors (night terrors), or nightmares); a sexualdysfunction not caused by organic disorder or disease; a mental orbehavioral disorder associated with the puerperium (e.g., postnataldepression, postpartum depression, or puerperal psychosis); and abuse ofnon-dependence-producing substances.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is an adult personality or behaviordisorder. Non-limiting examples of adult personality and behaviordisorders that affect the central nervous system include: a specificpersonality disorder (e.g., paranoid personality disorder, schizoidpersonality disorder, a dissocial personality disorder—such asantisocial personality disorder—an emotionally unstable personalitydisorder—such as borderline personality disorder—histrionic personalitydisorder, an anankastic personality disorder—such asobsessive-compulsive personality disorder, anxious (avoidant)personality disorder, dependent personality disorder, eccentricpersonality disorder, haltlose personality disorder, immaturepersonality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder,passive-aggressive personality disorder, or psychoneurotic personalitydisorder); mixed personality disorder; a habit or impulse disorder(e.g., pathological gambling, pathological fire-setting (pyromania),pathological stealing (kleptomania), or trichotillomania); andMunchausen syndrome.

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a psychological developmentdisorder. Non-limiting examples of psychological development disordersthat affect the central nervous system include: a developmental disorderof speech or language (e.g., specific speech articulation disorder,expressive language disorder, receptive language disorder (receptiveaphasia), acquired aphasia with epilepsy (Landau-Kleffner disorder), orlisping); a developmental disorder of scholastic skills (e.g., aspecific reading disorder—such as developmental dyslexia—specificspelling disorder, a specific disorder of arithmetical skills—such asdevelopmental acalculia and Gerstmann syndrome—or a mixed disorder ofscholastic skills); a developmental disorder of motor function (e.g.,developmental dyspraxia); a mixed specific developmental disorder; and apervasive developmental disorder (e.g., childhood autism, atypicalautism, Rett's syndrome, overactive disorder associated with mentalretardation and stereotyped movements, or Asperger's syndrome).

In one embodiment, the CNS disorder is a behavioral or emotionaldisorder with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence.Non-limiting examples of behavioral or emotional disorders with onsetusually occurring in childhood and adolescence that affect the centralnervous system include: a hyperkinetic disorder (e.g., a disturbance ofactivity and attention—such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorderand attention deficit syndrome with hyperactivity—or hyperkineticconduct disorder); a conduct disorder (e.g., conduct disorder confinedto the family context, unsocialized conduct disorder, socialized conductdisorder, or oppositional defiant disorder); a mixed disorder of conductor emotions (e.g., depressive conduct disorder); an emotional disorderwith onset specific to childhood (e.g., separation anxiety disorder ofchildhood, phobic anxiety disorder of childhood, social anxiety disorderof childhood, sibling rivalry disorder, identity disorder, oroveranxious disorder); a disorder of social functioning with onsetspecific to childhood and adolescence (e.g., elective mutism, reactiveattachment disorder of childhood, or disinhibited attachment disorder ofchildhood); a tic disorder (e.g., transient tic disorder, chronic motoror vocal tic disorder, or combined vocal and multiple motor tic disorder(de la Tourette); and an otherwise classified behavioral or emotionaldisorder with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence(e.g., nonorganic enuresis, nonorganic encopresis, feeding disorder ofinfancy and childhood, pica of infancy and childhood, stereotypedmovement disorders, stuttering (stammering), cluttering, attentiondeficit disorder without hyperactivity, Pediatric AutoimmuneNeuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal infections(PANDAS), or Pediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS)).

In one embodiment of the method for treating a CNS disorder, the methodincludes intranasally administering a dry powder composition containingfrom 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled human immunoglobulin to a subject inneed thereof daily. In other embodiments, the methods provided hereinfor the treatment of a CNS disorder include intranasally administering adry powder composition of pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequencycombination selected from variations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table2. In a particular embodiment, the method comprises administering thedry powder composition directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. Ina particular embodiment, the method comprises administering the drypowder composition directly to the olfactory epithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the method for treating a CNS disorder, the methodincludes intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of a CNS disorder includeintranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous) composition ofpooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combination selected fromvariations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particularembodiment, the method comprises administering the composition drop-wisedirectly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. In a particularembodiment, the method comprises administering the composition drop-wisedirectly to the olfactory epithelium of the subject. In anotherparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition via a spray directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject.In a particular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition via a spray directly to the olfactory epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the method for treating a CNS disorder, the methodincludes intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointmentcomposition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of a CNS disorder includeintranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointment composition ofpooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combination selected fromvariations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particularembodiment, the method comprises administering the gel, cream, orointment composition directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering the gel,cream, or ointment composition directly to the olfactory epithelium ofthe subject.

Alzheimer's Disease

IVIG has been used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. It has beenproposed that IVIG contains antibodies against β-amyloid. Relkin et al.2009 (Neurobiol. Aging 30(11): 1728-36). In this study, pooled human IgGwas administered intravenously (IVIG therapy) to eight subjectsdiagnosed with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The patients received IVIGtherapy for 6 months, discontinued treatment, and then resumed treatmentfor 9 more months. It was found that β-amyloid antibodies in the serumfrom AD patients increased in proportion to IVIG dose and plasma levelsof β-amyloid increased transiently after each infusion. After 6 monthsof treatment, mini-mental state tests were performed on the patients.The mini-mental state scores increased an average of 2.5 points after 6months, returned to baseline during washout and remained stable duringsubsequent IVIG treatment.

In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for treatingAlzheimer's disease in a subject in need thereof by delivering atherapeutically effective amount of a composition comprising pooledhuman immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain of the subject, whereindelivering the composition to the brain comprises intranasallyadministering the composition directly to an epithelium of the nasalcavity of the subject. In a specific embodiment, the composition isadministered directly to the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity.In one embodiment, the Alzheimer's disease is early-onset Alzheimer'sdisease. In another embodiment, the Alzheimer's disease is late-onsetAlzheimer's disease.

In one embodiment of the method for treating Alzheimer's disease, themethod includes intranasally administering a dry powder compositioncontaining from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled human immunoglobulin to asubject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments, the methodsprovided herein for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease includeintranasally administering a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGin a dosage/frequency combination selected from variations 1 to 816found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particular embodiment, the methodcomprises administering the dry powder composition directly to a nasalepithelium of the subject. In a particular embodiment, the methodcomprises administering the dry powder composition directly to theolfactory epithelium of the subject. In one embodiment, the Alzheimer'sdisease is early-onset Alzheimer's disease. In another embodiment, theAlzheimer's disease is late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

In one embodiment of the method for treating Alzheimer's disease, themethod includes intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of Alzheimer's diseaseinclude intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition of pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combinationselected from variations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition drop-wise directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. Ina particular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition drop-wise directly to the olfactory epithelium of thesubject. In another particular embodiment, the method comprisesadministering the composition via a spray directly to a nasal epitheliumof the subject. In a particular embodiment, the method comprisesadministering the composition via a spray directly to the olfactoryepithelium of the subject. In one embodiment, the Alzheimer's disease isearly-onset Alzheimer's disease. In another embodiment, the Alzheimer'sdisease is late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

In one embodiment of the method for treating Alzheimer's disease, themethod includes intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointmentcomposition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of Alzheimer's diseaseinclude intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointment compositionof pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combination selected fromvariations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particularembodiment, the method comprises administering the gel, cream, orointment composition directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering the gel,cream, or ointment composition directly to the olfactory epithelium ofthe subject. In one embodiment, the Alzheimer's disease is early-onsetAlzheimer's disease. In another embodiment, the Alzheimer's disease islate-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative and inflammatorydisease of the central nervous system (CNS) that represents one of themost prevalent human autoimmune diseases. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is anautoimmune disease that specifically affects the brain and spinal cord.MS is caused by damage to the myelin sheath, the protective coveringthat surrounds nerve cells. When the myelin sheath is damaged, nervesignals slow down or stop. Damage to the myelin sheath is caused byinflammation which occurs when the body's own immune cells attack thenervous system. This can occur along any area of the brain, optic nerve,and spinal cord.

MS is classified into four subtypes based on the disease's progression:Relapsing-Remitting MS (RMSS), Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS),Primary-Progressive MS (PPMS), and Progressive-Relapsing MS (PRMS). Morethan 80 percent of patients who are diagnosed with MS exhibit initialsigns of RMSS. RMSS is characterized by relapse (characterized bysymptom flare-ups) followed by remission. The relapses can be mild tosevere flare-ups and the remissions can last for days to months. RMSSpatients often develop SPMS. SPMS is characterized by relapses followedby only partial recoveries. During the partial recovery phase, thesymptoms may lessen but do not go into full remission. SPMS is aprogressive subtype of MS wherein the symptoms steadily worsen until achronic disability replaces the cycles of recovery and partial recovery.PPMS accounts for approximately 15 percent of MS occurrences. It ischaracterized by a slow and steady progression without periods ofremission or partial recovery. PRMS is the least common subtype of MS.PRMS is characterized by steadily worsening symptoms and attacksfollowed by periods of remission.

There are peptide-induced and transgenic mouse model for MS.Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an animal model ofbrain inflammation. EAE is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of theCNS. Acute and relapsing EAE is characterized by the formation of focalinflammatory demyelinating lesions in the white matter of the brain.This phenotype can be induced in normal SJL mice through theadministration of PLP139-151 peptide. Chronic progressive EAE ispathologically associated with a widespread axonal damage in the normalappearing white matter and massive demyelination in the grey matter,particularly in the cortex. This phenotype can be induced in normalC57BL/6 mice through the administration of MOG35-55 peptide.

There is also evidence that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand/receptorsuperfamily, particularly TNF and Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) are involved inthe pathogenesis of MS. Akassoglou et al. 1998 (Am J Pathol. 153(3):801-813). Accordingly, mouse models deficient in TNF can be used tostudy the pathologies of MS. The genotype of transgenic TNF knockoutmouse models include p55TNFR (p55−/−), p75TNFR (p′75−/−), and TNF(TNF−/−).

IVIG has proven useful in the treatment of a number of autoimmunediseases; however its role in the treatment of MS remains uncertain.IVIG trials in different types of MS patients have produced variableresults ranging from reports of monthly IVIG being beneficial to IVIGadministration not slowing disease progression or reversingdisease-induced deficits.

In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for treatingmultiple sclerosis in a subject in need thereof by delivering atherapeutically effective amount of a composition comprising pooledhuman immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain of the subject, whereindelivering the composition to the brain comprises intranasallyadministering the composition directly to an epithelium of the nasalcavity of the subject. In a specific embodiment, the composition isadministered directly to the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity.

In one embodiment of the method for treating multiple sclerosis, themethod includes intranasally administering a dry powder compositioncontaining from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled human immunoglobulin to asubject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments, the methodsprovided herein for the treatment of multiple sclerosis includeintranasally administering a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGin a dosage/frequency combination selected from variations 1 to 816found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particular embodiment, the methodcomprises administering the dry powder composition directly to a nasalepithelium of the subject. In a particular embodiment, the methodcomprises administering the dry powder composition directly to theolfactory epithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the method for treating multiple sclerosis, themethod includes intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of multiple sclerosisinclude intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition of pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combinationselected from variations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition drop-wise directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. Ina particular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition drop-wise directly to the olfactory epithelium of thesubject. In another particular embodiment, the method comprisesadministering the composition via a spray directly to a nasal epitheliumof the subject. In a particular embodiment, the method comprisesadministering the composition via a spray directly to the olfactoryepithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the method for treating multiple sclerosis, themethod includes intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointmentcomposition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of multiple sclerosisinclude intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointment compositionof pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combination selected fromvariations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particularembodiment, the method comprises administering the gel, cream, orointment composition directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering the gel,cream, or ointment composition directly to the olfactory epithelium ofthe subject.

Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a degenerative disorder of the CNS. PD isnotably linked to a decrease in motor control. The loss of motor controlcaused by PD results from the death of dopamine-generating cells in thesubstantia nigra, a region of the midbrain. Early in the progression ofthe disease, the most common symptoms include shaking, rigidity,slowness of movement and difficulty with walking and gait. As thedisease progresses, cognitive and behavioral problems arise, withdementia occurring in the advanced stages of the disease. Additionalsymptoms include sensory, sleep and emotional problems. PD is morecommon in the elderly, with symptoms most commonly occurring after theage of 50.

There are numerous transgenic mouse models for PD. These models include,for example, Park2 (parkin) transgenic strains, LRRK2 transgenicstrains, and synuclein transgenic strains (Jackson Laboratories, BarHarbor, Ma.). In addition to transgenic models, parkinsonian symptomscan also be induced in mice by administering the compounds MPTP,rotenone, paraquat, or maneb.

In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for treatingParkinson's disease in a subject in need thereof by delivering atherapeutically effective amount of a composition comprising pooledhuman immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain of the subject, whereindelivering the composition to the brain comprises intranasallyadministering the composition directly to an epithelium of the nasalcavity of the subject. In a specific embodiment, the composition isadministered directly to the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity.

In one embodiment of the method for treating Parkinson's disease, themethod includes intranasally administering a dry powder compositioncontaining from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled human immunoglobulin to asubject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments, the methodsprovided herein for the treatment of Parkinson's disease includeintranasally administering a dry powder composition of pooled human IgGin a dosage/frequency combination selected from variations 1 to 816found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particular embodiment, the methodcomprises administering the dry powder composition directly to a nasalepithelium of the subject. In a particular embodiment, the methodcomprises administering the dry powder composition directly to theolfactory epithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the method for treating Parkinson's disease, themethod includes intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of Parkinson's diseaseinclude intranasally administering a liquid (e.g., an aqueous)composition of pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combinationselected from variations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition drop-wise directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. Ina particular embodiment, the method comprises administering thecomposition drop-wise directly to the olfactory epithelium of thesubject. In another particular embodiment, the method comprisesadministering the composition via a spray directly to a nasal epitheliumof the subject. In a particular embodiment, the method comprisesadministering the composition via a spray directly to the olfactoryepithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the method for treating Parkinson's disease, themethod includes intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointmentcomposition containing from 0.05 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg pooled humanimmunoglobulin to a subject in need thereof daily. In other embodiments,the methods provided herein for the treatment of Parkinson's diseaseinclude intranasally administering a gel, cream, or ointment compositionof pooled human IgG in a dosage/frequency combination selected fromvariations 1 to 816 found in Table 1 and Table 2. In a particularembodiment, the method comprises administering the gel, cream, orointment composition directly to a nasal epithelium of the subject. In aparticular embodiment, the method comprises administering the gel,cream, or ointment composition directly to the olfactory epithelium ofthe subject.

Specific Embodiments

In a first aspect, the disclosure provides a method for treating acentral nervous system (CNS) disorder in a subject in need thereof, themethod comprising: delivering a therapeutically effective amount of acomposition comprising pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brainof the subject, wherein delivering the composition to the braincomprises intranasally administering the composition directly to a nasalepithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 40% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the nasal epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 50% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the nasal epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 60% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the nasal epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, the nasal epithelium is theolfactory epithelium of the subject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 40% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the olfactory epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 50% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the olfactory epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 60% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the olfactory epithelium of thesubject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, the nasal epithelium is a nasalepithelium of the subject associated with trigeminal nerve endings.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 40% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the nasal epithelium of thesubject associated with trigeminal nerve endings.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 50% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the nasal epithelium of thesubject associated with trigeminal nerve endings.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 60% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the nasal epithelium of thesubject associated with trigeminal nerve endings.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, delivering the composition to thebrain comprises intranasally administering the composition to the upperthird of the nasal cavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 40% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the upper third of the nasalcavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 50% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the upper third of the nasalcavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of the first aspect, at least 60% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the upper third of the nasalcavity of the subject.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system. In aspecific embodiment, the neurodegenerative disorder of the centralnervous system is Alzheimer's disease. In a specific embodiment, theneurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system is Parkinson'sdisease.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a systemic atrophy primarily affecting the central nervous system. Ina specific embodiment, the systemic atrophy primarily affecting thecentral nervous system is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). In aspecific embodiment, the systemic atrophy primarily affecting thecentral nervous system is Huntington's disease.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis an extrapyramidal and movement disorder.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. In a specificembodiment, the demylelinating disorder of the central nervous system ismultiple sclerosis.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis an episodic or paroxysmal disorder of the central nervous system.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a paralytic syndrome of the central nervous system. In a specificembodiment, the CNS disorder is a paralytic syndrome of the centralnervous system is cerebral palsy

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a nerve, nerve root, or plexus disorder of the central nervoussystem.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis an organic mental disorder.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a mental or behavioral disorder caused by psychoactive substance use.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a schizophrenia, schizotypal, or delusional disorder. In a specificembodiment, the schizophrenia, schizotypal, or delusional disorder isschizophrenia.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a mood (affective) disorder. In a specific embodiment, the mood(affective) disorder is bipolar disorder.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a neurotic, stress-related, or somatoform disorder.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a behavioral syndrome.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis an adult personality or behavior disorder.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a psychological development disorder.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the CNS disorderis a child onset behavioral or emotional disorder. In a specificembodiment, the child onset behavioral or emotional disorder isPediatric acute-onset neuropyschiatric syndrome (PANS). In anotherspecific embodiment, the child onset behavioral or emotional disorder isPediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated withStreptococcal infections (PANDAS).

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, intranasaladministration of the composition comprises the use of a non-invasiveintranasal delivery device.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, intranasaladministration of the composition comprises administration of a liquiddrop of the composition directly onto the nasal epithelium.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, intranasaladministration of the composition comprises directed administration ofan aerosol of the composition to the nasal epithelium. In a specificembodiment, the aerosol of the composition is a liquid aerosol. In aspecific embodiment, the aerosol of the composition is a powder aerosol.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the compositioncomprising pooled human IgG does not contain a permeability enhancer.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the compositioncomprising pooled human IgG consists essentially of pooled human IgG andan amino acid. In a specific embodiment, the amino acid is glycine. Inanother specific embodiment, the amino acid is histidine. In anotherspecific embodiment, the amino acid is proline.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the compositioncomprising pooled human IgG is an aqueous composition. In oneembodiment, the composition comprises: from 10 mg/mL to 250 mg/mL pooledhuman IgG; and from 50 mM to 500 mM glycine. In a specific embodiment,the pH of the composition is from 4.0 to 7.5. In another specificembodiment, the pH of the composition is from 4.0 to 6.0. In anotherspecific embodiment, the pH of the composition is from 6.0 to 7.5.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the compositioncomprising pooled human IgG is a dry powder composition. In oneembodiment, the dry powder composition is prepared from an aqueoussolution comprising: from 10 mg/mL to 250 mg/mL pooled human IgG; andfrom 50 mM to 500 mM glycine. In a specific embodiment, the dry powdercomposition is prepared from an aqueous solution having a pH of from 4.0to 7.5. In another specific embodiment, the pH of the composition isfrom 4.0 to 6.0. In another specific embodiment, the pH of thecomposition is from 6.0 to 7.5.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.08mg to 100 mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mgIgG/kg).

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.2 mgto 40 mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg).

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.5 mgto 20 mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg).

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 0.5 mgto 10 mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg).

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of from 1 mgto 5 mg pooled human IgG per kg body weight of the subject (mg IgG/kg).

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a fixed dose of from50 mg to 10 g pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a fixed dose of from100 mg to 5 g pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a fixed dose of from500 mg to 2.5 g pooled human IgG.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooledhuman IgG at least twice monthly.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooledhuman IgG at least once weekly.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooledhuman IgG at least twice weekly.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooledhuman IgG at least once daily.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes intranasally administering to the subject a dose of pooledhuman IgG at least twice daily.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the compositioncomprising pooled human IgG comprises at least 0.1% anti-amyloid β IgG.

In one embodiment of any of the methods provided above, the methodincludes administering a second therapy for the CNS disorder to thesubject in need thereof. In one embodiment, the second therapy for theCNS disorder is a cholinesterase inhibitor. In a specific embodiment,the cholinesterase inhibitor is donepezil. In another specificembodiment, the cholinesterase inhibitor is rivastigmine. In anotherspecific embodiment, the cholinesterase inhibitor is galantamine. Inanother specific embodiment, the cholinesterase inhibitor is tacrine. Inanother embodiment, the second therapy for the CNS disorder is aninhibitor of NMDA-type glutamate receptor. In a specific embodiment, theinhibitor of NMDA-type glutamate receptor is memantine.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Tolerability of Intranasal Administration of IgG inRats

A study was conducted to examine the tolerability of intranasaladministration of IgG in rats. The purpose of this study was todetermine the tolerability of rats to intranasal IgG administration atvarious concentrations and preparations.

Experimental Design: IgG was prepared as a liquid protein solution or asa microsphere preparation. The liquid IgG protein solution was preparedin glycine at 200 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL and had a pH of 5.1-5.3. The IgGmicrosphere preparation was prepared at 200 mg/mL and 150 mg/mL in PEG.The IgG preparations were administered to 8 anesthetized, adult maleSprague Dawley rats.

Prior to anesthesia, each rat was weighed. An anesthesia cocktail wasprepared and full, half, and quarter anesthesia doses were calculatedaccording to the animal's weight with a full dose containing 30 mg/kgketamine, 6 mg/kg xylazine, and 1 mg/kg acepromazine. The anesthesia wasadministered subcutaneously into the left hind leg, above the thigh.Anesthesia was monitored throughout the procedures by assessing reflexesusing pinching of the hind paw or tail. If a reflex was present, a halfor quarter dose booster was administered as necessary. During drugadministration, animals received a half dose booster roughly 20-25 minafter initial dose if needed.

Anesthetized rats were placed on their backs on a heating pad in a metalsurgical tray. The heating pad was connected to a thermostat and wasautomatically regulated to maintain a 37° C. temperature based oncontinuous measurement from a rectal probe. A 2″×2″ gauze pad was rolledtightly into a pillow, taped together, and under the neck to maintain acorrect neck position horizontal with the counter.

A 6 μL drop was loaded into a pipette and wiped dry with a tissue. Acotton swab covered in parafilm was used to occlude one naris completely(the flat part of the swab was pushed gently against the naris toprevent airflow), while the 6 μL drop was expelled slowly from thepipette (held at a 45° angle from the rat's midline), forming a drop onthe pipette tip. The drop was lowered onto the open naris to be inhaled.The IgG preparations were administered intranasally as described inTable 3.

TABLE 3 Intranasal administration of IgG to 8 rats to test forintranasal tolerability. Weight # Drops Time to Rat (g) Drug/Dosedelivered perfusion 1 259.87 Liquid protein 10 @ 6 μL/drop 23 minsolution-200 (60 μL total) mg/mL 2 272.61 Microsphere-50 10 @ 6 μL/drop60 min mg/mL (60 μL total) 3 309.14 Liquid protein  8 @ 6 μL/drop 60 minsolution-200 (60 μL total) mg/mL 4 309.00 Liquid protein 10 @ 6 μL/drop60 min solution-100 (60 μL total) mg/mL 5 342.62 Microsphere- 10 @ 6μL/drop 60 min 200 mg/mL (60 μL total) 6 355.1 Microsphere- 10 @ 6μL/drop 60 min 150 mg/mL (60 μL total) 7 364.28 Microsphere- 10 @ 6μL/drop 60 min 200 mg/mL (60 μL total) 8 348.93 Microsphere- 28 @ 6μL/drop 60 min 150 mg/mL (162 μL total)

Results. Three rats received the liquid preparation of intranasal IgG.One rat received 60 μL at 100 mg/ml and it was well tolerated. Two ratsreceived 60 μL at 200 mg/mL. The first rat had some difficultybreathing, most likely due to a problem with light anesthesia. Thesecond rat had some difficulties breathing, but survived. Tracheotomieswere not necessary.

Four rats received the microsphere preparation. Two rats received 60 μLat 150 mg/ml. One rat received 60 μL at 200 mg/ml. One rat received 162μL at 150 mg/ml. These rats tolerated the highest concentrationavailable at 200 mg/ml very well.

The rats tolerated the liquid and microsphere preparations; however, therats did tolerate the microsphere preparation better than the proteinpreparation.

Example 2 Comparison of Liquid, Microsphere, and FragmentBiodistribution at 30 and 90 Minutes

The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of intranasallyadministered IgG that reaches the central nervous system and peripheraltissues in anesthetized rats. Specifically, the biodistribution ofdifferent formulations and modes of administration were compared. Thedifferent formulations and modes of administration are described inTable 4.

TABLE 4 Formulations and modes of administration used in biodistributionstudy. ¹²⁵I radiolabeled IgG Formulation Mode of Administration Liquidprotein formulation Intranasal (biodistribution measured at 30 min postadministration) Liquid protein formulation Intravenous biodistributionmeasured at 30 min post administration) Liquid protein formulationIntranasal (biodistribution measured at 90 min post administration)Microsphere formulation Intranasal (biodistribution measured at 30 minpost administration) Microsphere formulation Intranasal (biodistributionmeasured at 90 min post administration) Microsphere formulationIntranasal (biodistribution measured at 30 (low μCi) min postadministration) Antibody fragment (FAb) Intranasal (biodistributionmeasured at 30 min post administration)

Experimental Design: 40 male Sprague-Dawley rats were given one of threepreparations of ¹²⁵I radiolabeled IgG. These included liquid IgG proteinsolution in glycine at pH 5.1-5.3, IgG in a microsphere preparationincluding PEG, or as Fab antibody fragments in phosphate buffered saline(PBS). Drug administration was either intranasal or intravenous. Ratswere sacrificed either 30 or 90 min after the onset of delivery of theIgG preparations for biodistribution studies.

For intranasal delivery, the rats were anesthetized and placed on theirbacks on a heating pad in a metal surgical tray. The heating pad wasconnected to a thermostat and was automatically regulated to maintain a37° C. temperature based on continuous measurement from a rectal probe.A 2″×2″ gauze pad was rolled tightly into a pillow, taped together, andunder the neck to maintain a correct neck position horizontal with thecounter. A lead impregnated shield was placed between the surgical trayand the experimenter for protection against radiation. The dosesolution, pipette, pipette tips, and waste receptacle were arrangedbehind the shield for easy access.

A 6 μL drop was loaded into the pipette behind the shield and wiped drywith a tissue. A cotton swab covered in parafilm was used to occlude onenaris completely (the flat part of the swab was pushed gently againstthe naris to prevent airflow), while the 6 μL drop was expelled slowlyfrom the pipette (held at a 45° angle from the rat's midline), forming adrop on the pipette tip. The drop was lowered onto the open naris to beinhaled. After two minutes, the alternate naris was occluded and a 6 μLdrop was administered in the same fashion. A drop was administered asdescribed above every two minutes to alternating nares until a total of8 drops was delivered (4 to each naris) over 14 min. Delivered time ofeach drop was noted as well as any details regarding the animal'srespiration or success of the delivery. Three 3 μL aliquots of eachdosing solution were gamma counted to determine the measured specificactivity.

For intravenous IgG delivery, the rats required cannulation of thefemoral artery. Anesthetized animals were positioned on their backs insurgical tray on a heating pad maintained at 37° C. Both hind legs weresecured by loosely tying a suture around the limbs and weighting themwith a hemostat. Small, superficial cuts with blunt scissors were madeat the mid inguinal point, making sure not to cut the superficial bloodvessels. Gentle, blunt dissection using cotton swabs exposed the femoralvein from the great saphenous vein to the inguinal ligament. Bluntscissors were used to cut away the skin to get a better view the area.Overlying muscle was retracted by threading a 4-0 suture with a curvedneedle through the muscle, attaching a curved hemostat to the end of thesuture and weighting it in place. Connective tissue surrounding thefemoral vein and artery was carefully removed with blunt dissection(cotton swabs). Connective tissue between the vein and artery was teasedapart using two pairs of forceps carefully using a motion runningparallel to the blood vessels and being careful not to rupture thevessels. Saline was applied if the area was dry.

In an area free of branches, the angled forceps was inserted underneaththe vein, the tip poked through the connective tissue, and the forcepsslowly opened to pull a 12 inch 4-0 suture through very carefully. Ifthe vein collapsed, a cotton swab was used to gently pump the vein fullof blood. A second suture was pulled through in a similar manner. Themedial and lateral sutures were tied into loose knots. A cotton swab wasused to pump the vein full of blood. The lateral suture (closest to theknee) was tied into a tight knot. A hemostat was attached to the suturestrings of the medial suture and some tension was added to occlude bloodflow.

A 1 mm transverse incision was made in the femoral vein and a blunted 25G butterfly needle connected to tubing previously filled with 0.9% NaCland attached to a 3-way stopcock was immediately inserted. The medialsuture was tied down around the needle to secure it in place. To confirmplacement within the vein, a small amount of blood was withdrawn thensaline was pushed. Free suture strings were tied to the butterfly needlesecuring the cannula in place. Muscles were protracted, sutures securingthe limbs removed, and the surgical area was covered with gauze wet withsaline.

For the intravenous infusion of ¹²⁵I IgG, a syringe pump was placed inthe hood behind the lead shield. Parts of the pump were covered withparafilm (or saran wrap) to prevent contamination with radiation. Thepump was set for 4.75 mm diameter and rate of 50 μL/min. The dosesolution (48 μL) was mixed with 452 μL of saline (0.9% NaCl, totalvolume 500 μL) in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. A 1 cc syringe filledwith saline was attached to the 3-way stopcock attached to the butterflyneedle and placed in the pump. A piece of parafilm was used to securethe saline syringe to the stopcock. With the stopcock closed to the rat,the pump was started to fill the stopcock with saline.

A 1 cc syringe attached to a 27 G or 30 G needle was used to collect thedrug from the microcentrifuge tube and then the syringe was connected tothe 3-way stopcock. The stopcock was turned so that the flow was openbetween the dose solution and the rat. The tubing was filled with dosesolution making sure that no air bubbles are pushed into the rat andthat fluid does not pool near the femoral vein (this would indicate theneedle was not in the vein). The stopcock was turned so that flow wasopen to the saline syringe and the rats.

The time and start volume of the saline syringe was noted and the pumpwas started. The stop volume of the saline syringe was also noted at theend of the 14 min infusion. At least 700 μL of saline was infused (50μL/min over 14 min). The volume of saline administered was slightly morethan the volume of the tubing which ensured that all of the dosesolution was administered.

Two minutes prior to the desired end point time, anesthetized animalswere laid flat on their backs in a metal surgical tray. The heating pad,rectal probe, and neck pillow were removed. Tape was used to secure thefront limbs to the pan. The back of the pan was elevated slightly toallow blood to run away from the animal. The sternum was exposed bycutting through the skin. The sternum was clamped with a hemostat andthe rib cage was cut open laterally, exposing the diaphragm. Thediaphragm was cut laterally to expose the pleural cavity.

Surgical scissors were used to cut up the sides of the ribcage towardthe armpits of the animal, creating a ‘V’ shaped incision exposing theheart. The hemostat holding the sternum was taped above the head to holdthe cavity open. The heart was stabilized using the blunt forceps whilea small cut was made into the left ventricle. A 1 cc-syringe with 18 G,1″ blunt needle was inserted into the left ventricle and approximately0.1 mL of blood was removed and placed into a pre-weighed tube for gammacounting. A second 18 G blunt needle attached to an extension set filledwith 60 cc of saline was inserted through the left ventricle and intothe aorta. A large bulldog clamp was placed just above the heart on theaorta, securing the blunt needle in place.

The animal was perfused with 60 mL of saline followed by 360 mL ofparaformaldehyde using a syringe pump at a rate of 15 mL/min.

Throughout experimental procedures, strict precautions were followed toprevent radioactive contamination of animal tissues, surgical tools, andequipment. Geiger counters were placed at each work station tocontinuously screen tools, workspace, and staff. Personal protectiveequipment including double layered gloves, lab coats, eye protection,masks, and bouffant caps were worn at all times. Lead impregnatedshields were used to minimize exposure to radiation. Radioactivemonitoring badges were also worn by staff throughout experimentalprocedures to quantify exposure.

Immediately after collection, each tissue sample was placed into apre-labeled and pre-weighed gamma tube for later measurement.

For brain dissection, skin and muscle around the neck were cut with ascalpel just above the shoulder blades and a large pair of scissors usedto decapitate the animal, cutting dorsal to ventral to avoidcontamination from the trachea and esophagus. To expose the brain, amidline incision was made on the dorsal side of the skull, then skin waspeeled away, and a straight hemostat was used to break the bone, takingcare to leave the dorsal dura attached. Dorsal dura was collected.

To remove the brain from the skull, the head was inverted and a smallspatula was used to free it from the cavity. The posterior optic nerveand trigeminal nerves were cut close to the brain. The brain was thenplaced into a clean Petri dish for dissection.

From the base of the skull, the ventral dura was collected by scraping aforceps on the ventral skull walls. The pituitary, optic chiasm, andtrigeminal nerves were collected. The anterior portion of the trigeminalnerve consisted of the portion before the visible branch in the skull,while the remainder containing the trigeminal ganglion was considered asthe posterior section. The head was then set aside and covered with akim-wipe for later dissection.

A microscope was used to help remove vessels from the brain. Usingsurgical forceps, microscissors, and a 30 G needle, the basilar arteryand circle of Willis were removed and placed onto pre-weighed paper(paper was used because of the small weight of this tissue). The needlewas used to lift the vessels away from the brain, the forceps to grabhold, and the microscissors to make the cuts. This tissue was weighedimmediately upon collection and then the entire paper was crumpled andplaced into the bottom of tube).

Prior to placing the brain into the coronal matrix, the olfactory bulbswere cut off at the natural angle using a razor blade. In the coronalbrain matrix, a razor blade was inserted at the center of where opticchiasm was before removal to normalize each animal to the same location(bregma). Additional blades were placed every 2 mm from the first blade,resulting in 6×2 mm slices, 3 rostral to the optic chiasm and 3 caudal.

Blades were removed and tissues were dissected from each slice (FIG.1A-1F). The remaining section of cortex and hippocampus was dissectedfrom the remaining brain tissue in the matrix and placed in respectivetubes. The upper cervical spinal cord was collected. The remaining brainwas then bisected along the midline and dissected into midbrain, pons,medulla, and cerebellum according to FIG. 1G.

Returning to the head, the ventral side of the neck was cut anteriorlyand skin peeled back exposing lymph nodes, salivary glands, and neckmuscles. The superficial nodes, deep cervical nodes, carotid arteries,and thyroid gland were dissected and cleared of connective tissue. Arazor blade was used to bisect the skull along the midline. Theolfactory epithelium and respiratory epithelium were collected.

For body dissection, bodies were placed on their backs and alongitudinal cut using a scalpel was used to open the peritoneal cavitydown to the bladder. 3 mm square samples of liver (superficial rightlobe), kidney (left, tip), renal artery, spleen (tip), lung (right, toplobe), and heart were collected. Approximately 0.1-0.2 mL of urine wascollected.

Bodies were flipped over onto the stomach and a superficial incision wasmade down the length of the animal from shoulders to hips, following thespine. The skin was peeled away from the underlying tissue on both sidesto expose the shoulder blades. Axillary nodes in the armpits weredissected and cleared of connective tissue. A piece of right deltoidmuscle was collected (˜3 mm²).

The muscles overlying the spine were scored with a scalpel. To exposethe spinal cord, a small hemostat was inserted into the spinal columnand used to chip away overlying vertebrae and tissues. A small spatulawas used to loosen the cord from the spinal cavity and forceps used toremove it and place into a petri dish. The dura was peeled off of thecord using forceps. The cord was dissected into lower cervical,thoracic, and lumbar portions. The top ˜2 mm of lower cervical segmentwas discarded.

A 2 cm segment of trachea and esophagus was dissected from the body andconnective tissues were removed. The top 0.5 cm (closest to thedecapitation point) of each was discarded.

Pre-weighed gamma tubes containing samples were reweighed to determinetissue weight. Tissue samples from the rats were counted using a COBRAII Auto-Gamma Counter using a standard ¹²⁵I protocol and a 5 min counttime. Counters were normalized weekly to ensure a counting efficiency ator above 80%. Background counts were subtracted.

Mean and standard error of the nM concentration of each tissue samplewere calculated. Any value outside two standard deviations of the meanfor each tissue was considered an outlier and removed from the data set.nM IgG concentrations were calculated for each tissue using the measuredspecific activity of dosing solutions, the CPM of each tissue, and thevolume of each tissue (assuming 1 g=1 mL).

Results, Intranasal IgG Liquid Preparation Distribution at 30 min EndPoint. Eight rats received IN IgG liquid preparation at an average doseof 6.0 mg in 47.4 μL containing 69.6 μCi with a 30 min end point.Animals tolerated the IN administration well and all survived until the30 min desired end point.

At the site of IN drug administration, the average IgG concentrations inthe respiratory and olfactory epithelia were 136,213 nM and 442 nMrespectively. A rostral to caudal gradient of 13.1 nM to 6.0 nM IgG wasobserved in the trigeminal nerve. A similar gradient from the olfactorybulb to the anterior olfactory nucleus of 4.1 nM to 1.5 nM IgG wasobserved. The average cortex concentration of IgG after INadministration was 1.3 nM. Concentrations of IgG in other brain regionsranged from a low of 0.7 nM in the striatum to a high of 1.7 nM in thehypothalamus. The hippocampus was found to contain 0.6 nM IgG. A rostralto caudal concentration gradient (1.6 nM to 0.7 nM) was observed withinthe extra brain material sampled. Similarly, a rostral to caudalconcentration gradient (1.2 nM to 0.3 nM) was observed in the spinalcord. The average concentration of IgG in the dura of the brain was 15.2nM compared to a spinal cord dura concentration of 2.8 nM. The duralikely also contains some or most of the arachnoid membrane and togethercomprise two of the three components of the meninges. Other tissuessampled from the cavity of the ventral skull (pituitary and opticchiasm) contained 8.2 nM and 7.4 nM IgG respectively.

The blood concentration of IgG at the 30 min end point was 13.9 nM.Concentrations of IgG in peripheral organs ranged from a low of 1.3 nMin the heart to a high of 6.1 nM in the spleen and kidney, with urinecontaining 8.1 nM. Concentrations of IgG in the basilar and carotidarteries were considerably higher than the renal artery (11.7 and 14.1nM versus 4.4 nM). Average concentration of IgG in the sampled lymphnodes was 4.7 nM. Levels of IgG in tissues measured to assessvariability of IN administration and breathing difficulty (lung,esophagus, and trachea) were consistent across animals.

Results, Intranasal IgG Microsphere Preparation (low μCi) Distributionat 30 min End Point. Four rats received IN IgG microsphere preparation(low at an average dose of 7.2 mg in 48.0 μL containing 24.7 μCi with a30 min end point. The raw data from the four rats is provided in Table5. The measured specific activity from this dosing solution was muchlower than expected based upon the provided specific activity. Animalstolerated the IN administration well and all survived until the 30 mindesired end point. Zero statistically significant outliers and fourteennon-statistically significant outliers were identified out of a total of211 concentration values.

TABLE 5 Biodistribution (nM concentrations) of intranasally administeredIgG microsphere preparations (with low uCi) at the 30 min end point withoutliers included. BAX-17 BAX-18 BAX-19 BAX-20 Avg SE Volume Delivered(μL) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 ±0.00 uCi Delivered 20.9 20.9 28.6 28.624.7 ±2.2 mg Delivered 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 ±0.00 Olfactory Epithelium6,806.0 3,931.1 15,573.6 203.9 6,628.6 ±3,273.6 Respiratory Epithelium559,241.5 268,256.5 219,595.4 25,412.0 268,126.3 ±110,307.7 AnteriorTrigeminal 9.7 28.6 11.4 4.6 13.6 ±5.2 Nerve Posterior Trigeminal 5.414.5 6.3 4.1 7.6 ±2.4 Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 5.9 3.4 3.7 4.1 4.3 ±0.6Anterior Olfactory 1.9 2.4 2.1 1.4 1.9 ±0.2 Nucleus Frontal Cortex 1.21.6 2.0 1.4 1.6 ±0.2 Parietal Cortex 0.8 1.2 1.1 0.5 0.9 ±0.2 TemporalCortex 0.9 * 1.2 0.6 0.9 ±0.2 Occipital Cortex 0.0 1.3 0.4 1.6 0.8 ±0.4Extra Cortex 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.3 ±0.2 Amygdala 1.6 5.1 1.9 0.7 2.3 ±0.9Striatum 0.8 16.5 0.6 0.6 4.6 ±4.0 Septal Nucleus 1.8 4.2 0.6 0.3 1.7±0.9 Hypothalamus 1.8 3.9 2.5 1.1 2.3 ±0.6 Thalamus 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5±0.1 Midbrain 0.8 1.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 ±0.2 Hippocampus 0.6 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.7±0.2 Pons 0.6 1.9 1.2 0.8 1.1 ±0.3 Medulla 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.0 ±0.1Cerebellum 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.8 ±0.2 Extra Slice #1 1.3 2.6 2.4 1.5 2.0±0.3 Extra Slice #2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 ±0.05 Extra Slice #3 0.7 1.1 1.00.7 0.9 ±0.1 Extra Slice #4 0.7 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.8 ±0.1 Extra Slice #5 0.61.0 0.8 0.5 0.7 ±0.1 Extra Slice #6 0.7 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.9 ±0.2 Pituitary7.0 18.1 6.2 3.6 8.7 ±3.2 Optic Chiasm 14.9 19.0 8.2 8.1 12.5 ±2.7Dorsal Dura 12.0 20.7 15.1 20.6 17.1 ±2.1 Ventral Dura 18.5 56.5 16.215.2 26.6 ±10.0 Spinal Dura 2.9 1.0 1.7 3.6 2.3 ±0.6 Upper CervicalSpinal 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.2 ±0.1 Cord Lower Cervical Spinal 0.4 0.3 0.40.9 0.5 ±0.1 Cord Thoracic Spinal Cord 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 ±0.1 LumbarSpinal Cord 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 ±0.03 Circle of Willis & Basilar 24.929.7 17.7 9.3 20.4 ±4.4 Artery Carotid Artery 207.3 17.9 14.1 13.1 63.1±48.1 Renal artery (L) 6.1 2.4 4.5 2.4 3.8 ±0.9 Superficial Nodes (2)30.8 17.1 6.9 0.8 13.9 ±6.6 Cervical Nodes (2) 7.7 3.4 9.2 62.7 20.8±14.0 Axillary Nodes (2) 4.2 2.1 2.2 2.8 2.8 ±0.5 Blood Sample 2,889.38.0 1,730.1 7.1 1,158.6 ±705.4 Muscle (R, deltoid) 3.7 2.1 1.2 1.4 2.1±0.6 Liver (R, superficial lobe) 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 ±0.1 Kidney (L,tip) 13.1 2.5 6.9 3.0 6.4 ±2.5 Urine 5.4 4.0 9.3 3.0 5.4 ±1.4 Spleen(tip) 3.1 1.2 3.0 1.8 2.3 ±0.5 Heart 4.4 2.9 0.4 0.7 2.1 ±0.9 Lung (R,top lobe) 3.4 5.2 2.3 2.6 3.4 ±0.6 Thyroid 28,623.9 102.6 30,320.6 15.714,765.7 ±8,497.9 Esophagus 3.7 2.5 2.7 4.7 3.4 ±0.5 Trachea 2.7 1.5 2.04.9 2.8 ±0.8 Drug Standard CPM 2,316,335 2,316,335 3,256,120 3,256,1202,786,228 ±271,292.6 Drug Standard CPM 2,380,434 2,380,434 3,216,2983,216,298 2,798,366 ±241,293.2 Drug Standard CPM 2,259,775 2,259,7753,051,466 3,051,466 2,655,621 ±228,541.5 * = negative tube weight, so nMcould not be calculated

Results, Intranasal IgG Microsphere Preparation Distribution at 30 minEnd Point. Eight rats received IN IgG microsphere preparation at anaverage dose of 7.2 mg in 48.0 μL containing 60.0 μCi with a 30 min endpoint. The raw data from the eight rats is provided in Table 6. Animalstolerated the IN administration well and all survived until the 30 mindesired end point.

TABLE 6 Biodistribution (nM concentrations) of intranasally administeredIgG microsphere preparations at the 30 min end point with outliersexcluded. BAX-21 BAX-22 BAX-23 BAX-25 BAX-26 BAX-28 Avg SE VolumeDelivered 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 ±0.00 (μL) uCi Delivered59.9 56.3 73.4 60.8 53.1 56.5 60.0 ±2.9 mg Delivered 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.27.2 7.2 ±0.00 Olfactory Epithelium X 377.5 629.1 X 97.9 201.0 326.4±116.3 Respiratory 23,108.2 20,219.7 33,657.6 87,547.5 183,182.6101,353.0 74,844.8 ±25,792.8 Epithelium Anterior Trigeminal 2.0 1.7 2.11.3 0.8 1.2 1.5 ±0.2 Nerve Posterior Trigeminal 2.0 1.2 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.91.1 ±0.2 Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 2.7 1.0 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.2 ±0.3 AnteriorOlfactory 0.7 1.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 ±0.1 Nucleus Frontal Cortex 0.80.3 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 ±0.1 Parietal Cortex 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4±0.1 Temporal Cortex 0.2 0.4 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 ±0.2 Occipital Cortex0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 2.3 0.6 0.7 ±0.3 Extra Cortex 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.30.4 ±0.1 Amygdala 0.2 X 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 ±0.04 Striatum 0.6 1.5 0.31.1 X 2.1 1.1 ±0.3 Septal Nucleus 0.4 0.7 0.1 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.6 ±0.1Hypothalamus 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.5 ±0.1 Thalamus 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 ±0.01 Midbrain 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 ±0.05 Hippocampus0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 ±0.03 Pons 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 ±0.04Medulla 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 ±0.04 Cerebellum 0.3 1.1 X 1.7 0.20.2 0.7 ±0.3 Extra Slice #1 1.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 ±0.1 Extra Slice#2 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.4 0.6 ±0.4 Extra Slice #3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.20.5 0.3 ±0.04 Extra Slice #4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 2.8 0.6 ±0.4 ExtraSlice #5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ±0.02 Extra Slice #6 0.2 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 ±0.01 Pituitary 1.8 1.3 3.2 2.9 1.7 2.6 2.2 ±0.3 OpticChiasm 2.2 1.4 2.5 2.1 1.4 0.7 1.7 ±0.3 Dorsal Dura 5.4 7.8 5.0 2.4 5.11.6 4.6 ±0.9 Ventral Dura 9.4 3.1 2.9 3.7 3.1 1.7 4.0 ±1.1 Spinal Dura0.6 0.4 0.8 0.2 X 0.6 0.5 ±0.1 Upper Cervical 0.50 0.36 0.52 0.28 0.340.53 0.42 ±0.04 Spinal Cord Lower Cervical 0.06 0.14 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.120.11 ±0.01 Spinal Cord Thoracic Spinal 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.09 X 0.04 0.06±0.0 Cord Lumbar Spinal Cord 0.08 0.07 0.10 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.06 ±0.01Circle of Willis & 11.5 X 15.7 12.4 2.0 5.2 9.3 ±2.5 Basilar ArteryCarotid Artery 4.6 5.4 1.6 1.9 X 1.9 3.1 ±0.8 Renal artery (L) 0.9 0.40.5 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 ±0.1 Superficial Nodes 0.8 0.7 0.9 X 4.3 0.8 1.5±0.7 (2) Cervical Nodes (2) 1.2 1.9 1.1 0.8 X 0.5 1.1 ±0.2 AxillaryNodes (2) 0.4 X 0.3 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 ±0.1 Blood Sample 156.7 261.5 1.11.9 362.3 268.7 175.4 ±61.1 Muscle (R, deltoid) 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.20.4 ±0.1 Liver (R, superficial 0.0 X 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 ±0.05 lobe)Kidney (L, tip) 0.6 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.0 1.2 0.8 ±0.1 Urine 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.93.5 2.7 1.6 ±0.5 Spleen (tip) 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.5 ±0.1 Heart 0.30.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 ±0.04 Lung (R, top lobe) 0.5 0.4 0.3 2.2 0.2 1.30.8 ±0.3 Thyroid 1,697.8 3,275.2 16.1 36.2 X 35.6 1012.2 ±651.5Esophagus 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.7 1.3 0.4 0.6 ±0.2 Trachea 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.6 0.80.6 0.6 ±0.1 Drug Standard 6,936,801 6,170,223 8,071,624 7,024,7146,006,357 6,587,524 6,799,540.2 ±303,198.0 CPM Drug Standard 6,854,5636,687,656 8,239,126 6,958,531 6,134,932 6,360,075 6,872,480.3 ±300,895.5CPM Drug Standard 6,894,326 6,596,846 9,035,030 7,046,819 6,205,3386,576,363 7,059,120.2 ±412,602.5 CPM X = outlier removed from analysis

At the site of IN drug administration, the average IgG concentrations inthe respiratory and olfactory epithelia were 74,844.8 nM and 326 nMrespectively. A rostral to caudal gradient of 1.5 nM to 1.1 nM IgG wasobserved in the trigeminal nerve. A similar gradient from the olfactorybulb to the anterior olfactory nucleus of 1.2 nM to 0.6 nM IgG wasobserved. The average cortex concentration of IgG after INadministration was 0.5 nM. Concentrations of IgG in other brain regionsranged from a low of 0.1 nM in the thalamus to a high of 1.1 nM in thestriatum. The hippocampus was found to contain 0.2 nM IgG. The averageconcentration of IgG in the extra brain material sampled was 0.4 nM,similar to the average cortex concentration, and a concentrationgradient was not observed. A rostral to caudal concentration gradient(0.42 nM to 0.06 nM) was observed in the spinal cord. The averageconcentration of IgG in the dura of the brain was 4.3 nM compared to aspinal cord dura concentration of 0.6 nM. Other tissues sampled from theventral skull, the pituitary and optic chiasm, contained 2.2 nM and 1.7nM IgG respectively.

The blood concentration of IgG at the 30 min end point was 175 nM.Concentrations of IgG in peripheral organs ranged from a low of 0.2 nMin the liver to a high of 0.8 nM in the kidney, with urine containing1.6 nM. Concentrations of IgG in the basilar and carotid arteries wereconsiderable greater than the concentration in the renal artery (9.3 and3.1 nM versus 0.6 nM). Average concentration of IgG in the sampled lymphnodes was 1.0 nM. Levels of IgG in tissues measured to assessvariability of IN administration and breathing difficulty (lung,esophagus, and trachea) were consistent across animals. IgG levels inthe thyroid varied greatly ranging from 16.1 nM to 3,275 nM, even afterthe removal of outliers.

Results, Intranasal IgG Fragment Preparation Distribution at 30 min EndPoint. Four rats received an IN IgG Fab antibody fragment preparation atan average dose of approximately 3.3 mg in 48.2 μL containing 76.4 μCi.The raw data from the four rats is provided in Table 7. All fourexperiments were completed with an end point of 30 min, and as expectedthe animals tolerated the IN administration well and all survived untilthe desired end point.

TABLE 7 Biodistribution (nM concentrations) of intranasally administeredIgG Fab preparations at the 30 min end point with outliers excluded.BAX-41 BAX-42 BAX-43 BAX-44 Avg SE Volume Delivered (μL) 48.1 48.1 48.248.2 48.2 ±0.0 uCi Delivered 76.7 76.7 76.0 76.0 76.4 ±0.2 mg Delivered3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 ±0.0 Olfactory Epithelium 232.4 435.2 271.2 X 312.9±62.1 Respiratory Epithelium 93,166.9 138,501.7 59,830.3 140,806.9108076.4 ±19,465.7 Anterior Trigeminal 72.8 101.4 141.5 73.3 97.2 ±16.2Nerve Posterior Trigeminal 32.4 34.2 33.9 19.8 30.1 ±3.4 Nerve OlfactoryBulbs 54.0 26.3 45.2 23.7 37.3 ±7.3 Anterior Olfactory 20.4 14.1 25.015.9 18.8 ±2.4 Nucleus Frontal Cortex 20.0 11.9 21.5 X 17.8 ±3.0Parietal Cortex 7.0 5.8 11.6 6.7 7.8 ±1.3 Temporal Cortex 5.6 4.3 9.54.3 5.9 ±1.2 Occipital Cortex 9.3 5.6 7.1 10.0 8.0 ±1.0 Extra Cortex 8.97.0 8.5 4.2 7.2 ±1.1 Amygdala 10.3 14.3 15.2 6.9 11.7 ±1.9 Striatum 5.05.0 8.6 3.8 5.6 ±1.0 Septal Nucleus 8.4 6.8 10.8 5.1 7.8 ±1.2Hypothalamus 18.0 18.1 22.7 6.3 16.3 ±3.5 Thalamus 5.1 8.2 9.8 2.9 6.5±1.5 Midbrain 8.9 10.3 11.0 4.0 8.6 ±1.6 Hippocampus 6.1 7.4 7.2 2.6 5.8±1.1 Pons 11.0 12.4 12.4 4.9 10.2 ±1.8 Medulla 11.0 10.5 11.3 5.0 9.4±1.5 Cerebellum 9.2 5.5 6.1 8.3 7.3 ±0.9 Extra Slice #1 27.6 16.8 31.232.5 27.0 ±3.6 Extra Slice #2 12.5 9.8 16.0 X 12.8 ±1.8 Extra Slice #38.5 8.1 11.5 13.9 10.5 ±1.4 Extra Slice #4 7.4 6.5 9.2 6.2 7.3 ±0.7Extra Slice #5 6.8 X 8.1 14.3 9.7 ±2.3 Extra Slice #6 6.0 5.5 7.4 4.15.7 ±0.7 Pituitary 41.6 44.2 50.6 34.0 42.6 ±3.4 Optic Chiasm 31.8 21.836.4 12.4 25.6 ±5.4 Dorsal Dura 138.2 115.3 129.9 101.5 121.2 ±8.1Ventral Dura 123.1 109.7 106.0 81.1 105.0 ±8.8 Spinal Dura 3.4 8.1 2.74.5 4.7 ±1.2 Upper Cervical Spinal 20.5 13.7 16.7 7.9 14.7 ±2.7 CordLower Cervical Spinal 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.0 ±0.1 Cord Thoracic Spinal Cord0.9 0.7 0.8 1.3 0.9 ±0.1 Lumbar Spinal Cord 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.7 ±0.1Circle of Willis & 64.0 84.6 69.8 44.4 65.7 ±8.3 Basilar Artery CarotidArtery X 36.0 35.5 42.9 38.1 ±2.4 Renal artery (L) 9.9 14.8 4.0 5.9 8.6±2.4 Superficial Nodes (2) 9.0 9.4 5.5 6.7 7.6 ±0.9 Cervical Nodes (2)19.5 X 23.8 32.0 25.1 ±3.7 Axillary Nodes (2) 3.2 6.2 3.6 4.1 4.3 ±0.7Blood Sample 31.2 38.4 28.9 33.2 32.9 ±2.0 Muscle (R, deltoid) 2.87 5.052.26 2.18 3.1 ±0.7 Liver (R, superficial 3.8 3.3 4.0 2.4 3.4 ±0.3 lobe)Kidney (L, tip) 11.1 21.5 4.0 13.1 12.4 ±3.6 Urine 10.6 10.3 19.9 9.012.4 ±2.5 Spleen (tip) 9.7 12.9 3.4 9.0 8.7 ±2.0 Heart 0.8 3.0 4.5 1.52.5 ±0.8 Lung (R, top lobe) 3.5 9.1 6.7 4.4 5.9 ±1.2 Thyroid 228.2 411.7230.1 273.2 285.8 ±43.2 Esophagus 4.1 6.4 X 5.8 5.4 ±0.7 Trachea 5.6 8.711.3 4.8 7.6 ±1.5 Drug Standard CPM 7,158,905 7,158,905 6,994,4546,994,454 7076679.3 ±47,472.8 Drug Standard CPM 6,974,631 6,974,6317,215,418 7,215,418 7095024.0 ±69,509.2 Drug Standard CPM 7,280,1047,280,104 7,020,805 7,020,805 7150454.3 ±74,853.3 X = outlier removedfrom analysis

At the site of IN drug administration, the average IgG Fabconcentrations in the respiratory and olfactory epithelia were 108,076nM and 313 nM respectively. A rostral to caudal gradient of 97.2 nM to30.1 nM IgG Fab was observed in the trigeminal nerve. A similar gradientfrom the olfactory bulb to the anterior olfactory nucleus of 37.3 nM to18.8 nM IgG Fab was observed. The average cortex concentration of IgGFab after IN administration was 9.3 nM. Concentrations of IgG in otherbrain regions ranged from a low of 5.6 nM in the striatum to a high of16.3 nM in the hypothalamus. The hippocampus was found to contain 5.8 nMIgG Fab. A rostral to caudal concentration gradient (27.0 nM to 5.7 nM)was observed within the extra brain material sampled. Similarly, arostral to caudal concentration gradient (14.7 nM to 0.7 nM) wasobserved in the spinal cord. The average concentration of IgG Fab in thedura of the brain was 113.1 nM compared to a spinal cord duraconcentration of 4.7 nM. Other tissues sampled from the cavity of theventral skull (pituitary and optic chiasm) contained 42.6 nM and 25.6 nMIgG Fab respectively.

The blood concentration of IgG Fab at the 30 min end point was 32.9 nM.Concentrations of IgG Fab in peripheral organs ranged from a low of 2.5nM in the heart to a high of 12.4 nM in the kidney and urine, with thespleen containing 8.7 nM. Concentrations of IgG Fab in the basilar andcarotid arteries were considerably higher than the renal artery (65.7and 38.1 nM versus 8.6 nM).

Results, Comparison of 30 min and 90 min end points. Concentrations ofIgG in brain tissues were generally similar or slightly higher with theextended 90 min end point as compared to the 30 min end point for theIgG liquid preparation. There was more variability in the IgGmicrosphere preparation, with some tissues containing much more(thalamus, midbrain) and some tissues containing much less (striatum,occipital cortex) at the 90 min vs. the 30 min end points. Summaries ofthe IgG concentrations in tissues are provided in Table 8 and Table 9.

TABLE 8 Summary of tissue concentrations (nM ± SE) of IN, IV, and FabIgG at 30 min and 90 min endpoints with outliers removed. Treatment IgGProtein (mean nM ± SE) IgG Microspheres (mean nM ± SE) Route IntravenousIntranasal Intranasal Time Point 30 min 90 min 30 min Sample Size n = 7n = 8 n = 6 n = 6 Volume Delivered (μL) 47.7 ± 0.2  47.4 ± 0.2  47.6 ±0.1  48.0 ± 0.00 uCi Delivered 69.5 ± 0.3  69.6 ± 0.3  70.0 ± 0.01 60.0± 2.9  mg Delivered  6.0 ± 0.03  6.0 ± 0.02  7.4 ± 0.00  7.2 ± 0.00Olfactory Epithelium 43.0 ± 3.7  441 ± 185 355 ± 71  326 ± 116Respiratory Epithelium 41.1 ± 4.3  136,213 ± 27,325  163,627 ± 16,376 74,845 ± 25793  Anterior Trigeminal 10.5 ± 1.0  13.1 ± 2.6  19.3 ± 2.8 1.5 ± 0.2 Nerve Posterior Trigeminal 6.3 ± 1.0 6.0 ± 1.1 8.4 ± 1.7 1.1 ±0.2 Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 3.4 ± 0.5 4.1 ± 0.9 9.9 ± 1.6 1.2 ± 0.3Anterior Olfactory 1.9 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.1 NucleusFrontal Cortex 2.9 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.1 3.8 ± 0.6 0.5 ± 0.1 Parietal Cortex3.3 ± 0.7 0.9 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 Temporal Cortex 2.9 ± 0.7 1.1 ±0.1 1.4 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.2 Occipital Cortex 2.3 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.20.7 ± 0.3 Extra Cortex 1.8 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.1 Amygdala1.9 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.2  0.3 ± 0.04 Striatum 1.8 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.3 Septal Nucleus 1.8 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 0.6 ±0.1 Hypothalamus 2.0 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1 Thalamus 1.7 ±0.3  0.4 ± 0.03  0.6 ± 0.04  0.1 ± 0.01 Midbrain 1.8 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.1 1.3± 0.1  0.3 ± 0.05 Hippocampus 1.1 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1  0.2 ± 0.03Pons 1.7 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2  0.4 ± 0.04 Medulla 1.8 ± 0.3 0.9 ±0.1 1.6 ± 0.2  0.3 ± 0.04 Cerebellum 1.9 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.2 0.7 ±0.3 Extra Slice #1 2.0 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.3 3.3 ± 0.4 0.5 ± 0.1 Extra Slice#2 2.1 ± 0.3 1.0 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.4 Extra Slice #3 2.2 ± 0.3 0.8± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.2  0.3 ± 0.04 Extra Slice #4 2.4 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.4 Extra Slice #5 2.6 ± 0.6 0.7 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.1  0.2 ± 0.02 ExtraSlice #6 2.6 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1  0.2 ± 0.01 Pituitary 10.1 ± 0.8 8.2 ± 1.8 8.4 ± 1.1 2.2 ± 0.3 Optic Chiasm 5.1 ± 0.7 7.4 ± 1.7 8.0 ± 0.71.7 ± 0.3 Dorsal Dura 27.6 ± 3.0  15.3 ± 2.6  31.1 ± 4.0  4.6 ± 0.9Ventral Dura 23.5 ± 3.1  15.0 ± 2.5  32.3 ± 4.4  4.0 ± 1.1 Spinal Dura47.2 ± 3.0  2.8 ±0.3  3.3 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 0.1 Upper Cervical Spinal 2.0 ±0.2 1.2 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.3  0.4 ± 0.04 Cord Lower Cervical Spinal 2.6 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1  0.1 ± 0.01 Cord Thoracic Spinal Cord 1.6 ± 0.2 0.4± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1  0.1 ± 0.01 Lumbar Spinal Cord 2.1 ± 0.3  0.3 ± 0.04 0.4± 0.1  0.1 ± 0.01 Circle of Willis & 18.1 ± 2.8  11.7 ± 2.5  14.8 ± 1.1 9.3 ± 2.5 Basilar Artery Carotid Artery 33.2 ± 3.3  14.1 ± 2.0  16.1 ±2.3  3.1 ± 0.8 Renal artery (L) 111.2 ± 10.1  4.4 ± 1.0 11.4 ± 3.3  0.6± 0.1 Superficial Nodes (2) 25.3 ± 2.9  4.8 ± 0.4 10.4 ± 2.2  1.5 ± 0.7Cervical Nodes (2) 62.6 ± 9.2  5.6 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 0.8 1.1 ± 0.2 AxillaryNodes (2) 42.8 ± 12.8 3.7 ± 0.5 6.0 ± 0.6 0.5 ± 0.1 Blood Sample 1,361 ±42.5  13.9 ± 0.9  19.7 ± 1.4  175 ± 61  Muscle (R, deltoid) 19.1 ± 3.8 2.7 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.1 Liver (R, superficial  135 ± 23.7 1.7 ±0.2 2.6 ± 0.4  0.2 ± 0.05 lobe) Kidney (L, tip)  355 ± 30.8 6.1 ± 0.88.5 ± 1.6 0.8 ± 0.1 Urine 92.6 ± 26.0 8.1 ± 1.4 17.5 ± 2.2  1.6 ± 0.5Spleen (tip)  228 ± 17.5 6.1 ± 1.0 6.8 ± 0.4 0.5 ± 0.1 Heart 63.2 ± 11.71.3 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.6  0.3 ± 0.04 Lung (R, top lobe)  261 ± 51.3 2.9 ± 0.44.5 ± 0.7 0.8 ± 0.3 Thyroid  534 ± 65.0  148 ± 12.8  620 ± 30.8 1,012 ±652  Esophagus 28.1 ± 3.9  4.3 ± 0.6 7.7 ± 1.3 0.6 ± 0.2 Trachea 28.2 ±6.2  3.9 ± 0.6 6.6 ± 1.4 0.6 ± 0.1 Drug Standard CPM 7,448,243 ±128,562  7,630,853 ± 169,309  7,166,204 ± 76,377   6,799,540 ± 303,198 Drug Standard CPM 7,089,796 ± 272,234  7,470,182 ± 171,868  7,200,437 ±154,753  6,872,480 ± 300,896  Drug Standard CPM 7,390,784 ± 351,624 7,689,073 ± 214,590  7,022,761 ± 10,481   7,059,120 ± 412,602  TreatmentIgG Microspheres (mean nM ± SE) IgG FAB (mean nM ± SE) Route IntranasalIntranasal Time Point 90 min 30 min Sample Size n = 5 n = 4 VolumeDelivered (μL) 48.0 ± 0.00 48.2 ± 0.0  uCi Delivered 59.7 ± 2.0  76.4 ±0.2  mg Delivered  7.2 ± 0.00 3.3 ± 0.0 Olfactory Epithelium 3,192 ±1,625 312.9 ± 62.1  Respiratory Epithelium 124,509 ± 20,723  108076.4 ±19,465.7  Anterior Trigeminal 8.0 ± 1.3 97.2 ± 16.2 Nerve PosteriorTrigeminal 3.1 ± 0.2 30.1 ± 3.4  Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 1.5 ± 0.2 37.3 ±7.3  Anterior Olfactory 0.6 ± 0.1 18.8 ± 2.4  Nucleus Frontal Cortex 0.7± 0.1 17.8 ± 3.0  Parietal Cortex 0.3 ± 0.1 7.8 ± 1.3 Temporal Cortex0.5 ± 0.1 5.9 ± 1.2 Occipital Cortex 0.3 ± 0.1 8.0 ± 1.0 Extra Cortex0.5 ± 0.1 7.2 ± 1.1 Amygdala 0.4 ± 0.1 11.7 ± 1.9  Striatum 0.6 ± 0.25.6 ± 1.0 Septal Nucleus 0.6 ± 0.4 7.8 ± 1.2 Hypothalamus 0.6 ± 0.1 16.3± 3.5  Thalamus 0.3 ± 0.1 6.5 ± 1.5 Midbrain 0.5 ± 0.1 8.6 ± 1.6Hippocampus 0.5 ± 0.1 5.8 ± 1.1 Pons 0.5 ± 0.1 10.2 ± 1.8  Medulla  0.4± 0.04 9.4 ± 1.5 Cerebellum 0.5 ± 0.1 7.3 ± 0.9 Extra Slice #1 0.8 ± 0.127.0 ± 3.6  Extra Slice #2 0.5 ± 0.1 12.8 ± 1.8  Extra Slice #3  0.4 ±0.04 10.5 ± 1.4  Extra Slice #4  0.3 ± 0.03 7.3 ± 0.7 Extra Slice #5 0.3 ± 0.04 9.7 ± 2.3 Extra Slice #6  0.3 ± 0.05 5.7 ± 0.7 Pituitary 2.8± 0.5 42.6 ± 3.4  Optic Chiasm 1.9 ± 0.9 25.6 ± 5.4  Dorsal Dura 5.8 ±1.8 121.2 ± 8.1  Ventral Dura 11.4 ± 3.8  105.0 ± 8.8  Spinal Dura 0.7 ±0.1 4.7 ± 1.2 Upper Cervical Spinal 0.6 ± 0.2 14.7 ± 2.7  Cord LowerCervical Spinal 0.3 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 Cord Thoracic Spinal Cord  0.2 ±0.05 0.9 ± 0.1 Lumbar Spinal Cord  0.2 ± 0.02 0.7 ± 0.1 Circle of Willis& 5.8 ± 1.1 65.7 ± 8.3  Basilar Artery Carotid Artery 6.3 ± 0.4 38.1 ±2.4  Renal artery (L) 3.7 ± 1.5 8.6 ± 2.4 Superficial Nodes (2) 2.4 ±0.1 7.6 ± 0.9 Cervical Nodes (2)  2.6 ± 0.03 25.1 ± 3.7  Axillary Nodes(2) 2.6 ± 0.6 4.3 ± 0.7 Blood Sample  223 ± 84.2 32.9 ± 2.0  Muscle (R,deltoid) 0.9 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.7 Liver (R, superficial 0.8 ± 0.2 3.4 ± 0.3lobe) Kidney (L, tip) 2.6 ± 0.6 12.4 ± 3.6  Urine 6.3 ± 1.7 12.4 ± 2.5 Spleen (tip) 2.0 ± 0.5 8.7 ± 2.0 Heart 0.6 ± 0.1 2.5 ± 0.8 Lung (R, toplobe) 1.2 ± 0.4 5.9 ± 1.2 Thyroid 216 ± 50  285.8 ± 43.2  Esophagus 4.7± 1.3 5.4 ± 0.7 Trachea 2.0 ± 0.6 7.6 ± 1.5 Drug Standard CPM 6,861,351± 210,321  7076679.3 ± 47,472.8  Drug Standard CPM 6,758,588 ± 176,717 7095024.0 ± 69,509.2  Drug Standard CPM 7,027,097 ± 316,344  7150454.3 ±74,853.3 

TABLE 9 Summary of tissue concentrations of IgG normalized to a 6 mgdose. Treatment IgG Protein (mean nM) IgG Microspheres (mean nM) IgG FAB(mean nM) Route Intravenous Intranasal Intranasal Intranasal Time Point30 min 90 min 30 min 90 min 30 min Sample Size n = 7 n = 8 n = 6 n = 6 n= 5 n = 4 Volume Delivered (μL) 47.7 47.4 47.6 48.0 48.0 48.2 uCiDelivered 69.5 69.6 70.0 60.0 59.7 76.4 mg Delivered 6.0 6.0 7.4 7.2 7.23.3 Olfactory Epithelium 43.0 441 288 272 2,660 569.0 RespiratoryEpithelium 41.1 136,213 132,671 62,371 103,758 196502.6 AnteriorTrigeminal 10.5 13.1 15.6 1.3 6.7 176.8 Nerve Posterior Trigeminal 6.36.0 6.8 0.9 2.6 54.7 Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 3.4 4.1 8.0 1.0 1.2 67.8Anterior Olfactory 1.9 1.5 2.1 0.5 0.5 34.3 Nucleus Frontal Cortex 2.91.4 3.1 0.4 0.5 32.3 Parietal Cortex 3.3 0.9 1.3 0.3 0.3 14.1 TemporalCortex 2.9 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.4 10.8 Occipital Cortex 2.3 1.8 2.0 0.6 0.314.5 Extra Cortex 1.8 1.0 1.6 0.3 0.4 13.0 Amygdala 1.9 1.4 1.3 0.2 0.321.2 Striatum 1.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.5 10.2 Septal Nucleus 1.8 0.9 0.9 0.50.5 14.2 Hypothalamus 2.0 1.7 1.6 0.4 0.5 29.6 Thalamus 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.10.3 11.8 Midbrain 1.8 0.7 1.1 0.2 0.4 15.6 Hippocampus 1.1 0.6 0.8 0.20.4 10.6 Pons 1.7 0.9 1.3 0.3 0.4 18.5 Medulla 1.8 0.9 1.3 0.2 0.3 17.1Cerebellum 1.9 0.8 1.3 0.6 0.4 13.2 Extra Slice #1 2.0 1.6 2.7 0.4 0.649.1 Extra Slice #2 2.1 1.0 1.6 0.5 0.4 23.2 Extra Slice #3 2.2 0.8 1.30.2 0.3 19.1 Extra Slice #4 2.4 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.2 13.3 Extra Slice #5 2.60.7 1.0 0.2 0.3 17.7 Extra Slice #6 2.6 0.9 1.0 0.2 0.3 10.4 Pituitary10.1 8.2 6.8 1.9 2.3 77.5 Optic Chiasm 5.1 7.4 6.5 1.4 1.6 46.5 DorsalDura 27.6 15.3 25.2 3.8 4.9 220.4 Ventral Dura 23.5 15.0 26.2 3.3 9.5190.8 Spinal Dura 47.2 2.8 2.7 0.4 0.6 8.5 Upper Cervical Spinal 2.0 1.21.6 0.4 0.5 26.7 Cord Lower Cervical Spinal 2.6 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.3 1.8 CordThoracic Spinal Cord 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 1.7 Lumbar Spinal Cord 2.1 0.30.4 0.1 0.1 1.2 Circle of Willis & 18.1 11.7 12.0 7.8 4.8 119.4 BasilarArtery Carotid Artery 33.2 14.1 13.1 2.6 5.3 69.3 Renal artery (L) 111.24.4 9.2 0.5 3.1 15.7 Superficial Nodes (2) 25.3 4.8 8.5 1.2 2.0 13.9Cervical Nodes (2) 62.6 5.6 5.6 0.9 2.2 45.6 Axillary Nodes (2) 42.8 3.74.9 0.4 2.2 7.8 Blood Sample 1,361 13.9 16.0 146 186 59.8 Muscle (R,deltoid) 19.1 2.7 2.3 0.4 0.8 5.6 Liver (R, superficial 135 1.7 2.1 0.20.7 6.1 lobe) Kidney (L, tip) 355 6.1 6.9 0.6 2.1 22.6 Urine 92.6 8.114.2 1.3 5.2 22.6 Spleen (tip) 228 6.1 5.5 0.4 1.7 15.9 Heart 63.2 1.32.2 0.2 0.5 4.5 Lung (R, top lobe) 261 2.9 3.6 0.7 1.0 10.8 Thyroid 534148 502 843 180 519.6 Esophagus 28.1 4.3 6.2 0.5 3.9 9.9 Trachea 28.23.9 5.4 0.5 1.6 13.8

Results, Intranasal IgG Liquid Preparation Distribution at 90 min EndPoint. Six rats received IN IgG liquid preparation at an average dose of7.4 mg in 47.6 μL containing 70.0 μCi with a 90 min end point. Animalstolerated the IN administration well and all survived until the 90 mindesired end point. The nanomolar IgG concentrations in tissues for INIgG liquid preparation administrations taken at the 90 min end point arepresented in Table 10.

TABLE 10 Tissue concentrations (nM) of IgG after intranasal IgG liquidpreparation administration at the 90 min end point with outliersexcluded. BAX-24 BAX-33 BAX-34 BAX-35 BAX-36 BAX-40 Avg SE VolumeDelivered 47.8 47.4 47.4 47.5 47.5 47.8 47.6 ±0.1 (μL) uCi Delivered70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 ±0.01 mg Delivered 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.47.4 7.4 7.4 ±0.00 Olfactory 669.3 389.3 196.5 203.8 307.7 365.8 355.4±70.8 Epithelium Respiratory 205,721.0 194,945.7 189,621.1 139,524.3150,482.2 101,469.9 163,627.4 ±16,376.5 Epithelium Anterior Trigeminal16.8 30.0 15.0 10.6 20.1 23.1 19.3 ±2.8 Nerve Posterior Trigeminal X13.4 5.2 6.7 5.6 11.3 8.4 ±1.7 Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 15.5 9.1 10.1 10.53.6 10.8 9.9 ±1.6 Anterior Olfactory 3.0 3.4 2.3 2.7 1.5 2.4 2.5 ±0.3Nucleus Frontal Cortex 3.3 5.9 2.4 5.0 2.7 3.3 3.8 ±0.6 Parietal Cortex1.4 1.6 1.3 2.1 1.4 X 1.5 ±0.1 Temporal Cortex 1.1 0.9 1.7 1.4 1.2 2.01.4 ±0.2 Occipital Cortex 2.1 3.43 1.8 2.6 2.4 2.8 2.5 ±0.2 Extra Cortex1.6 1.6 1.6 2.6 1.9 2.5 1.9 ±0.2 Amygdala 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.1 2.6 1.6±0.2 Striatum 0.9 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.9 ±0.1 Septal Nucleus 1.4 1.11.1 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.1 ±0.1 Hypothalamus 2.5 1.8 1.6 2.3 1.3 2.2 1.9 ±0.2Thalamus 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.78 0.6 ±0.04 Midbrain 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.21.8 1.3 ±0.1 Hippocampus 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.0 ±0.1 Pons 1.9 1.21.1 1.9 1.2 2.2 1.6 ±0.2 Medulla 1.7 1.0 1.1 1.9 1.5 2.4 1.6 ±0.2Cerebellum 1.4 1.0 1.6 2.1 1.4 2.5 1.7 ±0.2 Extra Slice #1 3.6 4.2 2.54.1 1.6 3.7 3.3 ±0.4 Extra Slice #2 X 2.4 1.4 2.1 1.4 2.3 1.9 ±0.2 ExtraSlice #3 1.4 1.9 1.1 1.6 1.1 2.3 1.6 ±0.2 Extra Slice #4 1.2 1.56 0.81.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 ±0.1 Extra Slice #5 1.2 1.3 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.43 1.2 ±0.1Extra Slice #6 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.9 1.3 ±0.1 Pituitary 12.7 5.5 5.68.1 8.4 10.4 8.4 ±1.1 Optic Chiasm 7.2 8.4 7.1 9.9 5.7 9.6 8.0 ±0.7Dorsal Dura 12.3 33.0 37.7 37.7 29.6 36.5 31.1 ±4.0 Ventral Dura 21.647.6 41.2 26.5 21.4 35.4 32.3 ±4.4 Spinal Dura 2.0 3.2 1.4 2.6 4.3 6.43.3 ±0.7 Upper Cervical 2.8 1.2 1.9 1.8 1.5 2.8 2.0 ±0.3 Spinal CordLower Cervical 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.7 X 0.6 ±0.1 Spinal Cord ThoracicSpinal 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.5 ±0.08 Cord Lumbar Spinal Cord 0.4 0.30.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 ±0.08 Circle of Willis & 16.8 11.7 15.1 X 17.7 12.914.8 ±1.1 Basilar Artery Carotid Artery 17.4 13.5 12.6 13.0 13.5 26.916.1 ±2.3 Renal artery (L) 22.4 8.4 7.7 14.6 3.7 X 11.4 ±3.3 SuperficialNodes 7.4 20.5 5.0 8.7 9.6 11.5 10.4 ±2.2 (2) Cervical Nodes (2) 6.7 8.94.4 5.2 6.9 9.1 6.9 ±0.8 Axillary Nodes (2) 7.2 5.8 4.3 4.5 7.9 6.3 6.0±0.6 Blood Sample 17.7 23.3 16.1 X 22.5 19.0 19.7 ±1.4 Muscle (R,deltoid) 2.6 3.2 1.0 1.3 5.4 3.6 2.9 ±0.7 Liver (R, superficial 2.8 1.43.9 1.1 2.7 3.4 2.6 ±0.4 lobe) Kidney (L, tip) 16.0 7.6 8.8 4.7 6.6 7.38.5 ±1.6 Urine 25.9 10.8 18.7 12.3 18.0 19.3 17.5 ±2.2 Spleen (tip) 5.87.8 6.8 7.1 5.3 7.7 6.8 ±0.4 Heart 2.1 4.8 1.5 X 1.8 3.4 2.7 ±0.6 Lung(R, top lobe) 5.4 2.0 4.6 7.3 4.5 3.1 4.5 ±0.7 Thyroid 543.6 566.7 700.5X 680.7 606.1 619.5 ±30.8 Esophagus 13.5 8.7 6.3 7.4 5.5 4.8 7.7 ±1.3Trachea 13.5 6.6 5.6 3.4 5.6 5.0 6.6 ±1.4 Drug Standard 7,390,8467,130,719 7,130,719 6,977,049 6,977,049 7,390,846 7166204.3 ±76,377.4CPM Drug Standard 7,285,169 7,575,479 7,575,479 6,740,664 6,740,6647,285,169 7200437.0 ±154,753.0 CPM Drug Standard 6,990,473 7,032,4267,032,426 7,045,383 7,045,383 6,990,473 7022760.5 ±10,480.7 CPM

X=outlier removed from analysis At the site of IN drug administration,the average IgG concentrations in the respiratory and olfactoryepithelia were 163,627 nM and 355 nM respectively. A rostral to caudalgradient of 19.3 nM to 8.4 nM IgG was observed in the trigeminal nerve.A similar gradient from the olfactory bulb to the anterior olfactorynucleus of 9.9 nM to 2.5 nM IgG was observed. The average cortexconcentration of IgG after IN administration was 2.2 nM. Concentrationsof IgG in other brain regions ranged from a low of 0.6 nM in thethalamus to a high of 1.9 nM in the hypothalamus. The hippocampus wasfound to contain 1.0 nM IgG. A rostral to caudal concentration gradient(3.3 nM to 1.2 nM) was observed within the extra brain material sampled.Similarly, a rostral to caudal concentration gradient (2.0 nM to 0.4 nM)was observed in the spinal cord. The average concentration of IgG in thedura of the brain was 31.7 nM compared to a spinal cord duraconcentration of 3.3 nM. Other tissues sampled from the ventral skull,the pituitary and optic chiasm, contained 8.4 nM and 8.0 nM IgGrespectively.

The blood concentration of IgG at the 30 min end point was 19.7 nM.Concentrations of IgG in peripheral organs ranged from a low of 2.6 nMin the liver to a high of 7.7 nM in the spleen, with urine containing17.5 nM. Concentrations of IgG in the basilar and carotid arteries weresimilar to the concentration in the renal artery (14.8 and 16.1 nMversus 11.4 nM). Average concentration of IgG in the sampled lymph nodeswas 7.8 nM. Levels of IgG in tissues measured to assess variability ofIN administration and breathing difficulty (lung, esophagus, andtrachea) were consistent across animals.

Results, Intranasal IgG Microsphere Preparation Distribution at 90 minEnd Point. Six rats received IN IgG microsphere preparation at anaverage dose of 7.2 mg in 48.0 μL containing 59.7 μCi with a 90 min endpoint. Animals tolerated the IN administration well and all surviveduntil the 90 min desired end point. The nanomolar IgG concentrations intissues for IN IgG microsphere preparation administrations taken at the90 min end point in five of the six rats are presented in Table 11.

TABLE 11 Tissue concentrations (nM) of IgG after intranasal IgGmicrosphere preparation administration at the 90 min end point withoutliers excluded. BAX-31 BAX-32 BAX-37 BAX-38 BAX-39 Avg SE VolumeDelivered (μL) 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 ±0.00 uCi Delivered 57.552.7 62.8 62.8 62.8 59.7 ±2.0 mg Delivered 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 ±0.00Olfactory Epithelium 293.5 3,632.7 853.2 1,898.5 9,281.1 3,191.8 ±1,625Respiratory Epithelium 169,083.6 169,807.3 128,471.3 69,460.0 85,723.8124,509.2 ±20,723 Anterior Trigeminal 11.1 5.9 10.7 7.6 4.5 8.0 ±1.3Nerve Posterior Trigeminal 2.6 3.3 3.6 X 3.1 3.1 ±0.2 Nerve OlfactoryBulbs 2.0 1.9 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.5 ±0.2 Anterior Olfactory 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.40.8 0.6 ±0.1 Nucleus Frontal Cortex 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.7 ±0.1Parietal Cortex 0.3 X 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 ±0.1 Temporal Cortex 0.7 0.7 0.30.5 0.5 0.5 ±0.1 Occipital Cortex 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 ±0.1 ExtraCortex 0.6 0.81 0.4 0.4 X 0.5 ±0.1 Amygdala 0.2 X 0.3 0.49 0.53 0.4 ±0.1Striatum 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.6 ±0.2 Septal Nucleus 0.4 1.9 0.1 0.2 X0.6 ±0.4 Hypothalamus 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.6 ±0.1 Thalamus 0.2 0.6 0.10.2 0.4 0.3 ±0.1 Midbrain 0.3 0.5 0.2 X 0.8 0.5 ±0.1 Hippocampus 0.3 0.50.2 0.2 1.0 0.5 ±0.1 Pons 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 ±0.1 Medulla 0.5 0.40.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 ±0.04 Cerebellum 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.5 ±0.1 ExtraSlice #1 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.8 ±0.1 Extra Slice #2 0.4 0.50 0.2 0.40.96 0.5 ±0.1 Extra Slice #3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 ±0.04 Extra Slice#4 0.3 X 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 ±0.03 Extra Slice #5 0.3 0.4 X 0.5 0.3 0.3±0.04 Extra Slice #6 0.4 X 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.3 ±0.05 Pituitary 4.4 2.1 2.92.7 1.6 2.8 ±0.5 Optic Chiasm X 3.4 X 1.9 0.4 1.9 ±0.9 Dorsal Dura X11.3 3.8 3.7 4.5 5.8 ±1.8 Ventral Dura 11.8 26.0 7.4 3.9 8.1 11.4 ±3.8Spinal Dura 0.6 0.8 0.7 X X 0.7 ±0.1 Upper Cervical Spinal 0.5 0.3 1.10.9 0.3 0.6 ±0.2 Cord Lower Cervical Spinal 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.3 ±0.1Cord Thoracic Spinal Cord 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 ±0.05 Lumbar SpinalCord X 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 ±0.02 Circle of Willis & 8.9 5.0 3.4 X 5.95.8 ±1.1 Basilar Artery Carotid Artery 5.3 7.1 5.9 7.5 5.9 6.3 ±0.4Renal artery (L) 1.8 3.3 1.9 9.6 1.8 3.7 ±1.5 Superficial Nodes (2) 2.32.1 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.4 ±0.1 Cervical Nodes (2) 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.7 2.6 ±0.0Axillary Nodes (2) 2.2 1.4 1.9 4.6 3.1 2.6 ±0.6 Blood Sample 249.6 388.453.0 6.6 417.6 223.0 ±84.2 Muscle (R, deltoid) 0.0 0.9 1.2 X 1.5 0.9±0.3 Liver (R, superficial 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.5 0.8 ±0.2 lobe) Kidney (L,tip) 1.6 1.9 1.3 3.7 4.3 2.6 ±0.6 Urine 4.7 4.6 6.7 2.7 12.8 6.3 ±1.7Spleen (tip) 1.4 1.5 0.8 2.9 3.4 2.0 ±0.5 Heart 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.6±0.1 Lung (R, top lobe) 0.9 2.3 0.8 0.9 X 1.2 ±0.4 Thyroid 181.3 153.4 X314.3 X 216.4 ±49.6 Esophagus 2.4 5.6 1.2 5.3 8.8 4.7 ±1.3 Trachea 1.71.6 0.9 3.7 X 2.0 ±0.6 Drug Standard CPM 6,696,942 6,103,589 7,168,7427,168,742 7,168,742 6,861,351 ±210,321 Drug Standard CPM 6,548,4476,157,644 7,028,950 7,028,950 7,028,950 6,758,588 ±176,717 Drug StandardCPM 6,631,733 5,962,084 7,513,889 7,513,889 7,513,889 7,027,097 ±316,344

X=outlier removed from analysis at the site of IN drug administration,the average IgG concentrations in the respiratory and olfactoryepithelia were 124,509 nM and 3,191 nM respectively. A rostral to caudalgradient of 8.0 nM to 3.1 nM IgG was observed in the trigeminal nerve. Asimilar gradient from the olfactory bulb to the anterior olfactorynucleus of 1.5 nM to 0.6 nM IgG was observed. The average cortexconcentration of IgG after IN administration was 0.5 nM. Concentrationsof IgG in other brain regions ranged from a low of 0.3 nM in thethalamus to a high of 0.65 nM in the septal nucleus. The hippocampus wasfound to contain 0.5 nM IgG. The average concentration of IgG in theextra brain material sampled was 0.4 nM, similar to the average cortexconcentration, and a rostral to caudal concentration gradient wasobserved. Similarly, a rostral to caudal concentration gradient (0.6 nMto 0.2 nM) was observed in the spinal cord. The average concentration ofIgG in the dura of the brain was 8.6 nM compared to a spinal cord duraconcentration of 0.7 nM. Other tissues sampled from the ventral skull,the pituitary and optic chiasm, contained 2.8 nM and 1.9 nM IgGrespectively.

The blood concentration of IgG at the 30 min end point was 223.0 nM.Concentrations of IgG in peripheral organs ranged from a low of 0.6 nMin the heart to a high of 2.6 nM in the kidney, with urine containing6.3 nM. Concentrations of IgG in the basilar and carotid arteries weresimilar to the concentration in the renal artery (5.8 and 6.3 nM versus3.7 nM). Average concentration of IgG in the sampled lymph nodes was 2.5nM. Levels of IgG in tissues measured to assess variability of INadministration and breathing difficulty (lung, esophagus, and trachea)were fairly consistent across animals. IgG levels in the thyroid variedgreatly prior to the removal of outliers.

Overall, IN administration of the IgG liquid preparation resulted inhigher brain concentrations than the microsphere preparation whennormalizing to a 6.0 mg dose with brain concentrations ranging from 0.4to 1.7 nM. A summary of the IN, IV and Fab data is presented in Table 8.This could be explained by lower concentrations of the microsphere IgGreaching the olfactory and respiratory epithelium. Intranasalmicrosphere preparation also resulted in about ten times higherconcentrations of IgG in the blood than the liquid preparation.

Normalized to a 6 mg IN dose, Fab tissue concentrations were on average19-fold higher in the brain than the liquid IgG preparations. A summaryof the tissue concentrations of IgG normalized to a 6 mg dose ispresented in Table 9. The three times smaller molecular weight of Fabversus intact IgG is likely responsible for the increased efficiency ofdirect delivery from the nasal cavity to the CNS. If the Fab has similarbiological effects as IgG for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, itwould be a promising candidate for IN delivery.

Comparisons of brain tissue concentrations (nM) after intranasal IgGliquid and microsphere preparations at 30 and 90 min end points aredepicted in FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B.

Results of IN and IV delivery of the liquid protein preparation after 30min. On average, IN administration of the IgG liquid preparationresulted in lower brain concentrations than an equivalent IV doseadministered at the 30 min end point (for example the average cortexconcentration of 1.3 nM vs. 2.6 nM). However, to achieve these brainconcentrations of IgG, IV administration resulted in bloodconcentrations that were a hundred times higher than IN administration(1,361 nM vs. 13.9 nM). Higher IgG concentrations in peripheral organsand systems were also observed with IV vs. IN administration. Forexample, IgG concentrations in the lymphatic system were ten timesgreater with IV vs. IN administration (43.6 nM vs. 4.7 nM).

When normalizing tissue concentrations to blood, liver, or lymphaticconcentrations, it was apparent that IN administration targets thecentral nervous system. The ratio of tissue concentrations to bloodconcentrations of intranasal and intravenous IgG is presented in Table12. For example for frontal cortex, IN administration results in a 48fold higher concentration than IV when normalizing for bloodconcentration, 40 fold higher when normalizing to liver concentration,and 5 fold higher when normalizing to average lymph concentration.Intranasal administration increased IgG targeting about 50-fold morethan IV administration (relative to the blood) to areas of the brainknown to accumulate β-amyloid and heme (both known to bind IgG)including the frontal cortex, hippocampus, and the blood vessel walls ofthe cerebrovasculature. Importantly, β-amyloid tightly binds heme andheme is both a strong pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory agent known toinactivate brain receptors involved in memory.

TABLE 12 Comparison of intranasal and intravenous targeting of IgG.Tissue to Blood Ratios Tissue to Liver Ratios Tissue to Avg Lymph RatiosIV IN IN/IV IV IN IN/IV IV IN IN/IV Olfactory 0.032 31.649 1002.1 0.319266.650 836.2 0.986 94.481 95.8 Epithelium Respiratory 0.030 9764.511323269.6 0.305 82267.965 269754.1 0.943 29149.726 30898.8 EpitheliumAnterior 0.008 0.937 122.0 0.078 7.896 101.8 0.240 2.798 11.7 TrigeminalNerve Posterior 0.005 0.427 92.8 0.046 3.600 77.5 0.144 1.276 8.9Trigeminal Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 0.002 0.294 119.4 0.025 2.478 99.60.077 0.878 11.4 Anterior 0.001 0.105 73.3 0.014 0.883 61.2 0.045 0.3137.0 Olfactory Nucleus Frontal Cortex 0.002 0.102 48.1 0.022 0.863 40.10.067 0.306 4.6 Parietal Cortex 0.002 0.066 26.9 0.025 0.556 22.5 0.0770.197 2.6 Temporal Cortex 0.002 0.081 38.2 0.022 0.686 31.9 0.067 0.2433.7 Occipital Cortex 0.002 0.130 78.1 0.017 1.093 65.2 0.052 0.387 7.5Extra Cortex 0.001 0.073 54.9 0.013 0.611 45.8 0.041 0.217 5.3 Amygdala0.001 0.103 73.5 0.014 0.867 61.3 0.044 0.307 7.0 Striatum 0.001 0.05239.2 0.014 0.442 32.7 0.042 0.156 3.7 Septal Nucleus 0.001 0.065 48.90.013 0.549 40.8 0.042 0.194 4.7 Hypothalamus 0.001 0.120 80.8 0.0151.008 67.4 0.046 0.357 7.7 Thalamus 0.001 0.030 24.7 0.012 0.254 20.60.038 0.090 2.4 Midbrain 0.001 0.049 37.7 0.013 0.411 31.4 0.040 0.1463.6 Hippocampus 0.001 0.041 51.8 0.008 0.346 43.2 0.025 0.123 5.0 Pons0.001 0.062 48.3 0.013 0.522 40.3 0.040 0.185 4.6 Medulla 0.001 0.06247.4 0.013 0.526 39.5 0.041 0.186 4.5 Cerebellum 0.001 0.056 40.0 0.0140.470 33.4 0.044 0.166 3.8 Extra Slice #1 0.001 0.116 77.8 0.015 0.97864.9 0.047 0.346 7.4 Extra Slice #2 0.002 0.071 47.2 0.015 0.602 39.40.047 0.213 4.5 Extra Slice #3 0.002 0.059 36.5 0.016 0.497 30.5 0.0500.176 3.5 Extra Slice #4 0.002 0.050 28.2 0.018 0.422 23.5 0.056 0.1492.7 Extra Slice #5 0.002 0.053 28.1 0.019 0.451 23.5 0.059 0.160 2.7Extra Slice #6 0.002 0.066 33.9 0.020 0.553 28.3 0.060 0.196 3.2Pituitary 0.007 0.585 79.0 0.075 4.928 65.9 0.231 1.746 7.5 Optic Chiasm0.004 0.528 141.8 0.038 4.450 118.3 0.116 1.577 13.6 Dorsal Dura 0.0201.100 54.2 0.205 9.268 45.2 0.634 3.284 5.2 Ventral Dura 0.017 1.07562.2 0.174 9.053 51.9 0.539 3.208 5.9 Spinal Dura 0.035 0.200 5.8 0.3511.688 4.8 1.084 0.598 0.6 Upper Cervical 0.001 0.089 60.3 0.015 0.74950.3 0.046 0.265 5.8 Spinal Cord Lower Cervical 0.002 0.044 23.2 0.0190.372 19.4 0.059 0.132 2.2 Spinal Cord Thoracic Spinal 0.001 0.032 27.70.012 0.269 23.1 0.036 0.095 2.6 Cord Lumbar Spinal 0.002 0.022 14.40.016 0.188 12.0 0.049 0.067 1.4 Cord Circle of Willis & 0.013 0.83762.8 0.135 7.048 52.4 0.416 2.497 6.0 Basilar Artery Carotid Artery0.024 1.013 41.6 0.246 8.537 34.7 0.761 3.025 4.0 Renal artery (L) 0.0820.315 3.9 0.825 2.651 3.2 2.552 0.939 0.4 Superficial 0.019 0.341 18.40.187 2.876 15.3 0.580 1.019 1.8 Nodes (2) Cervical Nodes (2) 0.0460.398 8.7 0.465 3.356 7.2 1.438 1.189 0.8 Axillary Nodes (2) 0.031 0.2658.4 0.318 2.235 7.0 0.983 0.792 0.8 Blood Sample 1.000 1.000 1.0 10.0978.425 0.8 31.233 2.985 0.1 Muscle (R, 0.014 0.190 13.6 0.142 1.603 11.30.438 0.568 1.3 deltoid) Liver (R, 0.099 0.119 1.2 1.000 1.000 1.0 3.0930.354 0.1 superficial lobe) Kidney (L, tip) 0.261 0.440 1.7 2.635 3.7111.4 8.150 1.315 0.2 Urine 0.068 0.584 8.6 0.687 4.917 7.2 2.124 1.7420.8 Spleen (tip) 0.168 0.434 2.6 1.693 3.658 2.2 5.236 1.296 0.2 Heart0.046 0.095 2.0 0.469 0.803 1.7 1.452 0.284 0.2 Lung (R, top 0.192 0.2101.1 1.936 1.769 0.9 5.990 0.627 0.1 lobe) Thyroid 0.393 10.607 27.03.963 89.366 22.5 12.259 31.665 2.6 Esophagus 0.021 0.312 15.1 0.2092.627 12.6 0.645 0.931 1.4 Trachea 0.021 0.281 13.5 0.209 2.365 11.30.647 0.838 1.3

Eight rats received IV IgG liquid preparation at an average dose of 6.0mg in 47.4 μL containing 69.5 μCi (diluted in saline to a total volumeof 500 μL for injection) with a 30 min end point. Animals tolerated theIV administration well and all survived until the 30 min desired endpoint. One animal (BAX-3) was removed from analysis of mean, standarderror, and outliers because the blood concentration was less than 20% ofthe value observed in all other animals, suggesting the IV infusion wasnot successful. Nanomolar concentrations of intravenously administeredIgG liquid preparation were measured in seven rats at the 30 min endpoint and presented in Table 13.

TABLE 13 Tissue concentrations of intravenously administered IgG liquidpreparation was measured in rats at the 30 min end point and outlierswere removed. BAX-5 BAX-7 BAX-9 BAX-10 BAX-11 BAX-13 BAX-15 Avg SEVolume Delivered 47.0 47.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 47.7 ±0.2 (μL) uCiDelivered 69.7 69.5 70.5 70.3 70.1 68.3 68.3 69.5 ±0.3 mg Delivered 6.06.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.9 5.9 6.0 ±0.03 Olfactory 33.0 40.5 40.4 43.0 56.532.0 55.5 43.0 ±3.7 Epithelium Respiratory 30.4 33.5 46.7 39.1 59.5 29.049.4 41.1 ±4.3 Epithelium Anterior 7.4 14.8 13.5 10.3 10.1 7.9 9.2 10.5±1.0 Trigeminal Nerve Posterior 4.2 11.0 8.3 6.7 5.4 3.5 4.8 6.3 ±1.0Trigeminal Nerve Olfactory Bulbs 2.2 2.8 5.5 3.7 3.2 1.9 4.2 3.4 ±0.5Anterior Olfactory 1.1 2.1 3.3 1.8 1.9 1.2 2.2 1.9 ±0.3 Nucleus FrontalCortex 2.5 4.0 3.2 1.8 2.7 1.2 4.9 2.9 ±0.5 Parietal Cortex 3.3 5.2 3.01.6 2.6 1.3 6.4 3.3 ±0.7 Temporal Cortex 1.7 3.7 2.5 2.2 5.8 1.5 X 2.9±0.7 Occipital Cortex 1.9 2.8 2.5 2.3 X 1.8 X 2.3 ±0.2 Extra Cortex 1.42.1 2.6 1.8 X 1.1 X 1.8 ±0.3 Amygdala 1.5 1.9 X 2.1 2.0 1.8 2.2 1.9 ±0.1Striatum 2.4 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.6 1.8 ±0.2 Septal Nucleus 1.6 1.4 2.01.6 X 2.0 2.2 1.8 ±0.1 Hypothalamus 1.2 2.4 2.7 1.7 1.9 1.5 2.7 2.0 ±0.2Thalamus 1.2 1.3 1.8 1.3 2.1 0.9 3.1 1.7 ±0.3 Midbrain 1.1 1.4 2.3 1.32.2 1.1 2.9 1.8 ±0.3 Hippocampus 1.1 1.3 0.6 1.3 X 1.1 X 1.1 ±0.1 Pons1.1 1.6 2.4 1.4 1.6 1.3 2.8 1.7 ±0.2 Medulla 1.2 1.4 2.7 1.5 X 1.2 2.71.8 ±0.3 Cerebellum 1.3 1.7 2.5 1.8 2.9 1.2 X 1.9 ±0.3 Extra Slice #11.5 2.8 2.7 1.7 2.2 1.3 2.1 2.0 ±0.2 Extra Slice #2 1.6 3.6 2.2 1.4 1.81.2 2.7 2.1 ±0.3 Extra Slice #3 1.9 3.3 2.1 1.4 2.0 1.1 3.6 2.2 ±0.3Extra Slice #4 1.9 3.1 2.5 1.4 2.6 1.1 4.3 2.4 ±0.4 Extra Slice #5 1.73.0 2.1 1.5 3.4 1.1 5.3 2.6 ±0.6 Extra Slice #6 1.9 2.4 2.2 1.6 3.9 1.35.3 2.6 ±0.5 Pituitary 10.9 X 12.7 9.4 8.7 7.1 11.8 10.1 ±0.8 OpticChiasm 5.9 5.2 8.4 3.9 4.7 2.9 4.6 5.1 ±0.7 Dorsal Dura 14.8 31.7 30.731.0 29.5 18.2 37.4 27.6 ±3.0 Ventral Dura 16.4 31.0 34.4 19.6 18.9 13.830.4 23.5 ±3.1 Spinal Dura 52.3 45.9 54.8 37.6 X 53.4 39.5 47.2 ±3.0Upper Cervical 1.4 2.3 2.7 1.8 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 ±0.2 Spinal Cord LowerCervical 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.4 1.4 2.4 2.2 2.6 ±0.3 Spinal Cord ThoracicSpinal 1.6 1.9 2.8 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.6 ±0.2 Cord Lumbar Spinal 2.8 1.82.5 2.0 1.3 1.3 3.1 2.1 ±0.3 Cord Circle of Willis & 16.8 23.8 X 14.215.7 9.9 28.4 18.1 ±2.8 Basilar Artery Carotid Artery 21.7 33.8 37.237.5 37.4 43.9 20.6 33.2 ±3.3 Renal artery (L) 98.8 129.2 76.5 94.4129.3 139.0 X 111.2 ±10.1 Superficial Nodes 20.3 29.6 22.9 31.9 35.312.6 24.1 25.3 ±2.9 (2) Cervical Nodes (2) 32.5 39.6 78.7 43.4 83.9 65.594.9 62.6 ±9.2 Axillary Nodes (2) 103.2 31.9 75.4 18.6 37.9 14.1 18.642.8 ±12.8 Blood Sample 1,224.9 1,234.2 1,543.3 1,322.6 1,364.7 1,413.41,422.9 1,360.9 ±42.5 Muscle (R, deltoid) 39.06 19.5 24.6 13.3 13.0 10.713.4 19.1 ±3.8 Liver (R, 74.2 72.2 115.0 126.1 122.2 186.3 247.5 134.8±23.7 superficial lobe) Kidney (L, tip) 347.7 313.9 287.3 459.1 397.7441.0 238.9 355.1 ±30.8 Urine 32.9 174.5 187.3 41.1 68.3 122.8 21.1 92.6±26.0 Spleen (tip) 234.3 241.9 196.8 317.5 232.6 175.8 198.1 228.1 ±17.5Heart 57.7 42.1 87.5 53.5 44.2 35.6 122.1 63.2 ±11.7 Lung (R, top lobe)392.8 289.6 219.1 104.5 482.5 177.0 161.4 261.0 ±51.3 Thyroid 317.8651.8 832.2 522.9 545.5 372.0 496.9 534.2 ±65.0 Esophagus 24.8 41.3 28.042.8 24.4 20.5 15.1 28.1 ±3.9 Trachea 14.6 29.2 17.9 39.2 13.4 59.0 24.228.2 ±6.2 Drug Standard 7,378,277 7,493,218 7,635,815 7,367,6117,809,027 6,770,035 7,683,717 7,448,243 ±128,561.8 CPM Drug Standard7,962,330 7,709,707 6,369,627 — 6,846,596 6,401,005 7,249,509 7,089,796±272,233.7 CPM Drug Standard 7,947,735 8,077,594 — — 6,447,049 6,626,2617,855,283 7,390,784 ±351,624.3 CPM X = outlier removed from analysis

The blood concentration of IgG at the 30 min end point was 1,361 nM.Concentrations of IgG in the respiratory and olfactory epithelia werelow as expected (43 nM and 41 nM respectively). A rostral to caudalgradient of 10.5 nM to 6.3 nM IgG was observed in the trigeminal nerve.A similar gradient from the olfactory bulb to the anterior olfactorynucleus of 3.4 nM to 1.9 nM IgG was observed. The average cortexconcentration of IgG after IV administration was 2.6 nM. Concentrationsof IgG in other brain regions ranged from a low of 1.1 nM in thehippocampus to a high of 2.0 nM in the hypothalamus. The averageconcentration of IgG in the extra brain material sampled was 2.3 nM,similar to the average cortex concentration, and a concentrationgradient was not observed. Similarly, a concentration gradient was notobserved in the spinal cord and the average IgG concentration was 2.1nM. The average concentration of IgG in the dura of the brain was 25.6nM compared to a spinal cord dura concentration of 47.2 nM. Othertissues sampled from the ventral skull, the pituitary and optic chiasm,contained 10.1 nM and 5.1 nM IgG respectively.

Concentrations of IgG in peripheral organs ranged from a low of 19.1 nMin the muscle to a high of 355.1 in the kidney, with urine containing92.6 nM. IgG concentrations in basilar and carotid arteries wereconsiderably lower than the renal artery (18.1 and 33.2 nM versus 111.2nM). Average concentration of IgG in the sampled lymph nodes was 43.6nM.

Example 3 The Effect of IN and IV Delivery on the Intactness of IgG

A study was conducted to examine whether IgG remains intact after IN andIV administration. Specifically, rats were administered ¹²⁵Iradiolabeled IgG either intranasally or intravenously and the totalintact and degraded IgG was determined 30 min after administration.

Experimental Design: The rats were anesthetized and IgG was administeredas described above in Example 2. Blood and brain was sampled and intactIgG was detected.

Blood was sampled approximately 30 minutes after intranasaladministration prior to perfusing with at least 100 mL of salinecontaining protease inhibitors and serum was processed.

Each blood sample (1.0 mL) was added to glass/tissue homogenizercontaining 2.0 mL of homogenization buffer (H.B., 10 mM tris buffer, pH8.0 containing protease inhibitors) and aprotinin (100 μL per mL blood).The sample was manually homogenized (30 passes) and then transferredinto a pre-weighed conical tube (15 mL) and stored on ice. Triplicate 25μL samples were removed for gamma counting.

The sample was centrifuged at 1,000×g (3,160 rpm) for 10 minutes at 4°C. Blood supernatant was removed into a pre-weighed ultracentrifuge tubeand stored on ice. The extraction procedure was repeated on the bloodpellet a second time (i.e. same volume of homogenization buffer added toconical test tube containing pellet, inverted several times to dislodgethe pellet, transferred into glass homogenizer, homogenized with 15passes, transferred to same pre-weighed conical test tube, centrifuged,and blood supernatant removed). All blood supernatant was pooled andstored in the same pre-weighed conical tube. The extraction procedurewas repeated on the blood pellet a third time. Triplicate 25 μL samplesfrom pooled blood supernatant were remove for gamma counting.

2 mL of the pooled blood supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 5,000×g(7,071 rpm) for 90 minutes at 4° C. to in a 100 kDa filter tube. Afterthe first two rats, it was found that 2 mL took a lot of time to filterso for and animals that followed, we centrifuged only 1 mL of the pooledblood supernatant. At the same time, 2 mL of the pooled bloodsupernatant in the ultracentrifuged at 5,000×g (7,071 rpm) for 90minutes at 4° C. to in a 30 kDa filter tube. After the first two rats,it was found that 2 mL took a lot of time to filter so for and animalsthat followed, only 1 mL of the pooled blood supernatant wascentrifuged.

And 2 mL of the pooled blood supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 5,000×g(7,071 rpm) for 90 minutes at 4° C. to in a 10 kDa filter tube. Afterthe first two rats, it was found that 2 mL took a lot of time to filter,for subsequent animals only 1 mL of the pooled blood supernatant wascentrifuged. Triplicate 25 μL samples were removed for gamma countingfrom the filtrate (100 kDa filter tube), the retentate (100 kDa filtertube), the filtrate (30 kDa filter tube), the retentate (30 kDa filtertube), the filtrate (10 kDa filter tube) for gamma counting, theretentate (10 kDa filter tube) for gamma counting.

Each brain was removed (on ice), weighed, and placed into a glass tissuehomogenizer. the brain was manually homogenized (40-50 passes) withhomogenization buffer at a 1:3 dilution (i.e., 2 mL buffer per g wetbrain) and the homogenate was transferred into a pre-weighed conicaltube (15 mL) and stored on ice. Triplicate 25 μL samples from brainhomogenate were removed for gamma counting. The sample was centrifugedat 1,000×g (3,160 rpm) for 10 minutes at 4° C. Brain supernatant wasremoved into pre-weighed ultracentrifuge tube and stored on ice.

The extraction procedure was repeated a second time on the pellet (i.e.,added same volume of homogenization buffer to conical test tubecontaining pellet, inverted several times to dislodge the pellet,transferred into glass homogenizer, homogenized with 20-30 passes,transferred to same pre-weighed conical test tube, centrifuged, andremoved supernatant). All brain supernatant was pooled and stored in thesame pre-weighed conical tube. The extraction procedure was repeated athird time on the pellets. Triplicate 25 μL samples from pooled brainsupernatant were removed for gamma counting.

2 mL of the pooled brain supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 5,000×g(7,071 rpm) for 90 minutes at 4° C. to in a 100 kDa filter tube. Afterthe first two rats, it was found that 2 mL took a lot of time to filter,for subsequent animals only 1 mL of the pooled blood supernatant wascentrifuged. At the same time, 2 mL of the pooled brain supernatant inthe ultracentrifuged at 5,000×g (7,071 rpm) for 90 minutes at 4° C. toin a 30 kDa filter tube. After the first two rats, it was found that 2mL took a lot of time to filter, for subsequent animals only 1 mL of thepooled blood supernatant was centrifuged. And 2 mL of the pooled brainsupernatant was ultracentrifuged at 5,000×g (7,071 rpm) for 90 minutesat 4° C. to in a 10 kDa filter tube. After the first two rats, it wasfound that 2 mL took a lot of time to filter, for subsequent animalsonly 1 mL of the pooled blood supernatant was centrifuged.

Triplicate 25 μL samples were removed for gamma counting from thefiltrate (100 kDa filter tube), the retentate (100 kDa filter tube), thefiltrate (30 kDa filter tube), the retentate (30 kDa filter tube), thefiltrate (10 kDa filter tube) for gamma counting, the retentate (10 kDafilter tube) for gamma counting.

Results: Two rats received IV IgG liquid preparation and two ratsreceived IN IgG liquid preparation at an average dose of 52 μLcontaining 56 μCi (diluted in saline to a total volume of 500 μL for IVinjection) with a 30 min end point. Animals tolerated the administrationwell and all survived until the 30 min desired end point.

In the brain, approximately 80% of gamma counts from ¹²⁵I-labeled IgGafter both IN and IV delivery were greater than 100 kD, suggestingintact protein. In the blood, 100% gamma counts from ¹²⁵I-labeled IgGafter IV delivery were greater than 100 kD, suggesting all was intact.With IN delivery, only 33% of gamma counts from ¹²⁵I-labeled IgG foundin blood was greater than 100 kD, suggesting that ¹²⁵I-labeled IgG maybe broken down and enter the blood as part of the clearance process fromthe nasal cavity, the brain or both. This also provides additionalevidence that IgG entering the CNS after IN administration does nottravel from the nasal cavity to the blood to the brain, but rather alongdirect pathways involving the olfactory and trigeminal nerves. A summaryof the intactness of IgG in the brain and blood after intranasal orintravenous administration is presented in Table 14.

TABLE 14 Summary of Intactness of IgG in the Brain and Blood. IN IV R1R3 Avg R2 R4 Avg BLOOD % greater than 100 kD 30 36 33 123 113 118 %greater than 30 kD 34 34 34 123 110 116 % greater than 10 kD 67 57 62 99108 104 BRAIN % greater than 100 kD 93 70 81 78 77 77 % greater than 30kD 87 78 82 83 84 83 % greater than 10 kD 88 78 83 88 93 91

Example 4 Effect of Intranasal Administration of IgG on Amyloid PlaqueLoads

A study was conducted to examine whether intranasal administration ofIgG decreases amyloid plaque loads in the brain in vivo. The purpose ofthe study was to determine whether chronic treatment with intranasallydelivered IgG at two doses (0.4 g/kg/2 wk and 0.8 g/kg/2 wk) would haveany effect on the amyloid plaque load in a transgenic amyloid mousemodel of Alzheimer's disease.

Experimental Design: The TG2576 (“TG”) amyloid mouse model was used inthis study as a mouse model for Alzheimer's disease and C57 mice wereused as controls. TG2576 mice (cat. #1349-RD1-M) were acquired fromTaconic, Inc. in two batches of 50 spaced one month apart (Batch 1 andBatch 2). Animals were individually housed with free access to food andwater, and were kept on a 12 hour light cycle. For dosing with drug in amg/kg dosing scheme, mice were divided into three size classes withineach treatment group, small, medium, and large. Size groups were made toinclude 1/3 of animals in each size group. Mice were re-evaluated tomake new size groups every two weeks. The mice were divided into fivetreatment groups of 20 mice as described in Table 15.

TABLE 15 Treatment groups assigned for intranasal administration of IgG.Mouse Strain Drug Administration Description Tg2576 IN IgG 0.4 g/kg/2 wk“TG-High” Tg2576 IN IgG 0.8 g/kg/2 wk “TG-Low” Tg2576 IN Saline(control) “TG-Saline” C57 IN IgG 0.8 g/kg/2 wk “WT-High” C57 IN Saline(control) “WT-Saline”

The mice were ordered and received in the animal facility at 2 months ofage and were singly housed and aged for 6 months. At 8 months of age,the mice were acclimated to handling for awake intranasal delivery overthe course of 1 month. Mice were then intranasally treated with IgG orsaline three times/week for 7 months. At 16 months of age, behavioraltesting occurred for 5 weeks while intranasal treatment continued. At˜17 months of age, 12 mice/group were euthanized and brain tissue wascollected for analysis.

IgG and saline for IN delivery was prepared Friday afternoons fromstocks sent by Baxter, and stored at ˜4° C. for use the following week.Solutions were made to deliver a dose of either 0.4 mg/kg/2 wk IgG or0.8 mg/kg/2 wk IgG, and were made to deliver a total of 24 μL. Drug wasalso made to cater to each of the three size classes within a treatmentgroup.

Mice were acclimated to handling for a period of two-four weeks beforethe onset of intranasal dosing. Acclimation to handling was important,as it helped ensure a correct body position for maximum effectiveness ofawake intranasal drug delivery. In addition, mice that have not beenproperly accustomed to this process can have a severe anxiety reactionafter dosing. Mice spent about 1-3 days on each of nine steps beforeprogressing to the next step, depending upon the animal's comfort tohandling. The mouse's stress level was used as a measure of progress.This means monitoring the mouse's movements, the amount/frequency ofurination, defecation, trembling, and biting. If a mouse had a highstress response, it remained on that step before progressing to the nextuntil the response is reduced. A sample acclimation schedule can be seenin Table 16. Acclimation of the mice progressed through the followingonce-a-day steps. The steps were not performed more than once per day inorder to minimize the anxiety in the mice.

First, the mouse was placed in the palm of the hand for a period of twoto three minutes, no more than one foot above the cage top, as animalsfrequently jumped during this introductory step. If the mouse attemptedto crawl out of the hand and up one's arm, the mouse was lifted by thebase of the tail and placed back in one's hand. Second, the mouse wasplaced in the palm of the hand for three minutes and petted gently. Themouse was petted directionally from head to tail, while allowing theanimal to move about freely. Third, the mouse was placed in the palm ofthe hand for three minutes while massaging behind the ears (lightlypinching together the skin on the back of the neck using the thumb andpointer finger). Fourth, the mouse was held/lifted by the scruff of itsneck for 30 seconds, letting the mouse rest on the cage top for 30seconds before repeating the hold again. Fifth, the mouse was held usingthe intranasal grip, without inverting the animal, for a period of 30seconds and then released back to the cage top. This was repeated asecond time after a one-minute rest period. Sixth, the mouse was heldwith the intranasal grip while inverting the animal so its ventral sidewas facing up towards the ceiling with the animal's neck is parallel tothe floor. This position was held for 30 seconds and was then repeated asecond time after a one-minute rest period. If the mouse freed itselffrom the grip, the mouse was put back on the cage top and re-gripped. Ifthe mouse's stress level increased too much, the mouse was returned itto the cage. Seventh, the mouse was held with the intranasal grip,inverted and a pipettor with an empty tip was briefly placed over eachnostril for 30 seconds. This step was repeated after a one-minute restperiod. Eighth, the mouse was held with the intranasal grip, inverted,and intranasally administered 6 μl of saline into the left and rightnare. Ninth, the mouse was held with the intranasal grip, inverted, andintranasally administered 6 μl of saline into the left and right naretwice placing the animal back on the cage top in between.

TABLE 16 Sample schedule for acclimation to awake IN drug delivery. Day# Day Action 1 M Hold for ~2-3 min 2 Tu Hold for ~2-3 min 3 W Hold andpet ~2-3 min 4 Th Hold and pet ~2-3 min 5 F Lightly pinch/scruff 6 MLightly pinch/scruff 7 Tu Scruff and lift 8 W Scruff and lift 9 ThIntranasal Grip 10 F Intranasal Grip 11 M Intranasal (IN) Grip andInvert 12 Tu Intranasal (IN) Grip and Invert 13 W IN Grip, Invert, emptypipette tip 14 Th IN Grip, Invert, empty pipette tip 15 F IN Grip,Invert, deliver 1 round saline to each nare 16 M IN Grip, Invert,deliver 1 round saline to each nare 17 Tu IN Grip, Invert, deliver 2rounds saline to each nare 18 W IN Grip, Invert, deliver 2 rounds salineto each nare

For awake intranasal delivery of drug, the intranasal grip, each mousewas restrained twice and held with their necks parallel to the floorwhile a volume of 24 μl of liquid was administered. Specifically,un-anesthetized mice were grabbed by the scruff of their necks and heldgently, but firmly, in an inverted position so that the mouse cannotmove around. Each mouse was given four 6 μl nose drops (alternatingnares) using a 20-μl pipettor. Intranasal drug delivery began when micewere 9 months of age.

At 16 months of age, mice were subjected to a five week battery ofbehavioral tests to assess for memory, sensorimotor, and anxiolyticchanges. These included Morris water maze hidden and visual platformtests (reference memory, visual ability), radial arm water maze (workingmemory), passive avoidance task (memory), Barnes maze (memory), openfield test (exploratory behavior), elevated plus maze (anxiety), androtarod (motor skills).

After behavior, 12 mice from each treatment group were euthanized andtheir brains collected for biochemical analyses. These analyses includeimmunohistochemistry (IHC) for amyloid plaques, inflammatory markers,and soluble and insoluble amyloid.

Prior to euthanasia via transcardial perfusion, mice were anesthetizedwith sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg diluted 1:4 with sterile saline). Afirst booster of half the full dose was given followed by additionalquarter-dose boosters, if necessary. The level of anesthesia andsensitivity to pain was monitored every five minutes throughout theprocedure by testing reflexes including pinching the hind paw and tail.Mice were then euthanized with transcardial perfusion with 15 ml icecold saline (no protease inhibitor needed) and blood was collected fromthe heart. Briefly, the arms of the mouse were taped down. The skin wascut to expose the sternum. A hemostat was used to hold the sternum whileblunt dissection scissors were used to cut vertically on both sides ofthe sternum making an incision with a V-shape to expose the heart. Bloodwas collected from the heart prior to perfusion and processed intoserum. A small hole in the left ventricle was made using a 24-gaugecannula. The cannula was inserted into the aorta and held in place.Extension tubing (filled with 5 mL of 0.9% NaCl) was attached to thecannula and the animal was manually perfused with 15 ml saline.

Blood was spun down and serum divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was50 μL and will be eventually pooled and sent for analyses of overallhealth of the treatment group. The remaining serum was placed into itsown tube and snap frozen for other analyses.

The brain was collected and hemisected sagitally in a mouse brainmatrix. The left half of the brain was dissected into olfactory bulbs,cortex/hippocampus mix, septum, midbrain/diencephalon, brainstem (downto the V of the upper cervical spinal cord), and cerebellum. Thesetissues were placed into microcentrifuge tube and snap frozen in liquidnitrogen. The right half was left in the matrix and sliced 3 mm from thecenterline. The inner portion towards the center of the brain waspost-fixed in formalin (in a 15 ml conical tube filled with 10 mlformalin) and sliced for IHC analyses. The outer portion was snap frozenin liquid nitrogen for eventual analysis for inflammation.

The medial 3 mm sagittal section of the right half of the mouse brainwas fixed by placing them each into 20 mL of 10% formalin. These sampleswere fixed for several hours at room temperature and then overnight at4° C. on slow moving rocker. The fixed sagittal brain sections wereplaced medial side down into labeled pathology cassettes. The pathologydepartment at Region's Hospital conducted the paraffin processing andembedding (dehydrate, infiltrate with paraffin, mount into paraffinblocks). The paraffin blocks were blinded by coding/relabeling.

The paraffin blocks were sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm using theLeica RM2235 microtome and collected on Superfrost Plus microscopeslides (Cardinal Health, cat#M6146-PLUS). Seven sections were collectedper mouse, with at least/approximately 100 μm of tissue removed betweentissue section collections (labeled 1-6 from, medial to lateral). Toincrease the quality of the sections to be stained, a dissectionmicroscope was used to identify and remove one of the seven sections.

Slides were deparaffinized and hydrated. Specifically, the slides wereplaced in a glass staining jar rack for easy transfer between stainingdishes. The paraffin wax was removed with xylene washes (clearing) andthen hydrated with ethanol/water. Specifically, the slides were washedin xylene three times for five minute intervals, washed in 100% ethanoltwo times for five minute intervals, washed in 95% ethanol one time forfive minutes, rinsed in running water for five minutes, and rinsed inPBS for five minutes.

Heat induced epitope retrieval (HIER) was used to pretreat the slidesprior to antibody staining. A Tris/EDTA Buffer (pH 9) was used. Theslides were immersed in a steamer proof dish containing the TargetRetrieval Solution (Tris/EDTA pH 9) pre-warmed to 70° C. The dish withslides was then placed in the steamer and incubate for 30 minutes at 97°C. The steamer was turned off and allowed to cool to at least 65° C. Thecontainer of slides was removed from the steamer and allowed to cool foranother 10-15 minutes. The slides were then removed from the containerand rinsed in PBS for 10 min in a coplan jar.

Non-specific binding sites were then blocked with normal serum blockingsolution (300 μL/slide) for 1 hour in a humidity chamber. Sections wereincubated in a humid box with primary antibody against amyloid (purifiedAnti-Beta-Amyloid, 17-24 (4G8) Monoclonal Antibody, from Covance(SIG-39220)) at a 1:200 dilution in primary antibody dilution buffer(0.01 M PBS pH 7.2) for 1 hour at room temperature. Sections wereincubated in secondary antibody (Goat anti-mouse IgG, Alexa Fluor 647 (2mg/ml) from Invitrogen (A21235)) dilution buffer (0.01 M PBS, pH 7.2)with a 1:200 secondary concentration for 1 hr at room temperature.

Slides were then counterstained with DAPI. Diluted 300 nM DAPI in PBSwas used. 1 μl of 14.3 mM DAPI stock was diluted into 48 ml PBS,vortexed, and mix thoroughly. The DAPI solution was poured into coplanjar containing the slides. The slides were incubate for 20 min at RT.The slides were rinsed quickly in PBS, then 2×10 min in washing buffer,followed by a 10 min incubation in PBS.

Immediately after staining, the slides were then dehydrated, cleared,and mounted. Specifically, the slides were incubated in 95% ethanol for5 minutes, 100% ethanol for two five minute increments, xylene for threefive minute increments, and mounted with a coverslip in DPX withoutletting the specimen dry. The mounted slides were stored at roomtemperature.

Images of the fluorescently stained plaques were captured with the AZ100Multizoom Macroscope with the C1si Spectral Confocal attachment and anAZ Plan Apo 4X objective. Initial localization and focusing of thehippocampus and cortex was conducted through epifluorescence imagingusing filters for the DAPI stain. The scope was then switched toconfocal imaging using the 637 nm laser for acquisition of theIHF-labeled amyloid. Fine tuning within the z-axis for optimal signaldetection was confirmed with a 512×512 pixel resolution. Images werethen captured at 1024×1024 with the Nikon EZ-C1 software and the rawimage files were saved in Nikon's “.ids” file format. Corresponding tifffiles of the 637 nm channel were generated using Fiji (ImageJ). The tifffiles were then converted to 8-bit images (from 16-bit) and the contrastwas enhanced by 0.5% through batch processing (Macro programming) inFiji (ImageJ).

Plaques were quantitated in selected regions of interest in thehippocampus and cortex by determining the average number of plaquesdetected in each region and by determining the percent area covered byplaques within each region. Image processing and analysis was conductedin Fiji. Plaques were defined within Fiji by using the particle analysisand the threshold function to select a minimum pixel value that definedeach identified particle as qualifying as a plaque. These values weredetermined by analyzing multiple positive and negative controls andverifying which values correctly identified the plaques in these controlslides. The region of interest within each image was chosen by a blindedresearcher who was instructed to place the region of interest in theposition that would maximize the inclusion of plaques. The size (pixels)and number of plaques identified were copied into excel for dataanalysis. The plaques were then characterized by their relative size.The plaque sizes reported in this study refer to the calculated radiusof a plaque assuming the particle conformed to the shape of a perfectcircle. The number of plaques and percent area covered by plaquescalculated from each region of interest was used as a single data pointin comparing the treatment groups. Two tailed t-tests were used toassess the significance between groups.

Prior to staining the complete set of collected tissue sections, aninitial verification of the staining and microscopy analysis wasconducted with relevant staining controls. These controls included, apositive control using sections from one of the transgenic micereceiving saline, negative controls in which either the primary orsecondary antibody incubation was omitted from the staining procedureand a negative control using sections from one of the wild-type micereceiving saline. Additional controls, including the titration ofprimary and secondary antibodies and the comparison of different epitoperetrieval methods have been conducted previously in our lab using theseantibodies and the same experimental procedure.

Tissue supernatants were analyzed using kits from Life Technologies(formerly Invitrogen; Carlsbad, Calif.; part #s KHB3482 (Aβ40) andKHB3442 (Aβ42)). Generally, the proper dilutions were first determinedwith three samples from either TG or WT mice, and then all samples wererun at that dilution. Samples were quantified using a polynomialequation fit to a standard curve. Quantities of AB measured in the wellswere then corrected for dilutions and total protein (as determined by aBCA assay).

Results: Immunohistochemical measurement of amyloid plaques in braintissue slices demonstrated that there was a significant drug effect.Both groups of TG mice administered IgG intranasally had significantlydecreased plaque loads in the cortex (FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3E).

Nasal administration of both the low dose and high dose of IgGsignificantly reduced the total percent area covered by plaques in thecortex of TG2576 mice (FIG. 3A). The percent area covered by plaquesdecreased by 25.7% (low dose; p=0.014) and 24.3%, (high dose; p=0.037),respectively. The change in the percent area covered by plaques wasslightly more pronounced at 27.1% for the low dose and 26.0% for thehigh dose when the minimum threshold for defining a plaque was increasedfrom a radius of 25 μm to 50 μm (p values of 0.01 and 0.026,respectively). The decrease in plaque load was also found to besignificant when the minimum threshold was set at 100 μm (p values of0.035 and 0.021, respectively). A change in the percent area covered byplaques was not apparent when the smaller plaques (less than 50 μmradius) were used exclusively in the analysis. Thus, plaque reduction inthe cortex appears to be more pronounced plaques larger than 50 μm.

The number of plaques in the cortex of both low dose and high dose IgGtreatment groups showed a trend toward a decrease in the numbers ofplaques detected (FIG. 3B). This decrease reached significance in thelow dose IgG treatment group when small plaques (less than 50 μm radius)were not included in the analysis. Specifically, treatment withintranasally administered IgG provided a significant reduction in plaqueload when the data were analyzed by inclusion of plaques having a radiusof from 50 μm to 100 μm greater than 100 μm and greater than 50 μm. Thedecrease in plaque load reached significance for the high dose IgGtreatment group when the radius of analyzed plaques was set at greaterthan 100 μm.

In contrast to the results seen in the brain cortex, IgG treatments didnot result in a significant change in either the percent area covered byplaques or the numbers of plaques detected in the hippocampus (FIGS. 3Cand 3D). Although intranasal administration of both low and high doseIgG appeared to result in a slightly reduced plaque load in thehippocampus, the reduction was minimal and did not reach significance inthis region of the brain.

Immunofluorescent staining of amyloid plaques in the hippocampus andcortex of aged TG mice is depicted in FIG. 3E. As show, there is adecrease staining for amyloid plaques in the hippocampus and cortex inmice that were treated with low and high IgG doses compared to TG micetreated with saline.

Example 5 Effect of Intranasally Administered IgG on Soluble andInsoluble AB40 and AB42

A study was conducted to assess the efficacy of chronic intranasal (IN)administration of IgG at two doses in a transgenic amyloid mouse model.Specifically, measurements of the soluble and insoluble amyloid betapeptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 were taken in wild type and Tg2576 (amyloid mousemodel) pre- and post- intranasal IgG administration. The purpose of thestudy was to determine whether chronic treatment with intranasallydelivered IgG at two doses (0.4 g/kg/2 wk and 0.8 g/kg/2 wk) would haveany effect on the amyloid plaque load in a transgenic amyloid mousemodel of Alzheimer's disease.

Experimental Design: As described in Example 4, the TG2576 (“TG”)amyloid mouse model was used in this study as a mouse model forAlzheimer's disease and C57 mice were used as controls. The handling ofthe mice, preparation of drug, and administration of drug was conductedas described above in Example 4.

The mice were divided into five treatment groups of 20 mice as describedin Table 15. At approximately 17 months of age and 12 months oftreatment, 12 mice from each treatment group were euthanized and theconcentration of the Aβ40 and Aβ42 amyloid peptides in the brains of theTG and control mice were measured by ELISA to determine whether amyloidplaque concentrations changes could be detected.

Aβ40 and Aβ42 were measured by ELISA using Invitrogen ELISA kits. TheELISA kits were stored in refrigerator until they were ready to use. Thekits were removed from refrigerator and allowed to warm to roomtemperature before use.

Standards and samples were run in duplicate. The samples and standardswere run in a protease inhibitor cocktail with 1 mM AEBSF (a serineprotease inhibitor). AEBSF was important because serine proteases canrapidly degrade Aβ peptides. The samples were kept on ice until theywere ready to be applied to the ELISA Plate.

Sample matrix has a dramatic impact on Aβ recovery. To ensure accuratequantitation, the standard curves were generated in the same diluent asthe samples. A standard reconstitution buffer was prepared by dissolving2.31 grams of sodium bicarbonate in 500 mL of deionized water and the pHwas adjusted using 2 N sodium hydroxide until the pH was 9.0.

The standards for a quantitative standard curve were prepared. The HuAβ42 Standard was used. The Hu Aβ42 Standard was allowed to equilibrateto room temperature (RT) and then reconstituted to 100 ng/mL withStandard Reconstitution Buffer (55 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.0). Thestandard mixture was swirled and mixed gently and allowed to sit for 10minutes to ensure complete reconstitution. The standard was then brieflyvortexed prior to preparing standard curve. Generation of the standardcurve using the Aβ peptide standard was performed using the samecomposition of buffers used for the diluted experimental samples. 0.1 mLof the reconstituted standard was added to a tube containing 0.9 mL ofthe Standard Diluent Buffer and labeled as 10,000 pg/mL Hu Aβ40. Thestandard was mixed and then 0.1 mL of the 10,000 pg/mL standard wasadded to a tube containing 1.9 mL Standard Diluent Buffer and labeled as500 pg/mL Hu Aβ40. Mix. The standard was mixed and then 0.15 mL ofStandard Diluent Buffer was added to each of 6 tubes labeled 250, 125,62.5, 31.25, 15.63, 7.81, and 0 pg/mL Hu Aβ40 to make serial dilutionsof the standard.

The samples were then prepared for the plate. Specifically, the sampleswere remove from the freezer, allowed to thaw, and diluted to thedesired dilution using dilution buffer provided with the kit mixed witha protease inhibitor tablet. The samples were kept on ice until loadedinto the wells on the plate.

The plates were labeled as being either AB40 or AB42 with a sharpie. 50ul of standards and sample were added to the pre-labeled wells. 50 μL ofHu Aβ40 or Aβ42 Detection Antibody solution provided with the kit wasadded to each well. The plate was covered and incubated for 3 hours atroom temperature with shaking. Shortly before the 3 hours expired, theAnti-Rabbit IgG HRP Working Solution was prepared. To make this, 10 μLof Anti-Rabbit IgG HRP (100×) concentrated solution was diluted in 1 mLof HRP Diluent for each 8-well strip used in the assay and labeled asAnti-Rabbit IgG HRP Working Solution.

The solution was thoroughly decanted from wells and the wells werewashed 5 times with 300 μL of wash solution. The plates were banged hardon lab bench to be sure it was dry. 100 μL of the Anti-Rabbit IgG HRPworking solution was added to each well. The plate was covered andallowed to sit at room temp for 30 min. The solution was thoroughlydecanted from wells and the wells were washed 5 times with 300 μL ofwash solution. The plates were banged hard on lab bench to be sure itwas dry. 100 μL of Stabilized Chromogen was added to each well and theplate was immediately placed in the dark and allowed to sit for 20 min.100 μL of Stop Solution was added to each well and the sides of theplate were gently tapped to mix.

The absorbance of each well was read at 450 nm having blanked the platereader within 30 minutes after adding the Stop Solution. Theconcentrations were determined using the standard curve.

Results: The ELISA plates for both Aβ40 and Aβ42 purchased fromInvitrogen yielded consistent standard curves. The best dilutions ofbrain supernatant for samples for soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42, and insolubleAβ40 and Aβ42 were 10×, undiluted, 10000×, and 2500×, respectively.Brain concentrations of each protein were analyzed by first determiningthe concentration of the sample in the well in the ELISA plate based onthe standard curve. These values were then corrected for dilution ofsupernatant, dilution from the extraction process, and then given acorrection factor from a BCA analysis of total protein extracted. Foreach protein, between 1 and 4 samples were excluded for either beingstatistical outliers or being too high/low to fit within the standardcurve. A summary of the soluble and insoluble Aβ40 concentrations arepresented in Table 17and Table 18. A summary of the soluble andinsoluble Aβ42 concentrations are presented in Table 19 and Table 20.The ratios of soluble Aβ40/Aβ42 are provided in Table 21 and the ratiosof insoluble Aβ40/Aβ42 are provided in Table 22.

TABLE 17 Soluble Aβ40 detected in brain. Mouse sac Date ConcentrationMouse sac Date Concentration order # Group measured (pg/ml) order #Group measured (pg/ml) 1 TG-Low 1-Oct 9078 33 TG-Saline 1-Oct 3940 6TG-Low 1-Oct 3964 38 TG-Saline 1-Oct 1328 11 TG-Low 1-Oct 3110 43TG-Saline 1-Oct 1983 16 TG-Low 1-Oct 2788 48 TG-Saline 1-Oct 3656 21TG-Low 1-Oct 3934 53 TG-Saline 1-Oct 6650 26 TG-Low 1-Oct 3747 58TG-Saline 1-Oct 6159 31 TG-Low 1-Oct 3796 4 WT-High 9-Oct 0 36 TG-Low1-Oct 5450 9 WT-High 9-Oct 0 41 TG-Low 27-Sep 5261 14 WT-High 9-Oct 0 46TG-Low 1-Oct 2082 19 WT-High 9-Oct 0 51 TG-Low 1-Oct 2520 24 WT-High9-Oct 0 56 TG-Low 1-Oct 9448 29 WT-High 9-Oct 0 2 TG-High 1-Oct 3061 34WT-High 9-Oct 0 7 TG-High 1-Oct 1814 39 WT-High 9-Oct 0 12 TG-High 1-Oct4681 44 WT-High 9-Oct 0 17 TG-High 1-Oct 2509 49 WT-High 9-Oct 0 22TG-High 1-Oct 7869 54 WT-High 9-Oct 0 27 TG-High 1-Oct 6363 59 WT-High9-Oct 0 32 TG-High 1-Oct 5541 5 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 37 TG-High 27-Sep 519010 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 42 TG-High 1-Oct 3609 15 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 47TG-High 1-Oct 1122 20 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 52 TG-High 1-Oct 12163 25WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 57 TG-High 1-Oct 1502 30 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 3 TG-Saline27-Sep 3708 35 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 8 TG-Saline 1-Oct 4833 40 WT-Saline9-Oct 0 13 TG-Saline 1-Oct 1673 45 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 18 TG-Saline 1-Oct4039 50 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 23 TG-Saline 1-Oct 2373 55 WT-Saline 9-Oct 028 TG-Saline 1-Oct 4133 60 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 Average Std deviation Stderror TG-Low 4598.418 2395.218 691.4399 TG-High 3932.644 1782.644630.2598 TG-Saline 3706.334 1570.737 473.595 WT-High 0 0 0 WT-Saline 0 00

TABLE 18 Insoluble Aβ40 detected in brain. Mouse Date ConcentrationConcentration Mouse Date Concentration Concentration sac order # Groupmeasured (pg/ml) (ug/ml) sac order # Group measured (pg/ml) (ug/ml) 1TG-Low 8-Oct 10257199 10.26 33 TG-Saline 8-Oct 25512730 25.51 6 TG-Low8-Oct 11697779 11.70 38 TG-Saline 8-Oct 19414980 19.41 11 TG-Low 8-Oct7575663 7.58 43 TG-Saline 8-Oct 26032547 26.03 16 TG-Low 8-Oct 83228548.32 48 TG-Saline 8-Oct 39277004 39.28 21 TG-Low 8-Oct 28084221 28.08 53TG-Saline 8-Oct 19280789 19.28 26 TG-Low 8-Oct 22248049 22.25 58TG-Saline 8-Oct 39064072 39.06 31 TG-Low 8-Oct 14817934 14.82 4 WT-High18-Oct 79052 0.07905 36 TG-Low 8-Oct 25661660 25.66 9 WT-High 18-Oct48296 0.04830 41 TG-Low 3-Oct 25537069 25.54 14 WT-High 18-Oct 482560.04826 46 TG-Low 8-Oct 9547715 9.55 19 WT-High 18-Oct 9511 0.00951 51TG-Low 8-Oct 5688511 5.69 24 WT-High 18-Oct 249003 0.24900 56 TG-Low8-Oct 9606698 9.61 29 WT-High 18-Oct 31520 0.03152 2 TG-High 8-Oct4410637 4.41 34 WT-High 18-Oct 39666 0.03967 7 TG-High 8-Oct 1571301315.71 39 WT-High 18-Oct 25225 0.02522 12 TG-High 8-Oct 18125865 18.13 44WT-High 18-Oct 134629 0.13463 17 TG-High 8-Oct 4945207 4.95 54 WT-High18-Oct 15163 0.01516 22 TG-High 8-Oct 33296598 33.30 59 WT-High 18-Oct23228 0.02323 27 TG-High 8-Oct 68491264 68.49 5 WT-Saline 18-Oct 37640.00376 32 TG-High 8-Oct 50062749 50.06 10 WT-Saline 18-Oct 37 TG-High3-Oct 36070736 36.07 15 WT-Saline 18-Oct 10815 0.01081 42 TG-High 8-Oct26864520 26.86 20 WT-Saline 18-Oct 38643 0.03864 47 TG-High 8-Oct3774286 3.77 25 WT-Saline 18-Oct 52 TG-High 8-Oct 42493407 42.49 30WT-Saline 18-Oct 4356 0.00436 57 TG-High 8-Oct 8907543 8.91 35 WT-Saline18-Oct 3 TG-Saline 3-Oct 13934212 13.93 40 WT-Saline 18-Oct 5701 0.005708 TG-Saline 8-Oct 28128069 28.13 45 WT-Saline 18-Oct 14256 0.01426 13TG-Saline 8-Oct 18908021 18.91 50 WT-Saline 18-Oct 2986 0.00299 18TG-Saline 8-Oct 18777770 18.78 55 WT-Saline 18-Oct 3072 0.00307 28TG-Saline 8-Oct 20470065 20.47 60 WT-Saline 18-Oct 3008 0.00301 AverageStd deviation Std error TG-Low 14.92045 8.129698 2.346842 TG-High24.60567 20.93301 6.31154 TG-Saline 24.43639 8.31837 2.401306 WT-High0.063959 0.070783 0.021342 WT-Saline 0.009622 0.011582 0.003861

TABLE 19 Soluble Aβ42 detected in brain. Mouse sac Date ConcentrationMouse sac Date Concentration order # Group measured (pg/ml) order #Group measured (pg/ml) 1 TG-Low 1-Oct 1455 33 TG-Saline 2-Oct 626 6TG-Low 2-Oct 551 38 TG-Saline 2-Oct 393 11 TG-Low 2-Oct 511 43 TG-Saline2-Oct 562 16 TG-Low 2-Oct 744 48 TG-Saline 2-Oct 432 21 TG-Low 2-Oct 70553 TG-Saline 1-Oct 1295 26 TG-Low 2-Oct 623 58 TG-Saline 1-Oct 1361 31TG-Low 2-Oct 463 4 WT-High 9-Oct 0 36 TG-Low 2-Oct 609 9 WT-High 9-Oct 041 TG-Low 27-Sep 1564 14 WT-High 9-Oct 0 46 TG-Low 2-Oct 606 19 WT-High9-Oct 0 51 TG-Low 1-Oct 825 24 WT-High 9-Oct 0 56 TG-Low 1-Oct 1526 29WT-High 9-Oct 0 2 TG-High 2-Oct 579 34 WT-High 9-Oct 0 7 TG-High 2-Oct446 39 WT-High 9-Oct 0 12 TG-High 2-Oct 880 44 WT-High 9-Oct 0 17TG-High 2-Oct 410 49 WT-High 9-Oct 0 22 TG-High 1-Oct 1198 54 WT-High9-Oct 0 27 TG-High 2-Oct 851 59 WT-High 9-Oct 0 32 TG-High 2-Oct 877 5WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 37 TG-High 27-Sep 1470 10 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 42 TG-High2-Oct 880 15 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 47 TG-High 2-Oct 290 20 WT-Saline 9-Oct 052 TG-High 1-Oct 3050 25 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 57 TG-High 2-Oct 385 30WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 3 TG-Saline 27-Sep 791 35 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 8TG-Saline 2-Oct 990 40 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 13 TG-Saline 2-Oct 562 45WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 18 TG-Saline 2-Oct 733 50 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 23TG-Saline 2-Oct 521 55 WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 28 TG-Saline 2-Oct 737 60WT-Saline 9-Oct 0 Average Std deviation Std error TG-Low 848.4637414.464 119.6455 TG-High 751.4925 368.8014 111.1978 TG-Saline 750.1043315.7884 91.16026 WT-High 0 0 0 WT-Saline 0 0 0

TABLE 20 Insoluble Aβ42 detected in brain. Mouse sac Date ConcentrationConcentration Mouse sac Date Concentration Concentration order # Groupmeasured (pg/ml) (ug/ml) order # Group measured (pg/ml) (ug/ml) 1 TG-Low3-Oct 4493237 4.49 33 TG-Saline 3-Oct 3705386 3.71 6 TG-Low 3-Oct7320913 7.32 38 TG-Saline 3-Oct 6032562 6.03 11 TG-Low 3-Oct 26419852.64 43 TG-Saline 3-Oct 6871640 6.87 16 TG-Low 3-Oct 1644845 1.64 48TG-Saline 3-Oct 12292890 12.29 21 TG-Low 3-Oct 10670528 10.67 53TG-Saline 3-Oct 6847851 6.85 26 TG-Low 3-Oct 2902253 2.90 58 TG-Saline3-Oct 11978111 11.98 31 TG-Low 3-Oct 5435473 5.44 4 WT-High 18-Oct 327570.0328 36 TG-Low 3-Oct 5458033 5.46 9 WT-High 18-Oct 53457 0.0535 41TG-Low 2-Oct 5807761 5.81 14 WT-High 18-Oct 38889 0.0389 46 TG-Low 3-Oct2751646 2.75 19 WT-High 18-Oct 5910 0.0059 51 TG-Low 3-Oct 1474153 1.4724 WT-High 18-Oct 76083 0.0761 56 TG-Low 3-Oct 6022267 6.02 29 WT-High18-Oct 19765 0.0198 2 TG-High 3-Oct 1984182 1.98 34 WT-High 18-Oct 264790.0265 7 TG-High 3-Oct 2733892 2.73 39 WT-High 18-Oct 20134 0.0201 12TG-High 3-Oct 10072470 10.07 44 WT-High 18-Oct 79499 0.0795 17 TG-High3-Oct 1786008 1.79 54 WT-High 18-Oct 19179 0.0192 22 TG-High 3-Oct7201686 7.20 59 WT-High 18-Oct 23360 0.0234 27 TG-High 3-Oct 1175689611.76 5 WT-Saline 18-Oct 3891 0.0039 32 TG-High 3-Oct 7338861 7.34 10WT-Saline 18-Oct 3916 0.0039 37 TG-High 2-Oct 10547976 10.55 15WT-Saline 18-Oct 9542 0.0095 42 TG-High 3-Oct 6116270 6.12 20 WT-Saline18-Oct 13878 0.0139 47 TG-High 3-Oct 954559 0.95 25 WT-Saline 18-Oct 52TG-High 3-Oct 14015195 14.02 30 WT-Saline 18-Oct 4040 0.0040 57 TG-High3-Oct 1353498 1.35 35 WT-Saline 18-Oct 3 TG-Saline 2-Oct 3362018 3.36 40WT-Saline 18-Oct 4698 0.0047 8 TG-Saline 3-Oct 6261392 6.26 45 WT-Saline18-Oct 15173 0.0152 13 TG-Saline 3-Oct 6056766 6.06 50 WT-Saline 18-Oct2862 0.0029 18 TG-Saline 3-Oct 5685368 5.69 55 WT-Saline 18-Oct 31510.0032 28 TG-Saline 3-Oct 3122150 3.12 60 WT-Saline 18-Oct 3320 0.0033Average Std deviation Std error TG-Low 4.718591 2.656887 0.766977TG-High 5.622391 4.045875 1.219877 TG-Saline 6.565103 3.065648 0.884976WT-High 0.035956 0.024034 0.007247 WT-Saline 0.006447 0.004669 0.001477

TABLE 21 Ratios of soluble Aβ40/Aβ42. Mouse sac Ratio of Mouse sac Ratioof order # Group AB42/AB40 order # Group AB42/AB40 1 TG-Low 0.160295 33TG-Saline 0.1588125 6 TG-Low 0.13894 38 TG-Saline 0.2960768 11 TG-Low0.164329 43 TG-Saline 0.2834986 16 TG-Low 0.266987 48 TG-Saline0.1180902 21 TG-Low 0.179196 53 TG-Saline 0.19472 26 TG-Low 0.16629 58TG-Saline 0.2209363 31 TG-Low 0.1219 4 WT-High 0 36 TG-Low 0.111683 9WT-High 0 41 TG-Low 0.297232 14 WT-High 0 46 TG-Low 0.290904 19 WT-High0 51 TG-Low 0.327174 24 WT-High 0 56 TG-Low 0.161546 29 WT-High 0 2TG-High 0.189314 34 WT-High 0 7 TG-High 0.245964 39 WT-High 0 12 TG-High0.188097 44 WT-High 0 17 TG-High 0.163459 49 WT-High 0 22 TG-High0.152272 54 WT-High 0 27 TG-High 0.13377 59 WT-High 0 32 TG-High0.158201 5 WT-Saline 0 37 TG-High 0.283163 10 WT-Saline 0 42 TG-High0.243714 15 WT-Saline 0 47 TG-High 0.258574 20 WT-Saline 0 52 TG-High0.250769 25 WT-Saline 0 57 TG-High 0.25651 30 WT-Saline 0 3 TG-Saline0.2132 35 WT-Saline 0 8 TG-Saline 0.204815 40 WT-Saline 0 13 TG-Saline0.335658 45 WT-Saline 0 18 TG-Saline 0.181432 50 WT-Saline 0 23TG-Saline 0.219518 55 WT-Saline 0 28 TG-Saline 0.1783 60 WT-Saline 0Average Std deviation Std error TG-Low 0.198873 0.075008 0.0217 TG-High0.20664 0.05204 0.0157 TG-Saline 0.217088 0.061325 0.0177 WT-High 0 0 0WT-Saline 0 0 0

TABLE 22 Ratios of insoluble Aβ40/Aβ42. Mouse sac Ratio of Mouse sacRatio of order # Group AB42/AB40 order # Group AB42/AB40 1 TG-Low0.43806 33 TG-Saline 0.14524 6 TG-Low 0.62584 38 TG-Saline 0.31072 11TG-Low 0.34875 43 TG-Saline 0.26396 16 TG-Low 0.19763 48 TG-Saline0.31298 21 TG-Low 0.37995 53 TG-Saline 0.35516 26 TG-Low 0.13045 58TG-Saline 0.30663 31 TG-Low 0.36682 4 WT-High 0.41437 36 TG-Low 0.212699 WT-High 1.10685 41 TG-Low 0.22742 14 WT-High 0.80589 46 TG-Low 0.288219 WT-High 0.62142 51 TG-Low 0.25915 24 WT-High 0.30555 56 TG-Low0.62688 29 WT-High 0.62708 2 TG-High 0.44986 34 WT-High 0.66754 7TG-High 0.17399 39 WT-High 0.79817 12 TG-High 0.5557 44 WT-High 0.590517 TG-High 0.36116 54 WT-High 1.26484 22 TG-High 0.21629 59 WT-High1.00566 27 TG-High 0.17166 5 WT-Saline 1.0335 32 TG-High 0.14659 10WT-Saline 37 TG-High 0.29242 15 WT-Saline 0.88232 42 TG-High 0.22767 20WT-Saline 0.35914 47 TG-High 0.25291 25 WT-Saline 52 TG-High 0.32982 30WT-Saline 0.92744 57 TG-High 0.15195 35 WT-Saline 3 TG-Saline 0.24128 40WT-Saline 0.82407 8 TG-Saline 0.2226 45 WT-Saline 1.06434 13 TG-Saline0.32033 50 WT-Saline 0.95864 18 TG-Saline 0.30277 55 WT-Saline 1.0257128 TG-Saline 0.15252 60 WT-Saline 1.10371 Std Average deviation Stderror TG-Low 0.3418191 0.15905 0.04591 TG-High 0.2727456 0.13256 0.04192TG-Saline 0.2667446 0.06933 0.02001 WT-High 0.7461702 0.28933 0.08724WT-Saline 0.9087633 0.22479 0.07493

The most obvious and expected result was that both soluble and insolubleAβ40 and Aβ42 were drastically higher in all TG mice than WT mice.Soluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 were not detectable in WT mice, while insolubleAβ40 and Aβ42 were present, though at about 1000 times lower than in TGmice. The next most obvious result was that in all TG mice, theconcentration of insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 was much higher than solubleAβ40 and Aβ42, roughly about 5000 and 7500 times higher, respectively.

Regarding group comparisons among the three TG groups, there were nosignificant differences among any of the groups for either soluble orinsoluble Aβ40 or Aβ42 using an ANOVA. This was somewhat surprising forinsoluble amyloid as there were clear differences in plaques in thecortex between drug-treated and saline-treated TG mice. The most likelyexplanation is that the ELISA was not as sensitive to these differencesas the IHC slides of plaques.

Example 6 Effect of Intranasal Administration of IgG on Weight andSurvival

A study was conducted to assess the efficacy of chronic intranasal (IN)administration of IgG at two doses in a transgenic amyloid mouse model.The purpose of the study was to determine whether chronic treatment withintranasally delivered IgG at two doses (0.4 g/kg/2 wk and 0.8 g/kg/2wk) would have any effect on the mouse weight and survival.

Experimental Design: As described in Example 4, the TG2576 (“TG”)amyloid mouse model was used in this study as a mouse model forAlzheimer's disease and C57 mice were used as controls. The handling ofthe mice, preparation of drug, and administration of drug was conductedas described above in Example 4.

The mice were divided into five treatment groups of 20 mice as describedin Table 15. The weight and survival of the mice were monitored for 103weeks. The weight of each mouse was recorded weekly (data not shown).

Results: These experiments showed that intranasal IgG increases thelifespan of TG mice. FIG. 4A shows that TG mice have an increasedlifespan when they are administered a high (0.8 g/kg/2 wk) or a low (0.4g/kg/2 wk) dose of intranasal IgG compared to TG mice administeredsaline intranasally (control). FIG. 4B shows that TG mice administeredintranasal IgG had longer lifespans than WT mice. Although this studybegun with 20 mice in each cohort, due to the mass euthanasia performedto evaluate amyloid plaque content (as described in Example 5),Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using the sub-group of 8mice in each cohort that were not euthanized. Dosing to the mice in thesub-groups was continued as described above through the entirety of theexperiment.

Example 7 Effect of Intranasal Administration of IgG on Memory

A study was conducted to examine whether intranasal administration ofIgG affects the memory in the brain in vivo. The purpose of this studywas to examine whether chronic treatment with intranasally delivered IgGat two doses (0.4 g/kg/2 wk and 0.8 g/kg/2 wk) would have any effect onmemory in a transgenic amyloid mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

Experimental Design: At 15 months of age, the mice described in Example4 were subjected to a six week battery of behavioral tests to assess formemory, sensorimotor, and anxiolytic changes. These included Morriswater maze hidden and visual platform tests (reference memory, visualability), radial arm water maze (working memory), passive avoidance task(memory), Barnes maze (memory), open field test (exploratory behavior),elevated plus maze (anxiety), and rotarod (motor skills).

Results: For each behavioral test, comparison data was analyzed usingT-tests as described above in Table 23. Statistical tests were performedon data after removal of both statistical outliers and non-compliantmice, which were specified for each behavioral test. Data was firstanalyzed by comparing WT-saline (WT-Sal) mice to TG-saline (TG-Sal) miceto determine whether there is a transgenic (model) effect for that test.Comparisons between all TG and all WT mice were also performed. Althoughthe latter analysis is confounded by drug treatment, it gains power byincreasing sample size and serves to give an overall picture of apotential transgenic (model) effect. Comparisons were made amongindividual drug treatment groups. Specifically, the drug treated TGgroups were compared directly to the TG-saline group to determinewhether the drug had any effect.

TABLE 23 T-tests used to evaluate results of behavioral studies in wildtype and Alzheimer’s disease mouse models administered IgG intranasally.Comparison Reason for Comparison WT-saline vs. TG-saline To determinewhether there is a transgenic effect of the model. WT-all vs. TG-all Toprovide a larger scale view of the (all = saline and IN IgG) transgeniceffect of the model. TG-saline vs TG-low dose To determine whether TGmice treated with IN IgG the low dose of IgG performed differently thanTG mice treated with saline. TG-saline vs TG-high dose To determinewhether TG mice treated with the high IN IgG dose of IgG performeddifferently than TG mice treated with saline.

Overall, in the three visio-spatial memory tests, mice learned overtime, and there was generally improved performance in the WT mice ascompared to the TG mice, which was expected. There was also a differencebetween WT and TG mice in the Elevated Plus Maze. There were minimalobserved differences in the Rotarod and Open Field Tests, butdifferences were not expected. Compliance was only a problem in theBarnes Maze, however, when non-compliant mice were removed the learningtrends were present, and the model effect mirrored those seen in the MWMand RAWM.

The Morris Water Maze (MWM) Hidden Platform. MWM is a standard test ofspatial memory. MWM performance was assessed using hidden-platformtesting (4 days, 4 trials/day). Before trials began, the mice wereacclimated to swimming in the water. For each of these blocks of trials,mice were randomly dropped into four quadrants within the MWM (round tubwith water) and allowed to swim for 60 seconds or until they reached theplatform. The mouse's ability to reach the platform depended on hisability to remember visual cues from previous trials and their locationin relation to the platform. Mice that did not reach the platform after60 seconds were placed on the platform. Mice were allowed to remain/reston the platform for 20 seconds between trials. All data was recordedusing MouseApp software, which records escape latency.

The Morris Water Maze Visual Platform is designed to assess visualability. It was run just like the MWM hidden platform, except theplatform was raised just above the surface of the water, has a flag ontop to identify it, and stripes along the side to make it more visual.It was only run for one day. Analysis was performed the same as with theMWM hidden platform tests.

Overall, the Morris Water Maze Hidden Platform tests showed that therewas a clear trend of learning both throughout the week and duringindividual days, demonstrating that the test was effective for measuringmemory. Escape latencies were lowest during days 3 and 4, and wereespecially lowest during trials 3 and 4 on these days.

There was evidence of a transgenic model effect. Table 25 and Table 26show that both WT groups had lower escape latencies than all three TGgroups on days 3 and 4. WT-Sal mice had lower escape latencies thanTG-Sal mice (Table 24, Table 25, Table 26, Table 27, and Table 28).However, when the WT and TG groups were put together, there were severalsignificant differences, including B1-T2, B3-T4, B4-T1, B4-T3, and B4-T4(p<0.05 or 0.01; Table 24, Table 27, and Table 28). Much of the powerfor this difference came from the TG-high mice, which performedparticularly well in this task.

TABLE 24 Summary of T-tests for specific comparisons in behavior tests.Tests are 2-sided and unpaired. Reported numbers are p-values. WT-SalvsTG- WT-All vs TG-Sal vsTG- TG-Sal vsTG- Test Measure Block Trial SalTG-All Low High RAWM Escape 1 1 0.023 0    0.883 0.539 RAWM Escape 1 20.689 0.558 0.141 0.298 RAWM Escape 1 3 0.088 0.215 0.592 0.15  RAWMEscape 1 4 0.615 0.358 0.803 0.335 RAWM Escape 2 1 0.159 0.215 0.6530.607 RAWM Escape 2 2 0.194 0.926 0.675 0.13  RAWM Escape 2 3 0.1610.497 0.06  0.046 RAWM Escape 2 4 0.446 0.219 0.271 0.918 RAWM Escape 31 0.959 0.767 0.619 0.65  RAWM Escape 3 2 0.069 0.001 0.5  0.202 RAWMEscape 3 3 0.995 0.806 0.185 0.597 RAWM Escape 3 4 0.281 0.002 0.1980.257 RAWM Escape 4 1 0.785 0.487 0.217 0.701 RAWM Escape 4 2 0.35 0.274 0.433 0.627 RAWM Escape 4 3 0.357 0.149 0.348 0.292 RAWM Escape 44 0.232 0.008 0.583 0.513 RAWM Errors 1 1 0.538 0.001 0.154 0.881 RAWMErrors 1 2 0.284 0.105 0.06  0.233 RAWM Errors 1 3 0.062 0.196 0.2360.089 RAWM Errors 1 4 0.443 0.255 0.577 0.293 RAWM Errors 2 1 0.6560.753 0.223 0.136 RAWM Errors 2 2 0.227 0.642 0.606 0.022 RAWM Errors 23 0.17  0.706 0.247 0.139 RAWM Errors 2 4 0.719 0.385 0.601 0.954 RAWMErrors 3 1 0.86  0.678 0.783 0.551 RAWM Errors 3 2 0.043 0.002 0.2070.336 RAWM Errors 3 3 0.946 0.75  0.55  0.526 RAWM Errors 3 4 0.3930.02  0.998 0.391 RAWM Errors 4 1 0.437 0.229 0.397 0.814 RAWM Errors 42 0.064 0.048 0.154 0.263 RAWM Errors 4 3 0.357 0.214 0.296 0.432 RAWMErrors 4 4 0.135 0.007 0.935 0.566 MWM hid Escape 1 1 0.262 0.186 0.0070.095 MWM hid Escape 1 2 0.069 0.086 0.663 0.532 MWM hid Escape 1 30.62  0.26  0.5  0.419 MWM hid Escape 1 4 0.663 0.171 0.111 0.189 MWMhid Escape 2 1 0.882 0.555 0.357 0.702 MWM hid Escape 2 2 0.24  0.5680.091 0.963 MWM hid Escape 2 3 0.393 0.71  0.802 0.276 MWM hid Escape 24 0.986 0.256 0.638 0.963 MWM hid Escape 3 1 0.475 0.419 0.906 0.163 MWMhid Escape 3 2 0.681 0.173 0.109 0.549 MWM hid Escape 3 3 0.905 0.1060.908 0.864 MWM hid Escape 3 4 0.355 0.072 0.874 0.6  MWM hid Escape 4 10.672 0.045 0.044 0.102 MWM hid Escape 4 2 0.147 0.127 0.264 0.991 MWMhid Escape 4 3 0.592 0.03  0.585 0.802 MWM hid Escape 4 4 0.507 0.02 0.436 0.192 Barnes Escape 1 1 0.681 0.35  0.946 0.696 Barnes Escape 1 20.925 0.643 0.587 0.337 Barnes Escape 1 3 0.098 0.277 0.876 0.408 BarnesEscape 2 1 0.478 0.576 0.542 0.63  Barnes Escape 2 2 0.673 0.64  0.1320.534 Barnes Escape 2 3 0.501 0.529 0.284 0.496 Barnes Escape 3 1 0.9430.313 0.189 0.764 Barnes Escape 3 2 0.764 0.88  0.678 0.626 BarnesEscape 3 3 0.581 0.274 0.826 0.657 Barnes Escape 4 1 0.623 0.052 0.0720.606 Barnes Escape 4 2 0.138 0.21  0.29  0.482 Barnes Escape 4 3 0.9160.986 0.925 0.845 Barnes Errors 1 1 0.485 0.851 0.807 0.75  BarnesErrors 1 2 0.057 0.033 0.436 0.416 Barnes Errors 1 3 0.231 0.414 0.5410.603 Barnes Errors 2 1 0.48  0.519 0.731 0.434 Barnes Errors 2 2 0.0850.15  0.41  0.383 Barnes Errors 2 3 0.423 0.079 0.17  0.341 BarnesErrors 3 1 0.979 0.894 0.875 0.759 Barnes Errors 3 2 0.54  0.741 0.8020.535 Barnes Errors 3 3 0.864 0.952 0.806 0.764 Barnes Errors 4 1 0.9280.245 0.185 0.355 Barnes Errors 4 2 0.885 0.965 0.736 0.758 BarnesErrors 4 3 0.013 0.116 0.19  0.707 MWM vis Escape 1 1 0.074 0.282 0.1340.589 MWM vis Escape 1 2 0.507 0.222 0.665 0.597 MWM vis Escape 1 30.863 0.237 0.516 0.959 MWM vis Escape 1 4 0.898 0.448 0.46  0.593 Openfield Line n/a n/a 0.534 0.138 0.112 0.688 Crossings Open field Velocityn/a n/a 0.38  0.057 0.25  0.618 Elev. plus Time in open n/a n/a 0.0360.001 0.726 0.225 arms Elev. plus Frequency in n/a n/a 0.034 0    0.3720.13  open arms Rotarod Best run n/a n/a 0.98  0.153 0.64  0.875 RotarodAverage run n/a n/a 0.856 0.131 0.557 0.973 Pass. Avoid Escape Learn n/a0.032 0.001 0.952 0.825 Pass. Avoid Escape Test n/a 0.072 0    0.34 0.207 Underlined cells p < 0.05; Boxed

TABLE 25 Average escape latencies (sec) from the Morris Water Mazetests. Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG-Low (N = 18) 34.54 30.47 25.0324.68 TG-High (N = 18) 33.38 27.06 24.50 30.51 TG-Saline (N = 16) 24.8022.20 24.25 24.02 WT-High (N = 16) 23.38 23.58 17.73 16.11 WT-Saline (N= 18) 27.26 26.82 24.85 26.82

TABLE 26 Average escape latencies (sec) from the Morris Water Maze testswith non-compliance removed. Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG-Low (N =15-18) 31.36 25.53 25.03 23.46 TG-High (N = 15-16) 28.73 20.55 20.0625.57 TG-Saline (N = 14-15) 23.25 19.68 21.87 19.68 WT-High (N = 14-15)20.93 19.30 14.92 13.18 WT-Saline (N = 13-16) 21.65 22.67 18.07 15.87

TABLE 27 Average daily escape latencies (sec) from the Morris Water Mazetests. Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG ALL (N = 52) 31.14 26.75 24.6126.50 WT ALL (N = 34) 25.43 25.29 21.50 21.78

TABLE 28 Average daily escape latencies (sec) from the Morris Water Mazetests with non-compliance removed. Group Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG ALL(N = 45-49) 27.86 21.92 22.44 22.99 WT ALL (N = 28-30) 21.29 21.10 16.4914.43

Like with RAWM, the three transgenic groups are grouped closely in Table25and Table 26. The only significant differences between TG-Sal andTG-low came on B1-T1, B2-T2, and B4-T1 (Table 24), and in each case,TG-Sal mice had shorter escape latencies than TG-low mice, who performedparticularly poor in this task. There was only one example in whichthere was a statistical difference between TG-high and TG-Sal (B1-T1).In this instance, TG-Sal did very well and outperformed the TG-highmice. However, it should be noted that the WT-high mice consistentlyoutperformed all other groups in this task. Although T-tests performedat each trial showed no statistical differences between WT-high andWT-Saline, repeated measures ANOVA would demonstrate a differencebetween these two groups.

For the MWM hidden platform test, the escape latency (time to find theplatform) was collected. T-tests were conducted for each day of eachtrial (1-4). Data was analyzed with non-compliant mice removed in orderto more accurately represent memory. Non-compliant mice were defined asany mice that had escape latencies of 60 seconds (the full timeallotted) for trials 3 and 4, when they should have been learning tosome extent. The percent of non-compliant mice for each group wasrecorded. For hidden platform tests non-compliance was as follows:TG-low=8.3%; TG-high=15.3%; TG-saline=7.8%; WT-high=7.8%; andWT-saline=18.1%.

The Radial Arm Water Maze (RAWM). RAWM is used to evaluate short-term,working memory. Similar to a MWM, this test has a round tub with water,visual cues throughout the room and a hidden platform. It is unique inthat inserts are placed into the tank to create six radially distributedarms of equal size that emanate from the center. Before trials began,the mice were acclimated to swimming in the water. Mice were droppedinto 4 radial arms, in an order selected randomly for each trial, andgiven 1 minute to find the platform, with 20 seconds of rest betweeneach trial. Trials occurred daily for twelve days and each day theplatform was moved to a new location. Halfway through the testing, anextra intra-maze visual cue was added to the tank in an effort to makethe test a little easier. The visual cue was a large ‘X’ made of tapeand placed on the inner wall of the maze above the arm with the escapeplatform. Both errors and escape latency were recorded.

TABLE 29 RAWM escape latency (seconds) of mice grouped in blocks 1-4.Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 T1(1) T2(1) T3(1) T4(1) T1(2) T2(2)T3(2) T4(2) T1(3) T2(3) T3(3) T4(3) T1(4) T2(4) T3(4) T4(4) TG-Low (N =18) 49.20 50.48 49.44 45.02 48.06 42.98 40.42 46.66 44.17 35.45 36.2540.67 37.46 26.44 22.72 29.89 TG-High (N = 18) 49.72 47.13 44.94 47.3347.78 34.09 42.11 42.96 40.00 45.02 35.56 41.59 32.70 27.20 29.76 29.57TG-Saline (N = 16) 50.58 44.13 48.96 42.94 49.92 41.58 34.98 43.50 39.9436.21 28.45 32.98 32.75 29.06 28.04 29.42 WT-High (N = 18) 39.96 47.1143.04 42.02 44.81 41.61 34.72 41.70 41.91 33.52 39.54 34.93 40.15 28.2824.78 24.43 WT-Saline (N = 18) 40.62 38.50 41.76 40.26 43.28 35.98 40.1540.81 42.41 31.70 33.83 33.70 33.09 27.87 24.96 25.20

Overall, RAWM was too difficult for mice in blocks 1 and 2, as evidencedby a general trend for the escape latency not to go below about 35seconds (Table 30). After the addition of the extra visual cue in blocks3 and 4, a clear trend of decreased time to find the platform and errorsbecame apparent in all treatment groups from trial 1 to trial 4 (Table30, Table 31, and Table 32). This demonstrated that the test waseffective for measuring memory.

TABLE 30 RAWM escape latency (seconds) of blocks 1 and 2. ESCAPE LATENCY(BLOCK) T1(1) T2(1) T1(2) T2(2) T1(3) T2(3) T1(4) T2(4) TG-Low 49.2050.48 48.06 42.98 44.17 35.45 37.46 26.44 (N = 18) TG-High 49.72 47.1347.78 34.09 40.00 45.02 32.70 27.20 (N = 18) TG-Saline 50.58 44.13 49.9241.58 39.94 36.21 32.75 29.06 (N = 16) WT-High 39.96 47.11 44.81 41.6141.91 33.52 40.15 28.28 (N = 18) WT-Saline 40.62 38.50 43.28 35.98 42.4131.70 33.09 27.87 (N = 18)

TABLE 31 RAWM escape latency (seconds) of blocks 1 and 3. ESCAPE LATENCY(BLOCK) T1(1) T3(1) T1(2) T3(2) T1(3) T3(3) T1(4) T3(4) TG-Low 49.2049.44 48.06 40.42 44.17 36.25 37.46 22.72 (N = 18) TG-High 49.72 44.9447.78 42.11 40.00 35.56 32.70 29.76 (N = 18) TG-Saline 50.58 48.96 49.9234.98 39.94 28.45 32.75 28.04 (N = 16) WT-High 39.96 43.04 44.81 34.7241.91 39.54 40.15 24.78 (N = 18) WT-Saline 40.62 41.76 43.28 40.15 42.4133.83 33.09 24.96 (N = 18)

TABLE 32 RAWM escape latency (seconds) of blocks 1 and 4. ESCAPE LATENCY(BLOCK) T1(1) T4(1) T1(2) T4(2) T1(3) T4(3) T1(4) T4(4) TG-Low 49.2045.02 48.06 46.66 44.17 40.67 37.46 29.89 (N = 18) TG-High 49.72 47.3347.78 42.96 40.00 41.59 32.70 29.57 (N = 18) TG-Saline 50.58 42.94 49.9243.50 39.94 32.98 32.75 29.42 (N = 16) WT-High 39.96 42.02 44.81 41.7041.91 34.93 40.15 24.43 (N = 18) WT-Saline 40.62 40.26 43.28 40.81 42.4133.70 33.09 25.20 (N = 18)

There was clear evidence of a transgenic model effect in RAWM (Table 33and Table 34). In Table 35 an overall summary of all groups averaged outover all days shows that in all four trials, both WT groups had lowertimes to find the platform than all three TG groups. This was also trueof errors for trials 2-4 (Table 36). In Table 33, Table 34, Table 35,and Table 36, individual blocks and trials can be seen. For escapelatency, WT-Sal mice had significantly shorter escape latencies thanTG-Sal mice in B1-T1 (Batch 1-Trial 1), B1-T3, and B3-T2 (p<0.05 or 0.1)(Table 24). For errors (Table 36), WT-Sal mice had significantly fewererrors than TG-Sal mice in B1-T3, B3-T2, and B4-T2 (p<0.05 or 0.1)(Table 24). When all WT mice were combined and compared to all TG mice(irrespective of treatment), it was clear that WT mice outperformed TGmice. When all days were combined, WT mice had shorter escape latencyand fewer errors than TG mice in all trials (Table 35 and Table 36).Similarly, in individual blocks and trials, all WT mice had shorterescape latency and fewer errors in all trials in blocks 2-4 (Table 35and Table 36). Statistically, WT mice had shorter escape latencies thanTG mice in B1-T1, B3-T2, B3-T4, and B4-T4 (p<0.05) (Table 24).Statistically, WT mice had fewer errors than TG mice in B1-T1, B3-T2,B3-T4, B4-T2, and B4-T4 (p<0.05) (Table 24).

TABLE 33 RAWM escape latencies (seconds) recorded for 12 days of RAWMtesting. TG ALL (N = 52) WT ALL (N = 36) Arm Arm Arm Arm Arm Arm Arm Arm1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Day 1 51.67 53.33 49.08 45.24 45.94 45.56 46.81 45.22Day 2 51.15 45.58 48.54 46.87 36.11 40.22 40.06 37.47 Day 3 46.60 43.1945.60 43.41 38.86 42.64 40.33 40.72 Day 4 50.29 37.31 39.87 43.27 43.1737.67 37.03 34.83 Day 5 49.85 40.62 38.27 44.76 41.94 38.14 36.61 44.08Day 6 45.41 40.45 39.84 45.20 47.00 40.58 38.67 44.86 Day 7 45.76 38.7637.14 42.38 41.53 32.08 34.53 40.67 Day 8 38.79 41.61 39.20 38.92 43.3628.36 38.36 28.97 Day 9 39.75 36.79 24.71 34.63 41.57 37.39 37.17 33.31Day 10 34.42 29.90 29.69 29.94 39.81 27.19 27.50 25.47 Day 11 34.1323.69 24.10 31.15 35.50 27.50 26.08 28.94 Day 12 34.54 28.94 26.60 27.8134.56 29.53 21.03 20.03

TABLE 34 RAWM escape latencies (seconds) of blocks 1-4. Block 1 Block 2Block 3 Block 4 T1(1) T2(1) T3(1) T4(1) T1(2) T2(2) T3(2) T4(2) T1(3)T2(3) T3(3) T4(3) T1(4) T2(4) T3(4) T4(4) TG ALL (N = 52) 49.81 47.3747.73 45.18 48.54 39.45 39.32 44.40 41.42 39.04 33.62 38.62 34.37 27.5126.79 29.63 WT ALL (N = 36) 40.29 42.81 42.40 41.14 44.06 38.80 37.4441.26 42.16 32.61 36.69 34.31 36.62 28.07 24.87 24.81

TABLE 35 12 day average of RAWM escape latencies (seconds). Trial 1Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 TG ALL (N = 52) 43.53 38.35 36.89 39.46 WT ALL(N = 36) 40.78 35.57 35.35 35.38

TABLE 36 12 day average of RAWM errors (trial averages). Trial 1 Trial 2Trial 3 Trial 4 TG ALL (N = 52) 4.77 4.64 4.28 4.42 WT ALL (N = 36) 4.523.84 3.71 3.72

There was evidence of a TG model effect in RAWM. A summary of all groupsaveraged out over all days (Table 35) shows that in all four trials,both WT groups had lower times to find the platform than all three TGgroups. This was also true of errors for trials 2-4 (Table 35 and Table36). In Table 35 and Table 36, individual blocks and trials can be seen.For escape latency, WT-Sal mice had significantly shorter escapelatencies than TG-Sal mice in B1-T1 (Batch 1-Trial 1), B1-T3, and B3-T2(p<0.05 or 0.1) (Table 24). As shown in Table 36, WT-Sal mice hadsignificantly fewer errors than TG-Sal mice in B1-T3, B3-T2, and B4-T2(p<0.05 or 0.1) (Table 24). When all WT mice were combined and comparedto all TG mice (irrespective of treatment), it was clear that WT miceoutperformed TG mice. When all days were combined, WT mice had shorterescape latency and fewer errors than TG mice in all trials (Table 35).Similarly, in individual blocks and trials, all WT mice had shorterescape latency and fewer errors in all trials in blocks 2-4 (Table 35and Table 36). Statistically, WT mice had shorter escape latencies thanTG mice in B1-T1, B3-T2, B3-T4, and B4-T4 (p<0.05) (Table 24).Statistically, WT mice had fewer errors than TG mice in B1-T1, B3-T2,B3-T4, B4-T2, and B4-T4 (p<0.05) (Table 24).

The Barnes Maze. The Barnes maze is a visual memory task based onfinding an escape hole on a table, aided by visual cues throughout theroom. The table was round, elevated 1 m from the floor, and had 40escape holes spaced equally around the periphery of the table. One ofthese holes had an escape box directly underneath, while the others wereopen. The motivation to find the escape box was aversive stimuli in theform of bright lights and fans blowing above the surface of the table.The escape box was located in one location for the duration of thestudy. The mouse was given 4 days, with 3 trials/day to learn thelocation of the escape box. Mice were given up to two minutes on thetable to find the escape hole. If after 2 minutes they did not find theescape box, they were placed into the box. Both escape latency to findthe hole and errors were recorded and analyzed. Errors were defined ashead-pokes through holes that do not have the escape box.

Overall, the Barnes maze test did not work well for the mice in thisstudy. This was the only behavior test in which non-compliance was anissue (roughly 50% of all mice did not perform the task). While runningthe tests, the mice were generally not scared of the aversive stimuli.However, among the mice that were compliant and included in theanalyses, there was a learning trend across the days and trials, whichcan be seen in the escape latencies.

There was evidence of a model effect with this test. Table 37 and Table38shows that both WT groups have lower escape latencies on days 3 and 4than all three TG groups. This mirrors data collected with the RAWM andMWM tests, the other two long-term memory tasks. This difference is alsoseen when all WT mice and TG mice were combined as in Table 39 and Table40.

TABLE 37 Average escape latencies (sec) from the Barnes Water Maze bytreatment. Time (s) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG-Low (N = 18) 105.15 99.7695.44 85.67 TG-High (N = 18) 107.74 94.57 100.30 97.33 TG-Saline (N =16) 95.48 89.10 90.10 82.31 WT-High (N = 17) 99.06 95.98 93.65 82.04WT-Saline (N = 18) 94.15 97.41 93.43 87.63

TABLE 38 Average escape latencies (sec) from the Barnes Water Maze bytreatment with non-compliance removed. Time (s) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4TG-Low (N = 7-12) 82.81 78.25 83.60 72.75 TG-High (N = 6-8) 84.28 72.1475.71 68.86 TG-Saline (N = 7-9) 79.71 65.38 74.30 71.48 WT-High (N =8-10) 83.74 79.17 66.29 60.13 WT-Saline (N = 7-10) 69.17 68.43 73.0060.74

TABLE 39 Average escape latencies (sec) from the Barnes Water Maze bygenotype. Time (s) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG ALL (N = 52) 103.07 94.6995.48 88.67 WT ALL (N = 35) 96.53 96.71 93.53 84.91

TABLE 40 Average escape latencies (sec) from the Barnes Water Maze bygenotype with non-compliance removed. Time (s) Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4TG All (N = 21-28) 82.05 72.21 78.16 71.37 WT All (N = 17-19) 76.8874.75 70.02 60.42

There was no evidence of a drug effect in the Barnes Maze tests (Table37, Table 38, Table 39, Table 40, Table 41, Table 42). The onlystatistical significance was in B4-T1, in which TG-low mice performedvery poorly and had longer escape latency than TG-Sal mice (p<0.1; Table24).

TABLE 41 Average number of errors from the Barnes Water Maze bytreatment. Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG-Low (N = 18) 8.48 5.57 6.24 5.39TG-High (N = 18) 6.85 5.54 4.15 4.04 TG-Saline (N = 16) 11.90 8.02 6.295.69 WT-High (N = 17) 6.96 6.45 4.69 4.00 WT-Saline (N = 18) 9.46 8.445.35 4.89

TABLE 42 Average errors from the Barnes Water Maze by genotype. Day 1Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 TG ALL (N = 52) 8.97 6.31 5.53 5.01 WT ALL (N = 35)8.25 7.48 5.03 4.46

For Barnes Maze, both the escape latency (time to find the escape hole)and errors (number of times a mouse pokes his head into a hole that doesnot have the escape box) were collected. T-tests were conducted for eachday of each trial (1-3). Data was analyzed with non-compliant miceremoved in order to more accurately represent memory. Non-compliant micewere defined as any mice that had escape latencies of 120 seconds (thefull time allotted) for trials 3, when they should have been learning tosome extent. The percent of non-compliant mice for each group wasrecorded and was as follows: TG-low=48.6%; TG-high=61.1%;TG-saline=48.4%; WT-high=45.6%; and WT-saline=52.8%.

Elevated Plus Maze. The Elevated Plus Maze is a standard test ofbaseline anxiety in which the animal is placed in the center of anelevated 4-arm maze that consists of two arms that are open and two armsthat are enclosed. The number of times the animal entered each of thearms and the time spent in each arm over 4 minutes was recorded. Thetest was used to determine the unconditioned response to a potentiallydangerous environment (the open, unprotected arms) and anxiety-relatedbehavior was measured by the degree to which the rodent avoids the openarms of the maze.

There was a transgenic effect in the Elevated Plus Maze. In this model,all TG mice spent more time and made more frequent arm entries into theopen arms of the maze than all WT mice, demonstrating inhibition ofexploratory behavior and anxiety that WT mice have regarding openspaces. When WT-Sal mice were compared to TG-Sal mice, TG mice spentsignificantly more time and have significantly more arm entries into theopen arms (Table 24, Table 43, and Table 44). When all WT-mice and allTG-mice were combined, the same results were seen (Table 44 and Table45), p<0.05; Table 24).

TABLE 43 Average time spent in open arms during the Elevated Plus Maze.TIME (SEC) SUM PERCENTAGE Avg. Time Avg Time Std Error Std Error Avg.Time Avg Time Std Error Std Error Enclosed Open Enclosed Open EnclosedOpen Enclosed Open TG-Low (N = 18) 115.2 31.4 10.8 5.3 48.0 13.1 4.5 2.2TG-High (N = 16) 128.7 48.9 11.2 8.7 53.7 20.4 4.7 3.6 TG-Saline (N =15) 117.5 34.6 11.6 7.4 49.0 14.4 4.9 3.1 WT-High (N = 16) 151.9 20.68.6 3.7 63.4 8.6 3.6 1.6 WT-Saline (N = 16) 169.8 15.9 11.6 4.4 70.8 6.64.8 1.8 TG ALL (N = 49) 120.3 38.1 6.4 4.2 50.2 15.9 2.7 1.8 WT ALL (N =32) 160.8 18.3 7.3 2.9 67.1 7.6 3.0 1.2

TABLE 44 Average frequency of entries into open arms during the ElevatedPlus Maze. FREQUENCY SUM PERCENTAGE Avg. Freq Avg. Freq Std Error StdError Avg. Freq Avg. Freq Std Error Std Error Enclosed Open EnclosedOpen Enclosed Open Enclosed Open TG-Low (N = 18) 16.6 10.8 2.0 2.0 60.939.1 5.1 5.1 TG-High (N = 16) 16.0 14.8 2.2 3.6 57.8 42.2 5.2 5.2TG-Saline (N = 15) 15.9 8.1 2.4 2.2 69.6 30.4 5.8 5.8 WT-High (N = 16)13.8 3.4 1.5 0.5 82.1 17.9 2.4 2.4 WT-Saline (N = 16) 9.8 3.0 1.1 0.881.9 18.1 3.8 3.8 TG ALL (N = 49) 16.2 11.3 1.2 1.6 62.5 37.5 3.1 3.1 WTALL (N = 32) 11.8 3.2 1.0 0.5 82.0 18.0 2.2 2.2

There was no evidence of a drug effect in the Elevated Plus Maze tests.Although the TG-high group had the most arm-entries and spent the mosttime in the open arms, it was not significantly different from any othergroups (Table 24, Table 43, and Table 44).

For the Elevated Plus Maze, both the time spent in open and enclosedarms and the number of arm entries (also called frequency of armentries) were recorded. Mice were not included in the analyses if theyfell off the maze in less than 120 seconds. There were 3 mice that felloff, all from different groups. For outliers, mice were removed if boththeir time spent in open arms and frequency of entries into open armswere more than two standard deviations from the mean of their treatmentgroup. Outliers included 3 mice, all from different groups.

The Open Field Maze Test. The Open Field Maze Test is used to detect anychange in spontaneous locomotor activity due to drug treatment oranxiety. Each mouse was given 4 minutes to individually explore arectangular box, while being tracked by the EthoVision video trackingsystem. For analysis, the box was subdivided into 16 equally sizedsquares that are separated by manually drawn lines using the “line draw”feature in EthoVision. The number of line crossings and patterns ofexploration were measured.

There was no evidence of a transgenic or drug effect in the Open FieldMaze tests. All groups of mice had very similar line crossings andvelocity (Table 24, Table 45, Table 46, Table 47, and Table 48).

TABLE 45 Average velocity of mice. Avg Velocity Std Dev Std Error ITGLow (N = 18) 7.66 2.48 0.58 TG High (N = 18) 9.32 3.73 0.88 TG Saline (N= 15) 8.73 2.78 0.72 WT High (N = 16) 10.03 2.50 0.63 WT Saline (N = 17)9.71 3.38 0.82

TABLE 46 Average velocity of mice, averaged by genotype. Avg VelocityStd Error TG ALL (N = 51) 8.66 0.44 WT ALL (N = 33) 9.46 0.56

TABLE 47 Average number of line crossings by mice. Avg Line CrossingsStd Dev Std Error TG Low (N = 18) 87.56 32.93 7.76 TG High (N = 18)110.94 44.01 10.37 TG Saline (N = 15) 105.53 29.47 7.61 WT High (N = 16)113.06 30.10 7.53 WT Saline (N = 17) 112.59 33.44 8.11

TABLE 48 Average number of line crossings by mice, averaged by genotype.Avg Line Crossings Std Error TG ALL (N = 51) 102.65 5.33 WT ALL (N = 33)107.83 6.21

For the Open Field Maze, both the number of line crossings and theoverall velocity were measured. Outliers were removed if an individualmouse's line crossings were more than 2 standard deviations from themean of the treatment group. This included 3 mice, each from differenttreatment groups. Analysis was performed for both line crossings andvelocity.

The Rotarod Performance Test. The Rotarod Performance Testis used todetect any changes in endurance, balance, and coordination. Mice wereplaced on an automated rotating bar and allowed to walk on the bar forup to 60 seconds. The speed of rotation was gradually increased and therodent's ability to remain on the rotating bar was recorded as the totaltime spent on the bar. Mice were given three trials, and the best timeis used for analysis.

There was no transgenic model effect on the Rotarod tests. All groupsperformed essentially the same and there were no statistical differencesamong groups (Table 24 and Table 49, Table 50, and Table 51). There wasa non-significant trend for all WT mice to outperform all TG mice (Table49, Table 50, and Table 51).

TABLE 49 Longest average runs on the rotarod by treatment group. BestTrial (Average) (sec) TG-Low (N = 18) 30.59 TG-High (N = 18) 37.33TG-Saline (N = 16) 35.38 WT-High (N = 16) 54.13 WT-Saline (N = 18) 35.67TG ALL (N = 52) 37.33 WT ALL (N = 34) 35.38

TABLE 50 Average run time on the rotarod by treatment group. Avg. Time(sec) TG-Low (N = 18) 19.43 TG-High (N = 18) 23.30 TG-Saline (N = 16)22.35 WT-High (N = 16) 35.24 WT-Saline (N = 18) 22.25 TG ALL (N = 52)23.30 WT ALL (N = 34) 22.35

TABLE 51 Trial averages of run time (sec) on the rotarod by treatmentgroup. Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 TG-Low (N = 18) 10.53 21.25 27.06 TG-High(N = 18) 15.72 20.44 33.72 TG-Saline (N = 16) 16.60 25.63 24.60 WT-High(N = 16) 19.56 43.00 44.20 WT-Saline (N = 18) 17.00 17.06 32.39 TG ALL(N = 52) 15.72 20.44 33.72 WT ALL (N = 34) 16.60 25.63 24.60

There was no evidence of a drug effect among transgenic groups (Table49, Table 50, and Table 51). However, it was observed that the WT-highmice had longer times on the rotarod than the WT-Sal mice. A t-testbetween WT-Sal and WT-high yielded a p-value of 0.089 for the longestrun, and a p-value of 0.041 for the average run (T-tests not shown,Table 49, Table 50, and Table 51).

For the Rotarod test, the time on the rotating bar before the mouse felloff was recorded. Three trials were conducted. If a mouse reached 120seconds (the maximum time) before trial 3, subsequent runs were notconducted. For each treatment group, both the average time on the barand the maximum time on the bar for each mouse were analyzed. Data couldnot be recorded if the mouse did not stay on the rod long enough beforestarting (˜3 seconds), and there was only 1 mouse that did not stay onlong enough to start for all three trials.

The Passive Avoidance Task. The Passive Avoidance Task is a classicalconditioning test used to assess short-term or long-term memory for miceand rats. The passive avoidance apparatus consists of equal-sized lightand dark compartments with a light bulb fixed in the center of the roofof the light compartment. The floor consists of a metal grid connectedto a shocker. The two compartments are separated by a trap door. On thelearning day (day 1), a mouse was placed in the light compartment andthe time taken to enter the dark compartment was recorded and termed asinitial latency. Immediately after the mouse entered the dark chamber adoor was automatically closed and an electric footshock (0.7 mA) wasdelivered for 3 seconds. Twenty-four hours after the acquisition trial,a second retention trial was conducted and the time the mouse takes toenter the dark compartment as designated retention latency (RL; recordedto a maximum of 500 seconds, no shock is administered during thisentry). T-tests were performed to compare the effects of IN IgG WT vs.TG.

Whereas RAWM, MWM hidden platform, and Barnes maze tests all showedevidence of learning and improved learning in WT mice over TG mice, thistest consistently showed the opposite effect, regardless of drugtreatment. There was no evidence of a drug effect among transgenicgroups (Table 24, Table 52, Table 53, and Table 54).

TABLE 52 Passive avoidance learn day escape latency (sec). Learn Esc.St. Err TG-Low (N = 17) 44.5 9.4 TG-High (N = 19) 46.3 7.6 TG-Saline (N= 15) 43.7 9.2 WT-High (N = 17) 21.6 6.4 WT-Saline (N = 18) 22.4 3.9 TGALL (N = 51) 44.9 4.9 WT ALL (N = 35) 22 3.6

TABLE 53 Passive avoidance test day escape latency (sec). Test Esc. St.Err TG-Low (N = 15) 224.6 8.5 TG-High (N = 17) 229.5 8.3 TG-Saline (N =13) 207.0 16.8 WT-High (N = 16) 114.3 22.0 WT-Saline (N = 18) 153.8 20.9TG ALL (N = 45) 221.4 4.9 WT ALL (N = 34) 135.2 3.6

TABLE 54 Passive avoidance average of escape latency differences (sec).Average of Differences St. Err TG-Low (N = 15) 190.2 8.5 TG-High (N =17) 191.9 8.2 TG-Saline (N = 13) 175.1 16.8 WT-High (N = 16) 98.8 22.4WT-Saline (N = 18) 131.4 21.4 TG ALL (N = 45) 186.5 6.3 WT ALL (N = 34)116.1 15.5

This test demonstrated an unexpected TG effect. Whereas TG mice withimpaired memory should normally have trouble remembering not to enterthe dark chamber and receive a shock after training, this was not thecase. TG mice generally did not enter the chamber on the test day,whereas WT mice seemed not to care whether they received a shock on thetest day. These results can be seen in Table 52, Table 53, and Table 54.The poor performance of the WT mice compared to the TG mice isstatistically significant (p<0.05; Table 24). The same willingness forWT mice to enter the dark chamber can be seen in the learning phase andmay play a role in the willingness of normal, WT mice to go receive apainful shock.

For the Passive Avoidance Task, the escape latency on both the learningday (day 1) and the test day (day 2) were recorded and the differencebetween the escape latency between the test and learn day werecalculated. Mice were not run on the test day (day 2) if they did notreceive a shock on day 1, which included 7 mice spread across 4 groups.Mice did not receive a shock simply because they did not enter the darkchamber. There were no outliers calculated. Analyses were performed forthe learn trial and the test trial.

Morris Water Maze—Visual Platform. Differences in performance in thistest were not expected as all mice were genetically tested for the RD1gene and the mice did not have problems with vision. There was notransgenic model effect. All groups performed essentially the same andthere were no statistical differences among groups (Table 24). The onestatistical difference came in trial 1, due to a strong performance byWT-Sal that did not carry over into subsequent trials. There was also noevidence of a drug effect among transgenic groups (Table 24, Table 55,Table 56, Table 57, and Table 58). However, much like with the MWMhidden platform tests, there was a trend for WT-high mice to outperformall other groups (Table 55, Table 56, Table 57, and Table 58). T-testcomparisons between WT-Sal and WT-high for each individual trial werenot significant, but a T-test for all trials between these two groupshad a p-value of 0.06.

TABLE 55 Visual escape (sec) by treatment group. Group Trial 1 Trial 2Trial 3 Trial 4 Average TG-Low (N = 18) 34.83 33.44 39.17 30.22 33.44TG-High (N = 18) 31.44 33.67 35.33 37.89 33.67 TG-Saline (N = 16) 23.1936.56 29.75 28.94 36.56 WT-High (N = 16) 28.25 23.44 23.13 22.00 23.44WT-Saline (N = 18) 29.78 29.06 26.11 25.50 29.06

TABLE 56 Visual escape (sec) by treatment group, with non-complianceremoved. Group Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Average TG-Low (N = 13)30.46 29.15 31.15 18.77 29.15 TG-High (N = 13) 21.69 27.92 25.85 29.3827.92 TG-Saline (N = 14) 17.93 33.21 25.43 24.50 33.21 WT-High (N = 14)25.07 18.57 17.86 16.57 18.57 WT-Saline (N = 17) 31.41 27.24 24.12 23.4727.24

TABLE 57 Visual escape (sec) by genotype group. Group Trial 1 Trial 2Trial 3 Trial 4 Average TG ALL (N = 52) 30.08 34.48 34.94 32.48 34.48 WTALL (N = 34) 29.06 26.41 24.71 23.85 26.41

TABLE 58 Visual escape (sec) by genotype, with non-compliance removed.Group Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Average TG ALL (N = 40) 23.2330.18 27.43 24.23 30.18 WT ALL (N = 31) 28.55 23.32 21.29 20.35 23.32

For the visual platform MWM, the escape latency (time to find theplatform) was collected. T-tests were conducted for each day of eachtrial (1-4). Data was analyzed with non-compliant mice removed in orderto more accurately represent memory. Non-compliant mice were defined asany mice that had escape latencies of 60 seconds (the full timeallotted) for trials 3 and 4, when they should have been learning tosome extent. The percent of non-compliant mice for each group wasrecorded. For visual platform tests non-compliance was as follows:TG-low=6.9%; TG-high=6.9%; TG-saline=3.1%; WT-high=3.1%; andWT-saline=1.4%.

Example 8 Radiolabeled ¹²⁵I IgG Reaches the CNS with Intranasal Delivery

A study was conducted to determine the feasibility and to optimize themethods used to determine the amount of intravenously and intranasallydelivered radiolabed ¹²⁵I IgG reaching the CNS in rats and mice at a twohour time point.

Experimental Design: There were two phases of this experiment. In phase1, six mice and rats were used to test a variety of different methodsincluding anesthesia with 2 hour survival, drug administration methods(intravenous infusion through cannulations of the jugular vein in ratsand mice, intranasal tube method in rats), transcardial perfusion (withand without a non-ionic detergent), and tissue processing for capillarydepletion and gamma counting. Animals and the methods tested with eachare shown in Table 51.

TABLE 59 Experimental design of phase 1 of Example 8. Brain AnimalSurgery IV delivery IN delivery Perfusion Dissection 1a-R-1 Jugular VeinNo infusion IN tube Saline Whole Brain Cannulation method removal 1a-R-2Jugular Vein 2 mg/mL BSA IN tube 0.05% Triton Whole Brain Cannulationuntil death method X removal 1a-R-3 Jugular Vein 2 mg/mL BSA IN tubeSaline Capillary Cannulation over 1 hour method Depletion 1a-R-4 JugularVein No infusion No IN delivery 0.1% Triton X Whole Brain Cannulationremoval 1a-R-5 Jugular Vein No infusion IN tube 0.1% Triton X WholeBrain Cannulation method removal 1a-R-6 Jugular Vein No infusion No INdelivery Saline Capillary Cannulation Depletion 1a-M-1 Jugular Vein Noinfusion No IN delivery Saline Capillary Cannulation Depletion 1a-M-2Jugular Vein 2 mg/mL BSA No IN delivery 0.05% Triton Whole BrainCannulation over 1 hour X removal 1a-M-3 Jugular Vein 2 mg/mL BSA No INdelivery 0.1% Triton X Whole Brain Cannulation over 1 hour removal1a-M-4 Jugular Vein 2 mg/mL BSA No IN delivery Saline Whole BrainCannulation over 1 hour removal 1a-M-5 Jugular Vein 8 g/kg IgG No INdelivery 0.05% Triton Whole Brain Cannulation over 1 hour X removal1a-M-6 Jugular Vein 8 g/kg IgG No IN delivery 0.05% Triton Whole BrainCannulation over 1 hour X removal R = rat and M= mouse.

In Phase 2, three tissue processing techniques after administration ofhigh IVIG does in 18 rats were tested in order to determine the optimaltechnique of subsequent Phase 1 experiments. The 18 rats were dividedinto 3 experimental groups (Table 60).

TABLE 60 Experimental groups for Phase 2. Group 1 Group 2 Group 3¹²⁵I-IVIG dose 200 mg 200 mg 200 mg Perfusion 140 mL 140 mL saline with 90 mL saline, 25 mL saline capillary depletion 0.025% Triton X-100, 25mL saline n =  6 rats  6 rats  6 rats

Adult male Sprague Dawley rats (N=6, average weight 250 g) and adultmale C57blk mice (n=6, 7-8 weeks) were used for Phase 1. Adult maleSprague Dawley rats (N=18, average weight 264 g) were used for Phase 2.The animals were housed in pairs with free access to food and water andwere kept on a 12 h light cycle.

Prior to commencing the Phase 1 and 2 experiments, the animals wereallowed to normalize in the facility for a period of three days beforehandling occurred. Animals were slowly acclimated to human handling overa period of about two weeks. Enrichment food treats are given afterhandling to encourage a human-animal bond while the acclimation processproceeds. Restraint techniques were kept brief and facilitated by usinga towel, restraint device, or scruffing, when working with mice.

An anesthesia cocktail containing Ketamine HCl (30 mg/kg), Xylazine HCl(6 mg/kg), and Acepromazine (1 mg/kg) was used. All anesthesia wasadministered as subcutaneous injections. Boosters alternated between theCocktail above and 50 mg/kg Ketamine. Reflexes were tested to assesslevel of anesthesia every 10-15 minutes throughout the study.

Intranasal deliver in rats was performed using a specialized pipettetip. The specialized pipette tip was inserted into the rat naris. Thepipette tip was created by cutting 23 mm off the end of a gel loadingpipette tip and attaching a 16 mm length of tubing (ID=0.04 mm, OD=0.07mm). The tubing was placed over the wide end of the pipette tip with anoverlap of 5.5 mm, and a black mark with a sharpie was made at 14.5 mmfrom the narrowest end of the pipette tip. The narrow end was ultimatelyinserted into the rat's nose up to the black mark.

For intranasal delivery, the fully anesthetized rat was placed on itsback on a heating pad in a metal surgical tray. The heating pad andrectal probe was used to maintain the rat's core temperature at 37° C. A2″×2″ gauze pad was rolled into a pillow and was securely taped. Thepillow was then placed under the rat's neck to ensure that the undersidefrom nostril to torso was planar and horizontal.

A lead impregnated shield was placed between the surgical tray and theexperimenter for protection against radiation. The dose solution,pipette, pipette tips, and waste receptacle were arranged behind theshield for easy access. The modified pipette tip was inserted into therat naris up to the black mark. The sample to be delivered (40-50 μl)was drawn into a pipettor, the tip of the pipettor placed into the opentube at the end of the modified pipette tip (while carefully holding themodified pipette tip in place in the rat's nose), and then the entiredose was slowly expelled into the rat's nostril.

After the animals were euthanized, their brains were removed foranalysis. With a large surgical scissors, the head of the animal wasremoved by cutting dorsal to ventral to avoid contamination. Using ascalpel, the fur and skin on the top of the skull was cut from nose topoint of decapitation. The skin was folded back and held with a smallgauze pad to expose the top of the skull. Using a small hemostat, theremainder of the spinal column was chipped away exposing the uppercervical spinal cord and posterior brain (cerebellum). Next, the top ofthe skull was removed to the olfactory bulbs exposing the entire dorsalside of the brain. The hemostat was inserted with one blade scraping theventral surface of the skull. This ensured the integrity of the dorsalsurface of the brain was maintained. A small spatula was used to loosenthe lateral surfaces of the brain from the skull and dura. The brain wasinverted over a clean Petri dish. The optic nerve was severed, whichreleased the brain from the skull. The brain was assessed for quality ofperfusion.

The brain was placed dorsal side up. A single edged razor blade was usedto sever the olfactory bulbs from the brain at the natural angle.Olfactory bulbs were collected. Razor blades were used to cut the braininto seven coronal sections (see FIG. 5). Each section was hemisectedand placed into tubes for counting.

For capillary deletion, each brain section was weighed and transferredto an ice cold ground glass homogonizer. A volume of 2.857 times thetissue sample weight of buffer, pH 7.4 (10 mM HEPES, 141 mM NaCl, 4 mMKCl, 2.8 mM CaCl₂, 1 mM MgSO₄—H₂O, 1 mM NaH₂PO₄, and 10 mM D-Glucose),was added to the homogonizer. The brain sample was homogenized usingvertical strokes. A small volume of 26% dextran solution was added tothe homogenized brain sample in order to provide a final concentrationof 15.5% Dextran in the homogenate. The homogenate was then vortexted,homogenized for a second time with vertical strokes, and then decantedinto a small glass centrifuge tube. The homogenate was then centrifugedin a swinging bucket rotor for 15 minutes at 4° C. at a speed of 5400×g.The homogenate was separated into the following layers: a bottom pelletcontaining the capillary segments, a clear liquid layer, and a top“cream” layer containing the nervous tissue. Using a transfer pipette,the cream and clear liquid layers were transferred into new tubes. Theradioactivity of the supernatant and the pellet was determined using agamma counter.

Results: The data from Phase 2 shows that intravenous ¹²⁵I-IVIG reachedthe central nervous system. The animals with capillary depletion tissueprocessing had the most IVIG in the brain tissue (49,791 ng). Theanimals perfused with 0.025% Triton X as a second perfusate had theleast IVIG in the brain tissue (33,855 ng) (Table 61 and Table 62). Thecapillary depletion pellet which should hold all of the IVIG stuck tothe capillary walls only accounted for ˜3% of the whole brain IVIG inthose animals (Table 63). The low amount of IVIG in the capillary pelletcould be a result of homogenization friction during processing,releasing the IVIG stuck to the capillary walls and allowing it to bemixed in with the supernatant instead of staying with the capillaries inthe pellet.

TABLE 61 ¹²⁵I-IVIG present in the central nervous system measured inCPM. Total CPM Total CPM Total CPM Total CPM Total CPM Perfusate(CPM/ul)Rat Method Whole Brain Liquid Pellet R. Hemisphere L. Hemisphere (2nd)(3rd) 1b-1 Cap Dep 68,554 65,326 3,228 30,687 37,867 1b-4 Cap Dep 40,79139,372 1,419 28,352 12,439 1b-7 Cap Dep 29,048 28,229 819 13,374 15,6741b-10 Cap Dep 15,498 14,851 647 8,104 7,393 1b-13 Cap Dep 47,908 46,5331,376 28,757 19,151 1b-16 Cap Dep 69,964 68,128 1,836 29,458 40,505 1b-3Control 98,341 52,972 45,368 278 356 1b-6 Control 21,141 10,557 10,584112 144 1b-11 Control 36,457 19,077 17,380 141 121 1b-15 Control 28,30314,228 14,075 126 66 1b-17 Control 20,524 9,508 11,016 231 127 1b-18Control 38,683 19,350 19,333 125 73 1b-2 Triton X 36,984 16,622 20,362540 216 1b-5 Triton X 49,882 25,617 24,264 98 219 1b-8 Triton X 19,19411,031 8,163 243 no sample 1b-9 Triton X 33,716 15,026 18,690 422 821b-12 Triton X 21,255 7,639 13,616 527 151 1b-14 Triton X 14,013 6,7127,301 441 117 Average Cap Dep 45,294 43,740 1,554 23,122 22,172 AverageControl 40,575 20,949 19,626 169 148 Average Triton X 29,174 13,77515,399 379 157

TABLE 62 ng by Group Total ng Total ng Total ng Total ng Total ngPerfusate(ng/ul) Rat Method Whole Brain Liquid Pellet R. Hemisphere L.Hemisphere (2nd) (3rd) 1b-1 Cap Dep 68,537 65,310 3,227 30,679 37,8581b-4 Cap Dep 45,383 43,804 1,579 31,544 13,840 1b-7 Cap Dep 32,06031,156 904 14,761 17,300 1b-10 Cap Dep 18,231 17,470 761 9,534 8,6971b-13 Cap Dep 57,258 55,614 1,644 34,369 22,889 1b-16 Cap Dep 77,27675,248 2,028 32,537 44,739 1b-3 Control 108,404 58,393 50,011 306 3921b-6 Control 24,824 12,397 12,428 132 169 1b-11 Control 35,411 18,53016,881 137 118 1b-15 Control 36,686 18,442 18,244 163 86 1b-17 Control25,940 12,017 13,923 292 160 1b-18 Control 50,757 25,390 25,367 165 951b-2 Triton X 46,547 20,921 25,626 680 272 1b-5 Triton X 56,294 28,91027,383 111 247 1b-8 Triton X 22,577 12,975 9,601 285 no sample 1b-9Triton X 39,032 17,396 21,637 488 95 1b-12 Triton X 22,099 7,943 14,157548 157 1b-14 Triton X 16,581 7,942 8,639 522 138 Average Cap Dep 49,79148,101 1,690 25,571 24,220 Average Control 47,004 24,195 22,809 199 170Average Triton X 33,855 16,014 17,841 439 182

TABLE 63 ng by Group Percent Percent Percent est. of ng Percent Percentof of ng of ng est. ng est. ng Percent delivered of whole wholedelivered delivered est. ng in 2nd in 3rd ng in (Whole brain brain (2nd(3rd in blood* perfusate perfusate blood Brain) (Liquid) (Pellet)perfusate) perfusate) Average 124,564,379 62% 0.02% 97% 3% Cap DepAverage 151,853,766 4,978,470 4,249,634 76% 0.02% 2.5% 2.1% ControlAverage 134,662,521 10,980,039 4,543,372 67% 0.02% 5.5% 2.3% Triton X*The total estimated blood volume was determined as the body weighttimes 0.06 plus 0.77 (Lee and Blaufox, 1985).

The Triton X perfusion methods resulted in a 28% reduction of IVIG wholebrain concentration versus the saline perfusion control. The perfusateshould show the amount of IVIG cleared from the blood vessels over thecourse of the 25 ml (perfused at a rate of 15 ml/min). Three 250 μlsamples of each perfusate were counted in the gamma counter. Averages ofthe three were than calculated. To determine the total amount of IVIG ineach perfusate, the ng/μl IVIG concentration was determined andmultiplied by 25000 (the 25 ml of perfusate used). The first perfusates(˜90 ml at 15 ml/min) were not collected since this step was the same inall of the animals in the study. In the group perfused with 0.025%Triton X, more ¹²⁵I-IVIG was removed (439 ng/μl) than the groupsperfused with saline (199 ng/μl). This difference was not seen in the3^(rd) perfusate, meant to clear any remaining Triton X from the bloodvessels, (170 ng/μl and 182 ng/μl, respectively) (Tables 1 and 2)suggesting that the maximum clearance of IVIG from the vessels at thisconcentration of Triton X was achieved. A higher Triton X concentrationin the perfusate may yield a further reduction.

In these results, approximately 0.02% of the total delivered IVIG thatwas infused reached the brain (Table 55) in all methods. During thePhase 2 experiments it was noted that the brain tissues were slightlypinkish, suggesting the total volume perfused was not adequate tocompletely remove blood from the brain. This slight coloration appearedconsistent throughout all animals in each experimental group. Anincrease in the total volume of perfusate in the next Phase should solvethis issue.

Example 9 Biodistribution of IgG administered Intranasally andIntravenously in Mice

A study was conducted to compare the biodistribution of pooled humanimmunoglobulin G (IgG) administered to mice intranasally andintravenously. Delivery of IgG to the brain and residual IgG in thebloodstream were determined.

Experimental Design: IgG radiolabeled with iodine-125 (¹²⁵I-IgG) waseither infused into the left femoral vein (intravenous administration;IV) or intranasally administered (IN) as drops to anesthetized rats over14 minutes. Animals were sacrificed and concentrations of ¹²⁵I-IgG weredetermined in the brain, blood, and body of the mice at nine differenttime points (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 hpost-IgG administration). Blood samples were taken from the heart,animals were perfused, and brains removed. Radiolabeled IgG was detectedwith a gamma counter for quantitative analysis. Half of each brain wasprocessed into supernatant and run through a size exclusion column toexplore intactness of the ¹²⁵I-label. The three experimental cohortswere administered IgG as described in Table 64.

TABLE 64 Treatment groups assigned for intranasal administration of IgG.IgG Cohort Dosage Administration Intranasal Drops—High  0.02 g/kg onedrop every 2 minutes to Dose (IN Drop—high) alternating naris; infusionof saline Intranasal Drops—Low 0.002 g/kg one drop every 2 minutes toDose (IN Drop—low) alternating naris; infusion of saline IntranasalDevice—(IN  0.02 g/kg two puffs to alternating naris at 0 Device) and 10minutes, with accompany- ing control intravenous infusion of salineIntravenous (IV)  0.02 g/kg infusion to left femoral vein over fourteenminutes *3 rats/time point for a total of 27 rats per experimental group

On the day of delivery, each ¹²⁵I-IgG aliquot was removed from thefreezer and allowed to come to room temperature (about 20 minutes). Thealiquots were then gently vortexed. A sample of 1 μl was placed into 999μl of water and vortexed (1:1,000 dilution). Three 20 μl samples wereremoved from the dilution and placed into labeled gamma tubes. Anadditional 10 μl was placed into 90 μl of water and vortexed (1:10,000dilution). Three 20 μl samples were removed from the 1:10,000 dilutionand placed into labeled gamma tubes. Standards were later quantifiedthrough gamma counting. All doses within groups were equalized forvolume, weight (mg), and radioactivity (μCi) by varying the dilutionwith saline to account for the decay of ¹²⁵I.

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Animal Care Facility at Regions Hospitalfrom Harlan) with the left femoral vein canulated were used in thisexperiment. All rats weighed approximately 250 g to ensure accuratedosing. The animals were housed individually with free access to foodand water. Animals were kept on a 12-hour light cycle.

For the IN Drop, IN Device, and IV administrations, an anesthesiacocktail containing ketamine HCl (30 mg/kg), xylazine HCl (6 mg/kg), andacepromazine (1 mg/kg) was used. All anesthesia was administered assubcutaneous injections. Boosters alternated between the cocktaildescribed above and 50 mg/kg ketamine. Reflexes were tested to assesslevel of anesthesia every 10-15 minutes throughout the study. Animals ingroups sacrificed at 4 hr and beyond were allowed to recover fromanesthesia and were re-anesthetized prior to euthanasia.

For IN Drop delivery, anesthetized rats were placed on their backs on aheating pad. ¹²⁵I-IgG was administered intranasally as 8×6 μL nose dropswith an Eppendorf pipettor to alternating nares every 2 minutes for atotal volume of 48 μL. Animals were then monitored for adverse effectsand anesthesia levels until the euthanasia time point was reached.During intranasal delivery, a 500 μL sample of saline was infused over14 minutes through the left femoral vein. All animals were rolled off oftheir backs at 15 minutes after the completion of delivery.

For IN Device delivery, anesthetized animals were placed on their backsand a tube was inserted about 14 mm deep into the nostril. The tube wasconnected to an actuator that delivered 15 μL of dosing solution towardthe olfactory epithelium. One bolus was sprayed at the start ofdelivery, one was sprayed at 10 minutes after the onset of delivery.Animals were then monitored for adverse effects and anesthesia levelsuntil the euthanasia time point was reached. During intranasal delivery,a 500 μl sample of saline was infused over 14 minutes through the leftfemoral vein. All animals were rolled off of their backs at 15 min afterthe completion of delivery.

For IV delivery, anesthetized animals were placed on their backs. Ablunt 22 gauge needle attached to a 1 cc syringe was inserted into thefemoral vein canula. ¹²⁵I-IgG was prepared in 500 μl aliquots andinfused over 14 minutes. Animals were then monitored for adverse effectsand anesthesia levels until the euthanasia time point was reached.

At the experimental end time, blood was drawn directly from the heartand animals were perfused with 120 ml ice cold saline directly throughthe heart. One small drop of blood was placed into a pre-weighed,labeled gamma tube and approximately 0.6 mL was placed into a labeledserum separator tube. The serum separator tube was spun and serum wascollected. The serum was diluted in homogenization buffer. The dilutedserum was further spun down in a 100 kDa size exclusion filtrationdevice. Samples were collected from both the top of the filter and thebottom and placed into labeled gamma tubes. The filter was alsocollected and placed into a labeled gamma tube.

The brain was extracted from the skull and hemisected. The lefthemisphere was further processed as described below. The righthemisphere was weighed, cut into 7 pieces and placed into labeled gammatubes.

Additionally, the olfactory and respiratory epithelia were collectedseparately. The epithelia were expected to contain higher amounts of¹²⁵I than the quantitation limit of the gamma counter, so both weresplit into multiple pieces. Each piece of epithelia was placed into apre-weighed, labeled gamma tube.

The left hemisphere was weighed after removal from the skull. It washomogenized and spun down to retrieve supernatant. The supernatant wasfurther spun down in a 100 kDa size exclusion filtration device. Sampleswere collected from both the top of the filter and the bottom and placedinto labeled gamma tubes. The pellet was collected and placed into apre-weighed labeled gamma tube. The filter was also collected and placedinto a labeled gamma tube.

3-5 mm samples of body tissues were collected and placed intopre-weighed, labeled gamma tubes. Body tissues include: liver, spleen,kidney, small intestine, lung, esophagus, trachea, and blood (drawndirectly from the heart as described above). The gamma tubes containingsamples were counted using a COBRA II Auto-Gamma Counter.

Results: Intactness of IgG in the brain was slightly less withintranasal administrations (example: IN high—49%, IN low—49%, INdevice—40% at 15 minutes) as compared to intravenous administration (69%at 15 minutes) in the earlier time points (Table 65, Table 66, Table 67,and Table 68). However, because of the non-validated method ofcalculating the intactness and the limitations of the gamma countingmachine, non-intact or “free” ¹²⁵I may be magnified. The CPM counts fromgamma tubes for aliquots representing the “bottom” of the filtrationdevice tubes (where the non-intact IgG would be expected) were ratherlow in many of IN treated animals. It is usually desired that the countsreach at least two times background (in this study would be ˜50 CPM).

TABLE 65 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose nasal drops (0.02 g IgG/kg). ug/g IN-Drops High IN IN IN IN INHigh High High High High Time 15 min 30 min 1 hr 2 hr 4 hr Raw ug/g92,625,403 99,889,203 97,886,218 111,043,619 101,049,672 Dosed ug/g (60uCi) Total ug/g Olfactory 585 127 120 938 167 Epithelium Respiratory8,614 11,790 13,222 16,686 5,189 Epithelium R. Hemisphere 0.24 0.22 0.180.10 0.11 L. Hemisphere 0.11 0.272 0.200 0.126 0.095 (total recovered)Dosing Solution 38,594 41,621 40,786 46,268 42,104 (1:1,000) ug/g Blood3.1 3.3 4.4 4.0 3.7 Liver 0.23 0.46 0.51 0.43 0.44 Spleen 0.55 1.1 1.41.2 1.4 Kidney 0.9 1.9 2.7 1.5 1.6 Small Intestines 0.32 0.4 0.91 0.752.2 Lung 0.9 1.8 1.5 1.0 1.3 Esophagus 0.51 0.61 1.1 0.9 33 Trachea 0.750.77 4.0 1.7 3.0 Intactness IN1 Brain 49% 46% 40% 48% 51% IN1 Blood 39%32% 35% 33% 16% ug/g IN-Drops High IN IN IN IN High High High High Time8 hr 12 hr 24 hr 72 hr Raw ug/g 99,398,932 78,063,258 108,114,87776,689,700 Dosed ug/g (60 uCi) Total ug/g Olfactory 118 20 10 0.56Epithelium Respiratory 1,312 41 10 2.4 Epithelium R. Hemisphere 0.150.22 0.16 0.039 L. Hemisphere 0.128 0.231 0.145 0.029 (total recovered)Dosing Solution 41,416 32,526 45,048 31,954 (1:1,000) ug/g Blood 5.3 7.35.4 0.8 Liver 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.24 Spleen 1.2 2.4 1.5 0.16 Kidney 2.8 3.82.2 0.39 Small Intestines 2.5 6.3 1.3 0.09 Lung 2.1 2.4 1.7 0.26Esophagus 126 4.9 6 0.22 Trachea 2.4 17 5 0.25 Intactness IN1 Brain 53%49% 49% 66% IN1 Blood 27% 30% 27% 54%

TABLE 66 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats vialow dose nasal drops (0.002 g IgG/kg). ug/g IN Drops-Low IN IN IN IN INLow Low Low Low Low Time 15 min 30 min 1 hr 2 hr 4 hr Dosed ug/g91,152,030 71,045,179 83,024,122 109,042,942 102,934,060 (60 uCi) Totalug/g Olfactory 118 57.6 58.7 58.0 56 Epithelium Respiratory 9,930 12,28410,402 6,716 3,055 Epithelium R. Hemisphere 0.060 0.048 0.031 0.0200.015 L. Hemisphere 0.057 0.042 0.023 0.018 0.016 (total recovered)Dosing Solution 37,980 29,602 34,593 45,435 42,889 (1:1,000) ug/g Blood0.41 0.56 0.51 0.44 0.37 Liver 0.091 0.09 0.06 0.086 0.061 Spleen 0.150.21 0.31 0.19 0.12 Kidney 0.22 0.26 0.27 0.1 0.20 Small Intestines0.075 0.16 0.10 0.13 0.18 Lung 0.14 0.25 0.09 0.15 0.17 Esophagus 0.0760.13 0.13 0.17 14 Trachea 0.14 0.36 0.26 0.19 0.58 Intactness IN2 Brain49% 46% 45% 48% 50% IN2 Blood 28% 22% 29% 19% 26% ug/g IN Drops-Low ININ IN IN Low Low Low Low Time 8 hr 12 hr 24 hr 72 hr Dosed ug/g64,471,560 78,549,717 72,139,899 64,455,268 (60 uCi) Total ug/gOlfactory 1.9 25.9 6.69 0.571 Epithelium Respiratory 101 111 7.8 1.20Epithelium R. Hemisphere 0.026 0.032 0.015 0.0044 L. Hemisphere 0.0270.030 0.014 0.0040 (total recovered) Dosing Solution 26,863 32,72930,058 26,856 (1:1,000) ug/g Blood 0.78 0.99 0.57 0.067 Liver 0.15 0.190.12 0.036 Spleen 0.38 0.30 0.20 0.023 Kidney 0.53 0.63 0.28 0.042 SmallIntestines 0.33 0.29 0.058 0.012 Lung 0.26 0.43 0.29 0.032 Esophagus 3.40.69 0.47 0.028 Trachea 4 0.50 0.30 0.034 Intactness IN2 Brain 65% 48%49% 72% IN2 Blood 37% 25% 31% 52%

TABLE 67 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose intranasal device (0.02 g IgG/kg). ug/g IN Device IN IN IN ININ Device Device Device Device Device Time 15 min 30 min 1 hr 2 hr 4 hrDosed ug/g 99,099,000 125,565,000 60,108,000 77,362,000 73,446,000 (60uCi) Total ug/g Olfactory 5,076 5,276 2,016 3,917 2,134 EpitheliumRespiratory 5,658 5,970 3,285 6,850 3,099 Epithelium R. Hemisphere 0.61.07 1.5 0.22 0.2 L. Hemisphere 0.831 1.32 0.365 0.229 0.139 (totalrecovered) Dosing Solution 66,067 83,710 40,072 51,575 48,964 (1:1,000)ug/g Blood 11 18 11 8.3 4.7 Liver 0.45 4.3 1.6 0.57 0.4 Spleen 1.4 3.24.8 1.7 1.3 Kidney 1.5 4.9 5.6 2.3 1.3 Small Intestines 0.52 1.2 3.2 1.31.2 Lung 1.4 4.5 5.9 2.0 1.8 Esophagus 1.5 3.1 4.9 3.4 488 Trachea 1.82.5 4.2 22 5.2 Intactness IN3 Brain 40% 44% 46% 43% 45% IN3 Blood 34%29% 34% 30% 26% ug/g IN Device IN IN IN IN Device Device Device DeviceTime 8 hr 12 hr 24 hr 72 hr Dosed ug/g 67,726,000 87,418,000 83,486,00074,898,000 (60 uCi) Total ug/g Olfactory 381 103 14 1.7 EpitheliumRespiratory 262 46 10 1.4 Epithelium R. Hemisphere 0.36 0.23 0.14 0.042L. Hemisphere 0.15 0.202 0.122 0.0527 (total recovered) Dosing Solution45,151 58,279 55,657 49,932 (1:1,000) ug/g Blood 6.7 5.9 4.7 0.61 Liver0.8 1.1 0.76 0.23 Spleen 2.1 2.3 1.2 0.13 Kidney 3.3 3.2 1.0 0.26 SmallIntestines 6.6 2.5 0.61 0.079 Lung 3.1 5.1 3.2 0.17 Esophagus 19 2.5 1.30.12 Trachea 3.6 3.3 1.7 0.22 Intactness IN3 Brain 46% 51% 47% 66% IN3Blood 32% 25% 30% 67%

TABLE 68 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose intravenous infusion (0.02 g IgG/kg). ug/g IV High IV IV IV IVIV Time 15 min 30 min 1 hr 2 hr 4 hr Dosed ug/g 125,946,138 76,865,00088,715,556 150,181,389 86,270,833 (60 uCi) Total ug/g Olfactory 14.4 1921 24 7 Epithelium Respiratory 9.8 14 17 13.1 5.3 Epithelium R.Hemisphere 0.425 0.5 0.6 0.63 0.36 L. Hemisphere 0.533 0.52 0.56 0.5480.411 (total recovered) Dosing Solution 5,038 3,075 3,549 6,007 3,451(1:1,000) ug/g Blood 141 96 79 59 35 Liver 80 34 28 34 25 Spleen 57 3028 32 20 Kidney 112 100 77 59 38 Small Intestines 13.4 8 9 9.2 7.1 Lung24 89 21 33 13.1 Esophagus 7.0 4 4 5.0 5.7 Trachea 9.7 9 11 9.4 8.8Intactness IV Brain 69% 68% 63% 59% 56% IV Blood 94% 92% 94% 90% 83%ug/g IV High IV IV IV IV Time 8 hr 12 hr 24 hr 72 hr Dosed ug/g105,588,889 81,584,098 74,669,134 64,916,672 (60 uCi) Total ug/gOlfactory 18 18 12 0.41 Epithelium Respiratory 20 10 7 0.7 Epithelium R.Hemisphere 0.34 0.39 0.14 0.038 L. Hemisphere 0.306 0.315 0.134 0.036(total recovered) Dosing Solution 4,224 3,263 2,987 2,597 (1:1,000) ug/gBlood 26 13 8 0.8 Liver 15 15 10 3.6 Spleen 14 14 10 2.6 Kidney 29 29 1910 Small Intestines 5.2 3.1 2.4 0.29 Lung 7.2 6.8 4.2 0.7 Esophagus 5.52.8 4.3 0.28 Trachea 6.3 2.1 5.4 0.34 Intactness IV Brain 56% 48% 51%68% IV Blood 74% 57% 53% 79%

TABLE 69 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose nasal drops (0.02 g IgG/kg), as corrected for intactness ofimmunoglobulin G. ug/g IN Drops High - corrected for intactness IN IN ININ IN IN IN IN IN Drops High Drops High Drops High Drops High Drops HighDrops High Drops High Drops High Drops High Minutes 15 30 60 120 240 480720 1,440 4,320 Corrected R. Hemisphere 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.080.11 0.08 0.03 L. Hemisphere 0.05 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.070.02 (total recovered) Blood 1.20 1.07 1.53 1.331 0.604 1.427 2.20 1.470.454 Uncorrected R. Hemisphere 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.22 0.160.04 L. Hemisphere 0.11 0.27 0.20 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.23 0.15 0.03 (totalrecovered) Blood 3.05 3.32 4.38 4.01 3.73 5.27 7.31 5.44 0.84 Trap.Calcs AUC R. Hemisphere 1.6 2.6 3.5 6.0 16.0 22.2 66.6 151.9 270.4 L.Hemisphere 1.3 3.1 4.2 6.5 13.9 21.6 65.7 129.0 245.4 (total recovered)Blood 17.0 39.0 86.0 116.1 243.7 435.3 1,323.3 2,777.1 5,038 UncorrectedTrap. Calcs R. Hemisphere 3.4 5.9 8.2 12.1 30.7 44.0 137.1 293.1 534.5L. Hemisphere 2.9 7.1 9.8 13.3 26.8 43.0 135.2 250.8 488.8 (totalrecovered) Blood 47.8 115.5 251.6 464.2 1,079.2 1,508.9 4,587.5 9,041.817,096 Intactness IN1 Brain 49% 46% 40% 48% 51% 53% 49% 49% 66% IN1Blood 39% 32% 35% 33% 16% 27% 30% 27% 54%

TABLE 70 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats vialow dose nasal drops (0.002 g IgG/kg), as corrected for intactness ofimmunoglobulin G. ug/g IN Drops Low - corrected for intactness IN IN ININ IN IN IN IN IN Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Minutes 15 30 60120 240 480 720 1,440 4,320 Corrected R. Hemisphere 0.029 0.022 0.0140.0096 0.0073 0.017 0.016 0.0072 0.0032 L. Hemisphere 0.028 0.019 0.0100.009 0.0078 0.0175 0.014 0.0068 0.0029 (total recovered) Blood 0.120.12 0.14 0.08 0.10 0.28 0.25 0.17 0.035 Uncorrected R. Hemisphere 0.0600.048 0.031 0.020 0.015 0.026 0.032 0.015 0.004 L. Hemisphere 0.0570.042 0.023 0.018 0.016 0.027 0.030 0.014 0.004 (total recovered) Blood0.41 0.56 0.51 0.44 0.37 0.78 1.0 0.57 0.067 Corrected AUC Trap. CalcsR. Hemisphere 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.9 3.9 8.2 15.0 33 L. Hemisphere 0.4 0.40.6 1.0 3.0 3.8 7.7 14.0 31 (total recovered) Blood 1.8 4.0 6.9 10.845.7 63.7 151.3 302.0 586 Uncorrected Trap. Calcs R. Hemisphere 0.8 1.21.5 2.1 4.9 7.1 17.0 27.6 62 L. Hemisphere 0.7 1.0 1.2 2.0 5.1 6.9 15.925.9 59 (total recovered) Blood 7.3 15.9 28.4 48.8 137.7 212.1 562.4919.3 1,932 Intactness IN2 Brain 49% 46% 45% 48% 50% 65% 48% 49% 72% IN2Blood 28% 22% 29% 19% 26% 37% 25% 31% 52%

TABLE 71 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose intranasal device (0.02 g IgG/kg), as corrected for intactnessof immunoglobulin G. ug/g IN Device - corrected for intactness IN3 IN3IN3 IN3 IN3 IN3 IN3 IN3 IN3 Minutes 15 30 60 120 240 480 720 1,440 4,320Corrected R. Hemisphere 0.23 0.47 0.71 0.09 0.08 0.16 0.12 0.07 0.03 L.Hemisphere 0.33 0.58 0.17 0.10 0.06 0.07 0.10 0.06 0.03 (totalrecovered) Blood 3.9 5.3 3.9 2.5 1.2 2.2 1.5 1.4 0.41 Uncorrected R.Hemisphere 0.6 1.1 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 L. Hemisphere 0.8 1.3 0.40.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 (total recovered) Blood 11.5 18.2 11.4 8.3 4.76.7 5.9 4.7 0.6 Trap. Calcs AUC R. Hemisphere 5.3 17.7 24.0 10.2 28.933.6 65.4 133.2 318 L. Hemisphere 6.9 11.2 8.0 9.7 15.8 20.5 57.4 132.1262 (total recovered) Blood 68.8 137.6 189.9 221.6 409.6 436.8 1,047.22,669.4 5,181 Uncorrected Trap. Calcs R. Hemisphere 12.3 39.3 52.8 23.163.3 70.5 132.6 259.6 654 L. Hemisphere 16.2 25.3 17.8 22.0 34.6 42.2116.4 250.8 525 (total recovered) Blood 222.4 444.2 591.4 778.3 1,369.61,516.1 3,826.3 7,703.8 16,452 Intactness IN3 Brain 40% 44% 46% 43% 45%46% 51% 47% 66% IN3 Blood 34% 29% 34% 30% 26% 32% 25% 30% 67%

TABLE 72 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose intravenous infusion (0.02 g IgG/kg), as corrected forintactness of immunoglobulin G. ug/g IV High - corrected for intactnessIV IV IV IV IV IV IV IV IV Minutes 15 30 60 120 240 480 720 1,440 4,320Corrected R. Hemisphere 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.37 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.03 L.Hemisphere 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.32 0.23 0.17 0.15 0.07 0.02 (totalrecovered) Blood 132.3 88.4 74.0 53.2 28.6 19.2 7.2 4.2 0.6 UncorrectedR. Hemisphere 0.43 0.52 0.628 0.632 0.36 0.34 0.39 0.14 0.038 L.Hemisphere 0.53 0.52 0.56 0.55 0.41 0.31 0.32 0.13 0.036 (totalrecovered) Blood 141.1 96.2 79.1 58.8 34.6 26.1 12.7 7.8 0.80 Trap.Calcs AUC R. Hemisphere 4.8 11.2 23.1 34.6 47.4 45.5 92.7 139.0 398 L.Hemisphere 5.4 10.6 20.3 33.3 48.1 38.6 78.6 133.5 369 (total recovered)Blood 1,655.5 2,437.1 3,817.6 4,908.0 5,738.1 3,165.3 4,074.7 6,898.132,694 Uncorrected Trap. Calcs R. Hemisphere 7.1 17.2 37.8 59.6 84.888.3 191.1 254.9 741 L. Hemisphere 7.69 16.56 34.25 67.06 93.15 76.73230.14 360.25 886 (total recovered) Blood 1,779.9 2,630.8 4,138.55,602.1 7,279.5 4,651.1 7,366.9 12,398.1 45,847 Intactness IV Brain 69%68% 63% 59% 56% 56% 48% 51% 68% IV Blood 94% 92% 94% 90% 83% 74% 57% 53%79%

The maximum brain delivery of intact IgG achieved with the intranasal INDevice (0.71 μg IgG/g tissue) was almost twice the maximum braindelivery achieved with intravenous (IV) administration (0.40 μg IgG/gtissue) of the same dose (0.02 g/kg), while resulting in a maximum bloodconcentration of 25 times less (IN Device—5.3 μg IgG/g, IV—132 μg IgG/g)(Table 71and Table 72).

The AUC of brain exposure over 72 hr was fairly equivalent with the INDevice versus intravenous administration (318/262 IN Device vs 398/369IV in right/left hemisphere as corrected for intactness) while the AUCof blood exposure was almost six times greater with intravenous (5,181Device vs. 32,694 as corrected for intactness; Table 73).

TABLE 73 Area under the curve and maximum concentrations of IN and IV¹²⁵I-IgG over time in rats administered pooled human IgG via INI, IN2,or IV. AUC - Corrected IN1 IN2 IN3 IV R. Hemisphere 270 33 318 398 L.Hemisphere (total recovered) 245 31 262 369 Blood 5,038 586, 5,18132,694 Max Concentrations - Corrected ug/g time (min) ug/g time ug/gtime ug/g time R. Hemisphere 0.12 15 0.029 15 0.71 60 0.40 60 L.Hemisphere (total recovered) 0.12 30 0.028 15 0.58 30 0.37 15 Blood 2.2720 0.28 480 5.3 30 132 15 AUC - Uncorrected IN1 IN2 IN3 IV R.Hemisphere 534 62 654 741 L. Hemisphere (total recovered) 489 59 525 682Blood 17,096 1,932 16,452 45,847 Max Concentrations - Uncorrected ug/gtime (min) ug/g time ug/g time ug/g time R. Hemisphere 0.24 15 0.060 151.54 60 0.63 120 L. Hemisphere (total recovered) 0.27 30 0.057 15 1.3230 0.56 60 Blood 7.3 720 0.99 720 18.2 30 141 15

All four delivery methods showed decreasing concentrations of IgG in thebrain over time (Table 65, Table 66, Table 67, Table 68, Table 69, Table70, Table 71, and Table 72). Intranasal drop delivery to the brain wasdose dependent (Table 65, Table 66, Table 69, and Table 70). Animalstreated with the high dose of IgG had a maximum brain concentration whencorrected for intactness (0.12 μg IgG/g) that was approximately fourtimes higher than the brain concentration (0.029 μg IgG/g) of animalstreated with the lower dose of IgG (Table 69, Table 70, and Table 73).

A second ¹²⁵I-IgG peak was observed most of the tissues in the INadministration groups (Table 65, Table 66, and Table 67). This secondpeak may be due to an artifact of the animal model. The animals beganwaking up from anesthesia around 2 hours and were able to eat, drink,and groom normally. As a result, they may have ingested some of theresidue IgG that was on their noses and passed through the nasopharynxinto the mouth and esophagus once they were upright. Therefore thissecond peak that occurred after 4 hours is likely a result ofblood-to-brain delivery of degraded IgG instead of direct nose to braindelivery of intact IgG.

A small group of three rats was also treated intranasally with anon-enhancer based dosing solution (Table 74). This group had only onetime point (30 minutes) and was dosed with the same concentration andmethod as the IN high group described in Example 9 and Table 65. At the30 minute time point, the concentration was much lower in both therespiratory (2,097 μg IgG/g) and olfactory (37 μg IgG/g) compared to theIN high group at 15 minutes (8,614 μg IgG/g and 585 μg IgG/g) and 30minutes (11,790 μg IgG/g and 127 μg IgG/g) respectively. The righthemisphere is equal (0.22 μg IgG/g for both the non-enhancer and IN highgroups), however the left hemisphere is much lower (0.04 μg IgG/g)compared to the IN high group

TABLE 74 Biodistribution and intactness of IgG administered to rats viahigh dose nasal drops (0.02 g IgG/kg) (IN High) compared to IgGadministered with a non-enhancer based dosing solution (IN4). ug/g INHigh IN High IN High IN4 Raw ug/g 15 min 30 min 30 min Dosed ug/g (60uCi) 92,625,403 99,889,203 685,291,111 Total ug/g Olfactory Epithelium585 127 37 Respiratory Epithelium 8,614 11,790 2,097 R. Hemisphere 0.240.22 0.22 L. Hemisphere 0.11 0.27 0.04 (total recovered) Dosing Solution(1:1,000) 38,594 41,621 27,412 ug/g Blood 3.1 3.3 6.9 Liver 0.23 0.460.3 Spleen 0.55 1.1 0.8 Kidney 0.9 1.9 2.6 Small Intestines 0.32 0.4 0.6Lung 0.9 1.8 1.1 Esophagus 0.51 0.61 1.1 Trachea 0.75 0.77 1.3Intactness IN1 Brain 49% 46% 39% IN1 Blood 39% 32% 37%

The bioavailability was calculated as the percent of CPMs measured inthe brain (or estimated blood volume) of the total amount of CPMsdelivered. Delivery via the intranasal device resulted in the highestbioavailability of all methods (0.037% at 30 min) and was twice as highas the maximum bioavailability with intravenous delivery (0.018% at 2hr) (Table 75 and Table 76).

TABLE 75 Bioavailability—Brain (% of CPMs delivered that reached thebrain- not corrected for intactness). Time IN high IN low IN device IV15 min 0.0037%  0.016%  0.020%  0.015% 30 min 0.0072%  0.014%  0.037% 0.016%  1 h 0.0056%  0.008%  0.030%  0.018%  2 h 0.0034% 0.0053% 0.007% 0.0180%  4 h 0.0030% 0.0047%  0.004%  0.012%  8 h 0.0041% 0.008%  0.006%  0.010% 12 h 0.0068%  0.010%  0.006%  0.011% 24 h0.0047% 0.0045% 0.0039% 0.0041% 72 h 0.0010% 0.0012% 0.0014% 0.0011%

TABLE 76 Bioavailability—Blood (% of CPMs delivered that reached thebrain- not corrected for intactness). Time IN high IN low IN device IV15 min 1.09% 1.47%   4% 50.3% 30 min 1.18%  2.0%   6% 34.3%  1 h 1.56% 1.8%   4% 28.2%  2 h 1.43% 1.58%   3% 21.0%  4 h 1.33% 1.32%  1.7%12.3%  8 h  1.9%  2.8%  2.4%  9.3% 12 h  2.6%  3.5%  2.1%  4.5% 24 h 1.9%  2.0%  1.7% 2.79% 72 h 0.30% 0.24% 0.22% 0.29%

As well as being a less invasive option than intravenous infusion, theincreased targeting to the brain (i.e. less blood and systemic exposure)achieved using IN Drops or an IN Device would be expected to reduce therisk of systemic side effects of IgG therapy.

Example 10 Stability of IgG administered by IN Drops and IN Device &Olfactory Epithelium Targeting

The stability of IgG administered by IN Drops or IV and IN Device wascompared to determine optimal modes of administration. Degradation andaggregation of the IgG administered via the IN Device was measured andolfactory targeting was assessed.

Stability of IgG: Samples of sprayed IgG from the IN Device werecompared to unsprayed IgG solution (representative of IVIG and INDrops). Five IgG formulations were prepared and divided into spray andsolution trial groups (A=25% pooled IgG, B=5% pooled IgG, C=10% pooledIgG, D=20% pooled IgG, E=25% pooled IgG). The sprayed and solution IgGsamples were run on non-reducing and reducing gels. The gels were eitherstained or blotted as follows: 1) a Coomassie stained, non-reduced gel,and 2) a reducing SDS-Page gel which was Western blotted and Coomassiestained.

In the non-reduced gel (FIG. 6A), there were no apparent higher orderaggregates or IgG degradation forms for both the solution and sprayedIgG. In the reduced Western blot (FIG. 6B), intact IgG was seen as wellas the heavy chain (HC) and light chain (LC) fragments of the IgG.Combinations of heavy chain and light chain (HC/LC) were also seen onthe reducing gel. Based on these results, spraying the IgG through an INDevice does not increase IgG degradation or increase IgG aggregation.

Olfactory Epithelium Targeting: IgG was administered to rats with theintranasal Device and with intranasal drops. A 25% solution of IgGformulated in histidine buffer was spiked with 0.01% fluorescein tracer.It was then intranasally delivered to a rat using an intranasal Deviceor drops and the brain of the rat was imaged to detect neuralIgG-fluorescein deposition.

Representative images of the deposition pattern of intranasal IgG (lessthan 2 minutes after drug administration) are depicted in FIGS. 7A and7B. FIG. 7A shows the deposition after Device administration of 15 μL of25% IgG solution spiked with 0.01% fluorescein tracer in a rat. FIG. 7Bshows the deposition patter after deposition of the same compound thatwas administered with nose drops. As can be seen by FIG. 7, there isgreater olfactory epithelium (OE) staining from Device administration.

It is understood that the examples and embodiments described herein arefor illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changesin light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and areto be included within the spirit and purview of this application andscope of the appended claims. All publications, patents, and patentapplications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in theirentirety for all purposes.

Example 11 Intranasal IgG Administration Decreases the Area of the BrainCovered By Plaques

An experiment was designed to assess the effect of intranasal IgG onbrain plaques and vascular amyloid. Congo Red staining of Tg2576 mousebrains revealed a decrease in the area covered by plaques, the number ofplaques and the total intensity of the plaques in both the low-dose andhigh-dose IgG intranasal treatment groups. The decrease approximates thereduction of β-amyloid identified with immuno-staining in the cortex.For example, in the low dose group amyloid decreased by 25.7% whenassessed with IHC and 22% when analyzed with Congo Red. However, unlikethe immuno-staining, the reduction in Congo Red plaque staining did notreach a level of statistical significance.

Plaque amyloid reduction was not observed with the vascular amyloid ineither the low or high dose IgG groups. Although not statisticallysignificant, a slight increase in vascular amyloid was observed with thehigh-dose IgG group.

Experimental Design: The aim of this study was to determine ifintranasal IgG treatment alters plaque and/or vascular amyloid in thebrains of Tg2576 mice. At 9 months of age, the mice were intranasallytreated with IgG or saline three times per week for 7 months (adescription of the experimental groups is provided in Table 15). At 16months of age, behavioral testing occurred and at ˜17 months of age, 12mice per group were euthanized (transcardial perfusion with saline) andbrain tissue was collected for analysis. The brain was sagittallyhemisected, the right half was fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffinand sectioned at 5 μm. Sections approximately 2.5 mm from sagittalmidline were used for Congo Red staining.

Quantification of both the plaque and vascular amyloid in the brains ofthe control groups, WT-PBS and WT-High Dose, and the experimental Tg2576groups, Tg-PBS, Tg-Low Dose (400 μg/kg/2 wk) and Tg-High Does (800μg/kg/2 wk) were analyzed using Congo Red staining and fluorescentmicroscopy. In this procedure sagittal sections were stained with astandard Congo Red procedure and imaged fluorescently using a Nikon AlSpectral Confocal Microscope. Specifically, NIS Elements imagingsoftware was used to control acquisition and analysis. An objective with10× magnification was used for capturing images. With this magnificationthe smaller blood vessels could be easily distinguish from plaques. Atthis magnification a 6×5 tiling of 30 images (5% overlap) was needed tocapture the whole brain section. Each of these 30 images was createdfrom a max intensity projection of a z-stack of 5 individual images.This corrected any change in the captured focal plane across the wholetissue section. Laser excitation at 561 nm (voltage at 10%) was used toexcite the Congo Red and the spectrum between 570-620 nm was capturedfor quantifying the fluorescence.

A single image of the complete sagittal section was obtained bystitching together 150 individual images (thirty in the x-y plane andfive in z dimension). Representative examples of these images areincluded in FIG. 12. The plaque and vasculature amyloid deposits weredistinguished manually by a blinded researcher through the de-selectionof the vascular components from the total amyloid using Nikon's ElementsAR software. The area covered by the amyloid (Area), the number ofindividual amyloid deposits (#) and the sum of the intensities of theseobjects (Sum Intensity) were determined for the total of the amyloiddeposits (both plaque and vascular), and for the plaque and vasculardeposits individually.

Specifically, image analysis and quantification consisted of firstadjusting look-up tables (LUTs) for optimal and consistent viewing todistinguish vascular and plaque amyloid. Second, the whole brain area ofthe brain section was quantified to determine the fraction of totalbrain covered by amyloid wherein the threshold was set so all tissue washighlighted and the cerebellum was deselected. Third, the total amyloidoccupied areas were quantified by setting the threshold to accuratelyselect the amyloid stained objects, deselect any staining due tobackground or tissue/staining artifacts prior to quantification, anddeselect object in the cerebellum. Fourth, the vasculature amyloid wasdeselected by manually zooming into the image to a 1:1 resolution andindividually deselecting the highlighted selections that were associatedwith blood vessels. Fifth, the plaque amyloid occupied areas werequantified.

For each sagittal section, the total amyloid stained objects (Total),the amyloid stained plaques (Plaques), and the amyloid stained vasculardeposits (Vasculature) were measured and data collected. Separatemeasurements were directly captured for Total and Plaques. Values forVascular were obtained by subtracting Plaques from Total. For each ofthe data sets, parapeters were determined, including 1) number ofobjects, 2) area (% area occupied by the collection of objects), and 3)SumIntensity (equals the sum of [Mean Intensity * Area] for eachindividual object). Two separate values were calculated for the areaparameter: 1) AreaImg (areas summed from image divided by total area ofImage *100), and 2) AreaTis (Areas summed from image divided by the areaoccupied by brain tissue *100).

Average values, standard deviations, and standard errors were calculatedfor each of the three parameters for each of the five experimentalgroups described in Table 15. The five experimental groups were analyzedfor significance using a two-tailed t-test and the following comparisonswere performed: WT-Saline vs. Tg-Saline, Tg-Saline vs. Tg-Low, Tg-Salinevs. Tg-High, and Tg-Low vs. Tg-High.

Results: Changes in the accumulation of total, plaque or vascularamyloid did not reach significance with t-tests in the comparison of theTg-PBS group to either the Tg-low or Tg-high group (Table 77). However,for each of the three parameters assessed, area covered by the amyloid(FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B), the number of individual amyloid deposits (FIG.8B and FIG. 9B) and the sum of the intensities of these objects (SumIntensity, which represents the total quantity of amyloid, FIG. 8C andFIG. 9C), for both total amyloid and plaque amyloid were found todecrease with both the low and high IgG intranasal treatments. The areacovered by plaques was reduced by 22% for the low dose and 20% for thehigh dose. The number of plaques was reduced by 17% for low dose and 19%for the high dose. The sum intensity of these plaques decreased 16% inthe low dose group and 24% in the high dose group.

TABLE 77 Percent change between groups and associated t-test p-values. %change T-test (p=) Total Amyloid Area (Plaque and Vascular) WT-saline vsTG-saline 2517%  0.000109 TG-saline vs TG-low −14% 0.520 TG-saline vsTG-high  −7% 0.809 TG-low vs TG-high  −7% 0.824 # Amyloid Depoits(Plaque and Vascular) WT-saline vs TG-saline 1633%  0.000010 TG-salinevs TG-low  −8% 0.381 TG-saline vs TG-high  −1% 0.667 TG-low vs TG-high −1% 0.745 Total Intestity All Amyloid Deposits (Sum Intensity)WT-saline vs TG-saline 3854%  0.000132 TG-saline vs TG-low  −9% 0.713TG-saline vs TG-high −11% 0.715 TG-low vs TG-high −11% 0.958 PlaqueAmyloid Area WT-saline vs TG-saline 3919%  0.000220 TG-saline vs TG-low−22% 0.345 TG-saline vs TG-high −20% 0.478 TG-low vs TG-high −20% 0.931# Amyloid Plaques WT-saline vs TG-saline 6355%  0.000109 TG-saline vsTG-low −20% 0.381 TG-saline vs TG-high −11% 0.667 TG-low vs TG-high −11%0.745 Total Intestity Amyloid Plaques (Sum Intensity) WT-saline vsTG-saline 4520%  0.000171 TG-saline vs TG-low −16% 0.531 TG-saline vsTG-high −24% 0.391 TG-low vs TG-high −24% 0.801 Vascular Amyloid AreaWT-saline vs TG-saline 1708%  0.000357 TG-saline vs TG-low  −1% 0.887TG-saline vs TG-high  9% 0.822 TG-low vs TG-high  9% 0.750 # VascularDeposits WT-saline vs TG-saline 787% 0.000001 TG-saline vs TG-low  6%0.710 TG-saline vs TG-high  12% 0.598 TG-low vs TG-high  12% 0.828 TotalIntestity Vascular Deposits (Sum Intensity) WT-saline vs TG-saline3037%  0.000648 TG-saline vs TG-low  3% 0.927 TG-saline vs TG-high  11%0.796 TG-low vs TG-high  11% 0.855

The reduction of amyloid was absent in the vasculature (FIGS. 10A, 10B,and 10C). For the vascular amyloid, each of the three parametersincreased in the high IgG intranasal treatment group, whereas thisincrease was either absent or was present to a lesser degree in the lowdose group (FIGS. 10A, 10B, and 10C). The sum intensity of thesevascular amyloid deposits increased 3% in the low dose group and 11% inthe high dose group (Table 77).

The relative proportions of vascular and plaque amyloid as itcontributes to total amyloid is depicted in FIG. 11A and FIG. 11B. Theaverage values from each group, along with standard deviations andpercent error are provided in

TABLE 78 Average values of amyloid plaques by treatment group. Group AvgSt. Dev St. Err Total Amyloid Area (Plaque and Vascular) WT-saline 23294235 1223 WT-high 5039 4875 1407 TG-saline 60930 31891 9206 TG-low 5224931572 9114 TG-high 56385 54901 15849 # Amyloid Deposits (Plaque andVascular) WT-saline 7 2.09 0.60 WT-high 18 1.51 0.43 TG-saline 114 34.369.92 TG-low 104 34.60 9.99 TG-high 113 46.17 13.33 Total Intestity ofAmyloid Deposits (Sum Intensity) WT-saline 891830 2038864 588569 WT-high1426429 1390829 401498 TG-saline 35260904 19089383 5510630 TG-low31921724 23768445 6861359 TG-high 31318149 30948336 8934015 PlaqueAmyloid Area WT-saline 852 2442 705 WT-high 647 687 198 TG-saline 3424119804 5717 TG-low 26539 18268 5273 TG-high 27338 25815 7452 # AmyloidPlaques WT-saline 1 2.09 0.60 WT-high 2 1.51 0.43 TG-saline 65 34.369.92 TG-low 52 34.60 9.99 TG-high 57 46.17 13.33 Total Intestity ofAmyloid Plaques (Sum Intensity) WT-saline 491018 1538511 444130 WT-high207397 217296 62728 TG-saline 22685550 12752488 3681326 TG-low 1898520815068946 4350030 TG-high 17345869 16402272 4734928 Vascular Amyloid AreaWT-saline 1477 687 198 WT-high 4391 19804 5717 TG-saline 26688 182685273 TG-low 26539 25815 7452 TG-high 29047 31592 9120 # VascularDeposits WT-saline 6 5.33 1.54 WT-high 16 15.02 4.34 TG-saline 50 15.494.47 TG-low 53 24.61 7.10 TG-high 55 34.12 9.85 Total Intestity ofVascular Deposits (Sum Intensity) WT-saline 400812 550529 158924 WT-high1219032 1387106 400423 TG-saline 12575353 8294807 2394505 TG-low12936517 10455665 3018290 TG-high 13972280 16240149 4688127

TABLE 79 Raw data of the areas and sum intensities for each mouse(identified by ID number). ID Area Area Area SumIntensity SumIntensitySumIntensity Number Group Total Plaques Vascular Total Plaques Vascular6 TG-saline 115,428 49,388 66,039 65,768,632 32,797,559 32,971,072 12TG-saline 9,615 3,207 6,408 4,122,348 1,775,361 2,346,986 13 TG-saline44,759 32,566 12,193 23,331,489 18,754,125 4,577,364 17 TG-saline 45,90220,360 25,542 24,817,330 14,365,335 10,451,995 19 TG-saline 100,85361,581 39,272 55,289,299 38,307,916 16,981,383 24 TG-saline 40,27516,232 24,043 28,219,039 14,592,692 13,626,348 26 TG-saline 72,87340,008 32,864 50,896,735 32,669,266 18,227,469 40 TG-saline 72,89251,395 21,497 42,116,237 31,329,942 10,786,294 46 TG-saline 83,07855,167 27,911 49,487,815 37,301,209 12,186,606 58 TG-saline 59,40938,548 20,862 31,689,695 22,410,388 9,279,308 59 TG-saline 25,142 8,19916,943 12,131,324 5,237,262 6,894,062 2 TG-Low 37,468 20,017 17,45120,321,550 13,258,997 7,062,553 7 TG-Low 61,365 34,477 26,888 49,667,94034,128,193 15,539,747 10 TG-Low 52,240 33,836 18,404 28,447,70721,346,439 7,101,268 25 TG-Low 68,827 43,997 24,831 37,245,90825,626,879 11,619,029 27 TG-Low 132,727 61,346 71,380 95,657,77452,780,178 42,877,596 32 TG-Low 32,299 9,761 22,538 19,011,353 6,252,63512,758,717 35 TG-Low 10,110 1,270 8,840 4,705,869 625,181 4,080,687 39TG-Low 14,232 3,239 10,993 6,755,635 2,258,758 4,496,877 42 TG-Low50,544 38,522 12,022 29,879,434 24,362,743 5,516,691 49 TG-Low 68,71939,481 29,238 38,885,021 27,024,755 11,860,266 51 TG-Low 49,382 18,55030,832 27,695,601 12,602,421 15,093,180 52 TG-Low 49,071 13,978 35,09324,786,898 7,555,312 17,231,586 1 TG-high 2,813 641 2,172 1,048,809237,175 811,634 15 TG-high 103,101 57,180 45,921 61,230,873 37,704,16123,526,712 16 TG-high 53,649 34,611 19,039 31,405,116 23,587,3667,817,749 20 TG-high 195,070 86,114 108,956 110,420,271 54,319,41256,100,859 23 TG-high 69,989 41,806 28,184 37,222,228 26,023,39611,198,831 34 TG-high 7,887 1,975 5,912 3,920,088 1,385,403 2,534,685 37TG-high 57,257 37,868 19,388 31,515,587 23,230,486 8,285,101 41 TG-high94,661 27,898 66,763 46,735,215 14,998,264 31,736,951 44 TG-high 23,7514,985 18,766 13,317,820 3,773,642 9,544,178 47 TG-high 38,637 11,89526,742 21,140,702 7,803,449 13,337,253 53 TG-high 10,580 8,478 2,1026,247,449 5,468,454 778,995 55 TG-high 19,223 14,606 4,617 11,613,6329,619,224 1,994,408 4 WT-saline 775 — 775 175,280 — 175,280 8 WT-saline203 — 203 63,844 — 63,844 9 WT-saline 2,197 — 2,197 549,057 — 549,057 14WT-saline 2,274 — 2,274 537,918 — 537,918 18 WT-saline 279 191 89 99,86575,732 24,133 21 WT-saline — — — — — — 29 WT-saline 15,165 8,503 6,6627,272,935 5,363,736 1,909,198 30 WT-saline — — — — — — 33 WT-saline2,547 133 2,413 806,288 64,381 741,907 43 WT-saline 3,836 1,397 2,4391,030,568 388,371 642,196 57 WT-saline 667 — 667 166,208 — 166,208 60WT-saline — — — 0 — — 5 WT-high — — — — — — 11 WT-high 946 546 400262,652 162,969 99,683 22 WT-high 5,233 1,035 4,198 1,418,585 303,8901,114,696 28 WT-high 2,826 1,988 838 951,551 710,345 241,205 31 WT-high9,405 362 9,043 2,931,770 228,181 2,703,589 36 WT-high 4,591 171 4,4201,260,094 90,200 1,169,894 38 WT-high 15,883 — 15,883 4,399,983 —4,399,983 45 WT-high — — — — — — 48 WT-high 11,393 1,638 9,754 3,248,816451,611 2,797,205 50 WT-high 1,892 1,067 826 465,341 245,731 219,610 54WT-high 4,477 959 3,518 1,191,920 295,835 896,086 56 WT-high 3,817 —3,817 986,431 — 986,431

Congo Red stained sagittal sections captured with confocal fluorescentmicroscopy are shown in FIGS. 12A-12F. Five individual images at 10×with a 512×512 resolution were used to create a z-stack max intensityprojection image (FIG. 12A). Thirty of these z-stacks projections,encompassing the whole tissue section were tiled (6×5, 5% overlap) tocreate a single image for analysis (FIGS. 12B-12F). Laser excitation at561 nm excited the Congo Red and the spectrum between 570-620 nm wascaptured for quantification. Selection of the amyloid deposits wasconducted with the thresholding function in Nikons Elements AR software.Examples of thresholding are depicted in FIGS. 12A and 12C-12F byhighlighting in red. FIG. 12A depicts a portion of the cortex andhippocampus at full resolution, highlighting both amyloid plaques andvascular amyloid. FIG. 12A is an example of a section from a Tg-Lowmouse without highlighting. Representative images from the groups,WT-Saline (FIG. 12C), Tg-Saline (FIG. 12D), Tg-Low (FIG. 12E) andTg-High (FIG. 12F) are shown with thresholding.

Analysis: Congo Red staining revealed a decrease of amyloid load in boththe low IgG and high IgG intranasal treatment groups (FIGS. 8A-8C). Thisdecrease in amyloid was a result of a decrease in plaque load (FIGS.9A-9C) as the vascular component of the amyloid was found to increaseslightly (FIGS. 10A-10C). Although the Congo Red results did not reachstatistical significance, the reduction in plaque load is supported bythe statistically significant reduction of plaques in the cortex ofthese mice as determined by the immuno-detection of β-amyloid (IHCstudy). In that study, using the 4G8 antibody to target β-amyloid, thepercent area covered by plaques decreased by 25.7% for the low dose IgGgroup and 24.3%, for the high dose IgG group, respectively, with pvalues of 0.014 and 0.037. In the current study using Congo Redfluorescent staining, the area covered by plaques was reduced by 22% forthe low dose and 20% for the high dose, respectively, with p values of0.35 and 0.48. Thus, a similar degree of plaque reduction observed inthe IHC analysis was also detected with the Congo Red analysis.

Several experimental parameters may be responsible for the difference ofstatistical power observed between the IHC and Congo Red analysis. TheIHC analysis was limited to either the cortex or hippocampus of themouse brain and a significant decrease was only observed in the cortex.In the Congo Red analysis, the complete brain section that is anteriorto the pons and cerebellum, with the exception of the olfactory bulb wasincluded. Variability and dilution of the plaque load throughout theseadditional areas of the brain may have contributed to a less significantp value. Additionally, three tissue sections from each mouse wereincluded in the IHC analysis, whereas a single section was analyzed withthe Congo Red staining. The difference could also be related to thestaining properties of each method. The Congo Red detects the insolublefibrous protein aggregates of β-sheets of amyloid, whereas the IHCdetects all Tg human β-amyloid protein.

Amyloid staining in the vasculature is, for the most part, observed onlyin the larger vessels of the brain. It has been suggested that this isat least partially due to the absence of the efflux amyloid transporter,LRP1 in these vessels. Consistent with this point, vascular amyloid wasobserved almost exclusively in the larger vessels in this study and IgGeither did not affect the aggregation of vascular amyloid or may haveslightly increased it. Although the brain does not have a separatelymphatic system, the perivascular space surrounding the larger cerebralvessels provides a path by which interstitial fluid and extracellularsolutes, including β-amyloid can exit the brain.

Example 12 Immunofluorescent Staining of Intranasal IgG Treated Tg2576Mice Astrocyte (GFAP) and Microglial (CD11b) Quantification

Human immunoglobulins are reactive to a wide array of inflammatoryproteins and intravenously administered IgG has been shown to induceanti-inflammatory properties under a variety of different conditions(Nimmerjahn F. et al., Annu Rev Immunol, 2008; 26: 513-533). The presentstudy assessed the expression of two inflammatory markers in the brainsof Tg2576 mice in response to low and high doses of chronicallyadministered IN IgG.

Brain tissues were analyzed for GFAP and CD11b from the 3 transgenicgroups of mice [TG-saline n=2, TG-low (0.4 g/kg/2 wk) n=4, and TG-high(0.8 g/kg/2 wk) n=6] for which frozen samples were available.Quantification of both GFAP and CD11b staining in the brains of theexperimental Tg2576 mice were analyzed using fluorescent microscopy. Inthis procedure fixed frozen brain sections (1 millimeter from themid-sagittal plane) were triple stained using antibodies for amyloid, amarker for activated astrocytes (GFAP) and a marker for activatedmicroglial (CD11b). Fluorescence was captured with a Nikon A1 SpectralConfocal Microscope. A sagittal section encompassing a portion of thefrontal cortex and a portion of the hippocampus was used for quantifyingaverage intensity of GFAP and CD11b staining. An example of the imagesis shown in FIG. 14.

Briefly, brains were sectioned into 2 mm sagittal sections and placedinto 20% sucrose. Sections were then stored at 4° C. until all animalsfrom the study were collected. Once all samples were collected thetissue was mounted in OCT (frozen quickly with dry ice) and sectioned onthe Leica CM3050 cryostat at 20 μm. Slide were allowed to dry at roomtemp overnight and stored in the −20° C. freezer. Prepared sections werethen stained according to standard IHC staining protocols.

The fluorescence of stained sections was imaged using three channelscorresponding to AlxaFluor405, AlexaFluor488, and AlexaFluor 568 with aNikon A1 Spectral Confocal Microscope. The system was mounted on a NikonTi2000E widefield, inverted, fluorescence microscope. NIS Elementsimaging software was used to control acquisition and analysis. Anobjective with 20× magnification was used for capturing images.Individual 512×512 images that included a portion of the frontal cortexand hippocampus were captured for quantitative analysis. Imagequantification was conducted with Nikon's Elements AR software and totaland average intensity values (corresponding to GFAP and CD11b) weredetermined for each image.

The results show that the Tg-PBS group was not statistically significantfrom the Tg-low or Tg-high groups for either the GFAP or CD11bcomparisons (Table 80). The average intensity of GFAP staining wasnearly identical in all three groups, differing by only a few percentagepoints (Table 80, FIG. 13A). The average intensity of CD11b stainingdecreased by 17% with the low dose of IN IgG (p=0.741) and the magnitudeof this decrease was larger, at 47%, with high dose of IN IgG (p=0.379)(Table 80, FIG. 13B).

TABLE 80 Results of GFAP and CD11b staining. GFAP CD11b Ratio TtestRatio Ttest Tg-Low vs Tg-Saline 0.993 0.963 0.828 0.741 Tg-High vsTg-Saline 0.987 0.946 0.565 0.379 Tg-Low vs Tg-High 1.006 0.965 1.4670.416

The immunofluorescent staining of the Tg2576 mouse brains for themarkers of inflammation, GFAP and CD11b, did not reveal a significantdifference between the saline and the low or high IN IgG treated groups.The statistical power of this analysis was limited by the low number ofsaline treated Tg mice available. Values obtained for the astrocytestaining using the GFAP antibody revealed practically no change in thequantification with either the low or high IN IgG treatment (Table 80).Although significance was not reached, there was an apparent reductionin microglial staining using an antibody against CD11b. Averageintensity of CD11b marker decreased by 17% with the low IN IgG dose anddecreased by 47% with the high IN IgG dose (Table 80).

In this study, GFAP, a marker of astrocyte activation, was not alteredwith either of the two treatment concentrations of IgG. This result isconsistent with previous work showing that IVIG treatment of APP/PS1dE9mice did not significantly affect the expression of GFAP (Puli L. etal., Journal of neuroinflammation, 2012; 9: 105.). In the current study,CD11b, a marker of microglial activation, did show a dose dependentdecrease in protein expression. However, neither the low dose nor thehigh dose values reached statistical significance. In the APP/PS1dE9study mentioned above, Puli et. al. (Id.) found a significant reductionin the microglia marker CD45 and an elevation of the microglial markerIba1 with IV IgG treatment. Magga, et. al. (Journal ofneuroinflammation, 2010; 7: 90) also found that IVIG functioned in aAPP/PS1 mouse model through a mechanism involving microglial, but notthrough a mechanism involving astrocytes. Although the affectsidentified in the present study did not reach statistical significance,the results do support a mechanism by which IgG influences theinflammatory state of the CNS through microglial modulation.

1-229. (canceled)
 230. A method for delivering pooled humanimmunoglobulin G (IgG) to the brain of the subject, the methodcomprising intranasally administering a composition comprising pooledhuman IgG to the subject, wherein at least 40% of the pooled human IgGadministered to the subject contacts the contacts the upper third of thenasal cavity of the subject.
 231. The method of claim 230, whereinadministering the composition comprises administration of a liquid dropof the composition directly onto the nasal epithelium of the subject.232. The method of claim 230, wherein administering the compositioncomprises directed administration of an aerosol of the composition tothe nasal epithelium of the subject.
 233. The method of claim 232,wherein the aerosol of the composition is a liquid aerosol.
 234. Themethod of claim 232, wherein the aerosol of the composition is a powderaerosol.
 235. The method of claim 230, wherein the compositioncomprising pooled human IgG comprises at least 0.1% anti-amyloid β IgG.236. The method of claim 230, wherein the composition comprising pooledhuman IgG does not contain a permeability enhancer.
 237. The method ofclaim 230, wherein the composition comprising pooled human IgG consistsessentially of pooled human IgG and an amino acid selected from thegroup consisting of glycine, histidine, and proline.
 238. The method ofclaim 230, wherein the composition comprising pooled human IgG is anaqueous composition comprising: (a) from 10 mg/mL to 250 mg/mL pooledhuman IgG; and (b) from 50 mM to 500 mM glycine.
 239. The method ofclaim 230, wherein at least 50% of the pooled human IgG administered tothe subject contacts the upper third of the nasal cavity of the subject.240. The method of claim 230, wherein at least 60% of the pooled humanIgG administered to the subject contacts the upper third of the nasalcavity of the subject.
 241. The method of claim 230, wherein at least70% of the pooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts theupper third of the nasal cavity of the subject.
 242. The method of claim230, wherein at least 50% of the pooled human IgG administered to thesubject contacts the olfactory epithelium of the subject.
 243. Themethod of claim 230, wherein at least 60% of the pooled human IgGadministered to the subject contacts the olfactory epithelium of thesubject.
 244. The method of claim 230, wherein at least 70% of thepooled human IgG administered to the subject contacts the olfactoryepithelium of the subject.